CHAPTER IV

Sample

There are thirty senior high students who have participated in this research. There are 18

girls and 12 boys, particularly. All of the students undergone a two type of exam. One is traditional

way exam: paper and pen, while the second one there is a technology-integrated with the exam.

And these are the results that would help our research questions be answered.

Data Analysis and Coding

Respondents Traditional Online

X1 11 11
X2 9 10
X3 5 9
X4 11 11
X5 11 11
X6 5 11
X7 3 7
X8 6 7
X9 9 9
X10 4 8
X11 4 7
X12 5 6
X13 8 9
X14 8 8
X15 11 11
X16 6 8
X17 7 8
X18 5 7
X19 9 10
X20 7 10
X21 11 10
X22 8 11
X23 8 9
X24 3 8
X25 0 8
X26 5 7
X27 11 11
X28 4 10
X29 5 11
X30 3 11
 202 274
Table 1. Scores of students in traditional and online-integrated exams

Male Scores

X1 7

X2 8

X3 7

X4 6

X5 9

X6 8

X7 7

X8 10

X9 8

X10 8

X11 7

X12 11

96

Table 2. Scores of male senior high students in technology-integrated exam

 Female Online

Y1 11

Y2 10

Y3 9

Y4 11

Y5 11

Y6 11

Y7 7

Y8 9

Y9 8

Y10 11

Y11 8

Y12 10

Y13 10

Y14 11

Y15 9

Y16 11

Y17 10

Y18 11

178

Table 3. Scores of female senior high students in technology-integrated exam

Research question one (RQ1):

To test the effectiveness of technology-integrated in students learning, 30 students were

given two tests, one on traditional way exam and the other is technology-integrated exam. The

following difference in the number of effectiveness of technology-integrated exam was observed:

Respondents Increase in scores

X1 0
X2 1
X3 4
X4 0
X5 0
X6 6
X7 4
X8 1
X9 0
X10 4
X11 3
X12 1
X13 1
X14 0
X15 0
X16 2
X17 1
X18 2
X19 1
X20 3
X21 -1
X22 3
X23 1
X24 5
X25 8
X26 2
X27 0
X28 6
 X29 6
X30 8
72
Table 4. Increase in scores of students on technology-integrated exam from the traditional exam

Do the data indicate the modification in technology-integrated exam increases the performance of

the 30 senior high students?

Solution:

Null hypothesis one:

1=2
H0 : i.e. the modification in technology-integrated exam does not increase the

performance of students.

Alternative hypothesis one:

1=2
H1 : (left-tailed test)

Level of significance: Let = 0.05

Computation:

Respondents d d2
X1 0 0
X2 1 1
X3 4 16
X4 0 0
X5 0 0
X6 6 36
X7 4 16
X8 1 1
X9 0 0
X10 4 16
X11 3 9
X12 1 1
X13 1 1
X14 0 0
X15 0 0
X16 2 4
X17 1 1
X18 2 4
X19 1 1
X20 3 9
 X21 -1 1
X22 3 9
X23 1 1
X24 5 25
X25 8 64
X26 2 4
X27 0 0
X28 6 36
X29 6 36
X30 8 64
d= 72 =356
d

d
d=
72
=2.4
n 30

[ ]
2
1 2 ( d )
S= d
n1 n

1
29 [
356
( 72 )2
30 ] = 6.317241379

2.513412298 2.513

Calculation of Statistic:
Under H0 the test statistic is

t 0=| |
d . n 2.4 x 5.48
S
=
2.513
=5.234

Expected Value: t e= | |
d. n
S follows t- distribution with 30 1 = 29 d.f

= 1.699

Inference:
 When t0 > te the null hypothesis is rejected. The data indicates that the modification in

technology-integrated exam increase the performance of the 30 senior high students.

Research Question two (RQ2):

A group of 12 male senior high students took a technology-integrated examination and

scored 7, 8, 7, 6, 9, 8, 7, 10, 8, 8, 7, and 11 points. Second group is composed of 18 female senior

high students who also took a technology-integrated examination with the same questions with male

students, and scored 11, 10, 9, 11, 11, 11, 7, 9, 8, 11, 8, 10, 10, 11, 9, 11, 10, and 11 points. Do you

agree with the claim that the female senior high students who took technology-integrated exam

increase their performance significantly?

Solution:

Let the male and female senior high students who took the technology-integrated

examination be denoted by variables X and Y respectively.

Null Hypothesis:

1=2
H0 :

i.e. There is no significant difference between the male and female senior high students as regards

to their performance on technology-integrated exam.

Alternative Hypothesis:

1 < 2
H1 : (left-tail) i.e female senior high students increase their performance on technology-

integrated exam significantly.

Level of Significance: Let =0

Computation of sample mean and [Link]

Male senior high students

X xx ( x=8 ) ( xx )2
7 -1 1
8 0 0
7 -1 1
6 -2 4
9 1 1
8 0 0
7 -1 1
10 2 4
8 0 0
8 0 0
7 -1 1
11 3 9
96 0 22

x=
x = 96 =8
n1 12

Female senior high students

Y y y ( y=9.89 ) ( y y )2
11 1.11 1.2321
10 0.11 0.0121
9 -0.89 0.7921
11 1.11 1.2321
11 1.11 1.2321
11 1.11 1.2321
7 -2.89 8.3521
9 -0.89 0.7921
8 -1.89 3.5721
11 1.11 1.2321
8 -1.89 2.5721
10 0.11 0.0121
10 0.11 0.0121
11 1.11 1.2321
9 -0.89 0.7921
11 1.11 1.2321
10 0.11 0.0121
 11 1.11 1.2321
178 1.09 26.7778

y=
y = 178 =9.888888889 9.89
n2 18

1
S 2=
n1 +n22
[ ( xx )2 + ( y y )2 ]

1
= [ 22+ 26.7778 ] =1.742064286 1.742
28

Calculation of Statistic:

Under H0 the test statistic is

| ( )|
x y
t 0=
1 1
S2 +
n 1 n2

| |
89.89

1.742 ( 121 + 181 )
1.89

1.742 x
5
36

1.89
=3.842412417 3.842
0.50

Expected Value:

| ( )|
x y
t e=
1 1 follows t-distribution with (12+18-2) = 28 d.f
S2 +
n1 n 2
 1.701

Inference:

Since t0 > te the null hypothesis is rejected. Hence, we conclude that the 18 female senior

high students increase their performance in technology-integrated exam significantly rather than the

male senior high students.

Summary

In this chapter, we computed the data that the researchers have gathered from the tests that

they did in the research methodology. The results will serve as evidences to the inferences that the

researchers have come up with. The researchers did a computation based on the formula that is

applicable to the information that have gathered by the use of examinations that will measure the

performance of the 30 sample senior high students.

In the next chapter, research questions will be answered. The researchers will discuss their

conclusions and recommendations based on the results they have come up with from their

computation and analysis of the problem.