Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law Chapter Business Cycle Measurement Before we go on to build models of aggregate economic activity that can explain why business cycles exist and what, if anything, should be done about them, we must understand the key features that we observe in economic data that define ‘a business cycle. In this chapter, we move beyond the study of the measurement of gross domestic product, the price level, savings, and wealth, which we covered in Chapter 2, 0 an examination of the regularities in the relationships among aggregate economic variables as they fluctuate over time. ‘We will show that business cycles are quite irregular, and therefore somewhat unpre- dictable; macroeconomic forecasters often have difficulty predicting the timing of a busi- ness cycle upturn or downturn, However, business cycles are quite regular in terms of comovernents, which is to say that macroeconomic variables move together in highly predictable ways. We will focus separately on the components of real GDP, nominal vari- ables, and labour market variables This chapter describes a set of key business eycle facts concerning comovements in Canadian macroeconomic data, In Chapters 4, 5. 6, 11, and 12, we will use these facts to show how our models can make sense of what we observe in the data, Then, in Chapters 13 and 14, we will use the key business cycle facts to help us evaluate alternative theories of the business cycle. These facts show how our models can make sense of what ‘we observe in the data, and help us evaluate alternative theories ofthe business cycle. Regularities in GDP Fluctuations ‘The primary defining feature of business cycles is that they are fluctuations about trend in real gross domestic product. Recall from Chapter 1 that we represent the trend in real GDP with a smooth curve that closely fits actual real GDP, with the trend representing that part of real GDP that can be explained by long-run growth factors. What is left over, the deviations from trend, we take to represent business cycle activity 63Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law 64 Part 1 Introduction and Measurement Issues FIGURE 3.1 ‘doalized Business Cycles: The black curve isan ideal 20d path for real GDP over tine, while the coloured Ine 'sthe growth trend in eal (GDP. Note that rel GOP cycles around the trend over ‘ime, with the maximum negative deviation from trend being a trough and the ‘maximum postive deviation ‘rom trend baing a peak The amplitude isthe sze of the maximum davition from trend, and the frequency i the number of peaks that o=- ccurwihinayoa's te, In Figure 3.1 we show idealized business cycle activity in real GDP, with fuctua- tions about 2 long-run trend. In the figure, real GDP is represented by the black line, while the trend is represented by the coloured line. There are peaks and troughs in real GDP, a peak being a relatively large positive deviation from trend, and a rough a relatively large negative deviation from trend. Peaks and troughs in the deviations from tuend in real GDP are referred to as turning points. In a manner analogous to wave motion in the physical sciences, we can think of the maximum deviation from trend in Figure 3.1 as the amplitude of the business cycle, and the number of peaks in real GDP that occur per year as the frequeney of the business cycle Next, in Figure 3.2 we show HEE SUN NCERRBE do8Mtons from trend in real GDP for Canada over the period 1961-2011. A series of positive deviations from trend culminating in a peak represents a boom, whereas a series of negative deviations from trend culminating in a trough represents a recession. In Figure 3.2, we have marked four important recent recessions: the 1974-1975, 1981-1982, 1990-1992, and 2008- 2009 recessions. The 1974-1975 recession was relatively mild, with a negative devia- tion from trend of less than 2%, while the 1981-1982 recession was relatively severe, with a negative deviation from trend of about 5%, In the 1990-1992 recession, the negative deviation from trend was fairly moderate, at about 2%, but that recession was fairly prolonged. Finally, with a negative percentage deviation from trend of about 3%, the most recent recession in 2008-2009 was more severe than all of the other three recessions, except the one in 1981-1982 ‘An examination of Figure 3.2 indicates a striking regularity, which is that the devi- ations from trend in real GDP are persistent. That is, when real GDP is above trend, it tends to stay above trend, and when it is below trend, it tends to stay below trend. This feature is quite important in terms of economic forecasting over the short run; persistence implies that we can fairly confidently predict that if real GDP is currently Real GOPUsername: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law (Chapter 3 Business Cycle Measurement 65 4 T T T i FIGURE 3.2 Percentage Deviations 7 7 from Trond in Real GDP, : | 1961-2011 Of particular note ae the four most ecant recessions, in 1974-1975, 1981-1982, 11990-1992, and 2008-2008, Soe pd am ha Sie Canta OMS tse, Ses vier & sb Percentage Deviation from Trend T960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 below (above) trend, it will be below (above) trend several months from now. Other than being persistent, however, the deviations from trend in real GDP are actually quite irregular, There are three other features to note from Figure 3.2: 1, The time series of deviations from trend in real GDP is quite choppy. 2. There is no regularity in the amplitude of fluctuations in real GDP about trend. Some of the peaks and troughs represent large deviations from trend, whereas other peaks and troughs represent small deviations from trend. 3. There is no regularity in the frequency of fluctuations in real GDP about trend. ‘The length of time between peaks and troughs in real GDP varies considerably. ‘Though deviations from trend in real GDP are persistent, which makes short-term forecasting relatively easy, the above three features imply that longer-term forecasting is difficult. The choppiness of fluctuations in real GDP will make these fluctuations difficult .o predict, while the lack of regularity in the amplitude and frequency of flue- tuations implies that itis difficult to predict the severity and length of recessions and booms. Therefore, predicting future fluctuations in real GDP by looking only at past real GDP is much like attempting to forecast the weather by looking out the window. fit is sunny today, itis likely that it will be sunny tomorrow (weather is persistent), bbut the fact that itis sunny today may give us very little information on whether it will be sunny one week from today. (See Macroeconomics in Action 3.1 for a discussion of economic forecasting and the financial crisis.)Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law Diels Oe} ea B ‘As was discussed in Chapter 1, a macroeconomic ‘modal is designed with a particuler purpose in ‘mind, Fst, we might want 2 model that wil lp us Understand a particular economic phenomenon, For ‘example, we may wish to understand why econo- rigs grow over time, Second, we might want to ‘make predictions about the efecis of economic pak Ici, such as the effects on real GDP and employ- ‘ment of a partiouar government tax proposal. For these types of problems—understanding economic [Phenomena and predicting the elects of economic Polcy—i is important to work wih structural mod- ls, By “structural,” we mean models bul from bbasic microsconomic principles, and for which pri- vate behavioural relationships do not change when polcymakers change their behaviour. A structural ‘modells sald to be immune to the “Lucas ertique,"* Predicting tho offects of economic policies Is quite aiferent trom macroeconomic forecast- Ing, which involves predicting the course of future ‘economic variables on the basis of what we are ‘observing today. Some economists have argued that economic theory is not a necessary input in 2 forecasting exercise. Christopher Sime, winner (with Thomas Sargent) of the 2011 Nobel Prize in Economies, is famous in part for inventing vec- tor autoregression methodology, an atheoretical statistical approach to capturing the dynamics in Comovement Economic Forecasting and the Financial Crisis ‘economic time series.* This approach was used in the Bayesian vector autoregression (BVAR) ‘models developed at the Federal Reserve Bank of Mineapots in the 1970s and 1980s. These BVAR models were used successfully in forecasting. Economie theory i not an input n setting uo or run ring a BVAR model. Al that is required is @ know! 12dge of statistics and computation. A BVAR model Captures tho dota that wo soo in Figure 3.2 and ‘more; part of wnat the BVAR wil do is to forecast real GDP on the bass of the histrcal behaviour at real GOP—its persistence and variablty for exam- ple, The BVAR wil also take account ofthe historical relationships between real GOP and other econemic ‘variables in producing a forecast. IF we take the ideas of people ke Christopher ‘Sims serious, the value of macroeconomic know edge is notin producing forecasts, but in under- stancing macroeconomic phenomena and guiding ‘macrosconomic policy. Tha is perhaps at odds with the views oflay people conceming what economists do, Just as meteorologists are expected to do a {good job predicting the weather, macroeconomists are sometimes expected to do a good job predict- Ing important macroeconomic events. Indeed, mao- roeconomists have suffered some ccism attr the recent global financial criss for not waming every- ‘one about Is that criticism justiiod? Although real GDP fluctuates in irregular patterns, macroeconomic variables fluctu- ate together in patterns that exhibit strong regularities. We refer to these patterns in fuctuations as comovement, Robert Lucas once remarked that “with respect to quali- tative behaviour of comovements among [economic time] series, business cycles are all alike.”" "see R Lucas, 198, “Understanding Business Cyces,"tn Suds in Buses Cle Theory, MIT Pres, 218,Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law ‘Sometimes economic theory tls us tha fre casting is in fact ute, For example, basic theory tolls us that the changes in stock prices from one day to the next cannot be forecast. if we knew ‘that the price ofa stack would be higher tomorrow than today, we should buy that stock, As a result today's market price forthe stock would tend to rise (because ofthe increase in the demand fori), 10 he point where the price ofthe stock today i the same as the price tomorrow. Similely, the widely held view that a stock's price wil be lower tomor: row than today wil tend to force today's stock price down, What we should observes that, at ary point intime, the price ofa given stockis the best forecast avaliable ofits price tomorrow. Economic theory ‘thus tell us that the changes in stock prices from day to day cannot be forecast. This is sometimes called the “efficient markets hypothesis.” ‘A similar idea applies to financial crises. A financial crisis involves severe tural in credit mar- kts. Intorost rates and stock prices can move by lerge amounts, and there is dramatic reduction in crecit market activity. I anyone could precict such an event he or she could profit handsomely from ‘that information. Just as with the efficient markats hypothesis, a widely hed belie that afnancial criss ‘will happen tomorrow should make it happen today. For example, if people expact a financial crisis to push down the price of stacks by 20%, the rice of ‘stocks should drop by 20% today. In economic models of francial rises, the fc tious people Ivng in the mode! know that afiancid ‘sis can happen, but they cannot predict It. As wal i can be the case thatthe pokoymakers ng in the model cannot predict the financial criss, and ‘are not able to prevent Further, we can have an ‘excellent model ofa financial ors, but an econo- mist equipped with that model wil not be able to predt a francalerss. The economist may, how ‘ever, be able to use the financial crisis model to design regulations that will prevent a financial crisis {rom happening, or perhaps mitigate its effects ‘The conclusion is that the ability to forecast {uture events is nota lmus test for macraeconom- ics, Macroeconomics can be useful in many ways that Rave nothing todo with forecasting, ¥Sce R. Lucas, 1976, “Econometric Policy Evaluation: ‘A Catigue” Camepe Rochester Cnfrnce Volume on Pubic Paley 1, 1846. ee C. Sims, 1980, “Macroeconomics and Realy,” Econometrica 48, 1-48, ‘See for example H. Ennis and. Keister, 2010, “Banking Parcs and Poly Responses, Jara of Monetary Exons Macroeconomic variables are measured as time series; for example, real GDP is ‘measured in a series of quarterly observations over time. When we examine comove- ‘ments in macroeconomic time series, typically we look at these time series two at a time, and a good starting point is to plot the data. Suppose, for example, that we have two macroeconomic time series and we would like to study their comovernent, We first transform these two time series by removing trends, and we will let x and y denote the percentage deviations from trend in the two time series. One way to plot x and y is in time series form, as in Figure 3.3. What we look for frst in the time series plot isa pat- tern of positive correlation or negative correlation in x and y. In Figure 3.3(a), there is positive correlation between x and y:x is high when y is high, andanislovowhemysislove.293.143,Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law 68 Part Introdueti Percentage Deviation from Trend ion and Measurement Issues Positive Correlation between, Negative Correlation between xandy gz | randy z 5 y £ 3 Bo z 8 x Z x 8 : é Time Time @ ) FIGURE 3.3. Time Series Plats of xand y (@) Two time series that are positively correlated: when xis high (ow), tends ta be high ow). Two time saris that are negatively conelated: when Is high (ow, y tends to below (gh) That is, one economic time series tends to be above (below) trend when the other eco- nomic time series is above (below) trend. In Figure 3.3(b), x and y are negatively cor- related: x is high (low) when y is low (high). Another way to plot the data is as a scatter plot, with x on the horizontal axis and ‘y on the vertical axis. In Figure 3.4, each point in the scatter plot is an observation on xand y for a particular time period. Here, whether x and y are positively or negatively correlated is determined by the slope of a straight line that best fits the points in