Scribd
Upload
34 views3 pages

Key Legal Principles in Case Law Analysis

This document provides a summary of various case laws related to property law under different headings: A-C discuss different cases related to the definition and distinction between terms like "transfer", "lease", and "licence". D discusses cases related to statutory interpretation and not supplying words not used by the legislature. E discusses cases related to state entities being fair in contractual matters and not indulging in profiteering. F-G cover principles of injunctions and the court's power to determine reasonable rent. H discusses the importance of renewal clauses. I covers joint ventures and partnerships. J-K discuss various other property law cases related to rights of first refusal and development

Uploaded by

rishiagrawala
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
34 views3 pages

Key Legal Principles in Case Law Analysis

This document provides a summary of various case laws related to property law under different headings: A-C discuss different cases related to the definition and distinction between terms like "transfer", "lease", and "licence". D discusses cases related to statutory interpretation and not supplying words not used by the legislature. E discusses cases related to state entities being fair in contractual matters and not indulging in profiteering. F-G cover principles of injunctions and the court's power to determine reasonable rent. H discusses the importance of renewal clauses. I covers joint ventures and partnerships. J-K discuss various other property law cases related to rights of first refusal and development

Uploaded by

rishiagrawala
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

CASE LAW

SNO.
A.

PROPOSITION
The term Otherwise transferred in Section 141(2) of the NDMC
Act, 1994 is to be read ejusdem generis with the preceding words
1. Union Bank of India vs. Pijush Kanti Nandy
(2009) 8 SCC 605 @ para 15 , 27

B.

2. Kamlesh Kumar Sharma vs. Yogesh Kumar Gupta


(1998) 3 SCC 45 @ para 13
Distinction between a Lease and a Licence

C.

3. Puran Singh Sahni v. Sundari Bhagwandas Kripalani,


(1991) 2 SCC 180 @ para 14, 15, 19
4. Mangal Amusement Park (P) Ltd. v. State of M.P.
(2012) 11 SCC 713 @ para 15, 17
The term letting on hire has been construed to mean akin to a
Licence

D.

5. H.S. Rikhy Vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee


AIR 1962 SC 554 @ para 5
When the legislature has consciously omitted certain words, the
Court while interpreting the said Section add or supply any words
especially when there is no ambiguity by applying the literal rule
of interpretation.
6. State v. Parmeshwaran Subramani,
(2009) 9 SCC 729: @ para 17-19, 22, 24-26
7. V. Jagannadha Rao v. State of A.P.
(2001) 10 SCC 401 @ para 18
8. Delhi Financial Corpn. v. Rajiv Anand,
(2004) 11 SCC 625 @ para 17
9. Sree Balaji Nagar Residential Assn. v. State of T.N.,
(2015) 3 SCC 353 @ para 11

E.

10. Bank of India v. Mehta Brothers,


(2008) 13 SCC 466 @ para 22, 26, 27
State instrumentality has to be fair in all its actions including
contractual matters. The State cannot indulge in rack renting and
profiteering like a private individual.
11. Jamshed Hormusji Wadia Vs. Board of Trustees, Port of
Mumbai and Anr.
(2004) 3 SCC 214 @ para 13, 14, 16-18, 20
12. M/s Dwarkadas Marfatia & Sons Vs. Board of Trustees of the
Port of Bombay

PAGE NO.

(1989) 3 SCC 293 @ para 17, 21-24.


13. Food Corporation of India Vs. M/s Kamdhenu Cattle Feed
Industries
(1993) 1 SCC 71 @ para 7, 8
14. Mahabir Auto Stores & Ors. Vs. Indian Oil Corp.
(1990) 3 SCC 752 @ para 12, 18
15. IOCL Vs. Nilofer Siddiqui
2015 SCC Online SC 1273 @ para 33-35
16. Style (Dress Land) Vs. Union Territory Chandigarh & Anr.
(1999) 7 SCC 89 @ para 10
F.

Grant of Principles of Injunction Injunction ought to be granted


where irreparable loss and injury would be caused and the
situation cannot be reversed. Public interest is also a important
consideration while granting an interim injunction.
17. Zenit Mataplast Private Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
(2009) 10 SCC 388
18. Cologate Palmolive Vs. Hindustan Unilever Ltd.
(1999) 7 SCC 1
19. Manohar Lal Chopra Vs. Rai Bahadur
AIR 1962 527
20. Star India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Piyush Agarwal
2013 (4) RAJ 749 (Del)

G.

The Court has the power to fix/determine reasonable rent in


certain cases.
21. Damodhar Tukaram Mangalmurti & Ors. vs. State of Bombay
AIR 1959 SC 639 @ para 1, 7, 8, 11
22. Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board & Anr. Vs.

H.

Prakash Dal Mill & Ors.


(2011) 6 SCC 714 @ para 19, 23-25
23. Mohammad Ahmad & Anr. Vs. Atma Ram Chauhan & Ors.
(2011) 7 SCC 755 @ para 21
24. M/s Raval & Co. Vs. K.G. Ramachandran & Ors.
(1974) 1 SCC 424 @ para 16
Renewal Clause is an important term and the court should be
reluctant to ignore such a term

I.

25. Naveen Chand & Anr. vs. Nagarjuna Travels & Hotels Pvt. Ltd.
(2002) 6 SCC 331 @ para 12
Joint Venture/Partnership
26. Suresh Dhanuka Vs. Sunita Mohapatra
(2012) 1 SCC 578 @ para 47
27. Addanki Narayanappa & Anr. Vs. Bhaskara Kristappa & 13 Ors.
AIR 1966 SC 1300 @ para 7
28. Sunil Siddharthbhai Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
(1985) 4 SCC 519 @ para 16, 17
29. Shreedhar Govind Kamerkar Vs. Yesahwant Govind Kamerkar

J.

K.

& Anr.
(2006) 13 SCC 481 @ para 27
30. Vidhi Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Baljit Kaur
(2001) 91 DLT 730 (DB) @ para 18
31. Robinson Vs. Ashton
Right of First Refusal is permissible in law.
32. Ravi development Vs. Shree Krishna Prathisthan & Ors.
(2009) 7 SCC 462 @ para 23,54
33. Agarwal & Modi Enterprises Vs. NDMC - -(2007) 8 SCC 75

You might also like