Estabilidad estructural topologica sobre espacios
proyectados
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
DM-IBILCE/UNESP- Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brasil
EDAN-US, Sevilla, Espana
ICMC-USP, Sao Carlos, Brasil
IX FAST WORKSHOP ON APPLIED AND
COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS
6 y 7 de Enero del 2016
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Introduction
In this work we study topological structural stability for a family of
nonlinear semigroups Th () on Banach space Xh depending on the
parameter h. We also study the robustness of the internal
dynamics in global attractors of projected Banach spaces,
generalizing previous results for small perturbations of infinite
dimensional dynamical systems [3] and [4]. We apply the results an
abstract semilinear equation with Dumbbell type domains.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Figura : Structural stability implies that the two phase portraits are
homeomorphic. Source: Scholarpedia.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Let Z be a metric space together with a metric d : Z Z R+ ,
where R+ = [0, ), and denote by C (Z ) the set of continuous
maps from Z into Z . Given a subset A of Z and > 0, the
neighborhood of A is the set
O (A) := {x Z : d(x, a) < for some a A}.
Now, we introduce the notion of semigroup in the metric space Z .
Definition
A family {T (t) : t > 0} C (Z ) is a semigroup in Z if
(i) T (0) = IZ , IZ is the identity map in Z .
(ii) T (t + s) = T (t)T (s), for all t, s > 0 and
(iii) (t, x) 7 T (t)x Z is continuous from R+ Z into Z .
A solution of T () corresponding to the initial condition x(0) = x0
is the mapping t 7 T (t)x0 from R+ into Z .
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
We begin with the necessary definitions to define the global
attractor for the semigroup.
Definition
A set A Z is said invariant under the action semigroup
{T (t) : t > 0} if T (t)A = A for all t > 0.
Definition
A global solution for a semigroup {T (t) : t > 0} is a continuous
function : R Z with the property that T (t)(s) = (t + s) for
all s R and for all t R+ . We say that : R Z is a global
solution through x Z if it is a global solution with (0) = x. The
orbit of a global solution is
[
() = {(t)}.
tR
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Definition
Given A and B nonempty subset of Z , we define the Hausdorff
semidistance from A to B as
distZ (A, B) := sup dZ (a, B) = sup inf d(a, b).
aA aA bB
Definition
Given two subsets A, B of Z we say that A attracts B under the
t
action of the semigroup {T (t) : t > 0} if distZ (T (t)B, A) 0.
Definition
A subset A of Z is a global attractor for a semigroup
{T (t) : t > 0} if it is compact, invariant under the action of
{T (t) : t > 0} and for every bounded subset B of Z we have that
A attracts B under the action of {T (t) : t > 0}.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Definition
We say that an invariant set Z for the semigroup T () is an
isolated invariant set if there is an > 0 such that is the
maximal invariant subset of O (). A disjoint family of isolated
invariant sets is a family S = {1 , 2 , , n } of isolated
invariant sets with the property that, for some > 0,
O (i ) O (j ) = , 1 6 i < j 6 n.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Definition
Let {T (t) : t > 0} be a semigroup. The unstable set of an
invariant set is defined by
W u () := {x Z : there is a global solution : R Z
such that (0) = x and lim distZ ((t), ) = 0}.
t
The local unstable manifold of is the set
W u, () := {x W u () : distZ ((t), ) < , t 6 0}.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Gradient semigroups
Definition
We say that a semigroup {T (t) : t > 0} with a global attractor A
and a family of isolated invariant sets S = {1 , 2 , , n } is a
gradient semigroup with respect to S , or an S gradient
semigroup, if there is a continuous function V : Z R such that
(i) The real function [0, ) 3 t 7 V (T (t)x) R is
non-increasing for each x Z ;
(ii) V is constant in each i , for each i = 1, . . . , n; and
[n
(iii) V (T (t)x) = V (x) for all t > 0 if and only if x i .
i=1
A function V with these properties is called a generalized Lyapunov
function for the semigroup {T (t) : t > 0} with respect to S , or
an S Lyapunov function for the semigroup {T (t) : t > 0}.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
For a gradient system, every trajectory on the attractor is both
forwards and backwards asymptotic to some equilibrium.