the scatter plot. Part (a) of Figure 3.4 shows a positive correlation between x and y, part (b) shows a negative correlation, and part (c) shows a zero correlation. It should be emphasized that a first pass at data carried out in this fashion tells us nothing about why two variables might be correlated in the fashion that we observe in the time series and scatter plot. To organize our thinking about the data, we need other evidence and macroeconomic theory. Macroeconomists are often primarily interested in how an individual macroeco- nomic variable comoves with real GDP. An economic variable is said to be proeyelical if ts deviations from end are positively correlated with the deviations [rom trend in real GDP, countercyclical if its deviations from trend are negatively correlated with the deviations from trend in real GDP, and acyelical if it is neither procyclical nor coun- tercyclical, As an example of comovement between two macroeconomic time series, we will consider real GDP and real imports for Canada over the period 1961-2011 In Figure 3.5 we plot the percentage deviations from trend in real GDP (the coloured line) and real imports (the black line) in time series form. There is a distinct pattern of positive correlation in Figure 3.5; when GDP is high (low) relative to trend, imports tend to be high (low) relative to trend. This positive correlation also shows up in the scatter plot in Figure 3.6, where we show a graph of observations of percentage devia-Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law Chapter 3 Business Cycle Measurement 69 ¥ | Positive Correlation between yand x @ ¥ | Negative Correlation between yand x ©) Y | Zero Correlation between yand x o tions from trend in imports versus percentage deviations from trend in GDP. Note that a straight line fit to the points in Figure 3.6 would have a positive slope. In this example, we have established an important fact: deviations from trend in imports and GDP are positively correlated. Any theory that we develop that is intended to help us understand, for example, business cycle activity and how itis transmitted across coun- tries should be consistent with this fact. FIGURE 3.4 ‘Scatter Plats of yand x (@)x and y are postvely ‘correlated. fb) xand y are negatively correlated, () x ‘andy ae uncoreated.Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law 70 Part 1 Introduction and Measurement Issues FIGURE 3.5 45 1 1 r 1 Imports and GOP for Canada, 1961-2011 This igure, as an example, shows the time series of percentage deviations trom trend in real imports the blackline) and real GDP (th coloured ine for Canada forthe period 1961-2011 Imports and GOP are leary positively correlated, so impor are procyclical Sour: esp ee Sais Canada OMS ee, Sern asin, rz Percentage Deviation from Trend 20, L 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Year FIGURE 3.6 Scatter Plot of imports and GDP for Canada, 1961-2011 This figure shows the same data as Figure 3.5 but in scatter plot rather than time sates form. We again ob serve the postive correlation between imports and GDP, 1s aposttvely sloped straight line would best fi the scatter plot; and again, imports are rocyeica Sauce: aod te Sais Canada CANSIM dbase, Stes Percentage Deviation from Trend in Imports “6 eat eager tee HERE ase ga Percentage Deviation from Trend in GDPUsername: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law Chapter 3 Business Cycle Measurement 71 A measure of the degree of correlation between two variables is the correlation coefficient. The correlation coelficient between two variables, x and y, takes on values between —1 and 1. Ifthe correlation coefficient is 1, x and y are perfectly positively correlated, and a scatter plot of observations on x and y will fall on a positively sloped straight line. Ifthe correlation coefficient is ~1, x and are perfectly negatively cor- related, and a scatter plot would consist of points on a negatively sloped straight line. If the correlation coefficient is 0, x and y are uncorrelated. In the example above, the percentage deviations from trend in real GDP and real imports have a correlation coe!- ficient of 0.75, indicating positive correlation, ‘An important element of comovement is the leading and lagging relationships that, exist in macroeconomic data. If'a macroeconomic variable tends to aid in predicting the future path of real GDP, we say that it is a leading variable; whereas if real GDP helps to predict the future path of a particular macroeconomic variable, that variable is said to be a lagging variable. In Figure 3.7 we show idealized time series plots of the percentage deviations from wend in real GDP and two variables, x and y. In part (a) of the figure, variable x isa leading variable, whereas in (b) variable x is a lagging variable. A coincident variable is one that neither leads nor lags real GDP. Ifit is known that some set of macroeconomic variables all tend to be leading variables, this information can be very useful in macroeconomic forecasting, as timely information on leading variables can then be used to forecast real GDP. One way to use this information is to construct a macroeconomic model, grounded in economic the- ory, that incorporates the relationships between leading variables and real GDP, which can then be used for forecasting. However, some economists argue that forecasting can be done simply by exploiting past statistical relationships among macroeconomic vari- ables to project into the future. A very simple form of this approach is the construction seating vate sea ging arate i i 5 i 5 5 3 0 i 0 i 5 é eae cor ~* Time Tine @ (b) FIGURE 3.7 Leading and Lagging Variables In (as leading variable, as ts peaks and troughs tend to precede those of eal GDP. In (), x lagging ‘variable, asthe peaks and troughs in reel GDP tend to lead those in x.Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law 72 Part 1 Introduction and Measurement Issues FIGURE 3. Percentage Deviations from Trend in Real GDP (coloured line) and the Composite Index of Business Leading Indicators (black tne), 1961-2011 The indoxis a weighted aver- age ofeaing variables and 0, not surprisingly, it tends to lead real GOP. Sree fom he tte Cana CAIN be, Sees ico? 87 and use of the composite index of business leading indicators (or index of leading indicators for short). This index is a weighted average of macroeconomic variables that has been found to do a good job of predicting future real GDP. Watching the index of leading economic indicators can sometimes provide useful information for forecasters, particularly with respect to the turning points in aggregate economic activity. In Figure 3.8 we show a plot of the percentage deviations from trend in real GDP (the coloured line) and in the index of leading indicators (the black line). Note that the index of leading economic indicators tends to track real GDP fairly closely, but with a lead. In particular, turning points in the index of leading economic indicators in Figure 3.8 tend to fall before turning points in real GDP. Finally, there are key regularities in terms of the variability of economic variables over the business cycle. As we will see, some macroeconomic variables are highly volatile, while others behave in a very smooth way relative