National Law University, Orissa
5th Semester [Link].B./[Link].B. 2014
IPR (Project Topics)
1. Each project topic is assigned to two students (except few) to work in a group.
2. Each group is expected to carefully go through some basic research material in the area (like standard text book, some
cases and other related material); and to meet the course teacher subsequently for guidance.
3. It is not advised to meet the course teacher without having preparatory reading or some initial research.
4. Projects may be typed on computer or may be handwritten on A-4 size paper with 1.5 margin in the left side and 1
margin on the right, with suitable margin at the top and bottom. Page nos. should be indicated at the centre top of the
page. The font size of the words should be 12 and there should be 1.5 spacing between the lines.( For detail please see
NLUO Examination Rules 2010)
5. The projects need not necessarily be spirally bound, but should be firmly stitched or pinned.
6. The projects should be between 4000-5000 words excluding Research Question, Scope, Objective, Research
Methodology, foot notes, abbreviation page, table of contents, table of cases and bibliography.
7. Bibliography should only be of those books that are made use of in writing the project. Table of cases should contain only
those cases actually read by the students (either wholly or partially) for the project.
8. All the groups will submit the soft copy of the project to the course teacher. Only thirty per cent turnitin text (excluding
foot notes) match will be allowed. If text match will be more than thirty percent then project will be rejected without
giving an opportunity to resubmit. Any text match should not be more than six per cent (Except quotation) at a place
within thirty per cent limit. No student will check his/her project on turnitin otherwise it will reflect hundred per cent
text match at the time of final checking which will result into rejection of project.
9. Any kind of change in project topic without written permission of the course teacher will lead to rejection of the
project.
10. Project Consultation:
Project Consultation is optional. There will not be any marks for consultation.
PROJECT TOPICS
Sl
No.
B.A. L.L.B.
1. PRIABRAT SINGH - 35
ABHAY PRATAP S. TOMAR -03
2. SANSKRITI TIWARI - 44
Project Topics
B. B.A. L.L.B.
Natural Law Justification of IPR in KARTIKEY GUPTA
the light of Pharmaceutical Industry
AKANSHA DIXT
Lockean Labour Philosophy
Doctrine of Creativity
Vs RANJEEV KHATANA 39
PRAGALBH BHARDWAJ 34
Project Topics
'Up In The Aereo: The Aereo
Fiasco And Its Impact In India And
Cloud Computing
Plant Patenting in USA and its
Global Implications
ROHAN GOSWAMI 42
3. ANIL KUMAR- 12.
ABHAY SHARMA- 26.
4. AMAN KUMAR DEVANDA 8
LALIT MEENA27
5. ASTITVA PRATAP SINGH 18
SHUBHAM SAIGAL 47
6. MANISHA RAWAT 29
DWARKANATH 22.
7. ABHISHEK TOPPO 5
NIKHIL SAINI 41
8. SHASHWAT 45
RAMESH 40
9. ISHIKA GOON 25
AMIT BHATTACHARYYA 9
[Link] SINGH,
SUDEER AND CHENNA REDDY
Issue and Challenges of IPR in MAYANK MISHRA 27
African Continent
DIVYAM KRISHNA 19
Critical Analysis of Article 27 of
TRIPS Agreements
Relevancy of Paris Convention in ANKITA MISHRA 10 DISHA Critical Analysis of Working of
Modern International IP Regime
KAPOOR 17
TRIPS Agreements
Relevancy of Berne Convention in AMAN PANDEY 9
Modern International IP Regime
SHUBHRAJYOTI JENA 51
Protected Person Under TRIPS
SOURAV MISHRA 53
Agreement
AVADHUTA VAMSHI
KRISHNA 13
Doctrine of Exhaustion vis a vis
GOUTAM PANIGRAHI 22
Parallel Import
SUNEET KU. PADHI 55
Compulsory Licensing under
SHAKTI SEKHAR 46
Copyright and Music Industries
MAYANK TRIPATHY 28
Protection of Non creative Data-Base:
A Global Perspective
Global Trend of Protectable Subject
