0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views1 page

Clinical Ethics Decision-Making Guide

The document outlines a decision-making guide for clinical ethics, focusing on medical indications, quality of life, patient preferences, and contextual features. It provides a structured approach to assess patient problems, treatment goals, quality of life considerations, and the influence of family, financial, and cultural factors on treatment decisions. The guide emphasizes the importance of respecting patient autonomy and ensuring informed consent in the decision-making process.

Uploaded by

Retno Manggalih
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views1 page

Clinical Ethics Decision-Making Guide

The document outlines a decision-making guide for clinical ethics, focusing on medical indications, quality of life, patient preferences, and contextual features. It provides a structured approach to assess patient problems, treatment goals, quality of life considerations, and the influence of family, financial, and cultural factors on treatment decisions. The guide emphasizes the importance of respecting patient autonomy and ensuring informed consent in the decision-making process.

Uploaded by

Retno Manggalih
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Clinical Ethics: Decision-Making Guide

MEDICAL INDICATIONS
1. What is the patients medical problem?
History? Diagnosis? Prognosis?
2. Is problem acute? Chronic? Critical?
Emergent? Reversible?
3. What are the goals of treatment?
4. What are the probabilities of success?
5. What are plans in case of therapeutic
failure?
6. In sum, how can this patient be benefited
by medical and nursing care, and how can
harm be avoided?

QUALITY OF LIFE
1. What are the prospects, with or without
treatment for a return to patients normal
life?
2. Are there biases that might prejudice
providers evaluation of patients quality of
life?
3. What physical, mental, and social deficits
is patient is patient likely to experience if
treatment succeeds?
4. Is patients present or future condition
such that continued life might be judged
undesirable by them?
5. Any plan and rationale to forgo treatment?
6. What plans for comfort and palliative
care?

PATIENT PREFERENCES
1. What has the patient expressed about
preferences for treatment?
2. Has patient been informed of benefits and
risks, understood, and given consent?
3. Is patient mentally capable and legally
competent? What is evidence of incapacity?
4. Has patient expressed prior preferences, ie
advance directives?
5. If incapacitated, who is appropriate
surrogate? Is surrogate using the
appropriate standards?
6. Is patient unwilling or unable to cooperate
with medical treatment? If so, why?
7. In sum, is patients right to choose being
respected to extent possible in ethics and
law?
CONTEXTUAL FEATURES
1. Are there family issues that might influence
treatment decisions?
2. Are there provider (physicians and nurses)
issues that might influence treatment
decisions?
3. Are there financial and economic factors?
4. Are there religious, cultural factors?
5. Is there any justification to breach
confidentiality?
6. Are there problems of allocation of
resources?
7. What are the legal implications of
treatment decisions?
8. Is clinical research or teaching involved?
9. Any provider or institutional conflict of
interest?

Albert R. Jonsen. (1998). Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine.
[Fourth Edition]. McGraw Hill
C:\My Documents\decision-making [Link]

You might also like