Urbanization Challenges in India
Urbanization Challenges in India
in
URBANIZATION IN INDIA
Urbanization and economic development have a strong positive correlation which is indicated by the fact that
a country with a high per capita income is also likely to have a high degree of urbanization. The economic
advantages provided by urban areas are many. Generally, the industrial, commercial and service sectors tend
to concentrate in and around urban areas. These areas provide a larger concentration of material, labour,
infrastructure and services related inputs on the one hand and also the market in the form of consumers, on
the other. But the situation is different for India.
1
[Link]
2. Emergence of Slums
The most important problem in all cities has been housing the sudden and large scale influx of migrants from
rural areas to urban areas especially the metropolises and state capitals. Due to lack of housing, in every city
Notes
2
[Link]
almost fifty percent population lives in [Link] known as bustees (Basties) in India, favelas in Brazil,
katchi abadis in Pakistan and focos insalubres in Cuba, all have few characteristics in common:
Poor structural quality and durability of housing
Insufficient living areas (more than three people sharing a room)
Lack of secure tenure
Poor access to water
3
[Link]
3. Urban Transport
India is transiting from a developing to developed country with high pace of economic development. Urbanization
is too increasing at high pace as mega cities, cities and towns are providing better economic opportunities. Fast-
growing cities have nurtured business and industry, and have provided jobs and higher incomes to many
migrants from rural areas. Thus, it is important that cities function efficiently that their resources are used
to maximize the cities contribution to national income.
City efficiency largely depends upon the effectiveness of its transport systems, i.e., efficacy with which people
and goods are moved throughout the city. Poor transport systems hampers economic growth and development,
and the net effect may be a loss of competitiveness in both domestic as well as international markets.
Notes
4
[Link]
Thus proper development of urban transport to meet the needs of growing population is urgently needed in
country like INDIA. The public transport system helps in improving urban-rural linkage and improves access
of the rural/semi-urban population in the periphery to city centres for the purpose of labour supply without
proliferation of slums within and around cities.
The major objective of urban transport initiative is to provide efficient and affordable public transport. A
National Urban Transport Policy (NUTP) was laid down in 2006, with the objective of ensuring easy, accessible,
safe, affordable, quick, comfortable, reliable, and sustainable mobility for all. In order to provide better transport,
proposals for bus rapid transit system (BRTS) were approved.
The quality and quantity of roads had been improved by providing better signaling system, foot over bridges
for pedestrians, over bridges and flyovers to decrease travelling time, diverging heavy vehicles directly to
highways without accessibility to city roads, etc. The new concept of low floor buses has been introduced in
capital cities to control pollution as well as for improving the conditions of local government buses.
Metro rail projects as already present in Delhi/NCR has been further sanctioned for new cities as Chennai,
Bangalore, Mumbai as (monorail) to decrease the travelling time and environmental effects of vehicular emissions.
5
[Link]
The six cities, selected by Government of India (GOI) through a competitive selection process, include Pune
and Pimpri-Chinchwad (in Maharashtra), Naya Raipur (in Chhattisgarh), Jalandhar (in Punjab), Indore (in
Madhya Pradesh), and Mysore (in Karnataka).
The global environment facility (GEF) grant will finance technical assistance activities under the component
one and component two. The recipient and participating stated cities will finance other project activities
(including civil works) by utilizing Jawharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) grant and
other sources of funds (including an International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) loan
being processed under a parallel loan project for three cities: Pune, Pimpri-Chinwad, and Naya Raipur).
II. National Urban Transport Policy
The National Urban Transport Policy (NUTP) was formulated in 2006, to integrate land use and transport
planning in cities, and to bring about comprehensive improvements in urban infrastructure.
While urban transport is a State responsibility under the Constitution, there is a need to guide State-level action
plans, particularly linked to land use planning, in order for transport plans to best support the key social and
economic activities of its resident.
