CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
This section presents the researcher’s selected views and
perspectives of authorities on the topics, related to the study. Findings on
similar topics provide comprehensive background to the current study.
Corporate Governance
The relationship between the company’s management and the board
is called corporate governance that provides the system of specific goals the
firm wants to attain. It is also the system of stewardship and control to direct
associations in satisfying their long term monetary moral lawful and social
commitments and goals toward their partners. It is an arrangement of heading,
criticism and control utilizing directions, execution norms and moral rules to
consider the board and senior administration be responsible for guaranteeing
moral conduct by accommodating long haul consumer loyalty with investor
esteem. Kapunan (2017) said that its motivation is to boost the association's
long-term achievement, making maintainable incentive for its investors,
partners, and the country. As stated by Alla Mostepaniuk (2017) corporate
governance specifies how investors judge, control and guide the
management’s action and how the responsibilities are distributed to the owners
and managers.
Corporate Governance is an intricate procedure that includes
hierarchical, legitimate, monetary, motivational, and social instruments, the
blend of which gives the exceptional working condition that permits to limit costs
by decreasing the hole amongst supervisors' and proprietors' interests. The
efficient corporate administration isn't constrained by chiefs' and proprietors'
objectives; it needs to incorporate the premiums of speculators, providers,
customers, specialists, delegates of a nearby network, and government
officers, as the monetary accomplishment of a company relies upon the
fulfillment the greater part of its chains. In the Philippines, the Code of
Corporate Governance was established to increase standards on corporate
governance of Philippine corporation. Organizations don't need to agree to the
code, yet they should state in their yearly corporate administration reports
whether they conform to the code arrangements, recognize any territories of
rebelliousness, and clarify the explanations behind resistance. The Securities
and Exchange Commission (2016) established 5 main areas of the code with
the proper distribution of 16 principles. The main areas are the board’s
governance responsibilities, disclosure and transparency, internal control and
risk management frameworks, cultivating a synergic relationship with
shareholders and stockholders, and the duties of stakeholders.
Board’s Governance Responsibilities
Board’s Governance Responsibilities is the first main area for the code
of corporate governance which has 7 principles. As stated by the Business
Roundtable (2012), for an organization to have an effective and efficient
corporate governance, directors, managers, and senior management should
have a concentrated and prudent perspective with respect to the maintenance
of the highest standard of responsibility and ethics. In spite of the fact that there
are various lawful and administrative necessities that must be met, good
governance is much more than a checklist rundown of board and administration
arrangements and obligations. Likewise, even the keenest and all around
drafted approaches and techniques are bound to fall flat if the board and
administration are not dedicated to upholding them practically. As stated by
Chams from ESADE School of Business (2017), a fruitful corporate governance
structure for any organization is a working framework for principled objective
setting, compelling basic leadership, and proper checking of consistence and
execution.
Establishing a Competent Board is the first principle under the
Board’s Governance Responsibilities. The company shall be led by a skillful,
working board to cultivate the long-term achievement of the organization, and
to manage its competitiveness and productivity in a way consistent with its
corporate targets and the long-term relationship with the investors and
creditors. The Board should be made of directors with an aggregate working
information, experience or ability that is applicable to the organization's
business or part. The Board shall dependably guarantee that it has a suitable
blend of ability and aptitude and that its individuals stay fit the bill for their
positions exclusively and collectively, to enable it to satisfy its parts and
obligations and react to the necessities of the organization. As stated by Tuffley
(2016), a managing & CEO of the B team, a capable board chief is unified with
learned and commanding "atmosphere champions" making associations that
are for the most part instructed and educated on the dangers and opportunities
exhibited by climate change to the company.
