Summery Points
We are mentioning herewith the points which were declared as mistake as per
drawings forwarded to us for construction.
In the admin office building, there is aluminum window of 8M in the front
elevation of the building, on the other hand, partitioning walls are attaching to
this window. We are unable to understand how these partitioning walls will be
having attachment to the window.
In the admin office building, PCL has given brickwork of 900MM above the stair
landing and above the 900MM there is window of 1500MM height, now
keeping in mind the total height of the floor, we have to break the already
constructed 1st floor slab and peripheral beam. Same is the case with second floor
too. Now PCL should clarify what kind of design they are providing us.
Backside stair structure in main plant building was not declared neither by
PCL nor by IZHAR, later on we sent an email to IZHAR for the clearance of the
same and then IZHAR reacted to contact PCL for the same and then PCL too the
matter seriously. Now we are still waiting for the drawings of the same.
While carrying out the work on recycling pool, it was pointed out by us that it is
overlapping with the adjacent pile cap. The matter has to be cleared by PCL but
we pointed out the mismatch.
In the main plant building, brick work detail was not available in the drawing
provided by PCL, later on, on telephonic discussion with Mr. Farhan, PCL provided
brick details but upon studying the same detail was not satisfactory and again
matter was discussed with PCL and gravel filling added under brickwork upon our
advice.
Layout plan was furnished to us but it was without coordinates. We were not
in a position to locate the structure on ground. It was again pointed out to PCL for
the clearance of the same. They furnished the coordinates upon our insistence.
The four columns of washing area which were coming in the main plant
building, the detail of these columns was missing in the drawings provided by PCL,
we contacted PCL for detail of said columns but they were unable to understand
that we are requiring which detail. We clarified the matter to PCL on telephone
and then they sent the same.
In structural drawings, 3 septic tanks were of the same size but when we
consulted layout drawings, they were of different size there. We pointed this
mismatch to PCL for rectification. After rectification in layout drawings, when we
started physical layout of the same manholes, it were overlapping with the
adjacent pile caps.
In the admin office building, PCL didnt provide Lintel Beam drawings related to
doors and windows. Upon our emails they provided us drawings of the lintel
beams upto 16feet span whereas the width of the span is 25feet, we again asked
them to provide us relevant drawings. Now as per current drawings provided by
them, they are asking us to stay the lintel beams on the columns but they didnt
instructed us the leave the dowel while constructing the columns. Now how can
we stay lintel beams on the columns?
One thing further to be pointed out is that whenever PCL sent us revised
drawings, the revision was not properly marked on the drawing and we
were unable to understand to follow which of the drawing. This was the question
mark for us to work on which particular drawing.
We did pile works for pressure filter foundation as per issued drawings by
PCL, later on they intimated that the location of pressure filter foundation is
somewhere different as compared to earlier drawing. Result of shifting came in
the shape of loss of 15 piles. We have to incur the cost of these lost piles