Data Collection and Methods
In order to identify if changing a persons perspective could reduce their racial bias, a
quasi-experiment was conducted. Eleven Long Reach High School faculty members voluntarily
partook in this experiment from April 7-21, 2017. All participants were White with nine being
females and two being males. The ages of participants varied between 20-60 years old. Three
participants fell in the age range of 20-30 years old, three participants fell in the age range of
31-40 years old, one participant fell in the age range of 41-50 years old, and four participants fell
in the age range of 51-60 years old.
The experiment was divided into several sections that participants could navigate through
on their own. In the first section, participants answered demographic questions regarding their
gender, age, and race. Next, participants were directed to the Harvard Implicit Association Test
(IAT) and were given specific instructions on which test to take (Race IAT). After completing
this test, participants self-reported their determined bias. A video meant to alter participants
perspective was shown to participants based on their IAT results. Once participants had finished
the video, they were again directed to take a Race IAT. After participants had completed this
post-test, they self-reported their new IAT results. To conclude, participants were asked to
answer a few additional questions about the accuracy of the IAT and the effect of the video.
Overall, the experiment took about 20-30 minutes to complete. During this time, the researcher
was not present, so all results were anonymous. Before beginning the experiment, all participants
filled out a human-consent form.
The researcher elected to do a quasi-experiment because of the specificity of her topic.
Little research has been done in this domain, so more data was needed to prove the correlation
between altering perspective and reducing bias. In addition, since race is a sensitive topic, the
researcher felt something that could be completed anonymously would be best. The questions the
researcher selected to use in her experiment were chosen to support and further explain the IAT
results. Ultimately, the researcher was looking to see how post-IAT results differed from
pre-IAT results and analyze why this change did or did not occur.