to trend. These patterns in variability are an important part of business cycle behaviour that we would like to understand, A measure of cyclical variability is the standard deviation of the percent- age deviations from trend. For example, in Figure 3.5, imports are much more variable than GDP. The standard deviation of the percentage deviations from trend in imports is more than twice that for GDP. Next we will examine some key macroeconomic variables and will evaluate for each whether they are () procyclical or countercyclical; (i) leading or lagging; and (Gii) more or less variable relative to real GDP. These facts will then make up the set of important business cycle regularities that we would like to explain by using ‘macroeconomic theory. Percentage Deviation from Trend = 4 6 Leading Index -10 12. L L L 1 L 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010-2020 YearUsername: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law Chapter 3. Business Cycle Measurement 73 THE COMPONENTS OF GDP In Figure 3.9 we show the percentage deviations from trend in real aggregate consump- tion (the black line) and real GDP (the coloured line). Clearly, the deviations from trend in consumption and in GDP are highly positively correlated, in that consump- tion tends to be above (below) trend when GDP is above (below) trend; these two time series move very closely together. The correlation coefficient between the percentage deviation from trend in real consumption and the percentage deviation from trend in real GDP is 0.80, which is greater than zero, so consumption is procyclical. There appears to be no discernible lead/lag relationship between real consumption and real GDP in Figure 3.9—the turning points in consumption do not appear to lead or lag the turning points in real GDP. Thus, consumption is a coincident variable From Figure 3.9, note that consumption is less variable than GDP, in that the devia- tions from trend in consumption tend to be smaller than those in GDP. In Chapter 9 we will study the theory of consumption decisions over time, and this theory will explain why consumption tends to he smoother than GDP. For the data displayed in Figure 3.9, the standard deviation of the percentage deviations in real consumption is 82.9% of that for teal GDP. This is a more precise measure of what our eyes tell us about Figure 3.9, ‘which is that consumption is smoother than GDP. The percentage deviations from trend in real investment (the black line) and real GDP (the coloured line) are plotted in Figure 3.10. As with consumption, investment is procyclical, since it tends to be above (below) trend when GDP is above (below) trend. The correlation coefficient between the percentage deviations from trend in investment and those in GDP is 0.80. There is no tendency for investment to lead or lag GDP from 4 Percentage Deviation from Trend FIGURE 3.9 Percentage Deviations from ‘Trond in Real Consumption (lack tine) and Real GDP {coloured tne) for Canada, 1961-2011 From the fgure, wo can ‘bsewe that consumption is prooyelcal, coincident, and Jess variable than GDP. ‘Sie Apt fn Satis nen, rene “Peso 1970 1980—«1990——2O00 RDN 20a ADAM o0.200.210.149 YearUsername: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law 74 Part 1 Introduction and Measurement Issues FIGURE 3.10 Percentage Deviations from Trend in Real Investment (black tne) and Real GDP {coloured tne) for Canada, 1961-2011 We can observe trom the ‘igure that investment is pro- cyclical, coincident, and more variable than GOP. Seren Aa om he Stats giz, iz, 82067 Percentage Deviation from Trend -30, 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Year Figure 3.10, and so investment is a coincident variable, However, it is well known that some components of investment, in particular residential investment and inventory investment, tend to lead the business cycle. In contrast to consumption, investment is much more volatile than is GDP. This is indicated in Figure 3.10, where the deviations from trend in investment tend to be much larger than those for GDP. The standard deviation of the percentage deviations from trend in investment is 519.1% of what it is for GDP. Given that some components of investment lead GDP and that itis highly volatile, investment can play a very important role over the business cycle. NOMINAL VARIABLES ‘The correlation between money prices and aggregate economic activity has long been of interest to macroeconomists. In the 1950s, A. W. Phillips® observed that there was a negative relationship between the rate of change in money wages and the unemploy- ‘ment rate in the United Kingdom, one that came to be known as the Phillips curve. If we take the unemployment rate to be 2 measure of aggregate economic activity (as wwe will see in Chapter 6, the unemployment rate is a strongly countercyclical vari- able; when real GDP is above trend, the unemployment rate is low), then the Phillips curve captures a positive relationship between the rate of change in a money price (the money wage) and the level of aggregate economic activity. Since Phillips made his se A.W, Pillps, 1958, “The Relationship between Unemployment and the Rate of Change in Money Wages the United Kingdom, 1861-1957," Eanomica 25, 283-209,Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law (Chapter 3 Business Cycle Measurement 75 initial observation, "Phillips curve” has come to be applied to any positive relationship between the rate of change in money prices or wages, or the deviation from trend in ‘money prices or wages, and the deviation from trend in aggregate economic activity. ‘As we will see in Chapter 18, observed Phillips curves are notoriously unstable—that is, they tend to shift over time—and there are sound theories to explain this instability In the 1961-2011 period the deviations from trend in the price level and deviations from trend in GDP, are essentially uncorrelated. There is no discernible correlation in Figure 3.11, and the correlation coelficient for the two variables is -.05. Thus there is no evidence of a Phillips curve relation, and the price level is acyclical. Note from Figure 3.12 that the price level (the black line) is about as variable as real GDP (the coloured line); the standard deviation of the percentage deviations from trend in the price level is 101.0% of that for GDP. Also, the price level tends to be much smoother than most asset prices. For example, the average price of shares traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange is highly variable relative to the money prices of goods and services, In Figure 3.12 there appears to be no tendency for the price level to lead or lag real GDP, so that the price level appears to be coincident. ‘Whether the price level is procyclical or countercyclical, and whether itis a lead- ing or a lagging variable, can play an important role in resolving debates concerning the causes of business cycles, as we will see in Chapters 13 and 14. In contrast to the 1961-2011 Canadian data examined above, it appears that the price level was a procy- clical variable over some periods of history in some countries (see Macroeconomics in Action 3.2), for example, in Canada during the period between the World Wars, and the price level is countercyclical in