11/23/2015
Department of Fire Protection Engineering
Performance-Based Approach
to Fire Safety Design
A. JAMES CLARK SCHOOL of ENGINEERING ● UNIVERSITY of MARYLAND
• Introduce Concept
• Discuss Elements
– Goals
– Assessments
– Designs
• Example Applications
• Choosing Appropriate Design
• Evaluation of Hazard or Risk based on defined
goals
• Scenario specific
– Fires
– Building
– Occupants
• Hazard‐Consequences
• Risk‐Consequences X Probability
1
11/23/2015
Define Project Scope
Identify Goals
Define Objectives
Develop
Performance Criteria
Develop Design
Fire Scenarios
Develop Trial Design(s)
Evaluate Trial Design(s)
Modify Design or Design Meets
Objectives Criteria
Select Final Design
Ref: SFPE PBD Guide
Prepare
Documentation
Code‐Based Fire Hazard/Risk
Evaluation Assessment
Fire Safety Design
• Based on Fire Risk/Hazard Assessment
Evaluation
• Evaluates specific building or structure
2
11/23/2015
• Prescriptive code not feasible
• Based on system performance
• Addresses project specific needs
Life Safety:
• Protect occupants not intimate with fire for time needed to evacuate
Building Structure:
• Minimize damage to major structural elements
Building Appearance:
• Minimize impact of strategies on architectural features and openness of
galleries
Facility Operations:
• Minimize undue loss of operations due to fire
• Prevent damage from fire to critical equipment
• Performance Criteria: Maintain visibility of >10 m
• CO / COHb
• Temperature
• Structural Integrity
Egress Time + Safety Factor < Time to
Hazardous Conditions
3
11/23/2015
• Quantify fire into engineering terms
– Example ‐ typical office fire
– 8,000 kW, fast‐growth rate fire, 15‐minutes
• Range of fire scenarios for different areas
Office F i re 1 - Heat Rel ease Rate
9000
8000
7000
6000 Office Fire
5000 Slow
HRR
(kW)
4000 Medium
Fast
3000
2000
1000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
T i m e (m inutes)
HIGH
MODERATE
Probability
Probability
LOW
Consequence
Consequence
RISK = HAZARD x PROBABILITY
f < 10‐6 10‐6< f <10‐4 10‐4< f <10‐2 f > 10‐2
• Apply to each fire scenario
(>10,000 yr) (>100 yr)
(>1,000,000 yr) (<100 yr)
• Determine relative fire risk
• Evaluate for Trial Designs
4
11/23/2015
Options That Cost
Meet Goals
Vs. Aesthetics
Options That Meet Feasibility
Most of the Goals
• Performance‐Based Design
– Different than prescriptive approach
– Use Fire Risk/Hazard Assessment Evaluation
– Numerous factors influence ultimate design