Furthermore, since V is non-increasing along trajectories but only
constant on elements of S , there cannot be any collection of
orbits producing a cycle between elements of S . We define such a
cycle formally as
Definition
Let T () be a semigroup which has a disjoint family of isolated
invariant sets S = {1 , , n }. A homoclinic structure
associated with S is a subset {`1 , `2 , , `k } of S , k 6 n,
together with a set of global solutions {j : R Z : 1 6 j 6 k}
such that
lim distZ (j (t), `j ) = 0 and lim distZ (j (t), `(j+1) ) = 0,
t t
where `k+1 := `1 and, if k = 1, the orbit (1 ) is not contained
in `1 .
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Dynamically gradient semigroups
We are now ready to define gradient-like or dynamically gradient
semigroups (See [4, Section 5.1]).
Definition
A semigroup T () with a global attractor A is dynamically gradient
with respect to the family S = {1 , 2 , , n } of isolated
invariant sets, or dynamically S gradient, if it satisfies the
following two properties:
(G1) Given a global solution : R Z in A, there exist
i, j {1, 2, , n} such that
lim distZ ((t), i ) = 0 and lim distZ ((t), j ) = 0.
t t
(G2) The collection S contains no homoclinic structures.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Theorem ([3, 4])
Let {T (t) : t > 0} be a semigroup with a global attractor A, and
let S be a finite collection of isolated invariant sets. Then
{T (t) : t > 0} is S gradient if and only if it is dynamically
S gradient.
As an immediate consequence of this theorem we obtain the
following characterization of the attractor.
Corollary
Let {T (t) : t > 0} be a dynamically gradient semigroup with
respect to S = {1 , , n } a family of bounded isolated
invariant sets. If {T (t) : t > 0} has a global attractor A, then
n
[
A= W u (j ). (1)
j=1
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Topological structural stability on a fixed Banach space
In Carvalho, A. N.; Langa, J. A., An extension of the concept of
gradient semigroup wich is stable under perturbations. JDE, 2009.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Theorem
Let X be a Banach space and {S (t) : t 0}, [0, 1], be a
family of nonlinear semigroups in X which satisfy:
(a) For each [0, 1], {S (t) : t 0} has a global attractor A
and [0,1] A is compact.
(b) {S0 (t) : t 0} is a gradient-like nonlinear semigroup with
, . . . , y }.
stationary solutions E0 = {y1,0 n,0
(c) {S (t) : t 0} has a finite number of stationary solutions
, . . . , y } and sup 0
E = {y1, n, 1in kyi, yi,0 kX 0.
0
(d) kS (t)u S0 (t)ukX 0 uniformly for t in compact subsets
of [0, ) and for u in compact subsets of X .
(e) There is a > 0 and neighborhoods Vi of yi,0 such that y is
i,
the maximal invariant set for S (t) in Vi , for each
i {1, . . . , n} and for each 0 < .
Then, there exists 0 > 0 such that, for all [0, 0 ], the
nonlinear semigroup {S (t) : t 0} is gradient-like.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Some definitions of Pconvergence
Let {Xh }h[0,1] a family of Banach spaces and P = {Ph }h(0,1] a
sequence of Ph : X0 Xh , Ph L (X0 , Xh ), for h (0, 1], with
the following property:
h0
kPh u0 kXh ku0 kX0 , u0 X0 . (2)
Definition
A sequence {uh }h(0,1] with uh Xh Pconverges to u0 X0 if
kuh Ph u0 kXh 0 as h 0.
P
We write this as uh u0 . Similarly, the Pconvergence of
sequences is defined as: A sequence {uhn }nN with uhn Xhn such
n
that hn 0 Pconverges to u0 X0 if kuhn Phn u0 kXhn 0
as n .
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Lemma
Let Ph L (X0 , Xh ) be satisfying (2) for h (0, 1], then there
exists a constant h0 (0, 1] such that sup kPh kL (X0 ,Xh ) < .
h[0,h0 ]
The Pconvergence has following property:
P P
i) If uh u0 and uh v0 , then u0 = v0 .
P P P
ii) If uh u0 and vh v0 , then uh + vh u0 + v0 ,
where and are constants in R or C.
P h0
iii) If uh u0 , then kuh kXh ku0 kX0 .
P h0
iv ) uh 0X0 if and only if kuh kXh 0.
P
v ) Given u0 X0 , then Ph u0 u0 .
h0 P
vi) If ku (h) u0 kX0 0, then Ph u (h) u0 .