U.S. post-World War II data. 4 T T T T T T T T it z ane err BL ‘ Sia | i ib a Pare at i ANE Bie E of £ st ee we 4 + 7 oe * ' REE i : - = va as, $ ee | Sag aaa ae OEE Ee Percentage Deviation from Trend in GDP FIGURE 3.11 Scatter Plot forthe Percent- age Deviations from Trend Inthe Price Level (he Implicit GDP Price Deflator) ‘and Real GOP for Canada, 1961-2011 The figure shows 2 cork tion between the two var bles which is essentially 200 for 1961-2011. Therefor, the rice level is acycical forthe peti 1961-2011, Sure ast nom ha Se Cade OMS te, See cer, 9876Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law The Correlation between the Price y, Level and Aggregate Output across Countries and over Time MACROECONOMICS In Chapters 12 through 14 we will study how the ‘comovements among macroeconomic variables can be affected by the types of shooks that are hitting the economy, the relatve saverty of those hooks, and the manner in which macroeconomic polcy reacts to these shocks. One interesting way this is reflected in the data isin the coraation we see between the price lavel and aggregate output. For example, a decrease in aggregate productiv- ity wil tond to incroaso the price lovel and reduce ‘ggregate output, producing a negative correlation between these two variables, or a countercyctcal price level. However, an increase in the money supply, engingered by the Bank of Canada, will tend to increase the price level and increase apgre~ gate output, producing a procycica price level. I the Bank of Canad reacts to a negative shock to aggregate productivity by increasing the money supply, then the price level could be observed to be counteroyccal or procycical. Whathor the prio level is countercycical or procyciial in the data right then be determined by whether shocks to aggregate productivity or money supply shocks {are more important, oF by how monetary policy reacts to shacks to the economy. David Backus and Patrick Kehoe have studied the properties of busiesmicyaiesicernss-eauanias and over long periods of time A finding of theirs is that the correlations among real aggregate vari- ‘ables are remarkably similar across countries and ‘over time. However, the correlation between the price level and aggregate output is not. After World ‘War Il, the price lovel was countercyclcal n mast of the counties that Backus and Kehoe studied.” But before World War | and between the World Wars, the price level was procyoscal in most ofthe coun- ‘ves in this set. This Is an important piece of infor- ‘mation that wil be usef for usin evaluating theories ‘of the business cycle in Chapters 13 and 14. ‘See. Backus and P Kehoe, 1992, "Intemational Evidence on the Historical Properiss of Business Cycles,” American Franc Review 82, 894-888, "australia Canada, Denna, Germany ypu, Nowy, Sweden, the Uned Kingdom, and the Unite Sat, In addition to Phillips curve relationships and reverse Phillips curve relationships, a key element of the comovement between nominal variables and aggregate economic activity isthe positive correlation between deviations from trend in the nominal money supply and deviations from trend in real GDP. The money supply is a measure of the ‘nominal quantity of assets used in making transactions in the economy. Depending on the measure of money under consideration, the money supply in Canada can include ‘currency in circulation and transactions accounts at chartered banks and other deposi- tory institutions. In Figure 3.13 we show the percentage deviations from trend in a ‘measure of the money supply (the black line) and in real GDP (the coloured line) over the period 1961-2011. The money supply is mildly procyclical here, with the cor- relation coefficient for the data in Figure 3.13 being 0.19. Therefore, we will take the the money supply measure used here the monlary hase, a narrow measure of money In Chapters 12 and 17, ‘we wil iri the meesrertet ofthe money apply in tore deal.Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law Chapter 3 Business Cycle Measurement 77 FIGURE 3.12 Price Level and GDP for 4 (Canada, 1961-2011 This igure shows the time 4 sates plot ofthe same data 3 in Figure 3.11. Here, we 4 ee thatthe price level (the black line) is countercycl- 4 cal coincident, and about as variable as real GDP (the 4 coloured ln). Snuoe: Altes tome tates 4 Canada CANS thon Sars 92067, 1987756, Percentage Deviation from Trend a L 1 L 1 L T960 1970 1980 1990 72000 2010 2020 Year 6 1 7 , : 1 FIGURE 3.13 Percentage Deviations from. Trend in the Money Supply 4 (black tine) and Real GOP {coloured tine) for Canada, 1961-2011 Money is a procyetcal and leading variabe, and itis ‘mora variable than real GDP. Sauce: gts ro he tise 4 Canada CANS dtase Ses Percentage Deviation from Trend 6, L L . 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 YearUsername: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law ‘The Great Moderation isa period running from the ‘mid-1980s unt about 2007 that featured relatively low variability n real GDP about trend, as well as low inflation and low variability in prices about trend, These features of the data ere most pro- ‘ounced forthe United States, bt some research- fers have claimed that this pattern exists mare widely. For example, Potor Summers"? claims that ‘a decine in the variabitty of real GOP occurred in Canada, France, Germany, italy, Japan, the U.K., the U.S., and Australia ater about 1985. Consider the data displayed in Figure 3.42. there were a Great Moderation in Canad, what we should observe isa deine in absolute percentage deviations from trend inthe period 1968-2007, ela- tive to 1961~1985. nf, f we calculate the stand: ‘ard deviation of percentage devations from trend in real GDP, this was 1.39 for 1961-1985, and 1.22 for 1986-2007. This might be characterized as 2 The Great Moderation? Very Small Moderation, but certainly not a Great ‘one. Further, if we incide the most recant reces- sion, and calculate the standard deviation for the ‘period 1986-2011, we get 1.97, whichis very close to the standard deviation for 1961-1986. ‘The United States certainly dd experience a ‘Great Moderation: the variabilty in real GOP about ‘ond is much larger for 1961~1986 than for 1986 2007, The difference between the US. and Canada inthis respect is explained primatiy by two reces- sions: the 1873-1975 recession was mid in Ganada ‘and severe in tha United States, whe tha recession Inthe early 1990s was mid in the United States and ‘severe hn Canada, ‘The picture is very diferent when we look ‘a the behaviour of inflation and the price level in ‘Cenada, rather than GOP varailty. we measure the inflation rate as the percentage change in the implict GDP price deftator from four quarters ‘money supply to be a procyclical variable. Another important observation concerning the nominal money supply and real GDP is that money tends to be a leading variable, ‘which we observe as a tendency for turning points in the money supply to lead turning points in GDP in Figure 3.13. This observation was emphasized by Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz,” who studied the behaviour of the money supply and real GDP in the United States over the period 1867-1960. ‘The money supply is somewhat more variable than GDP, with the standard devia- tion of