Scribd
Upload
12 views4 pages

Agisoft PhotoScan Processing Report

The document is an Agisoft PhotoScan processing report summarizing the results of a photogrammetry survey. It analyzed 122 images taken from 122 camera stations at an altitude of 87 meters to create a 3D model of the surveyed area. Over 25,000 tie points were found between the images with an average reprojection error of 2.1 pixels. A digital elevation model and orthomosaic were generated from the 3D reconstruction with a ground resolution of 0.024 meters per pixel and an average camera location error of 0.631 meters.

Uploaded by

satya
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
12 views4 pages

Agisoft PhotoScan Processing Report

The document is an Agisoft PhotoScan processing report summarizing the results of a photogrammetry survey. It analyzed 122 images taken from 122 camera stations at an altitude of 87 meters to create a 3D model of the surveyed area. Over 25,000 tie points were found between the images with an average reprojection error of 2.1 pixels. A digital elevation model and orthomosaic were generated from the 3D reconstruction with a ground resolution of 0.024 meters per pixel and an average camera location error of 0.631 meters.

Uploaded by

satya
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Agisoft PhotoScan

Processing Report
22 February 2018
Survey Data

>9
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1

Fig. 1. Camera locations and image overlap.

Number of images: 122 Camera stations: 122


Flying altitude: 87.0289 m Tie-points: 25601
Ground resolution: 0.024142 m/pix Projections: 97965
Coverage area: 0.0246551 sq km Error: 2.09878 pix

Camera Model Resolution Focal Length Pixel Size Precalibrated


FC220 (4.73 mm) 4000 x 3000 4.73 mm 1.57424 x 1.57424 um No
Table. 1. Cameras.
Camera Locations

1.34756 m
1.07805 m
0.808538 m
0.539025 m
0.269513 m
0m
-0.269513 m
-0.539025 m
-0.808538 m
-1.07805 m
-1.34756 m

Fig. 2. Camera locations and error estimates.


Z error is represented by ellipse color. X,Y errors are represented by ellipse shape.
Estimated camera locations are marked with a black dot.

X error (m) Y error (m) Z error (m) Total error (m)


0.204885 0.155372 0.576244 0.631011
Table. 2. Average camera location error.
Digital Elevation Model

81.0083 m

51.7912 m

Fig. 3. Reconstructed digital elevation model.

Resolution: 0.386271 m/pix


Point density: 6.70216 points per sq m

You might also like