0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views2 pages

S5 Mathematics Scores and Feedback

This document summarizes the performance of 15 students on a S5 mathematics exam in October 2016. It lists each student's name, their score, any weaknesses or areas for improvement, and comments on their behavior or willingness to improve. The highest score was 87 and the lowest was 15. Common weaknesses included fractions, rounding, solving problems, and understanding certain concepts. Most students were willing to improve or work on their weaknesses.

Uploaded by

Soon Kian Voon
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views2 pages

S5 Mathematics Scores and Feedback

This document summarizes the performance of 15 students on a S5 mathematics exam in October 2016. It lists each student's name, their score, any weaknesses or areas for improvement, and comments on their behavior or willingness to improve. The highest score was 87 and the lowest was 15. Common weaknesses included fractions, rounding, solving problems, and understanding certain concepts. Most students were willing to improve or work on their weaknesses.

Uploaded by

Soon Kian Voon
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

S5 MATHEMATICS (Sep / Oct 2016)

Date:Oct 2016 Day:Wed Time:9:0010:15pm Center:BL Teacher:Soon


Name

Subject

Score

Weaknesses / Improvement

Adam Iskandar

Maths

15

Farishah Dania

Maths

Izzatul Dyana Ramzhar

Maths

64

Faces some difficulties in

Responses

Mohd. Abbas

Maths

49

Faces difficulty in rounding of

Willing to

Mohd. Erfan Hayqal

Maths

75

Requires more practices in

Shows good

Mohd. Sirajuddin Mohd.


Riduan

Maths

34

Still faces difficulties in solving

Willing to

Muhd Afiq Khalid

Maths

40

Shows poor understanding in

Attention span is

Muhd. Faiz Fatri Abd. Majid Maths

47

Performed badly in fractional

Attention span is

Performed badly in fractional

87 (H) Able to do both fractional and

Behaviour

his lessons

Based on her

Nur Maisarah Hamidi

Maths

55

Faces difficulties in solving

Participation in

Nur Nadhirah bt. Nazar

Maths

47

Requires more practices in

Understanding of

Qurratul Ayn Yusriman

Maths

46

Main weaknesses lies in the

Quiet but willing to

Rossini

Maths

63

Shows weaknesses in

Quiet but willing to

Shivein Krishnan

Maths

57

Better understanding needed to Behaved well

er:Soon

You might also like