Scribd
Upload
876 views4 pages

Monologue and Speech Judging Criteria

This document contains judging criteria and scoresheets for four different performance categories: monologue, speech delivery, extemporaneous speech, and role play. Each category lists the criteria being judged, which include elements like character believability, dramatic impact, speech construction, and presentation skills. Contestants are listed and judges will score their performance in each category, with total scores deciding final rankings. Judges' signatures are required at the bottom to validate the scores.

Uploaded by

Acquisha Yestin Siona
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
876 views4 pages

Monologue and Speech Judging Criteria

This document contains judging criteria and scoresheets for four different performance categories: monologue, speech delivery, extemporaneous speech, and role play. Each category lists the criteria being judged, which include elements like character believability, dramatic impact, speech construction, and presentation skills. Contestants are listed and judges will score their performance in each category, with total scores deciding final rankings. Judges' signatures are required at the bottom to validate the scores.

Uploaded by

Acquisha Yestin Siona
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Judging Criteria
  • Consolidated Results

Name of Judge: __________________________________

SIGNATURE: ______________________

Monologue Judging Criteria

Contestant

Physical
Vocal
Characterization
Characterization
(10%)
(10%)

Character
Believability
(30%)

Dramatic
Build up
(20%)

Dramatic
Impact (20%)

Appropriatenes
s (10%)

Total

Rank

STEM
BAP 1
BAP 2
GAS 3
BAP 5
GAS 1
BAP 4

Speech Delivery Judging Criteria

Contestant

Speech
Construction
(20%)

Presentation and
Delivery (20%)

Content of
Speech (20%)

Language (20%)

STEM
BAP 1
BAP 2
GAS 3
BAP 5
GAS 1
BAP 4
Extemporaneous Speech Judging Criteria

Voice (20%)

Total

Rank

Contestant

Voice, pitch,
tempo, volume,
enthusiasm
(10%)

Platform Deportment:
Gestures, poise, eye
contact, mannerisms
(10%)

Appearance
(10%)

Organization, logical,
clearly understood,
suitable to topic,
coherent (30%)

Mechanics: diction,
grammar,
pronunciation (10%)

Closing: summary
and conclusion
(10%)

Total

Rank

STEM
BAP 1
BAP 2
GAS 3
BAP 5
GAS 1
BAP 4
Role Play Judging Criteria

Contestant

STEM
BAP 1
BAP 2
GAS 3
BAP 5
GAS 1
BAP 4

Quality of Scenario Scenario


was realistic, classappropriate, well-developed.
Use of props. (20%)

Organization role play was wellorganized. The transitions between


the role-plays and the narrator and
other presentation components
flowed smoothly. (20%)

Presentation Skills - spoke with


appropriate eye contact, volume,
tone, use of pauses, and gestures.
All presenters were well-prepared
and spoke with confidence. (50%)

Impact Presentation fully


engaged the
audience. (10%)

Total

Rank

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS
MONOLOGUE
CONTESTANT
STEM
BAP 1
BAP 2
GAS 3
BAP 5
GAS 1
BAP 4

JUDGE 1

JUDGE 2

JUDGE 3

JUDGE 4

JUDGE 5

TOTAL

RANK

JUDGE 5

TOTAL

RANK

JUDGE 5

TOTAL

RANK

SPEECH DELIVERY
CONTESTANT
STEM
BAP 1
BAP 2
GAS 3
BAP 5
GAS 1
BAP 4

JUDGE 1

JUDGE 2

JUDGE 3

JUDGE 4

EXTEMPORANEOUS SPEECH
CONTESTANT
STEM
BAP 1
BAP 2
GAS 3
BAP 5
GAS 1
BAP 4

JUDGE 1

JUDGE 2

JUDGE 3

JUDGE 4

ROLE PLAY
CONTESTANT
STEM
BAP 1
BAP 2
GAS 3
BAP 5
GAS 1
BAP 4

JUDGE 1

JUDGE 2

JUDGE 3

JUDGE 4

JUDGE 5

TOTAL

Signature of judges:

______________________

______________________________

___________________________

______________________________

______________________________

RANK

Name of Judge: __________________________________ SIGNATURE: ______________________ Monologue Judging Criteria Contestant Voc
Contestant Voice, pitch, tempo, volume, enthusiasm (10%) Platform Deportment: Gestures, poise, eye contact, mannerisms (10%
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS MONOLOGUE CONTESTANT JUDGE 1 JUDGE 2 JUDGE 3 JUDGE 4 JUDGE 5 TOTAL RANK STEM BAP 1 BAP 2 GAS 3 BAP 5 GAS
ROLE PLAY CONTESTANT JUDGE 1 JUDGE 2 JUDGE 3 JUDGE 4 JUDGE 5 TOTAL RANK STEM BAP 1 BAP 2 GAS 3 BAP 5 GAS 1 BAP 4 Signature of

You might also like