0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views3 pages

Electrical Machines: Magnetic Circuit Analysis

This document contains 4 questions from a tutorial on electrical machines and power systems. Question 1 asks the student to calculate the flux density in an electromagnet given its dimensions, number of coil turns, current, and core permeability. Question 2 provides the dimensions of a two-legged core and asks the student to: (1) draw the electrical representation; (2) calculate remaining reluctance; (3) determine induced voltage if one coil is open; and (4) calculate current in one coil. Question 3 asks for the flux produced by given currents in a two-coil core given dimensions and permeability. Question 4 repeats question 3 but accounts for a non-constant core permeability based on a provided magnetization curve.

Uploaded by

sadyehclen
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views3 pages

Electrical Machines: Magnetic Circuit Analysis

This document contains 4 questions from a tutorial on electrical machines and power systems. Question 1 asks the student to calculate the flux density in an electromagnet given its dimensions, number of coil turns, current, and core permeability. Question 2 provides the dimensions of a two-legged core and asks the student to: (1) draw the electrical representation; (2) calculate remaining reluctance; (3) determine induced voltage if one coil is open; and (4) calculate current in one coil. Question 3 asks for the flux produced by given currents in a two-coil core given dimensions and permeability. Question 4 repeats question 3 but accounts for a non-constant core permeability based on a provided magnetization curve.

Uploaded by

sadyehclen
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

UEEA1493 Introduction to Electrical Machines and Power Systems

Tutorial 1
1. An electromagnet of square cross-section (Fig.1) has a tightly wound coil with 1000 turns. The
inner and outer radii of the magnetic core are 10 cm and 12 cm, respectively. The length of the
air-gap is 1 cm. Because of fringing effects, the effective area of the air gap is 5% larger than its
physical size. If the current in the coil is 4A and the relative permeability of the magnetic
material is 1200, determine the flux density in the magnetic circuit.
[Ans.: 0.498T]

Fig.1
2. A two-legged symmetrical core is shown in Fig. 2. The magnetic core at right has a thickness of
2 cm, the width of each leg is 3 cm and the reluctance of the path traced by the white arrow is
53.1 kAt/Wb. The left core has a coil with 25 turns and the right leg has a coil with 500 turns.
The relative permeability of the core is 2000. The center leg has an effective length of 4 cm with
an air gap thickness of .1 cm. The flux in the left side of the core is 0.008cos(377t) Wb.
(i)

Draw the electrical representation of the magnetic circuit.

(ii)

Calculate the remaining reluctance (assume no fringing effects).


[Ans.:1.33AT/Wb, 26.533AT/Wb]
If the coil on the right leg is open circuited (i.e. the applied mmf is zero) calculate the
induced voltage in that leg as a function of time.
[ Ans. : 1447.6 sin(377t ) V ]

(iii)
(iv)

Calculate the current in the left coil at time t=0.

[Ans.: 33.3A]

UEEA1493 Introduction to Electrical Machines and Power Systems

Fig. 2
3. A two-legged core is shown in Figure 3. The winding on the left leg of the core (N1) has 400
turns, and the winding on the right (N2) has 300 turns. The coils are wound in the directions
shown in the figure. If the dimensions are as shown, then what flux would be produced by
currents i1 = 0.5 A and i2 = 0.75 A? Assume r = 1000 and constant.
[Ans.: 0.00462Wb]

Fig.3
4. The core shown in Q3 is made of a steel whose magnetization curve is shown in Figure 4. Repeat
Q3, but this time do not assume a constant value of r. How much flux is produced in the core
by the currents specified? What is the relative permeability of this core under these conditions?
Was the assumption in Q3 that the relative permeability was equal to 1000 a good assumption for
these conditions? Is it a good assumption in general?
[Ans.: 0.0033Wb, 731]

UEEA1493 Introduction to Electrical Machines and Power Systems

Flux density, B
Fig.4

Common questions

Powered by AI

Reluctance is the magnetic equivalent of resistance in an electrical circuit, representing the opposition to the establishment of magnetic flux through a material. In the two-legged symmetrical core, reluctance is calculated for different paths of the magnetic circuit. For instance, the reluctance of the path traced by the white arrow is 53.1 kAt/Wb, indicating a high opposition to flux. The remaining reluctance and that of the center leg, calculated as 1.33AT/Wb and 26.533AT/Wb respectively, are components that contribute to the total opposition. Understanding this helps in analyzing how flux distributes within the core and across different paths .

