Compressor Foundation Design Calculations

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
265 views4 pages
This document provides calculations for designing the foundation for a re-cycle gas compressor package. It calculates the total weight and load on the foundation, dimensions of the concrete …

Uploaded by

nvnagaraju
  • Introduction
  • Detailed Calculations
  • Seismic Calculation
  • Response Spectra

Owner Computed By NVN

Plant Unit Date


Project No. File No. Verified By
Title Date
Page of

Design of Foundation for Re-Cycle Gas Compressor

Total Weight of Package 41.40 kN Drg No. 1061-VD-M5003-0008


Safety Factor on foundation design 3.00 Drg No. 1061-VD-M5003-0008

Weight to be considered for foundation design 124.20 kN


Lever arm from CG to top of Foundation 1.13 m

Density of Concrete 25.00 kN/m3

Length of Foundation 5.25 m


Width of Foundation 3.25 m
Depth of Foundation 1.50 m

Weight of foundation 639.84 kN

Seismic Base Shear Co-efficient 0.18

Allowable Bearing Pressure 50.00 kN/m2

Moment at the base of foundation

Due Equipment package 60.24 kN m


Due to Self Weight of Foundation 88.65 kN m

Total Moment 148.89 kN m

P/A 44.78 kN/m2


M/Z 16.11 kN/m2

Pmax 60.89 kN/m2 NG


Pmin 28.67 kN/m2 OK

Ratio of Foundation to Equipment Weight 5.15 OK Ratio limit 5 as per DIN 4024

Reinforcement Calculation

fy of reinforcement steel 520.00 N/m2

Minimum as per ACI 318-14 0.00145 % of Ag Table [Link]

Ast Required 2180.77 mm2/m

Dia of Bar 16.00 mm

Area 201.06 mm2

Spacing 175.00 mm

Ast Provided 2297.85 mm2 OK

Calculation of Eccentricity

Dimensions Weight Mass Coordinates of Static moment


of elements C.G. of element of mass
Element
lxi lyi lzi wi mi xi yi zi mixi miyi mizi
(m) (m) (m) (t) (t.sec2/m) (m) (m) (m) (t.sec2) (t.sec2) (t.sec2)
Equipment - - - 3.09 0.31 2.63 1.63 2.63 0.83 0.51 0.83
Motor and Commpressor - - - 1.05 0.11 1.12 1.63 2.63 0.12 0.17 0.28
Foundation 5.25 3.25 1.50 63.98 6.52 2.63 1.63 0.75 17.12 10.60 4.89

Sum 6.94 18.07 11.28 6.00

x bar 2.60173 m
y bar 1.625 m
z bar 0.86405 m

Eccentricity in x direction 0.44% Eccentricity within 5% hence OK


Eccentricity in y direction 0.00% Eccentricity within 5% hence OK
Owner Computed By
Plant Unit Date
Project No. File No. Verified By
Title Design of Foundation for Re-Cycle Gas Compressor Date
Page of

Calculation of Seismic Force on Non-Structural Components based on IBC 2012, ASCE 7-10
Reference:
INPUT:
Risk Category IV ASCE 7, Table 1.5-1 (IBC Table 1604.5)

Site Classification D ASCE 7, Table 20.3-1

SS, Mapped MCER Spectral Response 30.1 ASCE 7, Fig 22-1 (IBC Fig 1613.5(1)), or NEHRP
Acceleration at Short Periods, %g's

S1, Mapped MCER Spectral Response 11 ASCE 7, Fig 22-2 (IBC Fig 1613.5(2)), or NEHRP
Acceleration at a Period of 1 s, %g's

ap, Component Amplification Factor 2.5 ASCE 7, Table 13.5-1 (architectural) or 13.6-1 (mech & elec)

Rp, Component Response Modification Factor 2.5 ASCE 7, Table 13.5-1 (architectural) or 13.6-1 (mech & elec)

z, height of point of attachment 1.12 ASCE 7, Section 13.3.1


of component with respect to base (ft)
h, average roof height of structure 5.91 ASCE 7, Section 13.3.1
with respect to base (ft)
Ip, Component Importance Factor 1.5 ASCE 7, Section 13.1.3
(life safety or high hazard applications)

OUTPUT:
Fa, Short-period site coefficient 1.56 ASCE 7, Table 11.4-1 (IBC Table 1613.5.3(1))

Fv, Long-period site coefficient 2.36 ASCE 7, Table 11.4-2 (IBC Table 1613.5.3(2))

SMS = FaSs /100 0.469 ASCE 7, Equation 11.4-1 (IBC Eqn 16-36)

SM1=FvS1 /100 0.260 ASCE 7, Equation 11.4-2 (IBC Eqn 16-37)

SDS=(2/3)SMS 0.313 ASCE 7, Equation 11.4-3 (IBC Eqn 16-38)

SD1=(2/3)SM1 0.173 ASCE 7, Equation 11.4-4 (IBC Eqn 16-39)

Seismic Design Category, Short Period C ASCE 7, Table 11.6-1 (IBC Table 1613.5.6(1))

Seismic Design Category, 1 second Period D ASCE 7, Table 11.6-2 (IBC Table 1613.5.6(2))

FP =( 0.4apSDS WP / (Rp/Ip))(1+2z/h) 0.259 WP ASCE 7, Equation 13.3-1 <-controls

FP is not required to be taken as greater than:


FP 1.6SDSIPWP 0.751 WP ASCE 7, Equation 13.3-2

FP shall not be taken as less than:


FP > = 0.3SDSIPWP 0.141 WP ASCE 7, Equation 13.3-3

Seismic force, FP, strength design 0.259 WP


Seismic force, FP, working stress 0.185 WP

Water Proprietary and Confidential CONTROLLED when read online


Page 3 of 4
WTR-FM-EN-1822B, 5/27/2015 Printed copy is UNCONTROLLED
Owner Computed By
Plant Date
Project No. Verified By
Title Date
Page of

Response Spectra reference= ASCE 7-10


Ss= #REF!
S1= #REF!
Site Class= #REF!
Acceleation (%g)

12.000

10.000

8.000

6.000

4.000

2.000

0.000
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Period (seconds)

Water Proprietary and Confidential CONTROLLED when read online


Page 4 of 4
WTR-FM-EN-1822C, 5/27/2015 Printed copy is UNCONTROLLED

Common questions

Powered by AI

The seismic base shear coefficient of 0.18 serves as a multiplier to quantify the seismic forces acting at the base of the structure, reflecting the potential shear demands under seismic loading. In foundation design, it affects the sizing and reinforcement of the foundation to adequately resist lateral forces without failure. By appropriately applying this factor, the design can ensure stability and prevent structural failure during seismic events .

The specified concrete density of 25.00 kN/m³ influences the foundation's weight and, consequently, its load-bearing capacity. A higher density increases the foundation's self-weight, contributing more significantly to the total downward load, which can improve resistance to uplift and lateral forces. However, it also demands a careful assessment to ensure the soil's load-bearing capacity isn't exceeded. In this document, the foundation weight calculated is 639.84 kN, integrating the density to ensure adequate support while evaluating soil endurance against such loads .

Temperature-dependent spectral response is important as it accounts for variations in material properties and structural behavior under different temperature conditions during seismic events. It influences the response calculation of structures, affecting safety assessments. The document incorporates spectral responses based on ASCE 7-10, using temperature-appropriate data for accurate seismic force calculations, thus ensuring realistic design parameters and increasing reliability against potential seismic consequences .

The 'Allowable Bearing Pressure' of 50 kN/m² is critical as it defines the maximum pressure the soil can safely support without undergoing shear failure. It affects structural integrity by ensuring the foundation's load is within the soil's capacity, thus preventing excessive settlement and potential structural damage. In the document, adhering to this pressure limit helps maintain the foundation's performance and ensures the stability of the gas compressor unit .

Eccentricity calculation determines the deviation between the applied loads' center of gravity and the foundation's geometric center. Maintaining eccentricity within 5% is crucial to minimize bending moments and ensure uniform load distribution across the foundation, which prevents tilting or uneven settlement. In the document, the calculated eccentricity in the x-direction is 0.44%, well within the acceptable range, confirming that the design can handle asymmetric loading effectively .

The document calculates moments at the base of the foundation separately for equipment package (60.24 kNm) and self-weight (88.65 kNm), summing these for a total moment of 148.89 kNm. This distinction is important as it allows for precise loading scenario analysis, where different load sources can have varying impacts on the foundation behavior. It ensures the design accounts for both operational and intrinsic structural loads, enhancing the accuracy and safety of the foundation under real-world loading conditions .

Reinforcement calculations are vital for enhancing the tensile strength of the concrete foundation which is inherently weak in tension. The document specifies a required area of reinforcement steel (Ast Required: 2180.77 mm²) and provides reinforcement details like bar diameter (16 mm) and spacing (175 mm). These calculations align with ACI 318-14 standards ensuring that cracking and deformation under load are minimized. Consequently, this optimization enhances durability and performance against dynamic and static loads .

The ratio of foundation to equipment weight being 5.15 implies the foundation is substantially heavier than the equipment it supports, which promotes stability by providing a lower center of gravity and greater anchorage against overturning moments. This ratio is significant as it ensures that the foundation can effectively counteract dynamic forces such as wind or seismic activity. The calculated ratio exceeds the limit of 5 recommended by DIN 4024, indicating additional stability margin .

The 'Safety Factor' in foundation design is crucial as it accounts for uncertainties in the load estimations and material properties, ensuring the structure can support the applied loads safely. In the document, a safety factor of 3 is used, indicating that the foundation can support three times the anticipated maximum load. This conservative measure helps in accommodating unexpected loads and potential inaccuracies in material strength or load predictions, thus enhancing the foundation's reliability and longevity .

Calculating seismic forces on non-structural components involves assessing the potential impact of seismic activity on components that are not primary load-bearing elements. This process uses parameters such as the site classification, spectral accelerations, and component factors like amplification and response modification. The document applies the IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10 standards, factoring in risk category, site class, and spectral response to determine the seismic force, FP, ensuring they are designed to withstand prescribed seismic activity levels without catastrophic failure .

Owner
   Computed By
NVN
Plant
Unit
   Date
Project No.
File No.
   Verified By
Title
   Date
   Page
of
Design of Foundation
Equipment
-
-
-
3.09
0.31
2.63
1.63
2.63
0.83
0.51
0.83
Motor and Commpressor
-
-
-
1.05
0.11
1.12
1.63
2.63
0.12
0.17
0.28
F
Water Proprietary and Confidential
WTR-FM-EN-1822B, 5/27/2015
Page 3 of 4
CONTROLLED  when read online
Printed copy is UNCONT
Water Proprietary and Confidential
WTR-FM-EN-1822C, 5/27/2015
Page 4 of 4
CONTROLLED  when read online
Printed copy is UNCONT

You might also like