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Assume that {Yh }h[0,1] is a family of Banach spaces and
Q = {Qh }h(0,1] a sequence of bounded linear operators
Qh : Y0 Yh with the following property:
h0
kQh v0 kYh kv0 kY0 , v0 Y0 . (3)
Definition
A operator Ah : Xh Yh PQconverges to an operator
Q P
A0 : X0 Y0 as h 0 if Ah uh A0 u0 whenever uh u0 . We
PQ
write Ah A0 as h 0.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Definition
Let Ah Xh , where Xh is a Banach space, for all h [0, 1].
(i) We say that the family of sets {Ah }h(0,1] is Pupper
semicontinuous at h = 0 if
h0
distXh (Ah , Ph A0 ) := sup inf kuh Ph ukXh 0.
uh Ah uA
(ii) We say that the family of sets {Ah }h(0,1] is Plower
semicontinuous at h = 0 if
h0
distXh (Ph A0 , Ah ) := sup inf kuh Ph ukXh 0.
uA uh Ah
(ii) We say that the family of sets {Ah }h(0,1] is Pcontinuous
at h = 0 if it is Pupper semicontinuous and Plower
semicontinuous at h = 0.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Topological structural stability on variable Banach spaces
We begin with a definition that is a generalization of the concept
of collectively asymptotically compact (see [1, Definition 4.2] or [4,
Definition 3.16]) for variable Banach spaces.
Definition
Let {Th (t) : t > 0}h[0,1] be a family of semigroups in the Banach
space Xh , for all h [0, 1]. We say that {Th (t) : t > 0}h(0,1] is
Pcollectively asymptotically compact at h = 0 if, for any
k
sequence {hk }kN in (0, 1] with hk 0, uniformly bounded
sequence {xk }kN with xk Xhk , sequence {tk }kN in (0, ) with
k
tk the sequence {Thk (tk )xk }kN has a Pconvergent
subsequence to some element in X0 .
Remark
In case Xh = X0 and Ph = IX0 , for all h (0, 1], Th () is
collectively asymptotically compact at h = 0.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Definition
Let {Th (t) : t > 0}h[0,1] be a family of nonlinear semigroups in
PP
Xh , for h [0, 1]. We say that Th () T0 () uniformly in
compact subsets of R+ X0 if for each > 0, we have
lim sup kTh (t)uh Ph T0 (t)u0 kXh = 0
h0 t[0, ]
whenever
lim kuh Ph u0 kXh = 0.
h0
Remark
In case that Xh = X0 and Ph = IX0 , for h [0, 1]. The Definition
h0
18 means that Th (t)x T0 (t)x uniformly for (t, x) in compact
subsets of R+ X0 in the sense of [3].
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Now, we are ready to state the following theorem on the behavior
of global attractors under perturbation.
Theorem (Topological structural stability)
Let {Th (t) : t > 0}h[0,1] be a family of nonlinear semigroups
Pcollectively asymptotically compact at h = 0 on a Banach
PP
space Xh , for h [0, 1] and that Th (t) T0 (t) uniformly on
+
compact subsets of R X0 . Suppose that
(a) for each h [0, 1], the semigroup {Th (t) : t > 0} has a global
attractor Ah , with suph[0,1] supxh Ah kxh kXh < ;
(b) there is a p N such that for any h [0, 1], the semigroup
{Th (t) : t > 0} has a disjoint family of isolated invariant
bounded sets Sh := {1,h , 2,h , . . . , p,h } that behave
Pcontinuously at h = 0, i.e, for each i = 1, . . . , p, we have
distXh (i,h , Ph i,0 ) + distXh (Ph i,0 , i,h ) 0 as h 0;
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Theorem (Topological structural stability)
(c) {T0 (t) : t > 0} is a gradient semigroup with respect to
S0 = {1,0 , 2,0 , . . . , p,0 };
(d) the family of local unstable manifold of i,h behaves
Pcontinuously at h = 0, that is, there exists a > 0 such
that
distXh (Whu, (i,h ), Ph W0u, (i,0 ))
h0
+ distXh (Ph W0u, (i,0 ), Whu, (i,h )) 0; and
(e) There exists a 0 > 0 such that, for all h [0, 1] and
j = 1, , p; j,h is the maximal invariant for the semigroup
Th () inside O0 (Ph j,0 ). Besides, 0 is such that the
0 -neighborhoods of the Ph j,0 s are disjoints.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Theorem (Topological structural stability)
Then,
1 the family {Ah }h(0,1] is Pupper semicontinuity at h = 0
whenever (a) holds;
2 the family {Ah }h(0,1] is Plower semicontinuity at h = 0
whenever (a), (b), (c) and (d) hold; and
3 there exist an h0 (0, 1] such that, for al h [0, h0 ],
{Th (t) : t > 0}h(0,1] is a gradient semigroup with respect to
Sh = {1,h , 2,h , . . . , p,h } whenever (a), (b), (c) and (e)
hold. Consequently,
p
[
Ah = W u (i , h), h [0, h0 ].
