FOUNDATIONS OF GOVERNMENT
Federalism
CHAPTER 4 WARM-UP
Imagine you are in each of the situations below and you want someone to help
you address it. Would you contact someone at the local, state, or federal level?
Then explain why you picked that level of government.
Situation #1: There is a huge pothole in the road in front of your house
Situation #2: You think someone is stealing the mail from your mailbox
Situation #3: When you were looking for an apartment, you feel sure a
property manger turned you down because of your race or national
origin.
Situation #4: You live a mile of a nuclear weapons plant and you learned
that a fifth neighbor has become very ill
Situation #5: You want to get married
Situation #6: You want to object to how high your taxes are
FOUNDATIONS OF GOVERNMENT
Federalism
LESSON 1: DIVIDING AND SHARING POWER
It was a new approach of governing the people
Federalism-two or more governments exercise
power over the same people and the same
territory
In this system the federal government has some
special powers over al citizens
The states have certain powers reserved for
them
They are supposed to share some powers
It can end with some disagreements on the
right formula for dividing and sharing power
National Powers
The Constitution grants both expressed and
implied powers to the national government
Expressed powers (enumerated powers) are
those powers directly expressed or stated in
the Constitution
Implied powers are those powers that are not
stated specifically in the Constitution
State and local powers
States have more powers
The Constitution says that states will have any
powers not delegated to the national
government (Reserved Powers)
Powers include: conduct elections, education,
regulated business and trade within the state
Concurrent Powers
Shared powers between the federal government and state
government
Each level of government operates independently
State actions must not conflict with any national laws
Denied Powers
The Constitution denies power to all levels of
government
Neither government can:
Pass retroactive laws (punish actions before law passed)
Tax exports
Hold or sentence a person to jail without fair trial
Pass any law that violates the Constitution
Grant tiles of nobility
The Supremacy Clause
Article VI makes the acts and treaties of the
United States supreme
No state law or state constitution may
conflict with any form of national law
Local governments can not come into
conflict with their own state constitution as
well as the federal government
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS
1. Why would it be important to you to understand which level of
government has a certain power?
2. Why did the Founders create this system of shared powers?
3. Why did Founding Fathers create the federalist system rather than
using a unitary form of government or confederation?
4. In your opinion, has the federalist system worked the way that the
founding fathers planed?
Answer all questions in two sentences, one to answer the question. Your
second sentence should be used to explain your answer. You have 10
minutes.
LESSON 2: RELATIONS BETWEEN THE NATIONAL
AND STATE GOVERNMENTS
Republican Form of Government and Protection
The national government must guarantee each
state a republican form of government
Voters must hold sovereign power
The national government must protect states
from invasion and unrest within the United
States, or attacks by foreign power
Congress has given the president authority to
send federal troops to a state where there is
civil unrest and the governor or state
legislature has requested help
The president can send troops in to a state that
violate federal laws
The national government can also intervene in
the aftermath of a natural disaster
Territorial Integrity and Admission of New States
Article IV, Section 3 says that the national government
has the duty to respect the territorial integrity of each
state
The Constitution also gives Congress to pass laws that
allow new states to join the nation
Like all other laws, the admission of new states is
subject to presidential veto
Before a territory can become a state, Congress must
pass an enabling act, so the territory can develop a
constitution
Once the constitution is approved by popular vote in
the territory, Congress then votes on whether or not to
accept the proposal
Obligations of the States
Two functions states perform for the national
government:
State and local governments conduct and pay for
elections of all national government officials
States play a key role in the process of amending the
Constitution
Federal Aid
The national government has always provided
different types of aid to the states
The main form of aid is through federal grants
Sums of money given to state or local governments for specific
purposes
Federal grants redistribute income among the states
Funds come at a price, with aid comes federal control
and red tape
Funds are only given if the state or local government
are willing to meet certain conditions
Mandates and Preemption
Mid-1960s Congress has taken over some functions
that used to be controlled by the state governments
A mandate is a law that requires states to take on an
activity or provide a service that meets minimum
national standards
Congress may also pass a restraint that limits a states
ability to regulate an area
Congress can pass laws that allow the national
government to assume responsibility for a state
government function (preemption)
Federalism divides the powers of government,
but conflicts do arise between the federal and
state governments
The federal court system, Supreme Court,
plays a key role to end these disputes
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)-concluded that
when the national government and a state
government come into conflict, the national
government is supreme
Throughout the years, the Supreme Court has
shifted on this issue, sometimes siding with
the national government other times the state.