Key objectives:
Incorporate urban transport as an important parameter in urban planning
Bring about more equitable allocation of road space with people rather than vehicles as the main focus
Encourage greater use of public transport and non-motorized modes of transport
Under the NUTP, each city with a population of over four million will be encouraged by the central government
to start planning for a mass transit system adopting a technology that would 'best suit the city requirements
in the next 30 years'. The policy also highlights the need for linking the transport plans with the geographical
constraints of its location, increased priority to public transport, non-motorised transport, and improving parking
facilities. The policy encourages the set up of Unified Metro Transport Authorities (UMTA)s in cities with a
million-plus population.
The Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM), which is linked to the rules and regulations
under the NUTP, will invest in infrastructure projects in 63 cities in India.
III. Adoption of PPP policy
The Government of India is actively promoting the expansion of Public Private Partnership (PPP) activities
across all key infrastructure sectors including highways, ports, power and telecoms. Implementation of projects
under Public Private Partnership (PPP) has the following advantages-
a. Better quality since the concessionaire (private sector) is to maintain the road for the period of concession.
b. Early completion of the project, since the concessionaire could save interest and earn early toll (in the case
of BOT project)/additional annuity installments (in the case of Annuity project).
c. No costs overrun (price escalation).
d. The Client (Government/NHAI) does not have the burden of maintaining the highways.
e. Involving the private sector leads to greater efficiency.
Notes
6
[Link]
f. The private sector has more flexible procurement and decision-making procedures and therefore, it can
speed up implementation efforts.
Benefits:
Requires 1/5th energy per passenger km compared to road-based transport system.
Causes less noise, no air pollution and eco friendly transport system.
Occupies no road space if underground and only about 2.60 mtrs width of the road if elevated.
More reliable, comfortable and safer than road based systems.
Reduces journey time.
Notes
7
[Link]
Salient Features:
All the Metro trains are Wi-Fi enabled (the first metro in India to have this feature), so passengers can use
laptops, tablets as well as mobile internet. Passengers also have emergency voice communication with train
staff through a speaker system. Passengers are provided with a call button to communicate anything to the
driver or control center during an emergency.
Notes
8
[Link]
Metro stations will have Powerheart Automated external defibrillator (AED) to protect its commuters against
death from sudden cardiac arrest. Powerheart AED is used for emergency treatment of victims exhibiting
symptoms of sudden cardiac arrest. The installation of AEDs will be followed by a certified training for a group
of staff members of BMRC. The devices are manufactured by Opto Circuits (India) Ltd.
4. Waste Disposal
Removing garbage, cleaning drains and unclogging sewers are the main jobs of municipalities and municipal
corporations in Indian cities. In most cities, the municipal service for the collection and transportation of urban
solid wastes comprises three separate functions as follows:
sweeping, curbside and domestic waste collection from garbage bins.
Transportation by handcarts to large or road collection points, which may be open dumps.
Transportation by vehicles to the disposal sites.
The weaknesses of the existing system of solid waste management are: (i) the professional and managerial
capacities of the municipal bodies are limited and this is more pronounced in case of smaller cities; (ii) no
charges are levied for garbage collection or disposal, nor are there any incentives for reducing garbage generation
or recycling waste; (iii) no separate costing is done for this function; (iv) indiscriminate use of plastic bags and
goods; (v) recourse to modern technology is rare and; (vi) segregation of garbage at the source is not enforced.
Thus, Indian waste management system is starved of resources to tackle the increasing demands associated
with growing urbanisation. Due to budgetary constraints, inadequate equipment and poor planning, house-to-
house collection is very rare in India, particularly in certain low-income areas where waste is not collected at
all. It is estimated that upto 30-40 per cent of disposed solid wastes are left uncollected. The areas, which are
not serviced, are left with clogged sewers and litter which create serious health problems for the resident
population.
Main objective of disposal options is to ensure maximum safety to the environment which require administrative,
technical, political, social and economic support. But most urban solid waste in Indian cities and towns is landfilled
and dumped but there are various treatment options also such as:
9
[Link]
Sanitary Landfilling
Sanitary landfill is a fully engineered disposal option, which avoids harmful effects of uncontrolled dumping
by spreading, compacting and covering the wasteland that has been carefully engineered before use. Through
proper site selection, preparation and management, operators can minimize the effects of leachates (polluted
water which flows from a landfill) and gas production both in the present and in the future. This option is
suitable when the land is available at an affordable price. Human and technical resources available are to operate
and manage the site.
