0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views1 page

La Compania vs. C.H. French Case Summary

The document discusses damages in legal cases. It states that unliquidated damages, or damages that have not been specifically determined and are not yet due, cannot be considered a credit or paid out. It also notes that a trial is needed to accurately determine the amount of damages, rather than allowing self-estimation, and that a pacto de commissario is not allowed in mortgage cases.

Uploaded by

Fbarrs
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views1 page

La Compania vs. C.H. French Case Summary

The document discusses damages in legal cases. It states that unliquidated damages, or damages that have not been specifically determined and are not yet due, cannot be considered a credit or paid out. It also notes that a trial is needed to accurately determine the amount of damages, rather than allowing self-estimation, and that a pacto de commissario is not allowed in mortgage cases.

Uploaded by

Fbarrs
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

La Compania vs. C.H. French, G.R. No. L-14024, Nov.

8, 1918

Unliquidated damages - not due and demandable - cannot be compensated. NOT CONSIDERED CREDIT.

Trial is needed to determine the amount for damages (self estimation is not allowed)

Pacto De Commissario(?) - not allowed in Mortgage7u

You might also like