DEBATING PERSPECTIVES ON IMMIGRATION LAWS
1. Why did Arizona say it needed this law?
2. Do you think Arizonas reason is valid?
3. Did the justices follow party lines as suggested in the video?
4. Why do you think that immigration is such a big issue for the states?
5. If you were running this country how would you handle immigration
issues? Explain
LESSON 3: STATE POWERS AND INTERSTATE
RELATIONS
Regulating and Promoting Business
States regulate corporations within their borders and
promote those businesses
The main goal is to help the states economy and
provide employment for state residents
States regulate business to also protect the consumer
States regulate business to protect the worker, to
ensure safe and sanitary working conditions
States also might provide minimum wage
Crime
Protecting life and property is the responsibility of state and
local governments
States call laws that protect citizens from certain crimes criminal
codes
Each state sets its own system of punishment
Local governments typically enforce these state laws
State courts handle the great majority of all criminal cases
Education, Health, and Welfare
Education is traditionally controlled by local governments, but
the states finance about half of education, feds 10%
Health care: states license doctors and dentists, require vaccines
for children, support public hospitals
Governments provide aid to needy families with children, people
with disabilities, and to people who cannot afford health care.
Environment
States try to preserve their natural resources by regulating air
and water pollution
Regulations impact the health of residents and the economy of
the states
Difference Among the States
Federalism permits considerable freedom to each state in setting
its own laws, regulations, taxes, criminal codes, and budget
priorities
States can come into conflict because of federalism
Privileges and Immunities
The Founders wanted to protect citizens as they traveled
between the states
The Constitution provides that the Citizens of each State shall be
entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several
States.
One state cannot discriminate unreasonably against citizens of
another state
The courts have never given a complete listing of all possible
privileges and immunities.
Residency of a state depends on how a state defines residency
States can treat out-of state residents differently if distinction is
reasonable (example: higher college tuition to state colleges)
Interstate Compacts
The Constitution requires the states to settle their differences
with one another peacefully
Principal way states settle disagreements is by negotiating
interstate compacts (written agreements between 2 or more
states)
Congress must approve interstate compacts, this prevents states
from threating the Union by making alliances among themselves
Once a compact has been signed and approved by Congress it is
binding and enforced by the Supreme Court
Lawsuits Between States
Sometimes states are unable to resolve their disputes through
negotiation or interstate compacts, they can sue each other
Reasons to sue another state:
Cases in the West often involve water rights
States fight over the sewage from one state polluting the water of
another
States fight over boundary lines
EXPLORING WHAT IS CONSIDERED REASONABLE
Below are a list of scenarios you must determine whether the are reasonable
and unreasonable. You also must explain why you answered it that way.
Charging them higher fines for traffic offenses
Charging them higher tuition at state universities
Banning them from getting a job in the state
Banning them from serving on a jury in the state
Stopping them from voting
Stopping them from speaking at a public hearing in the st
LESSON 4: DIFFERING VIEWS ABOUT
FEDERALISM
State and Local Policies
States and local governments can serve as proving grounds for
the development and testing of new policies
In many cases amendments get created because multiple states
have laws already in place giving people that right (19th
amendment, 18th amendment, 26th amendment)
Sunset law is a provision in a law that sets an automatic end date
for the law
Sunshine law which prohibits public officials from holding official
meetings that are closed to the public
National Policies
Public policy is created at the national level and states follow
The national government may impose policies on states if it
believed those states were infringing on groups basic rights
National Power and the Commerce Clause
Supreme Court decisions have expanded the constitutional power
of the national government to regulate interstate commerce
The Court has interpreted the term commerce to mean almost any
activity connected with producing, buying, selling, and
transporting goods across state lines
The Court has also issued few ruling that limit the legislative
powers that the commerce clause grants to the federal government
Supporters of Stronger State and Local Government Powers
21st century conservatives (Republican, Tea Party, libertarians)
They believe that the 10th amendment sets clear limits on the
power of the national government and states have more power
They believe that the state and local governments are closer to
the people and know how to best help them
Tend to use the term big government
They are more likely to oppose broad federal laws and
regulations that limit states authority to legislate as they wish
Supporters of Stronger National Government Powers
21st century liberals (Democratic Party and Progressives)
They believe that the Founders confirmed that they tended to
create a strong national government
They use the supremacy clause to argue tha the national
government should be supreme in matters of public policy
They believe that under the elastic clause the powers expressly
delegated to the national government should be expanded
They believe that the national government is better equipped
to solve some major social and economic problems
Federalism increases opportunities for American
citizens to participate in politics
American federalism gives citizens many points of
access to government and increase their
opportunities for influencing public policy
Citizens may also work with special interest
groups to influence national policies and state and
local government agencies
A related effect of federalism is an increased
chance that ones political participation will have
some practical impact on policy