Composting
Composting is a biological process of decomposition carried out under controlled conditions of ventilation,
temperature, moisture and organisms in the waste themselves that convert waste into humus-like material by
acting on the organic portion of the solid waste. If carried out effectively, the final product is stable, odour-
free, does not attract flies and is a good soil conditioner. Composting is considered when biodegradable waste
is available in considerable fraction in the waste stream and there is use or market for compost. Centralised
composting plant for sector may only be undertaken if adequate skilled manpower and equipment are available,
hence at household level and small level composting practices could be effective which needs the peoples
awareness.
Incineration
Incineration is the controlled burning of waste in a purpose built facility. The process sterilizes and stabilizes
the waste. For most wastes, it will reduce its volume to less than a quarter of the original. Most of the
combustible material is converted into carbon dioxide and ash. An extensive sample programme conducted in
India reveals that most of the waste had a calorific value of just 3350 joules/g compared with 9200 joules/
g in high income countries. Incineration may be used as a disposal option, only when landfilling is not possible
and the waste composition is of high combustible (i.e., self-sustaining combustible matter which saves the
energy needed to maintain the combustion) paper or plastics. It requires an appropriate technology, infrastructure,
and skilled manpower to operate and maintain the plant. In Indian cities, Incineration is generally limited to
hospital and other biological wastes and mostly others are either landfilled or dumped.
Much research needs to be done on the disposal of various types of solid waste without causing any harm to
the environment or the people.
10
[Link]
hassle free through use of Information Technology. As far as possible all water connections should be metered,
and if necessary targeted subsidy should be provided to the poorest sections.
Drainage situation is equally bad. Around half of the households have drainage connectivity with two-third
have the open drainage and one-third has the closed [Link] of the non-existence of a drainage
system, large pools of stagnant water can be seen in city even in summer months.
Further the sanitation problem is also high due to lack of toilet facilities in slums areas. According to the
census, 47% of the households have latrine facility within premises with 36% households have water closet and
9% households have pit latrine. Thus, practice of open defecation is prevalent. Human waste is also responsible
for spreading of water born diseases like typhoid, cholera, shigellosis, amebic dysenteries, diarrhea, etc.
The practice of open defecation in India comes from a combination of factors the most prominent of them
being the traditional behavioural pattern and lack of awareness of the people about the associated health
hazards.
Thus, government has come out with Swatchch Bharat Mission which would attempt to banish open defecation
within a decade. The components of the programme are:
a) Construction of individual sanitary latrines for households below the poverty line with subsidy (80%)
where demand exists.
b) Conversion of dry latrines into low-cost sanitary latrines.
c) Construction of exclusive village sanitary complexes for women providing facilities for hand pumping,
bathing, sanitation and washing on a selective basis where there is no adequate land or space within houses
and where villagepanchayatsare willing to maintain the facilities.
d) Setting up of sanitary marts.
e) Total sanitation of villages through the construction of drains, soakage pits, solid and liquid waste disposal.
f) Intensive campaign for awareness generation and health education to create a felling of necessity need for
personal, household and environmental sanitation facilities.
Further a new technology Bio-toilets have been introduced which is suitable for any area/ application in
India. Bio-Digester Toilet is a decomposition mechanized toilet system by means of which the sludge (Human
Waste), the fecal matter is decomposed to bits in the digester tank using a specific high graded bacteria further
converting them into methane and water, discharged further to the desired surface. The Bio-digester toilet is
total maintenance-free system & does not require any sewage system. The specific high graded bacteria involved
in these bio-digester toilets carries on to further auto generation on their own because of their supreme quality.
Bio-toilet technology is based on anaerobic biodegradation of organic waste by unique microbial consortium
and works at a wide temperature range. The bacterial consortium degrades night soil at temp as low as -20
degree C and produces colorless, odorless and inflammable gas containing 50 70% methane.
