Epidemiological Network for Disease Surveillance in Pakistan
Epidemiological Network for Disease Surveillance in Pakistan
Pakistan
Disease Surveillance and Reporting System Functional through Epidemiological
network at Federal, Provincial and SLSP target District level.
1. Introduction
With trade increasing its importance on the economy of each country to exist in
global village, it’s necessary to give proof of animal health status based on
credible surveillance and reporting system. The same applies on the control,
eradication of any globally important disease or to keep the disease or infection
free status intact. Pakistan has the same obligations as it has submitted its
application for the recognition of Rinderpest infection free country to
International Animal Health Organization (OIE).
Field data relating to the presence of any livestock disease can, and should,
come from primary source i.e livestock owner and field veterinarians. The data
from the lines of investigation should complement each other but need not be
identical. Data from these two sources must be evaluated, confirmed, perhaps
investigated further and eventually used to prioritise Departmental response
strategies and the allocation of funds. The above tasks can only be competently
undertaken by a permanently established, and adequately resourced veterinary
epidemiology unit that has qualified and capable staff, who can devote
themselves fulltime to the management of the Federal, provincial and targeted
districts Epidemiological Units. These Epidemiology Units shall work towards
improving the standards and efficiency of animal disease and reporting system
in the Pakistan by informing International and national agencies, decision-
makers through provision of timely, appropriate and required information.
1
The responsibility as coordinator for the activities of Result 2 of SLSP is a
challenge for me and surely the goal will be achieved with the coordination of
National, Provincial and Target District staff in the best interest of Livestock
Department and profession.
• To get better animal disease control, this is necessary for increasing the
productivity of the livestock sector and improving the livelihood of
farmers, livestock owners at village level.
• Absence of clear policies & strategies for animal health in general and for
contagious disease in special.
• No or Little obligation and incentive for VOs & VAs to report as their job
description making many reports inadequate.
2
• No feed back from provincial or national laboratories/authorities on
submission of samples/reports by the field staff making the whole
exercise of disease reporting unnecessary.
3
The information available under this system does not come from active searches
for the disease but only what the local VO reflects in his monthly reports.
Within the Livestock Departments of AJK, NAs, NWFP, Punjab, Sindh and
Balochistan a series of disease investigation laboratories (DILs) exist. These are
poorly equipped, staffed by officers with limited exposure to the correct training
and under funded to run the routine tests with consumables. They lack facilities
for investigating outbreaks. In essence they can function only at a local level
undertaking worm egg counts, haematology and some basic bacteriology. Roy
Halliwell’s report suggests that the vast majority of the results they produce are
of little value and sometimes misleading. Thus they can offer some limited
assistance to the farmer but cannot provide a confirmed diagnosis of the
presence of any major diseases.
4
component i.e a series of searches for evidence of clinical and serological
investigations of Transboundry Animal Disease especially for Rinderpest or
Rinderpest like disease across the villages of the entire country.
In spite of their mandate it was apparent that the Veterinary Research Institutes
did not participate in any national surveillance or disease investigation network.
Therefore they could not be given the task of searching the villages. This
workload was taken up by the Livestock Departments under a specially
introduced programme of participatory disease surveillance in last four year
under FAO/PAK/088-EC and SLSP EU projects.
This system can be made to function. The major obstacle at this time appears to
be persuading District Livestock Officers (DLOs) to submit meaningful returns.
Nevertheless DLOs remain in contact with the Veterinary Officers of the District
Hospitals who have the information that is needed. If the DLOs and Assistant
Disease investigation Officer (ADIO) of target district are mandated to work
5
together in district epidemiological network, the performance and information
related to disease surveillance and reporting will increase.
SLSP can improve the basic disease diagnostic system across the country
through the provision of equipments, and trainings as indicated in the proposed
Epidemiological Network programme. Epidemiological Network is the system
which consists of 30 targeted districts, 4 provincial and 1 National laboratories
working within a federally administrative and Co-ordinated network.
