Schlumberger
ANSWERS FOR
WORK SESSIONS
(05/96)
Introduction to Open Hole Logging
(05/96)
Schlumberger
SECTION B:
1a. Given Rmf = 2.5 Ω-m @ 10oC, find Rmf @ 52oC, using Chart Gen-9 (Figure B2).
Rmf = 1.1 ohm-m
b. What is NaCl concentration of the mud filtrate in ppm?
3000 ppm
2a. Given a solution salinity of 80 000 ppm, find the solution resistivity @ 121oC
Rm = 0.028 @121oC
b. Given a solution salinity of 10 000 ppm @ 20oC, find the solution resistivity @ 50oC
Rm = 0.36 @50oC
3. Given Rm = .74 @ 20oC, what will Rm equal at BHT if Total Depth is 2400m and the
Geothermal Gradient is 2oC/100m (Surface temperature 20oC) ?
Rm = 0.34 @ 68 o
C
BHT= 20 + (2/100 x 2400) = 68o C
(05/96) Answers 1
Introduction to Open Hole Logging
4. From this SP calculate the Rw.
SP(MV )
Formation temperature is 63oC. Rmf
-150.0 0.0
= .79 @ 20oC.
15
-|---|+
a) Rmf = 0 . 3 3 @FTGen 9 (Figure B2)
CP 32.6 FILE 1 01-APR-1941 17:28 b) SP = - 1 0 0 mV
INPUT FILE(S) CREATION DATE
1 05-JUN-1992 08:34 c) Rmfe = 0 . 2 6 @FTSP 2m (Figure B12)
1/240
d) Rwe = 0 . 0 1 8 @FTSP 1 (Figure B11)
e) Rw = 0 . 0 3 4 @FTSP 2m (Figure B12)
2150
f) Rw = 0.06 @25oCGen 9 (Figure B2)
g) Formation NaCl concentration
= 1 4 0 ppm Gen 9
Note: Use charts SP-1 and SP-2m
(Figures B11 and B12)
S S P = 6.75 Div x 15 mv/div
= -100 mv
SP---
2175
Figure B30
(05/96) Answers 2
Schlumberger
GR(GAPI)
5. Calculate Rw for the zone from 2326 to
30.000 130.00
SP(MV ) 2340 m.
-150.0 0.0 Rmf = .110 @ 20oC
15 Formation temperature = 58.9oC
-|---|+
Rw = 0 . 4 5
CP 32.6 FILE 3 01-APR-1941 18:05
@25oC
INPUT FILE(S) CREATION DATE
1 05-JUN-1992 08:38
a) R m f = 0.052 @ 58.9 @FT
1/240 b ) SP = +50 mV
c ) R mfe = 0.057 @F.T.
d ) R we = 0.21 @F.T.
e) Rw = 0.25 @F.T.
Rw = 0.45 @25 oC
3.3 div x 15/div = +49.5 mv
2325
6. Using the log examples on the next page
calculate:
a. Depth of invasion at A and B
---GR and
SP--- b. Rt-(ILD corrected) at A and B
a . Point A - 1.0 m
Point B - 1.2 m
b . Point A - 0.55 ohm-m
Point B - 9.8 ohm-m
7. Calculate Rw for the example DISFL on
page B-18.
Given: Rm = 3.05 @ 17oC
Rmf = 2.60 @ 17oC
2350 BHT = 23oC
a) R mf = 2.25 @ 23o C
b ) SP = -90 mv
c ) R mfe = 1.1
d ) R we = 0.053
e ) Rw = 0.08 @ 23o C
Figure B31
(05/96) Answers 3
Introduction to Open Hole Logging
ILM(OHMM)
RILD = 0.55
GR(GAPI)
.20000
ILD(OHMM)
2000.0
R I L M = 0.65
0.0 150.00 .20000 2000.0 R SFL = 1.4
SP(MV ) SFL(OHMM)
-150.0 0.0 .20000 2000.0 RIM
CP 32.6 FILE 8 09-JUN-1992 14:42 ______ = 1.18
INPUT FILE(S) CREATION DATE
1 09-JUN-1992 14:09
RID
1/240
RSFL
____ = 2.54
RID
di = 1 m
Rt
____
=1m
RID
therefore Rt = 0.55
NOTE: Rt
1800 A _____
RILD
cannot exceed 1.00
---GR
---SP
---ILM
---ILD
---SFL
R ILD = 10
R ILM = 12
R SFL = 17
RIM
_____ = 1.2
RID
1700
RSFL
_____ = 1.7
RID
di = 1.4 m
Rt
---SP B _____ = .95
---ILM
RID
---ILD
SFL--- R t = 9.5 ohm-m
1725
Figure B32
(05/96) Answers 4
Schlumberger
SP(MV )
