Scribd
Upload
12 views2 pages

Microteaching Evaluation Format Guide

The document provides an evaluation format for microteaching with 12 components for assessing student teachers. Each component is scored out of a maximum points and the total score is out of 25 points. The components include relevance of explanations, fluency in language, sentence structure, comprehensibility of terminology, use of examples, structure of presentation, voice modulation, conciseness, teaching approach, listening to students, and clarification. The format is to be used to evaluate a student teacher's microteaching performance on a given subject and topic.

Uploaded by

Dani Philip
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
12 views2 pages

Microteaching Evaluation Format Guide

The document provides an evaluation format for microteaching with 12 components for assessing student teachers. Each component is scored out of a maximum points and the total score is out of 25 points. The components include relevance of explanations, fluency in language, sentence structure, comprehensibility of terminology, use of examples, structure of presentation, voice modulation, conciseness, teaching approach, listening to students, and clarification. The format is to be used to evaluate a student teacher's microteaching performance on a given subject and topic.

Uploaded by

Dani Philip
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

SCHOOL OF NURSING SCIENCE AND RESERCH,

SHARDA UNIVERSITY, GR. NOIDA


EVALUATION FORMAT FOR MICROTEACHING
NAME OF STUDENT TEACHER:
SUBJECT:
TOPIC:
SN

COMPONENTS

1. Explanations were relevant to content


using beginning and concluding statements
2.
3.
4.
5.

9.
10.
11.
12.

MAX

SCORE

SCORE

OBTAINED

3
3

Fluency in language

Used short sentences

Terminology was comprehensible

6. Analogies, illustrations and examples were


used
7.
Presentation was well-structured
8.

DATE:
TIME:

3
2

Voice// Modulation

Was concise

Used inductive, deductive approach

Listened to students responses

Adequate Clarification and Explanation

1
Marks:

/25

Signature of student

Teachers remarks:

Signature of teacher

You might also like