Scribd
Upload
10 views3 pages

Student Training Evaluation Form

This document contains a performance evaluation form for a student in an engineering training program. The form rates the student in several areas, including their mastery of the subject area and engineering tools/techniques, ability to critically analyze problems, human behavior, and expression. The evaluator is asked to rate the student using a scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree for statements under each category.

Uploaded by

Yen
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
10 views3 pages

Student Training Evaluation Form

This document contains a performance evaluation form for a student in an engineering training program. The form rates the student in several areas, including their mastery of the subject area and engineering tools/techniques, ability to critically analyze problems, human behavior, and expression. The evaluator is asked to rate the student using a scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree for statements under each category.

Uploaded by

Yen
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Ateneo de Davao University

Engineering Division

NAME OF STUDENT: _______________________________________________________


PERIOD COVERED: _______________________________________________________
PHASE OF TRAINING: _______________________________________________________

Rate the student in the specific areas for each phase of training program using the following
rating code:

SA – Strongly agree A – Agree


NE – Not Evident D – Disagree
SD – Strongly Disagree

MASTERY OF AREA UNDER STUDY

SA A NE D SD
1. The student had a thorough understanding of the
existing conditions
2. The student considered gathering information from all
concerned, related area and personnel.
3. The student thoroughly considered all pertinent
assumptions prior to make final recommendations.

4. The problems (conditions) were clearly defined.


MASTERY OF ENGINEERING TOOLS/TECHNIQUES APPLIED

SA A NE D SD
1. The tools/techniques applied are most appropriate in
finding solutions to problems.
2. The student has a thorough comprehension of the
mechanics in using the tools.
3. All tools used to generate significant
results/conclusions useful to management.

ABILITY TO ANALYZE CRITICALLY

SA A NE D SD
1. Student is able to recognize and identify the causes of
the problems.
2. Student is able to counter these causes by
recommending most appropriate proposals..

3. Student is realistic in conceptualizing profiles.

4. Student is indigenous in conceptualizing profiles.

HUMAN BEHAVIOR

SA A NE D SD
1. Student manifests respect for superior.

2. Student manifests respect for peers.

3. Student manifests respect for rank and file employees.

4. Student takes suggestion and criticisms constructively.


EXPRESSION

SA A NE D SD
1. Student effectively conveys his ideas to different
sectors of the company.

2. Student is generally an interesting person.

EVALUATOR NAME: _______________________________________


POSITION: _______________________________________
COMPANY: _______________________________________
ADDRESS: _______________________________________

You might also like