0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views11 pages

Poisson Model Goodness-of-Fit Analysis

This document summarizes the results of a statistical analysis examining the relationship between favorability, sex, race and cell phone usage. It found significant relationships between these factors, with certain groups having higher or lower than expected cell phone usage based on their favorability, sex and race. Parameter estimates provided more details on the direction and strength of these relationships between the various groups.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views11 pages

Poisson Model Goodness-of-Fit Analysis

This document summarizes the results of a statistical analysis examining the relationship between favorability, sex, race and cell phone usage. It found significant relationships between these factors, with certain groups having higher or lower than expected cell phone usage based on their favorability, sex and race. Parameter estimates provided more details on the direction and strength of these relationships between the various groups.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

FS FR

Goodness-of-Fit Testsa,b

Value df Sig.

Likelihood Ratio 21,687 8 ,006


Pearson Chi-Square 21,498 8 ,006

a. Model: Poisson
b. Design: Constant + Favor + Sex + Race + Favor * Sex + Favor
* Race

Cell Counts and Residualsa,b

Favor Sex Race Observed Expected Residual Standardized Adjusted Residual Deviance

Count % Count % Residual

White 96 10,7% 86,509 9,6% 9,491 1,020 2,953 1,003


Male Black 16 1,8% 23,829 2,7% -7,829 -1,604 -2,594 -1,706

Other 3 0,3% 4,662 0,5% -1,662 -,770 -1,132 -,824


Strongly Agree
White 71 7,9% 80,491 9,0% -9,491 -1,058 -2,953 -1,080

Female Black 30 3,3% 22,171 2,5% 7,829 1,663 2,594 1,577

Other 6 0,7% 4,338 0,5% 1,662 ,798 1,132 ,754


White 172 19,2% 169,404 18,9% 2,596 ,199 ,623 ,199
Male Black 17 1,9% 24,970 2,8% -7,970 -1,595 -2,377 -1,694
Other 23 2,6% 17,626 2,0% 5,374 1,280 1,871 1,222
Agree
White 174 19,4% 176,596 19,7% -2,596 -,195 -,623 -,196
Female Black 34 3,8% 26,030 2,9% 7,970 1,562 2,377 1,491
Other 13 1,4% 18,374 2,0% -5,374 -1,254 -1,871 -1,324
White 59 6,6% 62,170 6,9% -3,170 -,402 -1,349 -,406
Male Black 1 0,1% 1,604 0,2% -,604 -,477 -,623 -,513
Other 13 1,4% 9,225 1,0% 3,775 1,243 1,718 1,170
Disagree
White 96 10,7% 92,830 10,3% 3,170 ,329 1,349 ,327
Female Black 3 0,3% 2,396 0,3% ,604 ,390 ,623 ,376
Other 10 1,1% 13,775 1,5% -3,775 -1,017 -1,718 -1,070
White 15 1,7% 15,000 1,7% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

Male Black 2 0,2% 1,200 0,1% ,800 ,730 ,903 ,666

Other 1 0,1% 1,800 0,2% -,800 -,596 -,751 -,651


Strongly Disagree
White 35 3,9% 35,000 3,9% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

Female Black 2 0,2% 2,800 0,3% -,800 -,478 -,903 -,504

Other 5 0,6% 4,200 0,5% ,800 ,390 ,751 ,379

a. Model: Poisson
b. Design: Constant + Favor + Sex + Race + Favor * Sex + Favor * Race
Parameter Estimatesb,c

Parameter Estimate Std. Error Z Sig. 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Constant 1,435 ,417 3,442 ,001 ,618 2,252


[Favor = 1] ,032 ,538 ,060 ,952 -1,023 1,087
[Favor = 2] 1,476 ,451 3,269 ,001 ,591 2,361
[Favor = 3] 1,188 ,470 2,527 ,012 ,266 2,109
a
[Favor = 4] 0 . . . . .
[Sex = 1] -,847 ,282 -3,008 ,003 -1,399 -,295
a
[Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
[Race = 1] 2,120 ,432 4,907 ,000 1,273 2,967
[Race = 2] -,405 ,645 -,628 ,530 -1,670 ,860
a
[Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 1] * [Sex = 1] ,919 ,312 2,946 ,003 ,308 1,531
a
[Favor = 1] * [Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 2] * [Sex = 1] ,806 ,298 2,707 ,007 ,222 1,389
a
[Favor = 2] * [Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 3] * [Sex = 1] ,446 ,320 1,396 ,163 -,180 1,073
a
[Favor = 3] * [Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Sex = 1] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 1] * [Race = 1] ,801 ,551 1,452 ,146 -,280 1,881
[Favor = 1] * [Race = 2] 2,037 ,741 2,748 ,006 ,584 3,490
a
[Favor = 1] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 2] * [Race = 1] ,143 ,466 ,306 ,760 -,771 1,056
[Favor = 2] * [Race = 2] ,754 ,681 1,107 ,268 -,581 2,089
a
[Favor = 2] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 3] * [Race = 1] -,212 ,486 -,437 ,662 -1,166 ,741
[Favor = 3] * [Race = 2] -1,344 ,843 -1,595 ,111 -2,995 ,308
a
[Favor = 3] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Race = 1] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Race = 2] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .

a. This parameter is set to zero because it is redundant.


b. Model: Poisson
c. Design: Constant + Favor + Sex + Race + Favor * Sex + Favor * Race

FS SR

Goodness-of-Fit Testsa,b
Value df Sig.

Likelihood Ratio 59,495 12 ,000


Pearson Chi-Square 53,318 12 ,000

a. Model: Poisson
b. Design: Constant + Favor + Sex + Race + Favor * Sex + Sex *
Race

Cell Counts and Residualsa,b

Favor Sex Race Observed Expected Residual Standardized Adjusted Residual Deviance

Count % Count % Residual

White 96 10,7% 94,091 10,5% 1,909 ,197 ,542 ,196

Male Black 16 1,8% 9,904 1,1% 6,096 1,937 2,380 1,777

Other 3 0,3% 11,005 1,2% -8,005 -2,413 -2,980 -2,866


Strongly Agree
White 71 7,9% 83,992 9,4% -12,992 -1,418 -3,469 -1,457

Female Black 30 3,3% 15,413 1,7% 14,587 3,715 4,557 3,284

Other 6 0,7% 7,595 0,8% -1,595 -,579 -,681 -,601


White 172 19,2% 173,455 19,3% -1,455 -,110 -,369 -,111
Male Black 17 1,9% 18,258 2,0% -1,258 -,294 -,439 -,298
Other 23 2,6% 20,287 2,3% 2,713 ,602 ,902 ,590
Agree
White 174 19,4% 173,478 19,3% ,522 ,040 ,116 ,040
Female Black 34 3,8% 31,835 3,5% 2,165 ,384 ,565 ,379
Other 13 1,4% 15,687 1,7% -2,687 -,678 -,959 -,699
White 59 6,6% 59,727 6,7% -,727 -,094 -,243 -,094
Male Black 1 0,1% 6,287 0,7% -5,287 -2,109 -2,428 -2,626
Other 13 1,4% 6,986 0,8% 6,014 2,276 2,634 2,030
Disagree
White 96 10,7% 85,562 9,5% 10,438 1,128 2,769 1,107
Female Black 3 0,3% 15,701 1,8% -12,701 -3,205 -3,942 -3,933
Other 10 1,1% 7,737 0,9% 2,263 ,814 ,960 ,778
White 15 1,7% 14,727 1,6% ,273 ,071 ,170 ,071

Male Black 2 0,2% 1,550 0,2% ,450 ,361 ,386 ,346

Other 1 0,1% 1,722 0,2% -,722 -,550 -,592 -,598


Strongly Disagree
White 35 3,9% 32,969 3,7% 2,031 ,354 ,799 ,350

Female Black 2 0,2% 6,050 0,7% -4,050 -1,647 -1,863 -1,916

Other 5 0,6% 2,981 0,3% 2,019 1,169 1,270 1,065

a. Model: Poisson
b. Design: Constant + Favor + Sex + Race + Favor * Sex + Sex * Race

Parameter Estimatesb,c
Parameter Estimate Std. Error Z Sig. 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Constant 1,092 ,226 4,831 ,000 ,649 1,536