i=1
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Applications
We consider the evolution equation of parabolic type of the form
ut (x, t) u (x, t) + u (x, t) = f (u (x, t)), x , t > 0,
u (x, t)
= 0, x ,
n
(4)
where RN , N > 2, is a bounded smooth domain, (0, 1] is
a parameter, n is the outside normal derivative and f C 2 (R)
which is bounded and has bounded derivatives up to the second
order.
The domain is a dumbbell type domain consisting of two
disconnected domains, that we denote by , joined by a thin
channel, R , which degenerates to a line segment as the
parameters approaches zero, see Figure 2.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Under standard dissipative assumption on the nonlinearity f of the
type,
f (s)
lim sup < 0,
|s|+ s
equation (4) has an attractor A H 1 ( ), for (0, 1].
Figura : Dumbbell domain
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
On the other hand, passing to the limit as 0, the limit
domain will consist of the domain and a line in between. We
denote by P0 and P1 the points where the line segment touches ,
see Figure 3.
Figura : Limit domain
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
The limiting equation is
wt (x, t) w (x, t) + w (x, t) = f (w (x, t)), x , t > 0,
w (x, t)
= 0, x ,
n
vt (s, t) Lv (s, t) + v (s, t) = f (v (s, t)), s R0 ,
v (0) = w (P0 ), v (1) = w (P1 ),
(5)
where w is a function that lives in and v lives in the line
segment R0 . Moreover, L is a differential operator which depends
on the geometry of the channel R , more exactly, on the way the
channel R collapses to the segment line R0 . More specifically
Lv = g1 (gvx )x where g has suitable geometric properties. Again,
this system has an attractor A0 in H 1 () H 1 (R0 ) =: H 1 (0 ).
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Now, we define appropriate spaces Up , for 1 < p < and
[0, 1] as follows, Up := Lp ( ), for (0, 1] with norm
1N
k kUp := k kLp () + p k kLp (R )
and U0p = Lp () Lp (R0 ) with norm
k(w , v )kU0p := kw kLp () + kv kLpg (0,1) ,
where Lpg (0, 1) is the space Lp (0, 1) with the norm
Z 1 1
p
p
kv kLpg (0,1) := g (s)|v (s)| ds .
0
We will also consider the spaces H1 = H 1 () H 1 (R ) with the
norm
1N
k kH1 = k kH 1 () + 2 k kH 1 (R )
and H01 = H 1 () H 1 (R0 ).
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Since both equations (4) and (5) are posed in different space
domains, the first one in and the second one in R0 , we need
to devise a tool to compare functions defined in this two different
sets. A tool given in [3, 2] is to define the extension operator
E : U0p Up as follows
w (x), x ,
E (w , v )(x) :=
v (s), x = (s, y ) R .
Proposition ([3])
For (0, 1], E : U0p Up is a bounded linear operator and
kE (w , v )kUp = k(w , v )kU0p for all (w , v ) U0p .
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
With this, we will see that problem (4) can be written as a
semilinear abstract equation of form
ut + A u = F (u ), t > 0
(6)
u (0) = u0 Up
for family of spaces Up , where A : D(A ) Up Up , for
(0, 1]. Also, problem (5) can also be written as
ut + A0 u = F0 (u), t > 0
(7)
u(0) = u0 U0p
in space U0p , where A0 : D(A0 ) U0p U0p . The nonlinearity
F : U U is the Nemitski operator generated by f , that is
F (u )(x) = f (u (x)).
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
We also define the projection operator M : Up U0p given by
M ( ) = (w , v ) where w (x) = (x), x and v (s) = Ts ,
s (0, 1), where
Z
s 1
T (x) = s (s, y )dy , s = {y : (s, y ) R }.
| | s
Proposition ([3])
For (0, 1], M L (Up , U0p ) and kM (w , v )kL (Up ,U0p ) 6 1.