8. Calculate Rw for both zones.
-80.00 20.000
Rm = 1.18 @ 25oC
Rmf = 0.93 @ 16oC
10
-|---|+ BHT = 59oC
CP 32.6 FILE 4 01-APR-1941 18:13 a. Top Zone 1685m to 1695m
INPUT FILE(S) CREATION DATE
1 05-JUN-1992 08:41 Rw = 0.12 ohm-m @ 59oC
1675
Rw = 0.22 ohm-m @ 25oC
a. Bottom Zone 1695m to 1717m
Rw = 0.082 ohm-m @ 59oC
Rw = 0.145 ohm-m @ 25oC
c. What are possible reasons for the differ-
ence?
a) SP = 4 x 10 = -40 mv l o g
R mf = 0.43 @ 59o C Gen 9 (Figure
B2)
R mfe = 0.3 ohm-m SP 2 (Figure
B12)
R we = 0.099 ohm-m SP 1 (Figure
1700 B11)
R w = 0.12 ohm-m SP 2 (Figure
B12)
b ) SP = 5.2 x 10 = -52 mv
log
R mf = 0.43 @ 59oC Gen 9
R mfe = 0.3 ohm-m SP 2
R w e = 0.068 SP 1
---SP R w = 0.082 SP 2
c ) 1. Zone not 100% clean.
2. Hydrocarbon and/or shale sup-
pression.
3. Different Rw from different sand
units.
1725
Figure B33
(05/96) Answers 5
Introduction to Open Hole Logging
(05/96) Answers 6
Schlumberger
SECTION C:
1a. Using the sonic log on page C-49 (Figure C34), calculate the sonic porosity at 586 meters.
∆tf = 620 µsec/m
∆tma = 182 µsec/m
∆t - ∆tma 400 - 182
Φs = = = 50%
∆tf - ∆tma 620 - 182
5 (∆t - ∆tma) 4 (400 - 182)
Φs = = = 34%
8 ∆t 8 (400)
b. Using Chart Por-3m (Figure C6)
Φs Wyllie Time Average = 50+
Φs Field Observation = 37.6
50% Porosity is not possible. We should use a compaction correction to the
Wyllie Time Average Equation:
ie., B c p = 4 2 0 = 1.28 Φ s = 38%
328
2. For the example logs on pages C-47 to 49 (Figures C32 to C34), calculate the following:
581m 600m
a. RILD 70 0.8
b. Rt ? 0.8
c. ∆t 372 350
d. ΦS 35 33 using field observation lines
(Raymer-Hunt) or 44 and 39
using Wyllie or 34 and 30.5
using Wyllie-compaction cor-
rected
e. ΦD 37.5 30
f. ΦN 6.0 35
(05/96) Answers 7
Introduction to Open Hole Logging
3a. On the CNT-LDT log on page C-50 (Figure C35), what effect is seen at 1941 m to 1946m?
Apparent gas effect
b. Using the Pe what is the lithology in this zone?
P e = 1.8
therefore Lithology is Sandstone
c. Convert the log readings (Φn and Φd) to equivalent sandstone values.
Φ d = 19% (SS matrix) Por 5 (Figure C14)
Φ n = 19% (SS matrix) Por 13a (Figure C21)
d. Explain the effect identified in question 3a.
The crossover effect is due to the matrix selection for the porosity calcula-
tion, and not due to the presence of gas.
(05/96) Answers 8
Schlumberger
SECTION D:
1. Using the logs on pages D-10 to 12 (Figures D3 to D5) follow through the overlay tech-
nique outlined on pages D-1 and 2.