Pragmatically, this Epidemiological network can be created from existing
laboratories belonging to different Provincial Governments and then at National,
Provincial and targeted district level, working for different Directorates
(VRI/CVDLs and Departmental DILs.). Developing a set of MoUs to identify the
role and mandates of Epidemiological Units at each level, which allows the
development of these networks/units, will require a major federal initiative by
Animal Husbandry Commissioner and Co-Directors SLSP. It appears that most of
the required inputs have been identified by SLSP (Roy Haliwell) but their supply
should be contingent on the acceptance of Federal and Provincial coordination.
The objective would be to have in place in each of the network labs/ units, the
reagents and trained manpower, able to confirm all the commonly occurring
diseases of Pakistan.
This is the most important area to which the SLSP can contribute. Disease
Surveillance and Reporting system will establish with time and experience but a
start-up model can be proposed, based on the successful Rinderpest surveillance
6
and reporting system, in which PDS and laboratory services collaborated to
deliver the results. Actually this surveillance and reporting system will be
laboratory based and, the laboratories must be part of Epidemiological network.
Acting as the National referral Laboratory, the NVL will also set role, mandates
and standards to be adhered by other laboratories in the network. It is also
necessary that the NVL will take on the role making epidemiological analyses
relating to all livestock diseases throughout the country.
7
4. The Proposed Structure
Upgrading the routine disease surveillance and reporting system, based on early
detection, reporting and investigation of outbreaks of target diseases and
submission of regular update reports for these outbreaks, will be a long process
that will require the full time attention of dedicated, interested, trained and
empowered staff.
Active support from senior decision makers, particularly the Director Generals,
Directors Livestock and Dairy Development Department, will be essential to
provide the required leadership, empowerment and direction for the system and
to ensure the provision of the required funding and resources after transferring
from SLSP.
8
Level Provincial
epidemiology unit
District DDLO -
Deputy DLO –
District Laboratory
Animal Health Poultry
Asst. disease
investigation officer
Vet. Hospital & Diag Lab
Vet./senior vet. officer
Village/
field Farmers & livestock owners
(Primary information source)
Key
Official epidemiological reporting
pathway
Information only – not part of the information transmission
pathway
9
Data consolidation, storage & analysis
Federal
National policy formulation & policy
level communication
Field
Primary data collection
level
Information flow
Key
Feed-back
Action
Outline of idealized animal disease information flow from field level to Federal level
and feed-back/action pathway by Gavin Thomson
10
The establishment of Epidemiological network will be carried out in four phases:
11
• Conduction of collaborative training workshops on diagnosis and
control of Transboundry Animal disease.
In this optional phase the Epidemiological network and other reporting functions
of the veterinary field service would be placed. Electronic data capture using
desk top or laptop computers would be introduced at progressively district level
to federal level in the reporting chain. These various levels would be linked
through WANs or internet connections to enable easy transmission of data
through the system.
12
• Conduction of Training workshops for private veterinarians on disease
reporting in target districts.
In 3rd phase, the Epidemiological network and other reporting functions of the
veterinary field service would be functional and operational. Electronic data
capture using desk top or laptop computers would be working and disseminating
from district level to Federal level in the reporting chain. These various levels
would be strengthened with trained staff and equipments, linked through WANs
or internet connections to enable easy transmission of data through the system.
13
• Follow up of disease information on Transboundry Animal Disease
especially Rinderpest or Rinderpest like disease.
In this phase SLSP will hand over the functional Disease surveillance and
reporting system to concerned livestock department. Long term survival and
success of the proposed Epidemiological Network will depend in larger part on
ownership of the system by the Livestock and Dairy Development Department.
To this end it is recommended that a surveillance working group of concerned
officers of the Livestock and Dairy Development Department be formed and
involved in the working of Epidemiological network at each level.
In the 4th phase of proposed Epidemiological Network, the surveillance working
group of each province will organises a participatory workshop in order to agree
14
upon and own the aim, objectives and basic working methods of the
Epidemiological Network as their part of departmental activities.
