Simple risk control matrix
For a good introduction tof this kind of risk-control matrix refer to the web page
"Matrix Mapping: the easiest and best way to map internal controls" at
[Link]/matrices.
The main advantage of this style is that it allows you to cope, easily, with the
common situation of having a many:many relation between risks and controls.
This template has two features not described in that article.
First, in this template there are three distinct groups of controls: those already in
place, those agreed but not yet operating (i.e. in development), and those proposed
but not yet agreed on.
After each set of controls there are revised summaries of the level of control
provided.
Second, there is space for two risk analyses. There's no need to do two, but if
alternative perspectives could be useful there's no reason for not using both together
and mapping controls to both of them.
Furthermore, if you want to migrate from one risk analyis to another, having the
ability to show two during a changeover period might be very useful.
Several columns are provided for capturing information about controls and you can
use, ignore, or add to them as you wish.
One limitation of this style is that your risk analyses have to be documented in the
column headings and comments of the controls sheet. If you want to say more than
this then you might be interested in the 'general rc [Link]' design, which includes
separate sheets for risk analyses and macro buttons to bring the control and risk
analysis sheets into alignment automatically.
You need to decide what metric(s) of risk 'size' you will use and update the headings
to make clear what your choice is. I've just used the word 'size' as a place holder.
Please feel free to contact me with any queries or suggestions at
matthew@[Link]
Sort Control group Control Control ID Ref to detail
CONTROLS CURRENTLY IN PLACE
1 Monitoring Business monitoring report: debtors m1
2 Monitoring Process monitoring report: process stats m2
etc etc etc
CONTROLS IN DEVELOPMENT
1 Monitoring Business monitoring report: debtors m1
2 Monitoring Process monitoring report: process stats m2
etc etc etc
CONTROLS PROPOSED
1 Monitoring Business monitoring report: debtors m1
2 Monitoring Process monitoring report: process stats m2
etc etc etc
xxxx
Perform-
Owner - Owner - To do Performance ance
operational development Frequency Sampling date evidence rating
Risk ref r1.1 r1.2 r1.3 r1.4
Short
name r1 r2 r3 r4
Development risk
Operation cost cost analysis 1 Size
Size after existing controls 10 20 30 40
Size after all agreed controls 10 20 30 40
Size after proposed controls 10 20 30 40
r1.5 Risk ref r2.1 r2.2 r2.3
Short
r5 name r1 r2 r3
risk
analysis 2 Size
50 Estimate of remaining risk 10 20 30
50 Estimate of remaining risk 10 20 30
50 Estimate of remaining risk 10 20 30
r2.4 r2.5
r4 r5
40 50
40 50
40 50