0% found this document useful (0 votes)
236 views22 pages

Open Hole Logging Calculations Guide

Schlumberger provides answers to example problems for open hole logging work sessions. Example problems cover topics like: 1) Calculating resistivity values at different temperatures and salt concentrations 2) Determining resistivity and salt concentration from SP curves 3) Calculating resistivity and invasion depths from example logs The document provides the questions, charts to use for calculations, and the written out answers.

Uploaded by

atharvalotlikar
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
236 views22 pages

Open Hole Logging Calculations Guide

Schlumberger provides answers to example problems for open hole logging work sessions. Example problems cover topics like: 1) Calculating resistivity values at different temperatures and salt concentrations 2) Determining resistivity and salt concentration from SP curves 3) Calculating resistivity and invasion depths from example logs The document provides the questions, charts to use for calculations, and the written out answers.

Uploaded by

atharvalotlikar
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Schlumberger

ANSWERS FOR
WORK SESSIONS

(05/96)
Introduction to Open Hole Logging

(05/96)
Schlumberger

SECTION B:

1a. Given Rmf = 2.5 Ω-m @ 10oC, find Rmf @ 52oC, using Chart Gen-9 (Figure B2).

Rmf = 1.1 ohm-m

b. What is NaCl concentration of the mud filtrate in ppm?

3000 ppm

2a. Given a solution salinity of 80 000 ppm, find the solution resistivity @ 121oC
Rm = 0.028 @121oC

b. Given a solution salinity of 10 000 ppm @ 20oC, find the solution resistivity @ 50oC
Rm = 0.36 @50oC

3. Given Rm = .74 @ 20oC, what will Rm equal at BHT if Total Depth is 2400m and the
Geothermal Gradient is 2oC/100m (Surface temperature 20oC) ?

Rm = 0.34 @ 68 o
C

BHT= 20 + (2/100 x 2400) = 68o C

(05/96) Answers 1
Introduction to Open Hole Logging

4. From this SP calculate the Rw.


SP(MV )
Formation temperature is 63oC. Rmf
-150.0 0.0
= .79 @ 20oC.
15
-|---|+
a) Rmf = 0 . 3 3 @FTGen 9 (Figure B2)

CP 32.6 FILE 1 01-APR-1941 17:28 b) SP = - 1 0 0 mV

INPUT FILE(S) CREATION DATE


1 05-JUN-1992 08:34 c) Rmfe = 0 . 2 6 @FTSP 2m (Figure B12)

1/240
d) Rwe = 0 . 0 1 8 @FTSP 1 (Figure B11)

e) Rw = 0 . 0 3 4 @FTSP 2m (Figure B12)


2150

f) Rw = 0.06 @25oCGen 9 (Figure B2)

g) Formation NaCl concentration


= 1 4 0 ppm Gen 9

Note: Use charts SP-1 and SP-2m


(Figures B11 and B12)

S S P = 6.75 Div x 15 mv/div


= -100 mv

SP---

2175

Figure B30

(05/96) Answers 2
Schlumberger

GR(GAPI)
5. Calculate Rw for the zone from 2326 to
30.000 130.00
SP(MV ) 2340 m.
-150.0 0.0 Rmf = .110 @ 20oC
15 Formation temperature = 58.9oC
-|---|+

Rw = 0 . 4 5
CP 32.6 FILE 3 01-APR-1941 18:05
@25oC
INPUT FILE(S) CREATION DATE
1 05-JUN-1992 08:38
a) R m f = 0.052 @ 58.9 @FT
1/240 b ) SP = +50 mV
c ) R mfe = 0.057 @F.T.
d ) R we = 0.21 @F.T.
e) Rw = 0.25 @F.T.
Rw = 0.45 @25 oC

3.3 div x 15/div = +49.5 mv


2325
6. Using the log examples on the next page
calculate:

a. Depth of invasion at A and B


---GR and
SP--- b. Rt-(ILD corrected) at A and B
a . Point A - 1.0 m
Point B - 1.2 m

b . Point A - 0.55 ohm-m


Point B - 9.8 ohm-m

7. Calculate Rw for the example DISFL on


page B-18.
Given: Rm = 3.05 @ 17oC
Rmf = 2.60 @ 17oC
2350 BHT = 23oC
a) R mf = 2.25 @ 23o C
b ) SP = -90 mv
c ) R mfe = 1.1
d ) R we = 0.053
e ) Rw = 0.08 @ 23o C