This bacterial consortium has been made through acclimatization, enrichment and bio-augmentation of cold-
active bacteria collected from Antarctica and the other low temperature areas.
Salient features of bio-toilet:
a) Suitable for sub zero temperature of Himalayan Region, Glaciers, Railway coaches, Buses, Highways,
Remote areas, sea ports, Mining area, metro cities, etc.
b) Suitable for Mobile Toilet applications
Notes
11
[Link]
6. Electronic Waste
Anew type of hazardous waste has come up in recent years, namely electronic waste. E-waste consists of
all waste from electronic and electrical appliances which have reached their end- of- life period or are no
longer fit for their original intended use and are destined for recovery, recycling or disposal. It includes
computer and its accessories monitors, printers, keyboards, central processing units; typewriters, mobile
phones and chargers, remotes, compact discs, headphones, batteries, LCD/Plasma TVs, air conditioners,
refrigerators and other household appliances.
The composition of e-waste is diverse and falls under hazardous and non-hazardous categories. Broadly,
it consists of ferrous and non-ferrous metals, plastics, glass, wood and plywood, printed circuit boards,
concrete, ceramics, rubber and other items. Iron and steel constitute about 50% of the waste, followed by
plastics (21%), non-ferrous metals (13%) and other constituents. Non-ferrous metals consist of metals like
copper, aluminium and precious metals like silver, gold, platinum, palladium and so on. The presence of
elements like lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium, selenium, hexavalent chromium, and flame retardants beyond
threshold quantities make e-waste hazardous in nature. It contains over 1000 different substances, many of
which are toxic, and creates serious pollution upon disposal. Obsolete computers pose the most significant
environmental and health hazard among the e-wastes.
There are 10 States that contribute to 70 per cent of the total e-waste generated in the country, while 65 cities
generate more than 60 per cent of the total e-waste in India. Among the 10 largest e-waste generating States,
Maharashtra ranks first followed by Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Delhi,
Karnataka, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Punjab. Among the top ten cities generating e-waste, Mumbai
ranks first followed by Delhi, Bengaluru, Chennai, Kolkata, Ahmedabad, Hyderabad, Pune, Surat and Nagpur.
The main sources of electronic waste in India are the government, public and private (industrial) sectors,
which account for almost 70 per cent of total waste generation. The contribution of individual households
is relatively small at about 15 per cent; the rest being contributed by manufacturers. Though individual
households are not large contributors to waste generated by computers, they consume large quantities of
consumer durables and are, therefore, potential creators of waste.
12
[Link]
7. Urban Poverty
Urban poverty is a major challenge before the urban managers and administrators of the present time. Though
the anti-poverty strategy comprising of a wide range of poverty alleviation and employment generating
programmes has been implemented but results show that the situation is grim. Importantly, poverty in urban
India gets exacerbated by substantial rate of population growth, high rate of migration from the rural areas and
mushrooming of slum pockets. Migration alone accounts for about 40 per cent of the growth in urban
population, converting the rural poverty into urban one.
Moreover, poverty has become synonymous with slums. The relationship is bilateral i.e. slums also breed
poverty. This vicious circle never ends. Most of the worlds poor reside in India and majority of the poor live
in rural areas and about one-fourth urban population in India lives below poverty line. If we count those who
are deprived of safe drinking water, adequate clothing, or shelter, the number is considerably higher.
Further, the vulnerable groups such as Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, minorities, pavement dwellers etc.,
are living in acute poverty. Housing conditions in large cities and towns are depicting sub human lives of slum
dwellers. With the reconstruction of poverty alleviation programmes in urban India, it is expected that social
and economic benefits will percolate to the population below the poverty line. However, eradication of poverty
and improving the quality of life of the poor, remains one of the daunting tasks.
Notes
13
[Link]
Alleviation of urban poverty necessarily calls for identification of the urban poor to be able to chalk out an
appropriate strategy. Thus with the objective of putting in place a uniform criterion to identify the BPL
households in urban areas so that objectivity and transparency is ensured in delivery of benefits to the target
groups, the Planning Commission constituted an Expert Group under the Chairmanship of Professor S.R.