Matter in Trademark: Issues and
PRAKHAR GHADGE
RITESH KUMAR SHARMA
MAYANK MISHRA
Bio-prospecting in New World
Order
Most Favoured Nation Treatment
Under TRIPS and Its Implications
Critical Analysis of doctrine of
exhaustion in Indian IP regime
Analysis of Judicial Approach in
Developing and Shaping New IP
jurisprudence in Last Ten Years
Cable casting and Infringement of
copyright
Copyright In Education
Institution: A Comparative Study
[Link] S KADUR 33
ARKA SAHA 15
[Link] BHATODKAR 028
PRISCILLA LALNUNPUII 36
[Link] BHASKAR 38
14.12BBA005--ADITYA PRASAD RATH
12BBA026--DEBASIS SHAOO
[Link] AGRAWAL 56
SAURABH SOTWAL 45
[Link] 1
59
[Link] DAS 52
UDATTA GANGULY 56
[Link] JHA (2012/BA/004) AND
SIMRAN SAHNI 49
[Link] NAGARAJA BHAT, 34,
ANDRI SHUKLA, 11,
[Link] ROY51
DURVA SHRIVASTHAVA 20
[Link] AWASTHI 14
NEELASHA NEMANI,
Titiksha Shrivastava 57
Rashmi Shukla 47
Social Perspective of protecting
Copyright
AVILASH KUMBHAR 15
GAURAV RAJ 21
Analysis of Diagnostic Method as non SAMRIDDHI VERMA 43
patentable subject matter
SANSKRITI BHARDWAJ 44
AMRITA LALL 10
VISHALAKSHI TIWARI
Challenges
Constitutional Perspective of
protecting IPRs
An analysis if the infringement of
trademark by comparative
advertising
Right of Information in
International IP Regime
"Distinctiveness And
Descriptiveness As A Feature Of
Trademark And Its Implications"
Impact of neighbouring rights on
entertainment in India"
Analysis of essential biological
process as non patentable subject
matter
(HIMANSHU R. PALIWAL
23
AKHILESH CHANDAK 8
A Critical Analysis of protection of
plant verities: A Global Perspective
Protection of Pantomimes and
Choreographic Works
STEVE SALDANHA 54
RISHI RAJ 040
SHIVANK JHANJI 49
MOHAMMED SHADAB30
Analysis of non biological and micro
biological process as patentable
subject matter
KUMAR SHUBHAM 3
VAISHALI SINGH 59
Public Policy and patentability of
Invention
Exceptions to Patentees Right: A
Comparative Study US, EU and India
ABHAY JAIN2
AKHIL NENE 7
AVI DHIRENDRA 14
SABAH KHAN 42
Copyright collecting societies
Concept of Originality in
Topographies of Integrated Circuits
ESHNA SAXENA 20
NAMRATA SRIVASTAVA32
'Reverse payments': analysis of a
trend contributing to the evergreening
NAMRATA BEHERA 31
AASTHA TRIVEDI 1
Analysis of Development of IP
Sentiments in India and Its Effect
on Economy
Biotechnologicalpatent: law nad
limitations
Software patent vs free software
Copyright in entertainment
industries (mainly film and music
industry)
Copyright: Economic Right vs
human right
Protection of confidential
information in india
22. ANKITA GOSWAMI 13
of patents in pharmaceutical industry
Patenting agricultural biotechnology:
an obstacle to food security in india
SANSKRITI BHARDWAJ 44
SAMRIDDHI VERMA 43
Comparative study of protection of
public funded intellectual property
Conceptual issues in patenting of life
forms
MINAL SANGATWANI 29
PRIYANKA MURALI 35
Patenting of Synthetic
Microorganism
DISHA MOHANTY1
[Link] PRASAD G. - 023
AISHWARYA MOHANTY [Link] CHOUDHURY30
VAISHALI BADERIYA 57
[Link] KUMAR- 21
VEER VIKRAM SINGH-58
[Link] SHUKLA 16
Challenges of breeder's rights in sugeneris protection of plant verities
A Comparative Study of IP
Administrative Procedures of USA,
EU, China and India
Biopatent vs bioethics
VIVEK RANJAN 60
27. SAKSHI SHARMA 43
SMRITI SINGH 50
Stem cell patenting: a comparative
study of UD, EU and Indian law
Note- 1. In case of getting complaint about non working or non cooperating of any partner by other partner, a fresh topic may be
allotted to non working or non cooperating partner last up to last three day before final submission date without giving any
relaxation for submission.
2. Any kind of group formation for project allotment will not be accepted now.