the percentage deviations from trend in the money supply being 127.3% of, ‘what itis for GDP. This can also be observed in Figure 3.13, LABOUR MARKET VARIABLES ‘The last business cycle regularities we will examine are those in labour markets, rlat- ing to the variables we will determine in the business cycle models in Chapters 13 and 14, First, in Figure 3.14 we show percentage deviations from trend in employment (the black line) and in real GDP (the coloured line) for the period 1976-2011, Clearly, the “See M, Fridman and A. Scat, 1963,A Monetary Hicory ofthe United Sas: 1867 Pres, Princeton, NI 1960, Peinceton UnversityUsername: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law previously, thon the average Canaan inflaton rate was 6.4% for 1962-1985, 2.5% for 1986-2007, ‘and 2.4% for 1986-2011, The standard deviation in percentage deviations from trend in the implicit GOP price deflator was 1.66 for 1961-1985, 91 for 1988-2007, and 1.08 for 1986-2011. Therefore, the inflaton rate dropped, and prices became more stable in the period after 1985 than Inthe period before, so there was an unambiguous moderation in this respect. The reduction inthe inflation rate and lower price level variailty after 1985 can be attributed ‘maint to the polcie ofthe Bank of Canada, which has been committed to inflation control at feast since the late 1970s, and adopted explicit inla- tion targets in 1991. In other countries, particularly the United States, researchers have attempted to ‘sentangle the reasons for the moderation in real ‘Moderation inthe United Statos has been attributed In varying proportions to better macroeconomic policy, financial development, and good luck." However, Canadian and U.S. monetary poliles fer ite in practice, and financial development in Canada and the United States has been siriar. “Therefore, if we are looking for an explanation of ‘hy the U.S. experienced a moderation in real GDP variabilty and Canad di no, the best one seems ‘o-be that Canadian luck was worse than the U.S.'s ‘over this period, ‘see P. Summers, 2003, “What Caused the Great Madera? Some Ciess-Counuy Evidence Federal Reve Bark of Kansas Cay Econom Rev, Ted Quarter, 5-32 2See wore ederaleserve gov/osarddocsspeeches 200 Ciera) MTs) IN ACTI GOP variabiity alter 1985. Generally, the Great 20040220 ham. deviations from trend in employment closely track those in real GDP, and so employ- ment isa procyclical variable. The correlation coefliient for the data in Figure 3,14 is, 0.80. In terms of leadag relationships, we can observe a tendency in Figure 3.14 for turning points in employment to lag turning points in GDP, and so employment is a lagging variable. Employment is less varable than GDP, with the standard deviation of the percentage deviation from trend for employment being 83.4% of that for real GDP in Figure 3.14. 1m the macroeconomic models we analyze, a key variable will be the market real wage, which is the purchasing power of the wage earned per hour worked for the average worker. This is measured from the data as the average money wage for all ‘workers, divided by the price level. The cyclical behaviour of the real wage will prove to be crucial in helping us discriminate among diflerent theories of the business cycle in Chapters 13 and 4, The weight of empirical evidence indicates thatthe real wage is... 45 procyclical.!2 We do not show data on the aggregate real wage, as it 18 difficult to meas- "7°71" ‘ue the relationship between real wages and real GDP by examining aggregate data "For the eridene fo he United Sues se G Solon, Rare, and J Pater, 1994, "Measuring the Cyclaity of Rel Wages: How Import ls Composton Ba” Quarter our of Economic, February, 1-25,Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission. Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law 80 Part 1 Introduction and Measurement Issues FIGURE 3.14 Percentage Deviations from Trend in Employment (biack line) and Real GDP (coloured line) or Canada, 1976-2011 Employmentis procyclical, itis lagging varabe; and it 's less variable than real GDP, See tom he Suter anata CAIN ba, Ss veco7, vaca Percentage Deviation from Trend 6 - Tors 19801985 19901995 2000 2008 20102015 Year ‘The key problem is that the composition of the labour force tends to change over the business cycle, which tends to bias the correlation between the real wage and real GDP. There is no strong evidence on whether the real wage is a leading or a lagging variable Productivity plays a key role in the economy, as was mentioned in Chapter 1, and in later chapters productivity will be an important element in our study of business cycles and economic growth. One measure of productivity is average labour pro- ductivity, Y/N, where Y is aggregate real output and N is total labour input. For our purposes Vis real GDP and Nis total employment, so we are measuring average labour productivity as output per worker. In Figure 3.15 we show the percentage deviations from trend in real GDP (coloured line) and average labour productivity (black line). From the figure, average labour productivity is clearly a procyclical variable. The cor- relation coefficient for percentage deviations from trend in real GDP and average labour productivity is 0.63, Average labour productivity is less volatile than GDP; the standard deviation of the percentage deviations from trend in average labour productivity is 63.9% of that for real GDP. Further, there is no apparent tendency for average labour productivity to lead or lag real GDP in Figure 3.15, so average labour productivity is a coincident variable. In Chapters 13 and 14, the predictions of different business cycle theories for the comovements between average labour productivity and real GDP are important in helping us to evaluate and compare these theories.Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law Chapter 3 Business Cycle Measurement 81 Percentage Deviation from Trend +, 1075-1980 -1985—«1990 1995 2000-2005 -—«2O10—«O1S, Year SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT The economic data we are studying in this chapter, and most data used in macroeco- nomic research and in formulating mactaeconomic policy, is seasonally adjusted. That is, in most macroeconomic time series, there exists a predictable seasonal compo- nent. For example, GDP tends to be low during the summer months when workers are on vacation; investment expenditure tends to be low in the winter months when under- taking construction projects is more difficult; and the money supply tends to be high during the December holiday season, when the quantity of retail transactions is high. ‘There are various methods for seasonally adjusting data, but the basic idea is to observe historical seasonal patterns and then take out the extra amount that we tend to see on average during a particular week, month, or quarter, simply because of the time of year. For example, to seasonally adjust the money supply, in December we would want to subtract some quantity that is due only to the extra spending over the holiday season. To see what seasonal adjustment can do, in Figure 3.16 we show the seasonally adjusted quantity of employment and seasonally unadjusted employment for Canada from 1976-2011. In the figure, the smooth line is the seasonally