Hashim.
The Expert Group decided that poverty in Urban areas could be best captured by identifying three categories
of vulnerabilities, i.e., residential vulnerability, occupational vulnerability and social vulnerability that the urban
poor is subjected to. It was agreed to evolve a methodology to identify urban poor based on the various
dimensions of these three areas of vulnerabilities to be qualified by a number of indicators which would also
give an idea of the depth/intensity of the vulnerability.
Based on the above broad approach, the Expert Group recommends a three stage identification process (i)
Automatic Exclusion ; (ii) Automatic Inclusion ; and (iii) Scoring Index.
Stage 1: Automatic Exclusion
If the number of dwelling rooms exclusively in possession of the household is 4 and above, that household
will be excluded. Secondly, the household possessing any one of the assets, i.e., 4 wheeler motorized vehicle,
AC Set and computer or laptop with internet will also be excluded. Besides the households possessing any
three of the following four assets, i.e., refrigerator, telephone (landline), washing machine, two wheeler motorized
vehicle will also be excluded.
Stage 2: Automatic Inclusion
Households facing various kinds of deprivations and vulnerabilities, viz., residential, social and occupational
vulnerabilities would be automatically included in the BPL List.
a) Under residential vulnerability,if the household is houseless or the household has a house with roof and
wall made of plastic/polythene or the household having only one room or less with the material of wall
being grass, thatch, bamboo, mud, un-burnt brick or wood and the material of roof being grass, thatch,
bamboo, wood or mud, then that will be automatically included.
b) Under occupational vulnerability, the household having no income from any source; any household
member (including children) engaged in a vulnerable occupation like beggar/rag picker, domestic worker
(who are actually paid wages) and sweeper/sanitation worker/mali); and all earning adult members in a
household are daily wagers or irregular wagers, then that household should be automatically included.
c) Under social vulnerability, if there is no member of the household aged 18 years and above (Child-headed
household) or there is no able-bodied person aged between 18 and 60 years in the household or all earning
adult members in a household are either disabled, chronically ill or aged more than 65 years, then that
household should be automatically included.
14
[Link]
15
[Link]
iii. Establishment of linkages between asset-creation and asset-management through a slew of reforms for
long-term project sustainability;
iv. Ensuring adequate funds to meet the deficiencies in urban infrastructural services;
v. Planned development of identified cities including peri-urban areas, outgrowths and urban corridors leading
to dispersed urbanisation;
vi. Scale-up delivery of civic amenities and provision of utilities with emphasis on universal access to the
urban poor;
vii. Special focus on urban renewal programme for the old city areas to reduce congestion; and
viii. Provision of basic services to the urban poor including security of tenure at affordable prices, improved
housing, water supply and sanitation, and ensuring delivery of other existing universal services of the
government for education, health and social security.
16
[Link]
in over 250 ancillary industries such as cement, steel, paint, brick, building materials, consumer durables and
so on.
But the most important obstacle to sustainable growth of cities is the total lack of regulation of this sector,
nowadays it is laced with black money, corruption, red tapism and land mafias and corruption. It is also
recognised that existing laws on land registry, transfer of property, contracts and related matters are themselves
inadequate in this context and are implemented by different authorities and they cast no responsibility (or
liability) on the builder/developer for observing certain core norms in the contracts with home-buyers. In recent
years, considerable progress has been made in setting up empowered regulatory bodies for the financial sector
for investments in corporates, companies and mutual funds.
The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill, 2013 has been introduced to curb the issues related to
unsustainable ubran real estate sector. It aims to provide a uniform regulatory environment in the real estate
sector which is laced with black money, corruption, red tapism, land mafias and corruption. The core objective
of this Bill are twofold, i.e., to ensure sale of immovable properties in an efficient and transparent manner and
to protect the interest of consumers in the real estate sector.
17
[Link]
specifying their functions, powers, and responsibilities to exercise oversight of real estate transactions. The
Bill shall also appoint adjudicating officers to settle disputes between parties, and to impose penalty and
interest.