Figure B31

(05/96) Answers 3
Introduction to Open Hole Logging

ILM(OHMM)
RILD = 0.55
GR(GAPI)
.20000
ILD(OHMM)
2000.0
R I L M = 0.65
0.0 150.00 .20000 2000.0 R SFL = 1.4
SP(MV ) SFL(OHMM)
-150.0 0.0 .20000 2000.0 RIM
CP 32.6 FILE 8 09-JUN-1992 14:42 ______ = 1.18
INPUT FILE(S) CREATION DATE
1 09-JUN-1992 14:09
RID
1/240
RSFL
____ = 2.54
RID
di = 1 m
Rt
____
=1m
RID

therefore Rt = 0.55

NOTE: Rt
1800 A _____

RILD
cannot exceed 1.00

---GR
---SP
---ILM
---ILD
---SFL
R ILD = 10
R ILM = 12
R SFL = 17
RIM
_____ = 1.2

RID
1700
RSFL
_____ = 1.7

RID
di = 1.4 m
Rt
---SP B _____ = .95
---ILM
RID
---ILD
SFL--- R t = 9.5 ohm-m

1725

Figure B32

(05/96) Answers 4
Schlumberger

SP(MV )
8. Calculate Rw for both zones.
-80.00 20.000
Rm = 1.18 @ 25oC
Rmf = 0.93 @ 16oC
10
-|---|+ BHT = 59oC

CP 32.6 FILE 4 01-APR-1941 18:13 a. Top Zone 1685m to 1695m


INPUT FILE(S) CREATION DATE
1 05-JUN-1992 08:41 Rw = 0.12 ohm-m @ 59oC
1675
Rw = 0.22 ohm-m @ 25oC

a. Bottom Zone 1695m to 1717m

Rw = 0.082 ohm-m @ 59oC

Rw = 0.145 ohm-m @ 25oC

c. What are possible reasons for the differ-


ence?

a) SP = 4 x 10 = -40 mv l o g
R mf = 0.43 @ 59o C Gen 9 (Figure
B2)
R mfe = 0.3 ohm-m SP 2 (Figure
B12)
R we = 0.099 ohm-m SP 1 (Figure
1700 B11)
R w = 0.12 ohm-m SP 2 (Figure
B12)

b ) SP = 5.2 x 10 = -52 mv
log
R mf = 0.43 @ 59oC Gen 9
R mfe = 0.3 ohm-m SP 2
R w e = 0.068 SP 1
---SP R w = 0.082 SP 2

c ) 1. Zone not 100% clean.


2. Hydrocarbon and/or shale sup-
pression.
3. Different Rw from different sand
units.

1725

Figure B33

(05/96) Answers 5
Introduction to Open Hole Logging

(05/96) Answers 6
Schlumberger

SECTION C:

1a. Using the sonic log on page C-49 (Figure C34), calculate the sonic porosity at 586 meters.

∆tf = 620 µsec/m


∆tma = 182 µsec/m

∆t - ∆tma 400 - 182


Φs = = = 50%
∆tf - ∆tma 620 - 182

5 (∆t - ∆tma) 4 (400 - 182)


Φs = = = 34%
8 ∆t 8 (400)

b. Using Chart Por-3m (Figure C6)

Φs Wyllie Time Average = 50+


Φs Field Observation = 37.6

50% Porosity is not possible. We should use a compaction correction to the


Wyllie Time Average Equation:
ie., B c p = 4 2 0 = 1.28 Φ s = 38%
328

2. For the example logs on pages C-47 to 49 (Figures C32 to C34), calculate the following:
581m 600m
a. RILD 70 0.8

b. Rt ? 0.8

c. ∆t 372 350

d. ΦS 35 33 using field observation lines


(Raymer-Hunt) or 44 and 39
using Wyllie or 34 and 30.5
using Wyllie-compaction cor-
rected
e. ΦD 37.5 30

f. ΦN 6.0 35

(05/96) Answers 7
Introduction to Open Hole Logging

3a. On the CNT-LDT log on page C-50 (Figure C35), what effect is seen at 1941 m to 1946m?

Apparent gas effect

b. Using the Pe what is the lithology in this zone?

P e = 1.8
therefore Lithology is Sandstone

c. Convert the log readings (Φn and Φd) to equivalent sandstone values.