adjusted time series, and the more variable line is unadjusted. As can be seen in the figure, there is a regular seasonal pattern that is repeated over time in the unadjusted time series, and seasonal adjustment tends to smooth out the time series. This is typical of the effect of seasonal adjustment on any time series. FIGURE 3.15 Percentage Deviations from ‘Trend in Average Labour Productivity (black tne) a Real GOP (coloured tine) ‘Average labour productvty Is procyclical and coincident, and tis ee variable than real GDP. Sch Ape tn Sat anda CASA boy, Sane nen, 26281Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law 82. Part 1 Introduction and Measurement Issues FIGURE 3.16 Seasonally Adjusted (coloured tine) and Unadjusted (black tne) Employment, 1976-2011 ‘Seasonal adjustment tends to smooth atime series with @ seasonal component Sere: te tom tte anata CASI eb, Ss ez, 2400, 14 Employment in Thousands a 1234 2013/08/16 99,229.213.143 9 9751980 1985 19901995 2000 2005-2010 2015 Year Working with seasonally adjusted data can often be the appropriate thing to do, but one has to be careful that the process of seasonal adjustment is not masking important phenomena that might interest us. For example, there may be economic factors that cause the nature of seasonality to change over time, For example, techno- logical developments may make it less costly to build houses in the winter, and thus reduce the seasonal fluctuations we see in investment expenditure. If we confine our attention to only seasonally adjusted data, we might not be aware that this process is occurring. COMOVEMENT SUMMARY To summarize the business cycle facts discussed above, we present Table 3.1 and Table 3.2. These, particularly Table 3.2, will prove very useful, especially when we discuss the predictions of different theories of the business cycle in Chapters 13 and 14, A first test of the usefulness of macroeconomic theories is their ability to match what we see in macroeconomic data. ‘We have concluded our study of measurement issues, in that we now know the basics of national income accounting, basic macroeconomic accounting identities, price ‘measurement, labour market facts, and business cycle facts. In the next chapters, we will proceed to build useful macroeconomic models, starting with some basic micro- economic principles concerning the behaviour of consumers and firms.Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law Chapter 3 Business Cycle Measurement 83 TABLE 3.1 Correlation Coefficients and Variability of Percentage Deviations from Trend Correlation Coeffcient (GDP) Std, Dev. (95 ofS.D. of GDP) Consumption 080 82.9% Investment 080 519.1 Price level 0.05 101.0 ‘Money supply 019 1a Employment 080 wa Average labour productivity 0.63 639 TABLE 3.2 Summary of Business Cycle Facts Cyclcalty __Lead/Lag _ Variability Relative to GDP. Consumption _Procyclical Coincident Smaller Investment Procyclical Coincident Larger Price level Acyclical Coincident Larger Money supply Procyclical Leading Larger Employment Procyclical Lagging Smaller Real wage rate Procyclical 2 > Average labour —Procyclical_ Coincident smaller productivity Chapter Summary ‘The key business cycle facts relate to the deviations of important macroeconomic variables, from their trends and the comovements in these deviations fram trend, ‘The most important business cycle fact is that real GDP fluctuates about trend in an irregu- lar fashion. Though deviations from trend in real GDP are persistent, there is no observed. regularity in the amplitude or frequeney of fluctuations in real GDP about trend Business cycles are similar mainly in terms of the comovements among macroeconomic time series, Comovement can be discerned by plotting the percentage deviations from trend in two economic variables in a time series or in a scatter plot or by calculating the correla- tion coefficient between the percentage deviations from trend. ‘We are interested principally in how a particular variable moves about trend relative to real GDP (be it procyclical, countercyclical, or acyclical); whether itis a leading, lagging, or coincident variable (relative to real GDP); and how variable itis relative to real GDP. Consumption is procyclical, coincident, and less variable than real GDP. Investment is procyclical, coincident, and more variable than real GDP. In the data set we examined here, the price level is acyclical, coincident, and less variable than GDP.Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law 84 Part Introduction and Measurement Issues = The money supply is procyclical, leading, and about as variable as real GDP. The fact that the ‘money supply tends to lead real GDP was assigned much importance by Milton Friedman, ‘= Inthe labour market, employment is procyclical, lagging, and less variable than real GDP. ‘The real wage, 100, is procyclical, There is, however, no consensus among macroeconomists ‘on whether the real wage is a leading or a lagging variable. Average labour productivity is procyclical, coincident, and less variable than real GDP. ‘= Seasonal adjustment is @ process that smooths out predictable fluctuations in an eco- nomic variable associated with the day of the week, or the month or quarter of the year. Macroeconomists typically study data that is seasonally adjusted. Key Terms business cycles: Fluctuations about trend in real GDP. peak: A relatively large positive deviation from trend in real GDP. trough: A relatively large negative deviation from trend in real GDP, turning points: Peaks and troughs in real GDP. amplitude: The maximum deviation fom trend in an economic time series, frequency: The number of peaks in an economic time series that occur per year ‘boom: A series of positive deviations from trend in real GDP, culminating in a peak. recession: A series of negative deviations from trend in real GDP, culminating in a trough, persistent: Describes an economic time series that tends to stay above (below) trend when it hhas been above (below) trend during the recent past. comovement: How aggregate economic variables move together over the business cycle. time series: Sequential measurements of an economic variable over time. positive correlation: Relationship between two economic time series when a straight line fit to a scatter plot of the two variables has a positive slope. negative correlation: Relationship between two economic time series when a straight line fit to a scatter plot ofthe two variables has a negative slope. scatter plot: A plot of two variables, x and y, with x measured on the horizontal axis, and y measured on the vertical axis. procyclical: Describes an economic variable that tends to be above (below) trend when real GDP is above (below) trend countercyclical: Describes an economic variable that tends to be below (above) trend when real GDP is above (below) trend. cyclical: Describes an economic variable that is neither procyclical nor countercyclica correlation coefficient: A measure of the degree of correlation between two variables, perfectly positively correlated: Describes two variables that have a correlation coefliient of 1 perfectly negatively correlated: Describes two variables that have a correlation coefficient of =I leading variable: An economic variable that helps to predict