Establishing Clear Rules and Responsibilities of the Board is the
second principle under the Board’s Governance Responsibilities. The roles,
obligations and accountabilities of the Board as given under the law, the
organization's articles, and by-laws, should be clearly be made known to all
directors, chiefs, and shareholders. The Board individuals should follow up on
a completely educated premise, in compliance with common decency, with due
perseverance and mind, and to the greatest advantage of the organization and
all investors. The Board shall be in charge of guaranteeing and embracing a
compelling progression arranging program for chiefs, key officers and
administration to guarantee development. Understanding one’s roles and
responsibilities should be his or her first task when appointed. The top
managerial staff is delegated to follow up for the benefit of the investors to run
the everyday issues of the business. Leading with, Intent (2017) elaborated that
the board are straightforwardly responsible to the investors and every year the
organization will hold a yearly broad gathering at which the executives must
give an answer to investors on the execution of the organization, what its
feasible arrangements and systems are and furthermore submit themselves for
re-election to the board.
Establishing Board Committees is the third principle under the Board’s
Governance Responsibilities. The Board shall set up board committees that
focuses on particular board capacities to help in the ideal execution of its parts
and duties. Board committees’ groups shall be set to the degree conceivable to
help the execution of the Board's capacities, especially as for audit review, risk
management, related organization transaction, and other key corporate
administration concerns. The composition, capacities and obligations of all
advisory groups built or made shall be publicly available Committee Charter.
Board Committees, for example, the Audit Committee, Corporate Governance
Committee, Board Risk Oversight Committee and Related Party Transaction
Committee are important to help the Board in the viable execution of its
capacities. The kind of board committees to be built up by an organization
would depend on its size, risk profile and many-sided quality of activities.
Nevertheless, if the committees are not built up, the functions of these panels
might be completed by the entire board or by some other board of trustees.
Chen & Wu (2016) explained that board advisory groups are generally utilized
by expansive organizations to help the top managerial staff to manage, and
settle on choices on, unpredictable or specific issues. They play an important
role in a company’s corporate governance and enable directors to use their time
more efficiently and effectively.
Fostering Commitment is the fourth principle under the Board’s
Governance Responsibilities. To indicate full commitment to the organization,
the directors shall give the time and consideration necessary to effectively and
efficiently execute their obligations and duties, including adequate time to be
comfortable with the company's business. The directors shall go to and
effectively take an interest in all gatherings of the Board, Committees, and
Investors personally or through video or tele communication directed in
accordance with the rules and controls of the Commission, aside from when
reasonable causes, for example, sickness, passing in the close family and
genuine mishaps occur, in which counteract them from doing as such. In Board
and Committee group gatherings, the director should review meeting materials
and if called for, ask the vital inquiries, or look for clarifications. As stated by
Marcus Erb (2016) rewards and promotion can be implemented to ensure
employees commitment and making sure that everyone has an equal chance
to be recognized.
Reinforcing Board Independence is the fifth standard under the Board's
Governance Responsibilities. The board should practice executing a goal and
autonomous judgment on every corporate issue. The Board shall have no less
than three autonomous executives or such number as to constitute no less than
33% of the individuals from the Board, whichever is higher. As stated by Busirin
Azme & Zacaria (2015), the importance of independent directors in the Board
is to guarantee the activity of free judgment on corporate issues and legitimate
oversight of administrative execution, including counteractive action of
irreconcilable situation and adjusting of contending requests of the partnership.
There is expanding worldwide acknowledgment that more independent
directors in the Board prompt more target basic leadership, especially in
irreconcilable circumstances
Assessing Board Performance is the sixth principle under Board’s
Governance Responsibilities. The best measure of the Board's viability is
through an evaluation procedure. The Board shall frequently do assessments
to evaluate its execution as a body, and survey whether it has the correct blend
of foundations and skills. The Board should direct a yearly self-appraisal of its
execution, including the execution of the Director, individuals, and boards of
trustees. At regular intervals, the evaluation shall be upheld by an outer
facilitator. Board appraisal causes the directors to completely audit their
execution and comprehend their parts and duties. The intermittent audit and
evaluation of the Board's execution as a body, the board panels, the individual
executives, and the Administrator indicate how the aforementioned shall
execute their duties adequately. Likewise, it gives a way to evaluate an
executive's participation at board and advisory group gatherings, investment in
meeting room exchanges and way of voting on material issues. Harvard
Business Review (2017) said that the utilization of an outer facilitator in the
appraisal procedure builds the objectivity of the same. The outer facilitator can
be any free outsider, for example, yet not restricted to, a counseling firm,
scholarly establishment or expert association. Board self-evaluation empowers
the board to hold itself, its individuals, and its procedures responsible, to
recognize holes between current execution and expected or sought-after
execution, and chart a course of improvement, refinement, and or further
progress.