2. Given ∆tma = 182 µsec/m tabulate the values and do an Rwa analysis of the example using
pages 10 to 12. First find Sw from Φs only and then do the calculation again using cross-
plot ΦT from the CNT/LDT log to get Sw. Compare the two results.
Depth ∆t ΦS Rt Rwa Sw ΦT Rwa Sw
_____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
605 360 34 0.90 0.104 91 33.0 0.098 89
600 350 33 0.80 0.087 100 31.0 0.077 100
595 355 33.5 0.90 0.101 93 32.0 0.092 91
592.5 3 5 5 33.5 1.00 0.112 88 31.0 0.096 90
590 372 35.2 13.0 1.610 23 33.0 1.420 23
587.5 4 0 0 37.5 17.0 2.391 19 31.0 1.630 22
585 395 37 38.0 5.202 13 25.5 2.500 18
580 375 35.5 50.0 6.301 12 24.5 3.000 16
Φ S uses Raymer-Hunt Transform on Chart POR-3m (page C-8) .
R wa from Rwa = Φ T 2 Rt for CNL-FDC.
S w from Rwa min
Rwa
R wa min is at 600 metres for both Sonic and CNL-FDC (Φ T ).
NOTE: Results for Sw are similar for both calculations in spite of different Φ
inputs.
R wa varies because:
None of the Φ (Porosity) measurements are corrected for gas effects
(05/96) Answers 9
Introduction to Open Hole Logging
3. Use Chart SW-1a (Figure D6 on page D-14) to calculate Sw for depths 1943m and 1945m.
(Rw = 0.06 @ formation temp.) (Figures D7 andD8 on ages D-15 and 16).
Depth RID ΦN ΦD Pe ΦT Ro RT Sw BVW
_____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _____
1943m 60 20 19 1.9 19.5 1.2 60 14% 273
1945m 40 18 16 2.15 17 1.6 40 19% 304
a. What can be said about the lithology from the Pe curve?
Sandstone
b. What can be said about permeability from the caliper and gamma ray?
Good permeability exhibited; especially from the caliper
(05/96) Answers 10
Schlumberger
4. Interpret the following sets of logs (Figures D9 and D10 on pages D17 and D18) using the di-
rect method of calculating water saturations in clean zones. Rmf = 2.35 @ FT (24 oC); a = 1;
m=2
ie. Sw 2 = Rw
Φ T 2 Rt
a. Zone 303m to 325m: Rw = 0.30 @ FT
SP = -50 mv
Rmf = 2.35 @ FT
Rmfe = 1.15 @ FT
Rwe = 0.20 @ FT
Rw = 0.23 @ FT
b. Zone 303m to 308m: Sw = 23 %
ΦN = 8
ΦD = 43 Sw = 0.23
ΦT = 25 (0.25) 2 x 70
Rt = 70
c. Zone 309m to 317m: Sw = 61 %
ΦN = 27
ΦD = 37 Sw = 0.23
ΦT = 32 (0.32) 2 x 6
Rt = 6
d. Zone 317m to 325m: Sw = 67 %
ΦN = 33
ΦD = 34 Sw = 0.23
ΦT = 33.5 (0.335) 2 x 4.5
Rt = 4.5
(05/96) Answers 1 1
Introduction to Open Hole Logging
(05/96) Answers 12
Schlumberger
SECTION F:
1 . Shaly Sand Problem.
Given: BHT = 24oC
Rmf = 3.08 @ 14.4oC
Rm = 2.86 @ 18.8oC
Rmf = 2.435 @ 24oC
Gel Chem Mud; WMUD = 1090 kg/m3
VISC = 585
pH = 8.5
Fluid Loss = 7.0 cc
[Link] hydrocarbon zones.
b. Rw - Calculate Rw for this interval.
c.Φe - Determine effective porosity.
d. ΦT - Determine total porosity.