Federal
International
liaison & OIE
reporting Federal
National Veterinary
epidemiology Laboratories
unit
DG: LDD
Poultry
DG: Research surveillance
Provincial network
Provincial laboratories
epidemiology
unit
Veterinary Research
Institute
Provincial/regional
diagnostic laboratory
15
4.4.2 Managing the Epidemiological Network
The SLSP and AHC would assume responsibility for design and operation of the
Epidemiological Network at National, Provincial and targeted districts level.
16
4.4.3 Improving the disease reporting system
In this context the Disease Surveillance working Group will address and suggest
for the improvements in the disease reporting system, the passive disease
reporting system; the early warning system, and investigation of disease
outbreaks.
District/Year/serial number –
or
District/Year/disease/serial number –
These outbreak identifiers would be used to identify all data relating to one
outbreak and will be in built in the soft ware used for the disease information
system of Epidemiological Network.
These would be held at the target district level for veterinary officers at
district headquarters and the veterinary hospitals and dispensaries (as
appropriate). To be effective these workshops must have the strong and
overt support of senior officers (eg by their attendance at workshops, or
at a minimum the distribution of a written statement of clear support and
instruction for reporting all occurrences of target diseases). The
workshops will include the following:
17
• Aims and objectives of disease surveillance and reporting (eg
Rinderpest pathway, international trade, enable effective use of
resources, rapidly identify new disease threats, identify trends in
enzootic diseases etc).
• The master trainers, PDS Experts and VOs who have attended a
disease orientation workshop will utilise their new knowledge and
conduct awareness sessions with livestock owners in the villages in
the jurisdiction of their veterinary hospital.
• These sessions will be repeated as and when required or according
to the agreed work plan.
18
• The SLSP will assist this process by designing, printing and
supplying the awareness published material ( pamphlets, leaflets
and posters)in local versions.
• News about regional and global disease patterns, any new threats
to and Pakistan’s livestock populations, news from FAO, OIE, WHO
as appropriate.
Each district submits a disease outbreak report at the end of each month as
required by the provincial livestock department’s records. A unified
19
recommended format by the DSWG for epidemiological network will be used
covering the following basic information. Different formats are presented as
Annex
• Names the target diseases and allocates one or more rows for each
for recording outbreak data, or one row per species
• Unique identifier for each outbreak
• Date of index case
• Number of villages affected
• Production system
• Species affected
• Age group affected
• Number of cases
• Number of deaths
• Number slaughtered
• Number of animals vaccinated in month (whether or not in
response to, outbreak)
7. Data management
The proposed Epidemiological network will be only functional with the provision
and application of agreed data base or unified soft ware (Disease information
system). In this regards:
8. Conclusions
20
• The commitment for the ownership of the Epidemiological network by the
Livestock department could be ensured by agreements and MoUs.
Province Punjab
1. Chakwal.
2. Kasur
3. Toba Tek singh
4. Gujrat
5. Bahawalpur
6. Bhakkar
Province Sindh
1. Thatta
2. Badin
3. Sanghar
4. Dadu
5. Tharparkar
Province Balochistan
1. Pishin
2. Zhob
3. kalat
4. Qila Saifullah
5. Loralai
6. Mastung
Province NWFP
1. Peshawar
2. Charsadda
3. Wsat
4. Mardan
21
5. Abbottabad
6. Nowshera
22
SLSP DISTRICTS IN PAKISTAN
W E CHINA
S
# S
#
S S
#
S
# S
#
S
#
##
S S
AFGHANISTAN S
#
S
#
S
# S
#
S
#
S
# S
# S
# S
#
S
#
S
#
S
#
INDIA
IRAN S
#
S
#
S #
# S
S
# S
#
S
# SLSP DISTRICTS
ARABIAN SEA PAKISTAN PROVINCES
AJK
Balochistan
FATA
ICT
NWFP
Northern Areas
Punjab
Sindh
23
24