Scribd
Upload
6 views2 pages

Kimpul vs Wheat Flour in Sweet Bread

The document presents the results of a study that investigated substituting kimpul flour for wheat flour in sweet bread at different ratios and evaluating the effects on physical, chemical, and sensory characteristics. The study found that substituting kimpul flour for 5% of wheat flour (L2) produced sweet bread with the best moisture, ash, fat, and dough properties as well as the highest sensory scores for texture, taste, color, and overall acceptance.

Uploaded by

bima03
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views2 pages

Kimpul vs Wheat Flour in Sweet Bread

The document presents the results of a study that investigated substituting kimpul flour for wheat flour in sweet bread at different ratios and evaluating the effects on physical, chemical, and sensory characteristics. The study found that substituting kimpul flour for 5% of wheat flour (L2) produced sweet bread with the best moisture, ash, fat, and dough properties as well as the highest sensory scores for texture, taste, color, and overall acceptance.

Uploaded by

bima03
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

ABSTRACT

THE SUBSTITUTION OF KIMPUL FLOUR (Xanthosoma sagittifolium)


AND WHEAT FLOUR AGAINST TO THE PHYSICAL CHEMICAL
CHARACTERISTIC AND SENSORY SWEET BREAD

By

BIRGITTA OKTAVIA SUPARYONO

The aim of the research was to obtained a difference between substitution of

kimpul flour and wheat flour of chemical characteristic, dough improvement and

sensory characteristics and to obtained a substitution of kimpul flour and wheat

flour to got the best chemical characteristic, dough improvement, and sensory

characteristic of sweet bread. The experiment was arranged in a Complete

Randomized Block Design (CRBD) non factorial with five repetitions. The

treatments had 5 levels comparison of kimpul flour and wheat flour (L), that were

L1 (0%:100%); L2 (5%:95%); L3 (10%:90%); L4 (15%:85%); L5 (20%:80%).

The data were analyzed using Barlett test to find homogenity, furthermore the

Tuckey test was used to test the additivity, then the data were further analyzed

with Least Significant Difference (LCD) test at 5% level. The research results

showed that L2 was the best formulation to produce sweet bread with the moisture

content of 21,20 %, ash content of 1.42 %, fat content of 12,48 %, and dough

improvment 1,37, NaCl content of 1.05 %, sucrose content of 7.6 %, with a score
texture of 3,47 (somewhat soft), a score taste and flavor of 2,62 (somewhat typical

kimpul) , the score color 4,18 (yellow), and the overall acceptance of 3,61 (like).

Keywords:kimpul flour, sweet bread, physic, chemical and sensory


characteristics

You might also like