[Favor = 1] ,935 ,182 5,136 ,000 ,578 1,292
[Favor = 2] 1,660 ,168 9,865 ,000 1,331 1,990
[Favor = 3] ,954 ,182 5,251 ,000 ,598 1,310
a
[Favor = 4] 0 . . . . .
[Sex = 1] -,549 ,360 -1,526 ,127 -1,253 ,156
a
[Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
[Race = 1] 2,403 ,179 13,420 ,000 2,052 2,754
[Race = 2] ,708 ,210 3,378 ,001 ,297 1,118
a
[Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 1] * [Sex = 1] ,919 ,312 2,946 ,003 ,308 1,531
a
[Favor = 1] * [Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 2] * [Sex = 1] ,806 ,298 2,707 ,007 ,222 1,389
a
[Favor = 2] * [Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 3] * [Sex = 1] ,446 ,320 1,396 ,163 -,180 1,073
a
[Favor = 3] * [Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Sex = 1] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
[Sex = 1] * [Race = 1] -,257 ,245 -1,050 ,294 -,737 ,223
[Sex = 1] * [Race = 2] -,813 ,311 -2,615 ,009 -1,423 -,204
a
[Sex = 1] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
a
[Sex = 2] * [Race = 1] 0 . . . . .
a
[Sex = 2] * [Race = 2] 0 . . . . .
a
[Sex = 2] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .

a. This parameter is set to zero because it is redundant.


b. Model: Poisson
c. Design: Constant + Favor + Sex + Race + Favor * Sex + Sex * Race

SR FR

Goodness-of-Fit Testsa,b

Value df Sig.

Likelihood Ratio 26,557 9 ,002


Pearson Chi-Square 26,027 9 ,002

a. Model: Poisson
b. Design: Constant + Favor + Sex + Race + Sex * Race + Favor
* Race
Cell Counts and Residualsa,b

Favor Sex Race Observed Expected Residual Standardized Adjusted Residual Deviance

Count % Count % Residual

White 96 10,7% 79,546 8,9% 16,454 1,845 2,910 1,786

Male Black 16 1,8% 15,771 1,8% ,229 ,058 ,095 ,057

Other 3 0,3% 4,865 0,5% -1,865 -,845 -1,331 -,911


Strongly Agree
White 71 7,9% 87,454 9,7% -16,454 -1,759 -2,910 -1,819

Female Black 30 3,3% 30,229 3,4% -,229 -,042 -,095 -,042

Other 6 0,7% 4,135 0,5% 1,865 ,917 1,331 ,859


White 172 19,2% 164,808 18,4% 7,192 ,560 1,076 ,556
Male Black 17 1,9% 17,486 1,9% -,486 -,116 -,200 -,117
Other 23 2,6% 19,459 2,2% 3,541 ,803 1,652 ,780
Agree
White 174 19,4% 181,192 20,2% -7,192 -,534 -1,076 -,538
Female Black 34 3,8% 33,514 3,7% ,486 ,084 ,200 ,084
Other 13 1,4% 16,541 1,8% -3,541 -,871 -1,652 -,905
White 59 6,6% 73,830 8,2% -14,830 -1,726 -2,693 -1,789
Male Black 1 0,1% 1,371 0,2% -,371 -,317 -,399 -,333
Other 13 1,4% 12,432 1,4% ,568 ,161 ,286 ,160
Disagree
White 96 10,7% 81,170 9,0% 14,830 1,646 2,693 1,599
Female Black 3 0,3% 2,629 0,3% ,371 ,229 ,399 ,224
Other 10 1,1% 10,568 1,2% -,568 -,175 -,286 -,176
White 15 1,7% 23,816 2,7% -8,816 -1,807 -2,588 -1,940

Male Black 2 0,2% 1,371 0,2% ,629 ,537 ,675 ,502

Other 1 0,1% 3,243 0,4% -2,243 -1,246 -1,917 -1,461


Strongly Disagree
White 35 3,9% 26,184 2,9% 8,816 1,723 2,588 1,638

Female Black 2 0,2% 2,629 0,3% -,629 -,388 -,675 -,405

Other 5 0,6% 2,757 0,3% 2,243 1,351 1,917 1,211

a. Model: Poisson
b. Design: Constant + Favor + Sex + Race + Sex * Race + Favor * Race

Parameter Estimatesb,c

Parameter Estimate Std. Error Z Sig. 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Constant 1,014 ,427 2,373 ,018 ,177 1,851


