Scribd
Upload
9 views2 pages

Electron Beam Planning Competency Evaluation

The student, Bianca, completed an evaluation for an external beam electron planning competency. She successfully completed all tasks of the competency and received a score of satisfactory for each one. This included discussing the plan with the physician, contouring anatomy, placing the treatment field and generating the plan with the correct parameters. She also generated dose calculations and distributed plans correctly. Her communication with the physician was noted as excellent. Overall she passed the competency with a score of 100%.

Uploaded by

api-404851310
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
9 views2 pages

Electron Beam Planning Competency Evaluation

The student, Bianca, completed an evaluation for an external beam electron planning competency. She successfully completed all tasks of the competency and received a score of satisfactory for each one. This included discussing the plan with the physician, contouring anatomy, placing the treatment field and generating the plan with the correct parameters. She also generated dose calculations and distributed plans correctly. Her communication with the physician was noted as excellent. Overall she passed the competency with a score of 100%.

Uploaded by

api-404851310
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Responses About You - Details - "External Beam ELECTRON Planning

Competency"
Print

1 of 1

Evaluation by: Clinical Instructors (SANCHEZ, Daryl)


Evaluation of: Students (Tester, Bianca)
Evaluation Period: 4/30/2018
Survey Completed: 4/30/2018 8:13:14 AM CT

Please assign each task a score of Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory.


Unsatisfactory in any essential task constitutes competency failure.
The student will repeat the competency at a later date.

 Discusses the plan prescription with the physician. - Satisfactory (Additional


Comment: reviewed possiblity of photon vs e-) [2 pts]
 Loads the patient imaging studies into the planning computer. -
Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Contours the appropriate anatomy on the image data set. - Satisfactory [2
pts]
 Successfully places field/SSD using simulation data. - Satisfactory (Additional
Comment: compared multiple energies/combinations w/ BOLUS) [2 pts]
 Correctly generates plan using appropriate cone/cutout size. -
Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Generates plan with correct reference depth. - Satisfactory (Additional
Comment: multiple comparisons) [2 pts]
 Generates plan with appropriate energy. - Satisfactory (Additional Comment:
reviewed w/ physics prior to presenting to doctor) [2 pts]
 Correctly adds the appropriate thickness of bolus. - Satisfactory (Additional
Comment: multiple combinations) [2 pts]
 Generates bolus to adequately cover treatment field borders. -
Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Accurately calculates daily dose for treatment field using prescription % and
weighting. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Accurately generates a single fraction DVH or composite DVH (for correct # of
fractions). - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Communicates effectively with physician for plan review and makes changes
as requested. - Satisfactory (Additional Comment: did a great job explaining to
physician her thought process) [2 pts]
 Exports/Prints appropriate plan data. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Performs hand verification calculations for plan MU settings using data/calc
books - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Enters in correct parameters for patient chart. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Performs pretreatment checks/calculations. - Satisfactory (Additional
Comment: worked with physics on final calc) [2 pts]
 Observes patient treatment. - Satisfactory (Additional Comment: review bolus
placement with therapists) [2 pts]
MEAN: 2.00 (out of possible 2), POINTS: 34, % SCORE: 100.0%

Overall rating:

 Pass [2 pts]

MEAN: 2.00 (out of possible 2), POINTS: 2, % SCORE: 100.0%

Additional Comments:

 Bianca has done multiple e- cases all satisfactory. She has a solid
understanding.

Total points for all rating scale questions: 36


Mean percentage score for all rating scale questions: 100.0%
(Each main question equally weighted)

Responses as of 5/4/2018 8:45:10 AM CT

You might also like