0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 7 views5 pagesPileIntegrityTestingAndAnalysis PDF
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Application of Stress: Wave Theory fo Pils, F B J Barends ject) © 1922 Raskema, Rotterdam, ISBN 90 54100826
Pile integrity testing and analysis
ERausche
Goble Rausche Likins and Associates, Inc.. Cleveland, Ohio, USA
[Link]
Pile Dynamics, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Shen Ren Kung
Nanjing Hydraulic Research Instinne, People's Republic of China
ABSTRACT: The methods of installation of drifled shafts give rise to concern among engincers regarding the structural
Integrity of the shafts, ‘This hay led to a celuctance to use these foundations by some engineers. Alternatively, many
engineers ate willing to accept these foundations provided that adequate inspection and integrity veritication testing are
Petfovmed.
Low strain integrity testing has seen substantial improvement in recent years. THe testing cost has been substan
reduced and, as a result, the methods are now widely employed. However, the results of these tests must also be
accurately evaluated. The evaluation may be a simple visual inspection of the data by an experienced engineer. Recent
Provements in analysis capabilities now offer less intuitive interpretations at a reasonable cost. These new automated
procedures ate superior to the visual techniques of the past beth from the standpoint of operator requited know-how and
‘user confidence fa results
iy
1 INTRODUCTION [Link]
Pile Integrity Testing (P.1°T.), a low strain method for ‘Three devices are needed to perform a low strain integrity
integrity testing of driven piles and drilled shafts, uses a test: the hammer (with or without force sensor), the seasor
variety of techbiques for the interpretation of force and and the processor (Figure 1). The primary difference
velocity records taken under the impact of a light hammer between various interpretation methods fies in the pro-
blow (Rauscie, Shen, Likins 1991). In its most basic form, gramming of the processor, The hammers and sensors ate,
the input pulse signals are inspected directly in the time ‘with slight exceptions, very similar for transient dynamic
domain for reflections or echoes and hence are feferred to response and sonic pulse echo methods.
as the "Sonic Pulse Echo Method", ‘The interpretatea of
the pile top velocity traces is further enkanced by an ampli-
fication which increases exponentially in time (Paquet
1968). This concept became practical with the develop.
ment of digital data processing
2.1 The hammer
Depending on the pile size to be tested, the hammer mass
should be between .5 and $ kg. Smaller hammers have
shorter rise times and higher frequency content, while
larger hammers apply greater energies to the pile top. To
‘The advent of fast spectral analyzers made possible the
development of the frequency domain Non Destructive
‘Testing (NDT) methods generally applied to structaral
concrete. NDT was then applied to iow strain pile testing,
resulting in the “Transient Dynamic Response Method”
which displays the records in the frequency domain in a so-
called mobility plot. hoTION sensOn
PROCESSOR WITH DISPLAY
Puorren
| =] FR
Interpretations in frequency andlor time domain are
selected either according to individual preference or locally
developed practice, Generally, civil engineers feel more
‘comfortable in the time domain, particularly if they have NONANSTRUMENTED On
been working with nigh strain Case Method testing. How- InsTmUMERTED HANMER,
ever, the experienced P1-T. engineer should take advantage
of all interpretation tools. This paper discusses various
analysis methods applicable to a low strain test. It also
‘compares the results obtained with different hammers and
sensors
nal low-pass filter feequency. Conversion of continuous
analog signals to discrete, digital representation requires &
low-pass filter limit of at most one half of the sampling
frequency. In [Link]. the usual digitizing frequency is ap
proximately 30 kHiz and hardware low pass frequeccy
response limits 10 kHiz. Additional user controlled digital
low pass filtering is sometimes necessary when unwanted
high frequency components mask the iinportant low fre-
quency signal
High-pass filtering removes low frequency components
such as a constaat shift oa slow drift. Velocity records
derived from acceleration records have been unjustly
blamed for an erratic low frequency behavior which then
yield useless dynamic stiffness (see mobility calculations
below). While accelerometers are dynamic instruments
whose signals slowiy drift towards zero, the average Velocity
{actually the zero frequency component) is always set to
zeto. This means that the displacement calculated from
the velocity is also zero at the end of the record, surely a
reasonable assumption considering the low impact energy.
However, removing or reducing other low frequency com
ponents, as suggested by Paquet (1968) and demonstrated
below, may distor: records and would be tolerable only if
‘exactly the same filtering is always applied. Clearly, the
caloulated stiffness values then only have relative vate.
However, such a relazive effect can also be casily evaluated
by merely comparing force and velocity atthe time of
impact,
615
3.2 Amptiication
Before the signals are converted to digital form, they are
usually amplified by the analog signal conditioning to take
advantage of the full digitizing range (e.g. 5 volts). This
assures that smal signal changes are optimally resolved by
the digital record. However, a high resolution analog-to-
digital converter, such as the 16 bit A/D of the [Link]. Col
lector, makes this less critical. The input wave returns at
2AJe after being reflected by the pile toc. Atcourse, sine
the wave then fas traveled the longest distance, iis magi
tude is usually strongly reduced by either internal (com:
‘rete) or external (soil) damping. Reflections from defects
are also reduced by these damping effects: defects which
are at deeper depths are therefore more ditficutt to detect
‘A effect of uniform friction om detecting defects or the toe
can be minimized by using an amplification which increases
‘exponentially in tiie until time 2c. By applying this
increasing amplification, exiceme weak signals from deeper
locations are more easily detected. However. in gener:
fiction effects are not uniformly distributed and therefore
the beginning of the amplification should be delayed until
the time when the major friction effects begin. An exan
ple is given in Figure 5.a and Sb. In this calculated exam:
ple (pile length 20 m and high side damping of 5 times pile
impedance) the pile toe response was practically invisible at
time 2L/¢ but was clearly apparent after 25X amplificatios
The amplification started at 4 m with unit intensity and
then increased exponentially as indicated below Figure 5.b.
3.3 Fourier transform and mobility
Fourier transformation of pile top velocity and force versus
time signals leads to the corresponding velaciey and farce
spectra. Dividing the velocity spectrum by the force spec
“9,
VELOcHY - re
pba ete
Bireanennths
il gether Manali,
eee a
oO
WI Nh ch AD Ne
PN Ne paps
aN
Fig. 5 (A) Unamplitied and (5) ampiiffed velocity time
records caleulated for a 4 m pulse. Velocity spectra are
respectively shown in (C) and (D).