Scribd
Upload
49 views3 pages

Common Marketing Research Errors

Common marketing research errors can occur throughout the six steps of the marketing research process. Some of the key errors include sampling errors, non-sampling errors like non-response bias, and response errors from the researcher, interviewer, or respondent. Specific researcher errors involve improperly defining the problem, population, or sample. Questionnaire errors also frequently occur through ambiguous language, improper question structure or measurement scales. Data analysis and reporting errors can further undermine the results if not done correctly. Avoiding many simple errors requires awareness, while limiting more complex mistakes demands a deeper understanding of the research process.

Uploaded by

Mathivanan Kuppusamy Gounder
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
49 views3 pages

Common Marketing Research Errors

Common marketing research errors can occur throughout the six steps of the marketing research process. Some of the key errors include sampling errors, non-sampling errors like non-response bias, and response errors from the researcher, interviewer, or respondent. Specific researcher errors involve improperly defining the problem, population, or sample. Questionnaire errors also frequently occur through ambiguous language, improper question structure or measurement scales. Data analysis and reporting errors can further undermine the results if not done correctly. Avoiding many simple errors requires awareness, while limiting more complex mistakes demands a deeper understanding of the research process.

Uploaded by

Mathivanan Kuppusamy Gounder
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Marketing Research Errors

Common Marketing Research Errors


Since the usability of any market research depends upon the accuracy of the results, it's critical to avoid marketing
research errors.

Even experienced marketers and market researchers easily make several common mistakes while taking the six
steps of the marketing research process. Avoiding many of the simpler marketing research errors takes only
common sense, but avoiding many of the more complex mistakes requires a much deeper level of awareness. The
more common marketing research errors are highlighted in red textbelow:

• Sampling error (1)


• Non-sampling error (2)
o Non-response error (3)
o Response error (4)
 Researcher error (5)
 Problem definition (6)
 Population definition error (7)
 Sample design error (8)
 Questionnaire error (9)
 Structure error (10)
 Language error (ambiguous, leading, assumptive, etc.) (11)
 Measurement/scale error (12)
 Data analysis error (13)
 Reporting error (14)
 Interviewer error (15)
 Questioning error (16)
 Cheating error (17)
 Population definition error (18)
 Respondent error (19)

1) Sampling error — the estimated inaccuracy of the results of a study when a population sample is used to
explain behavior of the total population.

2) Non-Sampling error — all the sources of bias or inaccuracy in a study besides sampling error. Examples: leading
by the interviewer, recording/data entry errors (see below)

3) Non-Response error — the estimated inaccuracy that results from a systematic difference between those who
do and do not respond to the measurement instrument.

4) Response errors — the estimated inaccuracy that can be introduced potentially by the researcher, the
interviewer or the respondent.

5) Researcher errors — the error that the researcher can make in survey design & execution throughout the6
Steps of the research process.
6) Problem definition — the error made during Step 1 of the research process when the researcher misinterprets,
misunderstands or does not properly define the issue/problem and related information need.

7) Population definition error — these common marketing research errors involve the difference between the actual
population relative to the issue/problem and the population as defined by the researcher. For example, estimating
that the total target population is 50,000 when it is actually 10,000.

8) Sample design error — the estimated inaccuracy between the properly defined actual target and the population
sampled. For example, mistakenly assuming an out of date telephone directory contains all current businesses, when
many new businesses will have started/move into the area and others will have closed.

9) Questionnaire error — the total of errors made when creating the survey instrument (see below).

10) Questionnaire structure error — another kind of marketing research errors occur when the structure and layout
of the survey instrument leads to inaccurate responses. For example, when aided brand recall (brand identified to the
respondent) questions are asked before unaided recall (brand not identified to the respondent) questions are asked,
you have a questionnaire design that will significantly impact unaided recall results. Another example would be asking
probing questions regarding viewpoints on potentially negative experiences before asking an overall satisfaction
question, where overall satisfaction would be incorrectly affected by the recent recall of potentially bad experiences.

11) Questionnaire language error — the error made when the researcher uses incorrect language (ambiguous,
leading, assumptive, etc) in the survey instrument so that respondents are influenced in their answers. Language
errors severely limit the validity and usefulness of those questions and are the most common error for inexperienced
marketing researchers.

12) Questionnaire measurement/scale error — the estimated inaccuracy that occurs when improper measurement
and scaling techniques are used in the survey instrument. There are far too many measurement/scale errors to list
here — the key is that for each type of question, there is a measurement/scale that is most appropriate, and
sometimes it is intuitive and sometimes not. The right type of measurement/scaling question to use will depend upon
the information being collected and the analysis that will be performed. A very common measurement error is not
controlling order bias, which occurs when a list is not randomly rotated for a given question and respondents may
exhibit a tendency to select the first few answers from a list over others.