Strengthening Board Ethics is the last and seventh principle for Board’s
Governance Responsibilities. Individuals from the Board are compelled by a
solemn obligation to apply high moral benchmarks, taking into account the
interests all shareholders. The Board shall adopt a Code of Business Direct and
Morals, which would give principles for proficient and moral conduct, and
additionally explain satisfactory and unsuitable direct and practices in interior
and outside dealings. The Code shall be legitimately dispersed to the Board,
senior administration, and representatives. It shall likewise be revealed and
made accessible to people in general through the organization site. AS stated
by US National Library (2015) a Code of Business Conducts and Ethics
formalizing moral qualities is an imperative apparatus to impart a moral
corporate culture that swarms all through the organization. The fundamental
duty to make and outline a Set of accepted rules appropriate to the necessities
of the organization and the way of life by which it works lies with the Board. To
guarantee appropriate consistence with the Code, proper introduction and
preparing of the Board, senior administration and workers on the same are
necessary. Strengthening an organization’s ethics plays a vital role to avoid
corporate scandals.
Disclosure and Transparency
Transparency and Disclosure are fundamental components of a powerful
corporate administrative structure, as they give the base to educated choice
making by investors, partners, and potential speculators in connection with
capital portion, corporate exchanges and monetary execution observing. The
two scholastics and market controllers have broadly perceived the significance
of transparency, bringing about various guidelines and directions being
presented after some time to guarantee convenient and reliable disclosure of
financial data, making models to which organizations must follow. Fung (2014),
states that Corporate administration in the present worldwide condition has
turned out to be more mind boggling and dynamic lately due to expanded
administrative prerequisites and more noteworthy examination, making
expanded obligations regarding top managerial staff to conform to thorough
administration measures and furthermore adapting with expanding interest for
T&D. There are four principles under in the disclosure and transparency as
stated in the code of corporate governance.
Establishing a Corporate Disclosure Policies and Procedures is the first
principle under disclosure policies and procedures. Organization of Economic,
Cooperation and Development (2015) stated that a solid disclosure
administration can help to pull in capital and keep up trust in the capital markets.
In differentiating, a weak disclosure and non-transparent practices can add to
unethical conduct and to loss market honesty at incredible cost, not simply to
the organization what's more, its investors yet in addition to the economy
overall.
Establishing a Standards is the second principle under disclosure policies
and procedures. As mention in Securities and Exchange Commission (2015),
An acceptable standard should be ought to build up in company for the fitting
selection of an external auditor and should practice a compelling oversight of
the same to fortify the external auditor’s independence and to excessively
improve the nature of the audit. It should be adhering with the accounting
standards.
Ensuring that the materials and non-reporting information are disclose
properly, and it is the third principle under the disclosure policies and procedure.
A disclosure helps the public to understand the practices, activities and
performance of the Company, with regards to ethical standards. It is proper to
fully disclose to the market all material associated to transactions with the
related parties and should indicate whether the transactions were executed in
a normal market term (PriceWaterhouseCoopers 2015).
Maintaining a comprehensive and cost-efficient communication is the last
principle under the disclosure and transparency. Disclosure of dependable,
timely data adds to fluid and effective markets by empowering financial
specialists to make speculation choices in view of most of the accessible data
that would be material to their choices. As a result, financial specialists are
requesting better announcing and more noteworthy transparencies (Fung
2014).