Penalties
Any promoter who fails to register in accordance with the provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and
Development) Bill, 2013 shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three
years, or a penalty which may extend to ten per cent of the estimated cost of the real estate project, or
with both.
If any promoter contravenes any other provisions of this bill, other than that provided above, or the Rules
or Regulations made, he shall be liable to a penalty which may extend to five percent of the estimated
cost of the real estate project.
Any promoter who willfully fails to comply with orders of the Authority shall be liable to a minimum
penalty of one lakh rupees for every day during which such default continues, which may extend to five
percent of the estimated cost of the real estate project.
Notes
18
[Link]
Any promoter who willfully fails to comply with the orders of Appellate Tribunal shall be punishable with
imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with a penalty which may extend to ten percent
of the estimated cost of the real estate project, or with both.
# The Bill is pending right now.
Inclusive Cities
The poor and lower income groups must be brought into the mainstream in cities. Regulations intended to
manage densities and discourage migration both limit the supply of landand require many households to
consume more land than they would choose. This drives urban sprawl and pushes up the price of land and
the cost of service delivery for all. High standards for parking, coverage limits, setbacks, elevators, road widths,
reservations for health centers schools, etc.(often not used) prevent the poor from choosing how much to
consume of the costliest resource (urban land) to put a roof over their heads, and comply with legal requirements.
Informality is now the only path to affordable housing for the bulk of the population in Indias cities. But
informality implies illegality and therefore vulnerability. While lower income groups pay dearly for shelter and
servicesthey are bereft of normal property rights protections and their investments are thus far riskier than
those of the well off. They must instead depend on the good will of bureaucrats and politiciansto safeguard
their homes and places of business. These barriers to healthy urbanization come not only at a high human cost,
but take a toll on productivity. Chronic informality discourages the very investments in education, health and
housing improvements; the lower classes need to improve their own lot and contribute more to the national
economy.
Local Governance
Meaningful reforms have to happen that enable true devolution of power and responsibilities from the states
to the local and metropolitan bodies according to the 74th Amendment. This is because by 2030, Indias
largest cities will be bigger than many countries today. Indias urban governance of cities needs an over-haul.
Indias current urban governance is in sharp contrast to large cities elsewhere that have empowered mayors with
long tenures and clear accountability for the citys performance. India also needs to clearly define the relative
roles of its metropolitan and municipal structures for its 20 largest metropolitan areas. With cities growing
beyond municipal boundaries, having fully formed metropolitan authorities with clearly defined roles will be
essential for the successful management of large cities in India.
Local Body Financing
Devolution has to be supported by more reforms in urban financing that will reduce cities dependence on the
Centre and the states and unleash internal revenue sources. Consistent with most international examples, there
are several sources of funding that Indian cities could tap into, to a far greater extent than today: Monetizing
land assets; higher collection of property taxes, user charges that reflect costs; debt and public-private partnerships
(PPPs); and central/state government funding. However, internal funding alone will not be enough, even in
large cities. A portion has to come from the central and state governments. Here one can use central schemes
such as JNNURM and Rajiv Awas Yojana but eventually India needs to move towards a systematic formula
rather than ad-hoc grants. For large cities with deep economies, this might mean allowing them to retain 20
Notes
19
[Link]
percent of goods and services tax (GST) revenues. This is consistent with the 13th Central Finance Commissions
assessment that GSTa consumption-based tax that creates local incentives for growth and that is therefore
well suited for direct allocation to the third tier of government. For smaller cities, however, a better option
would be to give guaranteed annual grants.
Urban Planning
India needs to make urban planning a central, respected function, investing in skilled people, rigorous fact base
and innovative urban form. This can be done through a cascaded planning structure in which large cities have
40-year and 20-year plans at the metropolitan level that are binding on municipal development plans. Central
to planning in any city is the optimal allocation of space, especially land use and Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
planning. Both should focus on linking public transportation with zoning for affordable houses for low-income
groups. These plans need to be detailed, comprehensive, and enforceable.
20