13) Data analysis error — the error that occurs when analysis is incorrectly executed. Simple mathematical errors
are common, which is why data analysis should be checked over by more than one qualified person for quality. A
more significant data analysis error is when simple frequency reporting (straight number percentage reporting) is
executed when far greater information can be mined from the results (often inexpensively) through additional analysis
such as cross-tabulation analysis, multiple regression (driver analysis), cluster analysis, factor analysis, perceptual
mapping (multidimensional scaling), structural equation modeling tests, etc.

14) Reporting error — marketing research errors can wreck the best approach and program design combined with
the best analysis, which are only as good as the researcher’s capability to synthesize and report on the results. The
most common reporting error by far is the improper representation of the significant findings in a format conducive to
creating management understanding and buy-in of survey results. It could be something as simple as poor language
syntax to as complex as choosing the wrong results to report or not choosing the best way to graphically represent
the results. More common in the current environment is not selecting the best delivery vehicle. For example, a quality
online reporting system is much preferred when distributing results across a company that is geographically spread
out.

15) Interviewer error —when a live interviewer improperly affects responses (see below)

16) Questioning error — when the interviewer improperly leads the respondent in any way through personal bias
or any other improper delivery of questions.

17) Cheating error — when the interviewer falsifies any results.

18) Population definition error — when the interviewer does not randomly select potential respondents according
to the methodology specified.

19) Respondent error — when respondents purposefully or mistakenly give incorrect answers to survey questions.

Some marketing research errors are common, while others are more subtle. All of them are dangerous, and Polaris
helps you avoid them all.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Failing to avoid sampling and non-sampling errors in marketing research can lead to inaccurate representations of the target population, resulting in misguided business decisions. Sampling error can lead to results that do not accurately reflect the behavior of the total population due to errors in how the sample is chosen. Non-sampling errors, such as interviewer bias or data entry mistakes, can introduce further biases and inaccuracies, potentially skewing results and leading to incorrect conclusions .

Interviewer errors, such as improperly influencing responses due to personal biases, can jeopardize data quality by introducing systematic bias into the responses. To minimize these errors, training interviewers to follow an unbiased approach, monitoring interviews, and possibly automating parts of the data collection process to reduce human-induced bias are effective strategies .

Problem definition errors can severely impact the effectiveness of a marketing research study by leading researchers to focus on the wrong issues or collect irrelevant data. Misinterpreting or improperly defining the issue at the start can result in an entire study being directed down an incorrect path, ultimately wasting resources and failing to provide actionable insights to address the real problem .

Data analysis errors arise from incorrect execution of the data analysis phase, such as mathematical mistakes or using overly simplistic analysis methods like straight frequency reporting instead of deeper analysis like regression. These errors can result in misinterpretation of the data, where significant patterns or insights might be missed, leading to flawed business decisions. Employing multiple qualified analysts to review results can reduce such errors .

Language error, such as using ambiguous, leading, or assumptive terms, can influence respondents' answers and severely limiting the validity of survey responses. This can be prevented by rigorously reviewing survey questions, avoiding biased language, employing clear and neutral wording, and pre-testing the questions to check for unintended interpretations and biases .

Questionnaire structure errors, such as asking aided recall questions before unaided ones or improperly sequencing questions about negative experiences, can bias respondents' answers and affect the reliability of research results. These can be mitigated by carefully designing the questionnaire layout, ensuring that the sequence of questions avoids introducing bias, and possibly pre-testing the survey with a small group to identify and correct structural issues before full deployment .

Cross-tabulation analysis can address data analysis errors by uncovering relationships between variables that might be missed in simpler analyses. This method allows researchers to examine intersections of multiple data points, providing deeper insights and more nuanced understanding of patterns in the data. It helps in arriving at a more comprehensive view of the dataset, thereby improving the reliability of conclusions drawn from marketing research studies .

Measurement/scale errors can significantly impact data interpretation by introducing biases and inaccuracies. If improper scales are used, such as failing to control for order bias, the data can misleadingly emphasize certain responses over others. This can lead to incorrect conclusions being drawn from the data, potentially misinforming business strategies. Utilizing appropriate scaling techniques and randomizing response options can help mitigate these issues .

Respondent errors differ from other errors as they arise from the participants' side, such as incorrect or untruthful answers. These errors can be intentional or unintentional and can distort study findings. Addressing them requires designing surveys that are easy to understand, ensuring confidentiality to encourage honesty, and validating responses where possible, such as through consistency checks within the questionnaire .

Reporting errors can undermine the value of a well-conducted study by obscuring critical insights due to improper representation of findings. Errors like poor syntax, incorrect graphic representations, or choosing inappropriate results to report can fail to communicate important results to management, reducing their ability to make informed decisions. Ensuring clarity, simplicity, and appropriate delivery formats like online systems for widely distributed teams can mitigate this .

You might also like