0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views1 page

Military Justice Administration Insights

- Gen. Ansell expressed his views freely and forcibly on subjects generally. While he did not explicitly state his views on men sleeping on sentry duty facing the enemy, it is possible they discussed it abstractly, with Ansell believing sleeping sentries deserved the most severe penalty of death. - Regarding four death cases in France, Ansell's initial impression was the convictions should be sustained, but after reviewing circumstances like long duty and fatigue, his opinion was altered that the circumstances mitigated the cases. - After returning from Europe, Ansell wrote a report of his observations which was given to Gen. Crowder, and a supplemental report was also written on the boat and given to Crowder.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views1 page

Military Justice Administration Insights

- Gen. Ansell expressed his views freely and forcibly on subjects generally. While he did not explicitly state his views on men sleeping on sentry duty facing the enemy, it is possible they discussed it abstractly, with Ansell believing sleeping sentries deserved the most severe penalty of death. - Regarding four death cases in France, Ansell's initial impression was the convictions should be sustained, but after reviewing circumstances like long duty and fatigue, his opinion was altered that the circumstances mitigated the cases. - After returning from Europe, Ansell wrote a report of his observations which was given to Gen. Crowder, and a supplemental report was also written on the boat and given to Crowder.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

838 ESTABLISHMENT OF MILITARY JUSTICE .

divorced myself from the office when I found I was going to Europe . Of course ,
I talked with him, but I never read the report . I had no time nor opportunity .
Q . During the period that you were on duty in the office with Gen . Ansell
do you recall any recommendations of an important nature made by him wit h
respect to the administration of military justice which were not adopted? I
except now all recommendations pertaining to the interpretation of section 1199 ,
Revised Statutes.A . I do not recall any . Of course, in an office of the sor t
there are a great many recommendations and discussions that are hard to iso-
late. I don't recall anything particular now . There may have been.
Q . In France you have been in the office of the judge advocate of the Ameri-
can Expeditionary Forces,?A. Yes, sir .
MAY 7, 1919 .
Q . Referring to the question of the four death cases in France can you tel l
me in a general way what Gen . Ansell's views were with respect to men who
would go to sleep on post in the face of the enemy?A . I can not affirmatively
state that he ever told me what his views were, but I think it is quite pos-
sible that he may have. I base this statement upon the fact that I have hel d
to the view that where a soldier was found sleeping , on sentry duty in the
front line he should receive the most severe penalty authorized for that offense ,
which is death unless there was some very mitigating explanation of his con -
duct . I have held to this view because a sentinel in such position holds th e
lives of his comrades in his hands . Having stated my opinions I will say tha t
I do not remember of Gen. Ansell ever disagreeing from that view . His dis-
agreement on the four cases from France was upon the sufficiency of thos e
cases and not upon the principle . I can not say that Gen. Ansell ever said
anything to me about this, but it is very probable, in fact extremely probable ,
that we have discussed the abstract proposition as I have outlined above .
Q . Was Gen . Ansell in the habit of expressing his views on subjects gener-
ally, freely and forcibly?A . He was .

EXHIBIT 31 .
APRIL 29, 1919.
Referring to this matter, Mr . Earle L. Brown, who at the time was stenog-
rapher in Gen . Ansell's office, states :
" You ask me if I can recall any discussion on the four death cases in France.
I can't recall any definite discussion . I do think, though, that when thos e
cases were first discussed that Gen . Ansell, before reviewing the cases at all ,
had really expressed himself that the conviction ought to be sustained, but I
know that after he reviewed the eases and found the circumstances of them,
or rather when the circumstances showed those men had, as I recall it, bee n
exposed to so much fatigue and long duty, that on that ground his opinion wa s
altered . I can't say anything definite, but that is my impression . "
MAY 5, 1919.
Q . Do you recall that when Gen . Ansell returned from Europe he wrote a
report of his observations over there? Did you write that report for him?
A. Yes, sir .
Q . Do you know what disposition was made of the original of that report?
A . In the first place it was written coming over on the boat, and I don' t
know what became of it, but I know it was turned into Gen . Crowder, and my
understanding was that report was made, through Gen . Crowder, to the Secre-
tary of War.
Q . Do you know for certain that the original report was given to Gen .
Crowder, or is that merely a presumption?A . It is a presumption stron g
enough to satisfy me, but I can't say I saw him hand it to Gen . Crowder ; but
I think Gen . Ansell submitted it with a supplemental report of his persona l
observations, and I believe I can say with certainty that Gen . Crowder dis-
cussed that with him .
Q . Did you write that supplemental report also?A . Yes, sir .
Q . Was that written coining over on the boat or after your arrival?A . I
think it was written on the boat .

You might also like