[Favor = 1] ,405 ,527 ,769 ,442 -,628 1,438
[Favor = 2] 1,792 ,441 4,063 ,000 ,928 2,656
[Favor = 3] 1,344 ,458 2,931 ,003 ,445 2,242
a
[Favor = 4] 0 . . . . .
[Sex = 1] ,163 ,233 ,697 ,486 -,295 ,620
[Sex = 2] 0a . . . . .
[Race = 1] 2,251 ,451 4,986 ,000 1,366 3,136
[Race = 2] -,048 ,661 -,072 ,943 -1,344 1,249
a
[Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Sex = 1] * [Race = 1] -,257 ,245 -1,050 ,294 -,737 ,223
[Sex = 1] * [Race = 2] -,813 ,311 -2,615 ,009 -1,423 -,204
a
[Sex = 1] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
a
[Sex = 2] * [Race = 1] 0 . . . . .
a
[Sex = 2] * [Race = 2] 0 . . . . .
a
[Sex = 2] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 1] * [Race = 1] ,801 ,551 1,452 ,146 -,280 1,881
[Favor = 1] * [Race = 2] 2,037 ,741 2,748 ,006 ,584 3,490
a
[Favor = 1] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 2] * [Race = 1] ,143 ,466 ,306 ,760 -,771 1,056
[Favor = 2] * [Race = 2] ,754 ,681 1,107 ,268 -,581 2,089
a
[Favor = 2] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 3] * [Race = 1] -,212 ,486 -,437 ,662 -1,166 ,741
[Favor = 3] * [Race = 2] -1,344 ,843 -1,595 ,111 -2,995 ,308
a
[Favor = 3] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Race = 1] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Race = 2] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .

a. This parameter is set to zero because it is redundant.


b. Model: Poisson
c. Design: Constant + Favor + Sex + Race + Sex * Race + Favor * Race

FS FR SR

Goodness-of-Fit Testsa,b

Value df Sig.

Likelihood Ratio 8,617 6 ,196


Pearson Chi-Square 9,348 6 ,155

a. Model: Poisson
b. Design: Constant + Favor + Sex + Race + Sex * Race + Favor
* Race + Favor * Sex

Cell Counts and Residualsa,b

Favor Sex Race Observed Expected Residual Standardized Adjusted Residual Deviance

Count % Count % Residual

Strongly Agree Male White 96 10,7% 91,967 10,3% 4,033 ,420 1,627 ,417
Black 16 1,8% 17,346 1,9% -1,346 -,323 -,607 -,327

Other 3 0,3% 5,687 0,6% -2,687 -1,127 -2,025 -1,240

White 71 7,9% 75,033 8,4% -4,033 -,466 -1,627 -,470

Female Black 30 3,3% 28,654 3,2% 1,346 ,251 ,607 ,249

Other 6 0,7% 3,313 0,4% 2,687 1,476 2,025 1,324


White 172 19,2% 173,923 19,4% -1,923 -,146 -,667 -,146
Male Black 17 1,9% 16,981 1,9% ,019 ,005 ,008 ,005
Other 23 2,6% 21,096 2,4% 1,904 ,415 ,945 ,409
Agree
White 174 19,4% 172,077 19,2% 1,923 ,147 ,667 ,146
Female Black 34 3,8% 34,019 3,8% -,019 -,003 -,008 -,003
Other 13 1,4% 14,904 1,7% -1,904 -,493 -,945 -,504
White 59 6,6% 61,067 6,8% -2,067 -,265 -1,035 -,266
Male Black 1 0,1% ,972 0,1% ,028 ,028 ,033 ,028
Other 13 1,4% 10,961 1,2% 2,039 ,616 1,098 ,598
Disagree
White 96 10,7% 93,933 10,5% 2,067 ,213 1,035 ,212
Female Black 3 0,3% 3,028 0,3% -,028 -,016 -,033 -,016
Other 10 1,1% 12,039 1,3% -2,039 -,588 -1,098 -,606
White 15 1,7% 15,043 1,7% -,043 -,011 -,034 -,011

Male Black 2 0,2% ,701 0,1% 1,299 1,551 1,774 1,263

Other 1 0,1% 2,256 0,3% -1,256 -,836 -1,170 -,941


Strongly Disagree
White 35 3,9% 34,957 3,9% ,043 ,007 ,034 ,007

Female Black 2 0,2% 3,299 0,4% -1,299 -,715 -1,771 -,772

Other 5 0,6% 3,744 0,4% 1,256 ,649 1,170 ,617

a. Model: Poisson
b. Design: Constant + Favor + Sex + Race + Sex * Race + Favor * Race + Favor * Sex

Parameter Estimatesb,c

Parameter Estimate Std. Error Z Sig. 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Constant 1,320 ,430 3,071 ,002 ,477 2,163