Moreover, M E = IU0p .
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
We can see that family of linear operators E : U0p Up satisfy
the property
0
kE ukUp kukU0p , for all u U0p , (8)
by using of Proposition 0.5.
Definition
We say that a sequence {u }(0,1] , u Up , E converges to
0 E
u0 U0p if ku E ukUp 0. We write this as u u0 .
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Theorem ([2])
Let {T (t) : t > 0} the solution operator associated to (4) and (5)
and A be its global attractor, [0, 1]. Then, there are 0 > 0,
L > 0, > 0, (0, 1) and C > 0 such that
(a)
N
kT (t)u E T0 (t)M v kLp ( ) 6 Ce t t (ku v kUp + p ),
kT (t)u E T0 (t)M v kUp 6 Ce t t (ku v kUp + ), p
for each p > N, (1/2, 2p/(N + 2p)), for all t > 0.
(b) If all equilibrium points E0 = {u1,0 , . . . , un,0 } of (5) are
hyperbolic (hence there are only a finitely many of them), the
semigroup {T (t) : t > 0} has a set of exactly n equilibria,
E = {u1, , . . . , un, }, all of them hyperbolic, for p > N,
N 1
kui, E ui,0 kLp ( ) 6 C p and kui, E ui,0 kUp 6 C p ,
1 6 i 6 n.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Theorem
(c) There is a > 0 such that, if
Lp ( )
Wu (ui, ) = W u (ui, ) B (ui, ) (or
p
Wu (ui, ) = W u (ui, ) BU (ui, )), there is a C > 0 such that
p ( )
dist L
(Wu (ui, ), E Wu (ui,0 ))
p ( N
+ dist L )
(E Wu (ui,0 ), Wu (ui, )) 6 C p ,
Up
( or dist (Wu (ui, ), E Wu (ui,0 ))
p
+ dist U (E Wu (ui,0 ), Wu (ui, )) 6 C p ),
where dist X (A, B) := supaA inf bB ka bkX is the Hausdorff
semi-distance between the subsets A and B of the Banach
space X .
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Next we present the main result of this section.
Theorem
Under the same conditions of Theorem 23. Suppose that
{T0 (t) : t > 0} is a gradient nonlinear semigroup in U0p with
respect to E0 = {u1,0 , . . . , un,0 }, then there is an 0 > 0 such that
the family {T (t) : t > 0}(0,1] of nonlinear semigroups in Up is
gradient with respect to E = {u1, , . . . , un, }, for all [0, 0 ].
Consequently,
n
[
A = W u (ui, ), [0, 0 ].
i=1
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Proof. We note first to show this result we need to prove the
hypotheses of Theorem 19.
We can see that, EE convergence of T () on compact subsets of
R+ U0p , follows directly from the item (a) of Theorem 23 put
v = E u0 , where u E converges to u0 .
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Now, let us prove the E collectively asymptotically compactness
at = 0. We know that the nonlinear semigroup T0 (t) : U0p U0p
is compact for t > 0 (see [4, p. 198]), so that for every bounded
sequence in U0p , say {u k }kN in B0 with B0 U0p bounded, it
follows that there are a subsequence of {T0 (t)u k }kN (denoted by
the same) and some u 0 U0p such that kT0 (t)u k u 0 kU0p 0 as
k . From item (a) of Theorem 23 and [5, Remark 4.5], that
is, < 0, we obtain
kT (t)v E u 0 kUp 6 Ce t t p + kE T0 (t)M v E u 0 kUp
6 Ce t t p + kT0 (t)M v u 0 kU0p .
Thus, given the sequences k 0, tk as k and
{vk }kN in Bk a bounded subset of Upk , the compact asymptotic
E collectivity at = 0 follows from the fact of taking u k = Mk vk
along with the Proposition 0.6.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
The existence of global attractor A Up for T (), [0, 1], was
shown in [4, 5]. In general, the attractors A lie in more regular
spaces. In particular, they lie in U , [0, 1]. With this, the
condition (a) of Theorem 19 holds.
Clearly, item (b) of Theorem 19 is valid due to item (b) of
Theorem 23 (for more details see [3]).