Internal Control System and Risk Management Framework
A proper risk administration and internal control enable associations to
comprehend the dangers they are presented to, set up controls to counter
threats, and adequately seek after their objectives. They are along these lines
a vital part of a governance, administration, and tasks (International Federation
of Accountant 2016). Internal Controls should be receptive to the particular
nature and necessities of the business. Consequently, they should try to reflect
business practice, stay applicable after some time in the evolving of business
environment and enable the organization to react to the needs of the industries
or business.
Securities and Exchange Commission (2016), Ensuring Integrity,
Transparency and Proper Governance is the only principle under the Internal
Control System and Risk Management Framework. It is to ensure that the
company should have a strong foundation and effective internal control system
and risk management framework.
Cultivating a Synergic Relationship with Shareholders
Securities and Exchange Commission 2016 principle 13 promoting
shareholder rights listed in the Code of Corporate Governance or the first
principle under Cultivating a Synergic Relationship with Shareholders states the
company should treat all shareholders fairly and equitably, and also recognize,
protect and facilitate the exercise of their rights.
There has been an exceptional spotlight on the part of shareholders in
the 2008 financial crisis and an acknowledgment that short-term theoretical
conduct assumed a key part in the worldwide financial market end. Shareholder
cultivation will become increasingly important for public corporations who thinks
about creating and accomplishing long term value. The aim of shareholder
cultivation is to distinguish, pull in, and develop a center of conferred
shareholders stewards who comprehend the company's purpose and values.
As a leading cover of the significance of stewardship contends the
accomplishment of companies and the societies in which their work relies upon
the exercise of stewardship. Public enterprises express this longing to develop
investor stewards from various perspectives. (Belifanti 2014)
Business Roundtable (2012) trusts that shareholder esteem is enhanced
when a corporation connects viably with its long-term shareholders.
Corporations ought to deliberately think about the perspectives of shareholders
but remember the obligation of the board to act in what it accepts to be the best
advantages of the corporation and every one of its shareholders. It is in a
corporation’s best enthusiasm to treat employees reasonably and equally.
Organization of Economic, Cooperation and Development (2015) states
that the corporate governance system ought to secure and facilitate the activity
of shareholders rights and guarantee the fair treatment of shareholders,
including minority and foreign shareholders. All shareholders ought to have the
chance to obtain effective review for infringement of their rights. Shareholders
rights to impact the corporations focus on certain central issues, for example,
the decision of board individuals, or different methods for affecting the structure
of the board, changes to the company's natural reports, approval of
extraordinary transactions, and other fundamental issues as indicated in
company law and interior company statutes. The capital that the shareholders
invested in the corporation will be protected from misuse. Shareholders ought
to have the chance to partake successfully and vote by in shareholders meeting
and should be educated of the rules, including voting procedures, that represent
general shareholder meeting.
Duties of Stakeholders
Securities and Exchange Commission (2016) principle 14 states the
rights of stakeholders established by law, by contractual relations and through
voluntary commitments must be respected. Where stakeholders’ rights and or
interests are at stake, stakeholders should have the opportunity to obtain
prompt effective redress for the violation of their rights. Principle 15 states a
mechanism for employee participation should be developed to create a
symbolic environment, realize the company’s goals and participate in its
corporate governance processes. Principle 16 states the company should be
socially responsible in all its dealings with the communities where it operates.
It should ensure that its interactions serve its environment and stakeholders in
a positive and progressive manner that is fully supportive of its comprehensive
and balanced development.
The corporate governance framework ought to perceive the privileges of
stakeholders built up by law or through mutual agreements and support
dynamic cooperation amongst corporations and stakeholders in creating
wealth, occupations, and the sustainability of financially sound undertakings. A
key part of corporate governance is concerned about guaranteeing the stream
of capital to corporations both in the value of equity and credit. The governance
structure ought to perceive the interests of stakeholders and their commitment
to the long-term success of the corporation.