Different coil configurations, such as varying the number of turns or the winding direction, influence the magnitude and direction of the induced voltage as explained by Faraday's Law. In magnetic circuits with multiple coils and changing currents, the coil with more turns induces a more significant voltage. For instance, open-circuiting the right leg coil in the two-legged core with 500 turns displays an induced voltage that varies sinusoidally based on flux changes, highlighting the critical role of coil design. This configuration can significantly affect voltage outcomes in transformers and similar devices, providing insights into manipulating induced voltages through strategic winding designs .

Assuming a constant relative permeability of 1000 in the calculation simplifies the process by using a linear approximation of the material's response to the magnetic field. In the specific case of the two-legged core in Q3, using a constant μr resulted in a calculated flux of 0.00462 Wb. However, when considering the actual magnetization curve of the steel, the resulting flux was 0.0033 Wb, and the relative permeability was found to be 731. This discrepancy highlights that the assumption of constant μr can lead to significant errors when the material's properties change with the magnetic field, particularly in non-linear regions of the BH curve .

Fringing occurs when magnetic field lines bulge outwards around the edges of the air gap, effectively increasing the area through which the magnetic flux passes. In the electromagnet with a square cross-section, the effective area of the air gap is considered to be 5% larger than its physical size to account for fringing. This increase in effective area reduces the flux density, compared to calculations that do not account for fringing, since flux density is inversely proportional to the cross-sectional area through which the flux passes .

The polarity and number of turns of a coil significantly affect the induced voltage according to Faraday's Law of Electromagnetic Induction. In a two-legged core where one coil is open-circuited (zero applied mmf), the induced voltage is directly related to the rate of change of flux linkage. For the right coil with 500 turns operating with zero applied mmf, the induced voltage varies as a function of sin(377t), calculated as 1447.6*sin(377t). The number of turns amplifies the induced voltage, and the direction (polarity) influences the sign of the emf, according to Lenz's Law .

Calculating flux density (B) in a magnetic circuit involves first determining the magnetic field intensity (H) and then using the relationship B = μH, where μ is the permeability of the material. For an electromagnet with dimensions such as inner and outer radii of 10 cm and 12 cm, respectively, and considering the current and number of turns, the magnetic field strength is derived. Adding fringing effects which increases the effective area by 5%, further refines the calculation: B = (N*I)/(R+0.05A). For the given current of 4A and a relative permeability of 1200, the calculated flux density is 0.498T, showing the combined influence of core dimensions, current, coil turns, and material properties .

Assuming constant relative permeability simplifies calculations by treating the magnetic circuit as having linear properties, which is valid for small-signal operations near linear sections of the magnetization curve. However, in practical applications, this assumption can be faulty, especially as materials operate closer to saturation or in hysteresis zones, where μr varies significantly with the magnetizing force H. In such scenarios, actual permeability should be measured or predicted from the material's BH curve. For example, in Q4, the calculated flux differed notably when accounting for the real magnetization curve, evidencing the limitations of constant-assumption models in dynamic, high flux density applications .

The effective length and air gap of a magnetic core critically determine the magnetic flux since they directly affect the reluctance. An increased air gap heightens the reluctance, as seen in the center leg with an effective length of 4 cm and an air gap thickness of 0.1 cm. This increase reduces the magnetic flux as reluctance is inversely proportional to flux. Therefore, carefully designing these parameters is crucial: minimizing the air gap and optimizing the core length can achieve desired performance efficiently while balancing cost and material limits on saturation .

The calculation of current in a coil is influenced by time-dependent flux variations, which can be expressed as a time-varying magnetic flux, like 0.008cos(377t) Wb in a magnetic core. The induced electromotive force (emf) is related to the rate of change of this flux through Faraday's Law. At t=0, evaluating the derivative gives instantaneous emf values, which are directly related to changes in current. The initial current value at t=0 can be calculated by adjusting the coil configuration to counter this emf, arriving at 33.3A in the given situation. This value explains how dynamic changes in the magnetic environment affect electric circuit behavior .

Balancing theoretical and practical forces in magnetic circuits involves calculating precise flux, field strength, and reluctance values, while considering practical factors like core losses, saturation, and thermal limits. Theoretical calculations use formulas for magnetic force (NI), reluctance (R = l/μA), and flux linkages, while practical considerations involve accounting for fringing, permeability variations, and material hysteresis. Optimizing machine performance requires iterative design adjustments: reducing core losses by minimizing hysteresis and eddy currents through materials with high resistivity and low-loss properties, calculating precise air gap sizes, and configuring coil arrangements to maximize efficiency while mitigating parasitic effects .

You might also like