From item (c) of Theorem 23 follows the condition (d) of
Theorem 19.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
To see the hypothesis (e) of Theorem 19 , we just have to observe
that, by Theorem 23, all of the equilibrium points
E = {u1, , . . . , un, }, for the semigroup T () in Up , are
1
hyperbolic, and by estimate kui, E ui,0 kUp 6 C p , 1 6 i 6 n,
we can see that ui, is the maximal invariant in O0 (E ui,0 ) for
0 > 0 small enough. Because in this neighborhood ui, is the only
global solution for T (), so if A is an invariant set for T () inside
O0 (E ui,0 ), it is an union of global solutions : R Up for
T () (see [4, Lemma 1.4]), therefore each one of these solutions
must be equal to ui, , consequently A = {ui, } and (e) is satisfied.
Furthermore, the conditions of the Theorem 19 are satisfied, then
the result follows.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Gracias !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Referencias bibliograficas
Aragao-Costa, E. R.; Caraballo, T.; Carvalho, A. N.; Langa, J.
A., Stability of gradient semigroups under perturbations.
Nonlinearity, v. 24, n. 7, p. 20992117, 2011.
Arrieta, J. M.; Bezerra, F. D. M.; Carvalho, A. N. Rate of
convergence of attractors for some singularly perturbed
parabolic problems. Topological Methods in Nonlinear
Analysis, Torun, v. 41, n. 2, p. 229253, 2013.
Arrieta, J.M.; Carvalho, A. N.; Lozada-Cruz, G., Dynamics in
dumbbell domains. I. Continuity of the set of equilibria.
Journal Differential Equations 231 (2006), n. 2, 551597.
Arrieta, J.M.; Carvalho, A. N.; Lozada-Cruz, G., Dynamics in
dumbbell domains. II. The limiting problem. Journal of
Differential Equations, 247 (2009), n. 1, p. 174202.
Arrieta, J.M.; Carvalho, A. N.; Lozada-Cruz, G., Dynamics in
dumbbell domains. III. Continuity of attractors. Journal of
Differential
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada;Equations,
Jose Langa; Eder 247
Aragao (2009), n. 1, p. 225259.
Babin, A.V., and Vishik, M.I., Attractors in evolutionary
equations, Studies in Mathematics ans its Applications 25,
North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1992.
BRENNER, S. C.; SCOTT, L. R. The mathematical theory
of finite element methods. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996.
Carvalho, A. N.; Langa, J. A., An extension of the concept of
gradient semigroup wich is stable under perturbations. Journal
of Differential Equations, New York, v. 246, n. 7, p.
26462668, 2009.
Carvalho, A. N.; Langa, J. A.; Robinson, J. C. Attractors for
infinite-dimensional non-autonomous dynamical systems,
Applied Mathematical Sciences 182, Springer, New York,
2013.
Carvalho, A.N., Piskarev, S., A general approximations
scheme for attractors of abstract parabolic problems,
Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 27 (2006), n. 7-8, p. 785829.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Ladyzhenskaya, O., Attractors for semigroups and
evolution equations. [Lincei Lectures] Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, 1991.
Nolasco de Carvalho, A. Analise Funcional II, Notas de aula,
ICMC-USP, Sao Carlos, 2011.
Pazy, A., Semigroups of linear operators and applications
to partial differential equations, Applied Mathematical
Sciences, Springer-Verlag, New york, 2nd edition, 1992.
Stummel, F., Diskrete Konvergenz linearer Operatoren I.
Mathematische Annalen, v. 190, 1970, p. 4592.
Vainikko, G., Approximative methods for nonlinear
equations (Two approaches to the convergence
problem). Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Melhods and
Applications. v. 2, n. 6, p. 647687.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao
Vainikko G., Multidimensional weakly singular integral
equations, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1993.
Vainikko G. Funktionalanalysis der
Diskretisierungsmethoden, Teubner-Texte zur Mathematik,
Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig, 1976.
Vainikko, G., Regular convergence of operators and
approximate solution of equations. Translated from Itogi
Nauki i Tekhniki, Seriya Matematicheskii Analiz, Vol. 16,
1979, pp. 5-53.
Wolf-Jurgen, B.; Piskarev, S., Shadowing for discrete
approximations of abstract parabolic equations. Discrete
Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 10 (2008), n. 1, pp. 19-42.
Zheng, S. Nonlinear evolution equations. Florida: Chapman
and Hall/CRC, 2004.
Rodiak Figueroa, German Lozada; Jose Langa; Eder Aragao