Organization of Economic, Cooperation and Development (2015) states
that the privileges of stakeholders that are established by law or through mutual
agreements are to be respected. Where stakeholder interests are ensured by
law, stakeholders ought to have the chance to acquire effective redress for
infringement of their rights. Components for employee support ought to be
permitted to develop. Where stakeholders take part in the corporate
governance process, they ought to approach applicable, adequate, and reliable
data on a timely and regular basis. Stakeholders, including employees and their
agent bodies, ought to have the capacity to uninhibitedly convey their worries
about unlawful or exploitative practices to the board and to the capable public
authorities and their rights should not be imperiled for doing this. The corporate
governance framework ought to be supplemented by a successful, proficient
bankruptcy system and by viable authorization of creditor rights.
Financial Performance
An explicit and working corporate governance framework encourages
the firm to pull in investment, raise subsidizes, and reinforce the establishment
for firm performance. Investors will probably be pulled in to companies that
disclose ideal corporate governance issues since they see very much governed
firms to be less risky. Thus, firms with a sound corporate governance framework
will have an enhanced performance. Firms performance referred to as measure
of the productivity and adequacy of internal also external operations. In this day
and age, the execution of the performance of the firm is considered as the body
of the organization in light of the fact that if the execution of a firm is well enough
just than the firm’s growth would be enhanced. Firm’s performance can be seen
through the financial statements which are reported by the company.
There have been numerous studies for the subject of corporate
governance. Although the fact that these studies have concentrated on the
connection between corporate governance and firm performance, the
outcomes have not been convergent. Some of these studies revealed a positive
effect on corporate governance on financial performance. Varshney, Kaul and
Vasal (2012), who provide empirical confirmation that good corporate
governance practices positively affect a firm’s performance as measured by
economic value added. However, when other customary performance
measurements, such as, Tobin’s Q, return on capital utilized and return on
assets are considered, this relationship cannot be validated. Makki and Lodhi
(2014) examine the existence of a critical structural relationship between
corporate governance, intellectual capital proficiency and financial
performance. They find no significant relationship between corporate
governance and firm’s financial performance. However, good corporate
governance in a firm has a significant positive effect on intellectual capital
proficiency which by implication improves its financial performance.
Reliable findings of Wahba (2015) utilizing an example of 40 Egyptian
listed firms shows that expanding the extent of non-executive board members
under Chief Executive Officer duality adversely influences firm financial
performance. A study of public listed companies across Sub-Saharan African
countries have embraced good corporate governance practices, and its impact
on firm’s performance and market valuation, discovered companies complying
with good corporate governance practices accomplish higher financial
performance. However, their study found a negative relationship between the
corporate governance and market valuation. Azeez (2015) has analyzed the
relationship between corporate governance and firm performance among 100
listed firms in Sri Lanka on the Colombo Stock Exchange for 2010-2012
financial years found a negative relationship between board size and firm
performance. Isolating the part of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and
chairman has a critical association with firm performance and having more non-
executive directors has no relationship with firm performance among listed firms
in Sri Lanka.
Return on Asset
Return on Asset (ROA) is an indicator of how profitable a company is
with respect to its aggregate resources. ROA gives a manager, investor, or
expert a thought in the matter of how productive a company’s management is
at utilizing its assets to generate earnings. In essential terms, ROA reveals to
you what income were created from contributed capital. ROA for public
companies can change generously and will be profoundly subject to the
industry. This is the reason when utilizing ROA as a relative measure, it is best
to compare it against a company’s previous ROA numbers or against a
comparable organization’s ROA. ROA is most valuable for comparing
companies in a similar industry, as various industries utilize assets differently.
Rostami, Rostami and Kohansal (2015) investigates the impact of
corporate governance on return on assets and stock return of companies listed
in Tehran stock trade. With a specific end goal to test the speculation, around
469 firm year observations were gathered utilizing methodical sampling for a
period of seven years. The outcomes indicate that there is a significant positive
relationship between ownership concentration, board independence, Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) duality and CEO tenure and return on assets. On the
other hand, there is a significant negative relationship between institutional
ownership and board size and return on assets. Besides there is a significant
positive relationship between institutional ownership, Board independence,
CEO duality and CEO tenure with stock return. However, there is a significant
negative relationship between ownership concentration and Board size with
stock return. Rostami, Rostami and Kohansal (2015) aimed to examine the
relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and value of the firm.