Φ d = 19% (SS matrix) Por 5 (Figure C14)


Φ n = 19% (SS matrix) Por 13a (Figure C21)

d. Explain the effect identified in question 3a.

The crossover effect is due to the matrix selection for the porosity calcula-
tion, and not due to the presence of gas.

(05/96) Answers 8
Schlumberger

SECTION D:

1. Using the logs on pages D-10 to 12 (Figures D3 to D5) follow through the overlay tech-
nique outlined on pages D-1 and 2.

2. Given ∆tma = 182 µsec/m tabulate the values and do an Rwa analysis of the example using
pages 10 to 12. First find Sw from Φs only and then do the calculation again using cross-
plot ΦT from the CNT/LDT log to get Sw. Compare the two results.

Depth ∆t ΦS Rt Rwa Sw ΦT Rwa Sw


_____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

605 360 34 0.90 0.104 91 33.0 0.098 89

600 350 33 0.80 0.087 100 31.0 0.077 100

595 355 33.5 0.90 0.101 93 32.0 0.092 91

592.5 3 5 5 33.5 1.00 0.112 88 31.0 0.096 90

590 372 35.2 13.0 1.610 23 33.0 1.420 23

587.5 4 0 0 37.5 17.0 2.391 19 31.0 1.630 22

585 395 37 38.0 5.202 13 25.5 2.500 18

580 375 35.5 50.0 6.301 12 24.5 3.000 16

Φ S uses Raymer-Hunt Transform on Chart POR-3m (page C-8) .


R wa from Rwa = Φ T 2 Rt for CNL-FDC.
S w from Rwa min
Rwa

R wa min is at 600 metres for both Sonic and CNL-FDC (Φ T ).

NOTE: Results for Sw are similar for both calculations in spite of different Φ
inputs.
R wa varies because:
None of the Φ (Porosity) measurements are corrected for gas effects

(05/96) Answers 9
Introduction to Open Hole Logging

3. Use Chart SW-1a (Figure D6 on page D-14) to calculate Sw for depths 1943m and 1945m.
(Rw = 0.06 @ formation temp.) (Figures D7 andD8 on ages D-15 and 16).

Depth RID ΦN ΦD Pe ΦT Ro RT Sw BVW


_____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _____

1943m 60 20 19 1.9 19.5 1.2 60 14% 273

1945m 40 18 16 2.15 17 1.6 40 19% 304

a. What can be said about the lithology from the Pe curve?

Sandstone

b. What can be said about permeability from the caliper and gamma ray?

Good permeability exhibited; especially from the caliper

(05/96) Answers 10
Schlumberger

4. Interpret the following sets of logs (Figures D9 and D10 on pages D17 and D18) using the di-
rect method of calculating water saturations in clean zones. Rmf = 2.35 @ FT (24 oC); a = 1;
m=2

ie. Sw 2 = Rw
Φ T 2 Rt

a. Zone 303m to 325m: Rw = 0.30 @ FT

SP = -50 mv
Rmf = 2.35 @ FT
Rmfe = 1.15 @ FT
Rwe = 0.20 @ FT
Rw = 0.23 @ FT

b. Zone 303m to 308m: Sw = 23 %

ΦN = 8
ΦD = 43 Sw = 0.23
ΦT = 25 (0.25) 2 x 70
Rt = 70

c. Zone 309m to 317m: Sw = 61 %

ΦN = 27
ΦD = 37 Sw = 0.23
ΦT = 32 (0.32) 2 x 6
Rt = 6

d. Zone 317m to 325m: Sw = 67 %

ΦN = 33
ΦD = 34 Sw = 0.23
ΦT = 33.5 (0.335) 2 x 4.5
Rt = 4.5

(05/96) Answers 1 1
Introduction to Open Hole Logging

(05/96) Answers 12
Schlumberger

SECTION F:

1 . Shaly Sand Problem.


Given: BHT = 24oC
Rmf = 3.08 @ 14.4oC
Rm = 2.86 @ 18.8oC
Rmf = 2.435 @ 24oC
Gel Chem Mud; WMUD = 1090 kg/m3
VISC = 585
pH = 8.5
Fluid Loss = 7.0 cc
[Link] hydrocarbon zones.
b. Rw - Calculate Rw for this interval.
c.Φe - Determine effective porosity.
d. ΦT - Determine total porosity.

