Diploma Unit A - Element A2 - Loss causation and incident investigation
NEBOSH DIPLOMA
IN OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND
SAFETY
February 2014
LICENCE DETAILS
RMS Publishing
Victoria House, Lower High Street, Stourbridge DY8 1TA
RMS Publishing.
Unit A
Fifth Edition November 2013.
All rights reserved. No part of this presentation may be stored in a retrieval system, reproduced, or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without either the prior written permission of the Publishers.
This presentation may not be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise disposed of by way of trade in any form other than that in which it is published,
without the prior consent of the Publishers.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the information contained herein, RMS can bear no liability for any
omission or error.
Managing health and safety
Issued to:
Single Licence
Licence No:
ELEMENT A2
LOSS CAUSATION AND INCIDENT
INVESTIGATION
LEARNING OUTCOMES
A2.1
A2.2
A2.3
A2.4
Explain theories of loss causation
Explain the quantitative analysis of accident/incident
ill-health data, limitations of their application, and
their presentation in numerical and graphical form
Explain the statutory and the internal reporting and
recording systems for injuries, ill-health, dangerous
occurrences and near-misses
Explain loss investigations; the requirements,
benefits, the procedures, the documentation, and
the involvement of and communication with relevant
staff and representatives
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
A2.1
A2.2
A2.1
A2.2
A2.3
A2.4
Theories of loss causation
Quantitative analysis of accident and ill-health
data
Reporting and recording of injuries, ill-health,
dangerous occurrences and near-misses
Loss investigations
A2.3
A2.4
Theories of loss causation
Quantitative analysis of accident and ill-health
data
Reporting and recording of injuries, ill-health,
dangerous occurrences and near-misses
Loss investigations
Sample of PowerPoint presentation for NEBOSH National Diploma in Occupational Health and Safety
Diploma Unit A - Element A2 - Loss causation and incident investigation
February 2014
Theories of loss causation
ACCIDENT/NEAR MISS
Theories of loss causation
Losses result from lack of control
Revealed by loss causing events accident
Definition of an accident is:
An unplanned, uncontrolled event which led to, or could
have led to injury to persons, damage to plant or some
other loss to the company
Definition includes near misses', i.e. where no injury or
damage etc. occurs
Important not to think of injuries, damage and other losses
as accidents, but rather as the results of accidents
Accident
Near miss
Source: HSG245.
Theories of loss causation
Theories of loss causation
Difference between a near miss and a fatal accident in
terms of time and distance can be very small
The damage to persons or property is not the accident, but
part of the effects of the accidents (i.e. the result or
consequences).
An old adage says never waste an accident
Every accident constitutes an opportunity to correct some
problem
A near miss which has the potential to cause loss is just as
important as a serious injury/damage
HSG245 Investigating accidents and incidents
An adverse event includes accidents and incidents
The term adverse event, as used by the HSE is similar to
the term accident and encompasses events that have a
wide range of outcomes
The HSE reserve the term accident for events that involve
harm to people
The HSE define an Accident as:
An event that results in injury or ill-health
10
Theories of loss causation
Theories of loss causation
ACCIDENT RATIO STUDIES AND THEIR USE
AND LIMITATIONS
ACCIDENT RATIO STUDIES AND THEIR USE
AND LIMITATIONS
Some years ago, a study of 1,750,000 accidents, in 21
industry sectors, led by Frank Bird, showed that there is a
fixed ratio between losses of different severity (and
accidents where no loss occurred, i.e. near misses)
This can be demonstrated with a pyramid model
Accident ratio study
Source: Frank Bird.
11
Sample of PowerPoint presentation for NEBOSH National Diploma in Occupational Health and Safety
12
Diploma Unit A - Element A2 - Loss causation and incident investigation
February 2014
Theories of loss causation
Theories of loss causation
ACCIDENT RATIO STUDIES AND THEIR USE
AND LIMITATIONS
ACCIDENT RATIO STUDIES AND THEIR USE
AND LIMITATIONS
Accident ratio pyramid
Use
If only those resulting in injury are considered, many opportunities
to learn about what goes wrong are being missed
If near misses are also studied they can provide more
opportunities to learn and possibly prevent some of the events
that result in injury
The Bird model includes property damage in addition to near
misses
The models help to convince people of the value of reporting a
wide range of events and show that there are usually more near
misses than injury events
Source: HSG96 the costs of accidents at work.