[Favor = 1] -,122 ,549 -,223 ,824 -1,198 ,954
[Favor = 2] 1,382 ,460 3,003 ,003 ,480 2,283
[Favor = 3] 1,168 ,477 2,451 ,014 ,234 2,102
a
[Favor = 4] 0 . . . . .
[Sex = 1] -,506 ,358 -1,413 ,158 -1,209 ,196
a
[Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
[Race = 1] 2,234 ,442 5,053 ,000 1,367 3,101
[Race = 2] -,127 ,655 -,193 ,847 -1,410 1,157
a
[Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Sex = 1] * [Race = 1] -,337 ,249 -1,353 ,176 -,825 ,151
[Sex = 1] * [Race = 2] -1,042 ,321 -3,250 ,001 -1,671 -,414
a
[Sex = 1] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
a
[Sex = 2] * [Race = 1] 0 . . . . .
a
[Sex = 2] * [Race = 2] 0 . . . . .
a
[Sex = 2] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 1] * [Race = 1] ,886 ,555 1,595 ,111 -,203 1,975
[Favor = 1] * [Race = 2] 2,284 ,749 3,050 ,002 ,816 3,751
a
[Favor = 1] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 2] * [Race = 1] ,212 ,470 ,452 ,651 -,708 1,133
[Favor = 2] * [Race = 2] ,952 ,687 1,386 ,166 -,394 2,298
a
[Favor = 2] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 3] * [Race = 1] -,180 ,488 -,368 ,713 -1,135 ,776
[Favor = 3] * [Race = 2] -1,254 ,846 -1,483 ,138 -2,911 ,404
a
[Favor = 3] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Race = 1] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Race = 2] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 1] * [Sex = 1] 1,047 ,316 3,313 ,001 ,427 1,666
a
[Favor = 1] * [Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 2] * [Sex = 1] ,854 ,299 2,853 ,004 ,267 1,441
a
[Favor = 2] * [Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 3] * [Sex = 1] ,413 ,321 1,285 ,199 -,217 1,042
a
[Favor = 3] * [Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Sex = 1] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .

a. This parameter is set to zero because it is redundant.


b. Model: Poisson
c. Design: Constant + Favor + Sex + Race + Sex * Race + Favor * Race + Favor * Sex

Saturated

Goodness-of-Fit Testsa,b

Value df Sig.

Likelihood Ratio ,000 0 .


Pearson Chi-Square ,000 0 .

a. Model: Poisson
b. Design: Constant + Favor + Sex + Race + Favor * Sex + Favor
* Race + Sex * Race + Favor * Sex * Race

Cell Counts and Residualsa,b


Favor Sex Race Observed Expected Residual Standardized Adjusted Residual Deviance

Count % Count % Residual

White 96,500 10,6% 96,500 10,6% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

Male Black 16,500 1,8% 16,500 1,8% ,000 ,000 . ,000

Other 3,500 0,4% 3,500 0,4% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000


Strongly Agree
White 71,500 7,9% 71,500 7,9% ,000 ,000 . ,000

Female Black 30,500 3,4% 30,500 3,4% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

Other 6,500 0,7% 6,500 0,7% ,000 ,000 . ,000


White 172,500 19,0% 172,500 19,0% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Male Black 17,500 1,9% 17,500 1,9% ,000 ,000 . ,000
Other 23,500 2,6% 23,500 2,6% ,000 ,000 . ,000
Agree
White 174,500 19,2% 174,500 19,2% ,000 ,000 . ,000
Female Black 34,500 3,8% 34,500 3,8% ,000 ,000 . ,000
Other 13,500 1,5% 13,500 1,5% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
White 59,500 6,5% 59,500 6,5% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Male Black 1,500 0,2% 1,500 0,2% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Other 13,500 1,5% 13,500 1,5% ,000 ,000 . ,000
Disagree
White 96,500 10,6% 96,500 10,6% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Female Black 3,500 0,4% 3,500 0,4% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Other 10,500 1,2% 10,500 1,2% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
White 15,500 1,7% 15,500 1,7% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

Male Black 2,500 0,3% 2,500 0,3% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

Other 1,500 0,2% 1,500 0,2% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000


Strongly Disagree
White 35,500 3,9% 35,500 3,9% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

Female Black 2,500 0,3% 2,500 0,3% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

Other 5,500 0,6% 5,500 0,6% ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

a. Model: Poisson
b. Design: Constant + Favor + Sex + Race + Favor * Sex + Favor * Race + Sex * Race + Favor * Sex * Race