0.62 Rw
[Link] - From SWT2 =
ΦT2.15 Rt

Note: When Φe has been determined, Rt must also be corrected for effect of shale to properly
calculate Swe. This will be discussed in the next chapter.

a)407 - 409.5 m and 416 - 422 metres


b ) From SP @ 407 - 409
1. R mf = 2.435 @ 24o C
2. R mfe = 1.10 @ 24o C
3. SP = -68
4. R we = 0.12 @ 24o C
5. R w = 0.125 @ 25o C

(05/96) Answers 1 3
Introduction to Open Hole Logging

From the logs:

Φ NSH = 49 Φ DSH = 18 R S H = 2.1


GR CL = 30 GR SH = 105

(c) (d)
Depth RT ΦN ΦD GR VSH Φe ΦT
_____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

Zone 1
422 - 423 2 . 3 39 25 75 40 19.0 32

Zone 2
418 - 420 5.5 31 34 75 40 20.5 34

Zone 3
407 - 409.5 7.5 21 39 40 6 29.0 32

(e)

Zone 1. SW = 62%

Zone 2. SW = 38%

Zone 3. SW = 34.6%

(05/96) Answers 14
Schlumberger

SECTION G:

1. Calculate SWE on the shaly sand example. (Figures F10 to F13).

RO = 1 1
ΦT 1-V S H
2
VSH
RWF + RWB

Need RW B
RWB = Φ T 2 RT in Shale
therefore: RWB = (0.335) 2 x 2.1
= 0.23

2 . RO = 1  1  = 1.28
(0.34) 2  1 - 0.40 0.4 
 0.12 +
0.23 
S WT = RO = 1.28 = 48%
RT 5.5

1 . RO = 1  1  = 1.45
(0.32) 2  1 - 0.40 0.4 
 0.12 +
0.23 
S WT = 1 . 4 5 = 79%
2.3

3 . RO = 1  1  = 1.21
(0.32) 2  1 - 0.06 0.06 
 0.12 +
0.23 
S WT = 1 . 2 1 = 40.1%
7.5

(05/96) Answers 1 5
Introduction to Open Hole Logging

S WE = S W T - SW B
1 - SW B

Calculate SWT from SW = RO


RT

1 . S W E = 0.48 - 0.40 = 0.133 or 13.3%


1 - 0.40

2 . S W E = 0.79 - 0.40 = 0.65 or 65%


1 - 0.40

3 . S W E = 0.401 - 0.06 = 0.36 or 36%


1 - 0.06

(05/96) Answers 16
Schlumberger

SECTION H:

1. Using the complex lithology example logs determine:

a. Lithology and Φ at 1377m.

Anhydrite - 0%

b. Lithology and Φ from 1360-1370m.

Dolomite

c. Lithology and Φ at 1342-1349m.

Limestone

d. Is there any secondary Φ in any of the zones?

N Φ S = Φ N-D

[Link] the cross plot porosities for points a and b.


a. Φ = ____0 ___%
b. Φ = ____0 ___%

b. What is the lithology in these zones?

Limestone

(05/96) Answers 1 7
Introduction to Open Hole Logging

[Link] plot Pe and DPHI for both points a and b (use chart CP-16 - Figure H15).
a. Φ =___8 . 5___%
b. Φ =____0 ___%

b. What is the lithology at points a and b?


a. _Dolomite__
b. _Limestone_

c. What effect is occurring at point a?

Gas Effect

d. Apply proper correction for point a to find correct cross plot porosity.
a. Φ =___8 . 5___%

(05/96) Answers 18
Schlumberger

SECTION I:

1. Calculate BVW for the shaly-sand example. What predictions can be made for the production
of this zone:

a. Type of fluid or gas?

b. A.O.F. production rates?

1 . From the Φ N - Φ D x Plots and Shale corrections, Zones 1 and 3 would


produce gas and Zone 2 would produce water.

2 . Total BVW S WT x Φ T

1. 0.48 x 0.34 = 0.1632


2. 0.79 x 0.32 = 0.2528
3. 0.40 x 0.32 = 0.1280

Use SW = 40% as SW I R R

Then: K 1/2 = 79 Φ T 3
SWIRR

K = 79 (0.32) 3 = 2.54
0.4

Q gas = 0.11 x 2.54 x 2 x (3337)2


___________________________________
x 103
273 + 24

= 20 951 366 m3 /day or 739 mcf/day

(05/96) Answers 1 9
Introduction to Open Hole Logging

(05/96) Answers 20

You might also like