1
The ecclesiastical authority, however, does not only confirm the legitimacy
of the charism of the Spirit. It is also the approbation of the institute as a
juridical body governed by laws and subject to the supervision and vigilance
of the Churchs competent authority.
2
Cf. C.488, 3, CIC 1917 and CC. 114, 1 and 589, CIC 1983; S.C.R.I.S
Decr. Quod iam, 30 Nov. 1922, in Leges Ecclesiae post Codicemuris Canonici
editae, ed. X. Ochoa, vol.1 (Roma: Ediurcla, 1966), n. 474 (LE hereafter); and
Lumen Gentium 45, in Vatican Council II: Constitutions, Decrees and
declaration, vol.1 gen. Ed. A. Flannery (Dublin Dominican Publications,
1996), p. 69. Fl hereafter.
3
Nevertheless, those institutes that traditionally required solemn vows still
ask their members to renounce all ownership of property before their
perpetual profession (cf. C. 668, 4-5). We will discuss more of this when
we tackle the regulation of personal property in religious institutes in
Chapter VI.
4
D.J. Andrs, II Dritto dei Religiosi, 2nd ed. (Roma: EDIURCLA, 1999), p. 33
5
The term formata finds no literal translation in English. Edward Peters, in
his English translation of the 1917 Code, uses the word :Formal: but it
appears inaccurate. Domus formata, indeed, means a Canonically
established house.
6
D.J. Andrs, II Diritto dei Religiosi, op. Cit., p.81