Parameter Estimatesb,c

Parameter Estimate Std. Error Z Sig. 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Constant 1,705 ,426 3,998 ,000 ,869 2,540


[Favor = 1] ,167 ,579 ,288 ,773 -,968 1,303
[Favor = 2] ,898 ,506 1,775 ,076 -,094 1,889
[Favor = 3] ,647 ,526 1,228 ,219 -,385 1,678
a
[Favor = 4] 0 . . . . .
[Sex = 1] -1,299 ,921 -1,411 ,158 -3,105 ,506
a
[Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
[Race = 1] 1,865 ,458 4,069 ,000 ,967 2,763
[Race = 2] -,788 ,763 -1,034 ,301 -2,283 ,707
a
[Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 1] * [Sex = 1] ,680 1,135 ,599 ,549 -1,544 2,905
a
[Favor = 1] * [Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 2] * [Sex = 1] 1,854 ,982 1,887 ,059 -,072 3,779
a
[Favor = 2] * [Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 3] * [Sex = 1] 1,551 1,009 1,537 ,124 -,427 3,528
a
[Favor = 3] * [Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Sex = 1] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Sex = 2] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 1] * [Race = 1] ,533 ,615 ,867 ,386 -,672 1,738
[Favor = 1] * [Race = 2] 2,334 ,877 2,663 ,008 ,616 4,053
a
[Favor = 1] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 2] * [Race = 1] ,694 ,538 1,290 ,197 -,361 1,750
[Favor = 2] * [Race = 2] 1,727 ,828 2,086 ,037 ,105 3,349
a
[Favor = 2] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 3] * [Race = 1] ,353 ,562 ,629 ,529 -,748 1,454
[Favor = 3] * [Race = 2] -,310 ,981 -,316 ,752 -2,233 1,613
a
[Favor = 3] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Race = 1] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Race = 2] 0 . . . . .
a
[Favor = 4] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Sex = 1] * [Race = 1] ,471 ,970 ,485 ,628 -1,431 2,372
[Sex = 1] * [Race = 2] 1,299 1,284 1,012 ,312 -1,217 3,816
a
[Sex = 1] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
a
[Sex = 2] * [Race = 1] 0 . . . . .
a
[Sex = 2] * [Race = 2] 0 . . . . .
a
[Sex = 2] * [Race = 3] 0 . . . . .
[Favor = 1] * [Sex = 1] * [Race
,448 1,185 ,378 ,705 -1,875 2,772
= 1]
[Favor = 1] * [Sex = 1] * [Race
-1,295 1,477 -,877 ,381 -4,189 1,600
= 2]
[Favor = 1] * [Sex = 1] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 3]
[Favor = 1] * [Sex = 2] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 1]
[Favor = 1] * [Sex = 2] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 2]
[Favor = 1] * [Sex = 2] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 3]
[Favor = 2] * [Sex = 1] * [Race
-1,036 1,034 -1,002 ,316 -3,063 ,990
= 1]
[Favor = 2] * [Sex = 1] * [Race
-2,532 1,361 -1,861 ,063 -5,199 ,134
= 2]
[Favor = 2] * [Sex = 1] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 3]
[Favor = 2] * [Sex = 2] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 1]
[Favor = 2] * [Sex = 2] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 2]
[Favor = 2] * [Sex = 2] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 3]
[Favor = 3] * [Sex = 1] * [Race
-1,205 1,067 -1,130 ,258 -3,296 ,885
= 1]
[Favor = 3] * [Sex = 1] * [Race
-2,398 1,664 -1,441 ,150 -5,660 ,864
= 2]
[Favor = 3] * [Sex = 1] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 3]
[Favor = 3] * [Sex = 2] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 1]
[Favor = 3] * [Sex = 2] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 2]
[Favor = 3] * [Sex = 2] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 3]
[Favor = 4] * [Sex = 1] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 1]
[Favor = 4] * [Sex = 1] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 2]
[Favor = 4] * [Sex = 1] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 3]
[Favor = 4] * [Sex = 2] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 1]
[Favor = 4] * [Sex = 2] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 2]
[Favor = 4] * [Sex = 2] * [Race
0a . . . . .
= 3]

a. This parameter is set to zero because it is redundant.


b. Model: Poisson
c. Design: Constant + Favor + Sex + Race + Favor * Sex + Favor * Race + Sex * Race + Favor * Sex * Race

You might also like