13
14
Theories of loss causation
Theories of loss causation
ACCIDENT RATIO STUDIES AND THEIR USE
AND LIMITATIONS
DOMINO AND MULTI-CAUSALITY THEORIES
Limitations
Birds findings are not uniform throughout industry
The accident ratio studies may not necessarily show the extent of
the loss to the organisation
There are no universally agreed definitions of each subset of
accident type
Statistical analysis of loss events relies on large numbers,
comparable work and worker skills over the measured time-frame, to
be effective
In smaller organisations, the first recorded accident may be the top
event, i.e. fatality or major injury
Near miss reporting may mean different things to different people
HW Heinrich proposed one of the first coherent theories of
accident causation in the mid 1920s
Suggested that accidents were not acts of God but were
caused by the failures of people
His domino theory suggested that the series of events,
which led to an injury or some other loss, were a
succession of events which followed a logical pattern
15
16
Theories of loss causation
Theories of loss causation
DOMINO AND MULTI-CAUSALITY THEORIES
DOMINO AND MULTI-CAUSALITY THEORIES
The domino theory
Accident causation domino
The domino theory
Further research by the International Loss Control Institute
(ILCI) into accident causation led them to put forward a
modified domino theory
Source: H.W. Heinrich.
17
Sample of PowerPoint presentation for NEBOSH National Diploma in Occupational Health and Safety
18
Diploma Unit A - Element A2 - Loss causation and incident investigation
February 2014
Theories of loss causation
Theories of loss causation
DOMINO AND MULTI-CAUSALITY THEORIES
DOMINO AND MULTI-CAUSALITY THEORIES
The domino theory
Accident causation domino
Loss
Event
Immediate (direct) causes
Underlying (indirect or root) causes
- Organisational factors
- Job factors
- Personal factors
Source: Frank Bird - ILCI.
19
20
Theories of loss causation
Theories of loss causation
DOMINO AND MULTI-CAUSALITY THEORIES
DOMINO AND MULTI-CAUSALITY THEORIES
Lack of management control
Policy
Planning
Organising
Controlling
Monitor
Review
Sequence of dominoes
Source: HSG245.
21
22
Theories of loss causation
Theories of loss causation
DOMINO AND MULTI-CAUSALITY THEORIES
LATENT AND ACTIVE FAILURES - REASONS
MODEL OF ACCIDENT CAUSATION
Multiple accident causes
Usually more than one causative factor
Each of the multiple causation factors may be seen as one
domino in its own line of dominoes (just as the roots of a
tree branch out)
Reason proposed four levels of human failure, each
influencing the next
The first level that Reason identifies is unsafe acts of
persons, which ultimately lead to the accident
These unsafe acts were considered to relate to the errors,
such as the skill-based slips/lapses and mistakes identified
in Rasmussens work in 1987 - called active failures
Reason identified three further levels of human failure that
comprised latent failures
Source: RMS.
23
Sample of PowerPoint presentation for NEBOSH National Diploma in Occupational Health and Safety
24
Diploma Unit A - Element A2 - Loss causation and incident investigation
February 2014
Theories of loss causation
Theories of loss causation
LATENT AND ACTIVE FAILURES - REASONS
MODEL OF ACCIDENT CAUSATION
LATENT AND ACTIVE FAILURES - REASONS
MODEL OF ACCIDENT CAUSATION
The second level of human failure involves preconditions
that lead to unsafe acts taking place
In many instances, these preconditions can be traced back
to instances of unsafe supervision, the third level of
human failure identified by Reason
Importantly, Reasons identified that causation did not stop
at the supervisory level
He recognised that the fourth level, the organisation
itself, can impact on performance at all levels
J. Reasons accident model
Source: Reason/RMS.
25
26
Quantitative analysis of accident and ill-health data
CONTENTS
METHODS OF CALCULATING INJURY RATES
FROM RAW DATA
A2.1
A2.2
Accident frequency rate: number of accidents over time
Accident incident rate: number of accidents compared with
number of people
Accident severity rate: average number of days lost
compared with hours worked
Ill-health prevalence rate: similar to incidence rate but is an
index of ill-health rather than accidents
A2.3
A2.4
Theories of loss causation
Quantitative analysis of accident and ill-health
data
Reporting and recording of injuries, ill-health,
dangerous occurrences and near-misses
Loss investigations
27
28
ELEMENT A2
LOSS CAUSATION AND INCIDENT
INVESTIGATION
Quantitative analysis of accident and ill-health data
METHODS OF CALCULATING INJURY RATES
FROM RAW DATA
These calculations are made from the actual numbers of
accidents, hours worked, numbers employed and days lost
In order for the result to be a meaningful number, a large
multiplier is included in the equation
The injury rates only mean something if they are compared
to other injury rates and are to be used to show trends
May be compared to rates from previous years, to rates
from other departments in the company, to other companies
or to rates in a particular industry
PART ONLY
SAMPLE
29
Sample of PowerPoint presentation for NEBOSH National Diploma in Occupational Health and Safety
30