TT network[edit]
In a TT (Terra-Terra) earthing system, the protective earth connection for the consumer is provided by
a local earth electrode, (sometimes referred to as the Terra-Firma connection) and there is another
independently installed at the generator. There is no 'earth wire' between the two. The fault loop
impedance is higher, and unless the electrode impedance is very low indeed, a TT installation should
always have an RCD (GFCI) as its first isolator.
The big advantage of the TT earthing system is the reduced conducted interference from other users'
connected equipment. TT has always been preferable for special applications like telecommunication
sites that benefit from the interference-free earthing. Also, TT networks do not pose any serious risks in
the case of a broken neutral. In addition, in locations where power is distributed overhead, earth
conductors are not at risk of becoming live should any overhead distribution conductor be fractured by,
say, a fallen tree or branch.
In pre-RCD era, the TT earthing system was unattractive for general use because of the difficulty of
arranging reliable automatic disconnection (ADS) in the case of a live-to-PE short circuit (in
comparison with TN systems, where the same breaker or fuse will operate for either L-N or L-PE
faults). But as residual current devices mitigate this disadvantage, the TT earthing system has become
much more attractive providing that all AC power circuits are RCD-protected. In some countries (such
as the UK) is recommended for situations where an low impedance equipotential zone is impractical to
maintain by bonding, where there is significant outdoor wiring, such as supplies to mobile homes and
some agricultural settings, or where a high fault currents could pose other dangers, such as at fuel
depots or marinas.
The TT earthing system is used throughout Japan, with RCD units in most industrial settings. This can
impose added requirements on variable frequency drives and switched-mode power supplies which
often have substantial filters passing high frequency noise to the ground conductor.
Comparison[edit]
TT
IT
TN-S
TN-C
TN-C-S
Earth fault loop
impedance
High
Highest
Low
Low
Low
RCD preferred?
Yes
N/A
Optional
No
Optional
Need earth
electrode at site?
Yes
Yes
No
No
Optional
PE conductor cost
Low
Low
Highest
Least
High
Risk of broken
neutral
No
No
High
Highest
High
Safety
Safe
Less Safe
Safest
Least
Safe
Safe
Electromagnetic
interference
Least
Least
Low
High
Low
Safety risks
High loop
impedance (step
voltages)
Double fault,
overvoltage
Broken
neutral
Broken
neutral
Broken
neutral
Advantages
Safe and reliable
Continuity of
operation, cost
Safest
Cost
Safety
and cost