future real GDP. lagging variable: An economic variable that past real GDP helps to predict. coincident variable: An economic variable that neither leads nor lags real GDP. composite index of business leading indicators or index of leading indicators: A weighted average of leading macroeconomic variables, which is sometimes used to forecast the deviations of real GDP from trend. standard deviation: A measure of variability. The cyclical variability im an economic time series can be measured by the standard deviation of the percentage deviations from trend. Phillips curve: A positive correlation between a money price or the rate of change in @ money price, and a measure of aggregate economic activity,Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law Chapter 3 Business Cycle Measurement 85 real wage: The purchasing power of the wage eared per hour worked average labour productivity: Total output divided by labour input 6241234 2013/09/16 [Link] seasonal adjustment: the process of smoothing a time series by removing predictable fluctua- tions associated with the day of the week or the month or quarter of the year Questions for Review 1. What isthe primary defining feature of business cycles? 2. Besides persistence, what are three important features of the deviations from trend in GDP? 3. Explain why forecasting GDP over the long term is dificult 4. Why are the comovements in aggregate economic variables important? ‘5, What did Robert Lucas say about the comovements among economic variables? 6. How can we discern positive and negative correlation in a time series plot? Ina scatter plot? 7. Why isthe index of leading economic indicators useful for forecasting GDP? 8. What are the three features of comovement that macroeconomists are interested in? 9. Describe the key business cycle regularities in consumption and investment expenditures, 10. What are the key business cycle regularities with respect to the price level and the money supply? 11. Does a Phillips curve relationship exist in the data set that was studied in this chapter? 12. What are the key business cycle regularities in the labour market? 13, Why do macroeconomists work with seasonally adjusted data? Problems 1. We have measured average labour productivity in this chapter as Y/N, where Y is real GDP and N is employment. The business cycle facts concerning employment relate to how the denominator N comoves with the numerator Y, and those concerning average labour productivity relate to how Y/N comoves with Y. Explain how the business cycle facts concerning employment and average labour productivity in Table 3.1 and Table 3.2 are consistent 2. Consumption of durables is more variable relative to trend than consumption of semi- durables, and consumption of semi-durables is more variable relative to trend than con- sumption of nondurables and services. Speculate on why we observe these phenomena, and relate this to the key business cycle facts in Table 3.1 and Table 3.2. 3. In Figure 3.17 the percentage deviations from trend in GDP (¥) and government expendi- tures (G) forthe period 1961-2011 are plotted. Figure 3.18 isa scatter plot of the same data, 1. Which is more variable, Y or G? bls G procyclical, countercyclical, or acyclical, and how can you tell? What do you think explains this? Is there any tendency for G to lead or lag Y, or is G coincident? 4. Do you find any of these characteristics of the relationship between real GDP and govern- ment spending surprising? Explain.Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law 86 Part 1 Introduction and Measurement Issues FIGURE 3.17 Percentage Deviations from Trond in Real GDP (coloured tine) and Government Ex- penditures (black ine) Sue: Aad fo Stasis canada CANSIM bce, Sere 92057, voH209, on080, 9205, FIGURE 3.18 Scatter Plot of Government Expenditures against Real oP Soe: Atte Statics Canada CANSIM bse, Series 92057, 952069, 992080, wens 4 Percentage Deviation from Trend Government Spending 1970 r 980 1990 2000, 2010 2020 foeo Year 4 T T T T T T T T T Boat : 4 q : Eo} a | 3 Ise aie Baal e Me te | 5 . . ae gob ees | 8 ae . 77 * ae ‘| wel 7 ts | i ” t za} | Gee settee ets ee EEE rae me ee are ers Wey are eee Ee Percentage Deviation in GDPUsername: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law Chapter 3 Business Cycle Measurement 87 98 T T T 7 T T ; FIGURE 3.19 Natural Log of Employment ‘and Linear Trend 97h 4 ‘Sauce: Add tom Sis ‘Canada CANSIM dane, Sees voszan Natural Log of Employment 4 n f 'lo73 1980 1985 1990 1998 2000 2008 2010-2018 Year 4 In Figure 3.19, the natural logarithm of employment is displayed, along with a linear time trend fit to the data. The linear time trend, which is the best fit to actual employment, tells, us that employment grew on average by 1.6% per year over the period 1976-2011. An interesting feature of Figure 3.19 is that it can sometimes take a very long time for employ- ment to return to trend after a recession. Alter the 19811982 recession, it took only a couple of years for employment to return to trend, but this took about eight years after the 1990-1992 recession. To highlight this phenomenon, take note of Figure 3.20, which shows the percentage deviation of employment from the linear trend. Discuss why this phenom- ‘enon might be important, and comment on the behaviour of employment following the 2008-2009 recession. 5, Suppose I were to count the number of birds I see flying south, and also measure the tem- perature each day (averaged over 24 hours). a. IE plotted the two measured time series, and also constructed a scatter plot of number of birds flying south versus temperature, show what I would see. 'b. Considering the lead/ag relationships between birds flying south and temperature, what should I conclude about what is causing what? c. Explain the lesson here for how we should make inferences from lead/lag patterns in economic data d. Milton Friedman liked to argue thar, because money leads real GDP in the data, the fluc- tuations in money were causing the fluctuations in real GDP. Evaluate this argument, 6. Sometimes Phillips curve relationships are described in terms of inflation and unemploy- tment. Ifa Phillips curve relationship of this type exists in the data, we should observe a negative correlation between the inflation rate and the unemployment rate. Figure 3.21 shows scatter plot of annual inflation rates versus the unemployment rate for Canada over the period 1976-2010. Explain what you see, and discuss.Username: Roger MooreBook: Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Esition. No pat of any hook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the publisher's prior written permission, Use (other than pursuant to the qualified fair use privilege) in violation of the law or these Terms of Senice is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law 88 Part 1 Introduction and Measurement Issues FIGURE 3.20 6 a Percentage Deviation of Employment rom a Linear sb 4 Trend } ‘Source: Adapted from Stasics & 4r 7 amt GH ter ee ; com is 4 E 2 4 £ aa 4 Fob 4 g 7S 4 B-2 4 é ib7s i380 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 201 Year FIGURE 3.21 a Ati carve? Soap te Ss Sams sis ees nb * 4 vans as : 10} 2 4 é 4 a 6241234 2013/09/16 99.229.213 Biel . i ft = aL oo ee : | 5 6 112