0.62 Rw
[Link] - From SWT2 =
ΦT2.15 Rt
Note: When Φe has been determined, Rt must also be corrected for effect of shale to properly
calculate Swe. This will be discussed in the next chapter.
a)407 - 409.5 m and 416 - 422 metres
b ) From SP @ 407 - 409
1. R mf = 2.435 @ 24o C
2. R mfe = 1.10 @ 24o C
3. SP = -68
4. R we = 0.12 @ 24o C
5. R w = 0.125 @ 25o C
(05/96) Answers 1 3
Introduction to Open Hole Logging
From the logs:
Φ NSH = 49 Φ DSH = 18 R S H = 2.1
GR CL = 30 GR SH = 105
(c) (d)
Depth RT ΦN ΦD GR VSH Φe ΦT
_____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
Zone 1
422 - 423 2 . 3 39 25 75 40 19.0 32
Zone 2
418 - 420 5.5 31 34 75 40 20.5 34
Zone 3
407 - 409.5 7.5 21 39 40 6 29.0 32
(e)
Zone 1. SW = 62%
Zone 2. SW = 38%
Zone 3. SW = 34.6%
(05/96) Answers 14
Schlumberger
SECTION G:
1. Calculate SWE on the shaly sand example. (Figures F10 to F13).
RO = 1 1
ΦT 1-V S H
2
VSH
RWF + RWB
Need RW B
RWB = Φ T 2 RT in Shale
therefore: RWB = (0.335) 2 x 2.1
= 0.23
2 . RO = 1 1 = 1.28
(0.34) 2 1 - 0.40 0.4
0.12 +
0.23
S WT = RO = 1.28 = 48%
RT 5.5
1 . RO = 1 1 = 1.45
(0.32) 2 1 - 0.40 0.4
0.12 +
0.23
S WT = 1 . 4 5 = 79%
2.3
3 . RO = 1 1 = 1.21
(0.32) 2 1 - 0.06 0.06
0.12 +
0.23
S WT = 1 . 2 1 = 40.1%
7.5
(05/96) Answers 1 5
Introduction to Open Hole Logging
S WE = S W T - SW B
1 - SW B
Calculate SWT from SW = RO
RT
1 . S W E = 0.48 - 0.40 = 0.133 or 13.3%
1 - 0.40
2 . S W E = 0.79 - 0.40 = 0.65 or 65%
1 - 0.40
3 . S W E = 0.401 - 0.06 = 0.36 or 36%
1 - 0.06
(05/96) Answers 16
Schlumberger
SECTION H:
1. Using the complex lithology example logs determine:
a. Lithology and Φ at 1377m.
Anhydrite - 0%
b. Lithology and Φ from 1360-1370m.
Dolomite
c. Lithology and Φ at 1342-1349m.
Limestone
d. Is there any secondary Φ in any of the zones?
N Φ S = Φ N-D
[Link] the cross plot porosities for points a and b.
a. Φ = ____0 ___%
b. Φ = ____0 ___%
b. What is the lithology in these zones?
Limestone
(05/96) Answers 1 7
Introduction to Open Hole Logging
[Link] plot Pe and DPHI for both points a and b (use chart CP-16 - Figure H15).
a. Φ =___8 . 5___%
b. Φ =____0 ___%
b. What is the lithology at points a and b?
a. _Dolomite__
b. _Limestone_
c. What effect is occurring at point a?
Gas Effect
d. Apply proper correction for point a to find correct cross plot porosity.
a. Φ =___8 . 5___%
(05/96) Answers 18
Schlumberger
SECTION I:
1. Calculate BVW for the shaly-sand example. What predictions can be made for the production
of this zone:
a. Type of fluid or gas?
b. A.O.F. production rates?
1 . From the Φ N - Φ D x Plots and Shale corrections, Zones 1 and 3 would
produce gas and Zone 2 would produce water.
2 . Total BVW S WT x Φ T
1. 0.48 x 0.34 = 0.1632
2. 0.79 x 0.32 = 0.2528
3. 0.40 x 0.32 = 0.1280
Use SW = 40% as SW I R R
Then: K 1/2 = 79 Φ T 3
SWIRR
K = 79 (0.32) 3 = 2.54
0.4
Q gas = 0.11 x 2.54 x 2 x (3337)2
___________________________________
x 103
273 + 24
= 20 951 366 m3 /day or 739 mcf/day
(05/96) Answers 1 9
Introduction to Open Hole Logging
(05/96) Answers 20