Their study is based on 93 listed nonfinancial companies in Dhaka Stock
Exchanges (DSE) 2006. The relationship between corporate governance and
the value of the firm contrasts in the diverse nations because of divergent
corporate governance structures resulting from disparate social, financial and
regulatory conditions in these nations.
The outcomes of the study of Rostami, Rostami and Kohansal (2015)
additionally delights a positive significant relationship amongst ROE and board
independent director and also Chief Executive Officer duality. The study, be
that as it may, could not give a significant relationship between the value of the
firm measures (ROA and ROE) and board size and board audit committee. The
return on asset gives investors a perception of how compelling the company is
in changing over the cash it invests into net income. The higher the ROA, the
better, in light of the fact that the organization is gaining more cash on less
investment.
Return on Equity
Return on Equity (ROE) is a financial ratio that figures the measure of net
profit earned as a level of investors' value or equity. It uncovers how
productively an organization has utilized investors' money. ROE is processed
as net profit separated by net worth (i.e. equity+ reserves+ retained earnings).
At the point when an organization has a low ROE, it implies that the organization
has not utilized the capital contributed by investors proficiently. It mirrors that
the organization isn't in a situation to give financial specialists considerable
returns. Stephen Karphin (2016) additionally stated that ROE is best used to
analyze organizations in a similar industry. Execution proportions like ROE,
focus on past execution to get a check on future desire.
Dia Rekhi (2016) stated that Investigators feel if an organization's ROE is
under 12-14 for each cent, it isn't palatable. Organizations with ROE of 20 for
each cent or more are viewed as great speculations. Experts alert financial
specialists not to consider organizations that have a negative ROE, particularly
in this unpredictable environment. Kent Chong (2018) identified that a high ROE
isn't only a sign of a productive organization. It likewise demonstrates that an
organization is great at utilizing its retained earnings proficiently. Retained
earnings is a source of capital for organizations. Organizations dependably
keep benefits to back its day by day tasks. It is an inward source of financing
which is free from Interest expense. Retained earnings have insignificant
dangers since it doesn't expand the obligation of the organization. A high ROE
can demonstrate if an organization is utilizing held profit to produce incomes. A
speculator could look at the organization's past financial report to examine it.
Theoretical Framework
This study acquaints a hypothetical structure suited with the setting of Sri
Lanka, based on agency, stewardship and stakeholder theories to address the
connections between corporate administration practices and firm execution in
Sri Lanka. In this system corporate governance factors (authority structure,
arrangement and panels) show up as checking components of the board,
though responsibility to investors and different partners is evaluated through
corporate detailing practices of CSR reporting through firm execution.
The four factors identified with corporate governance practices, which are
exceptionally huge in the Sri Lankan setting in influencing firm performance in
this study include: board authority structure, board creation, board advisory
groups and corporate reporting practices. The firm performance is estimated as
far as accounting and market-based measures.
Conceptual Framework
This study aims to determine the significant relationship between
corporate governance principles and performance of service sectors in the
Philippines. Figure 2.1 illustrated below shows the independent and dependent
variables of the study. The first variable which is the independent variable is the
main sections on Code of Governance. This variable aims to determine the
compliance of service sectors in the Philippines in terms of board’s governance
responsibilities, disclosure and transparency, internal control and risk
management framework, cultivation synergic relationship with shareholders
and duties of stakeholders. The second variable, the dependent one, is to
investigate the impact of corporate governance on financial performance of
service sectors in the Philippines in terms of return on assets and return on
equity.
COMPLIANCE
EFFECT ON FINANCIAL
Board’s Governance PERFORMANCE
Responsibilities Return on Assets
Disclosure and Return on Equity
Transparency
Internal Control and
Risk Management
Framework
Cultivating a synergic
relationship with
shareholders
Duties of Stakeholders
Figure 2.1