Scribd
Upload
10 views3 pages

ANOVA Results on Fiber and Exam Means

The document contains computations and analyses of three separate ANOVA tests with the following conclusions: 1) For Problem 14, the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in fiber content among breakfast cereals, fruits and vegetables fails to be rejected. 2) For Problem 15, the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in means of comprehensive exam results for three reading classes also fails to be rejected. 3) For Problem 16, the final null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in means of three groups of students is also not rejected.

Uploaded by

Rachel Macanas Fabilane-Dela Peña
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
10 views3 pages

ANOVA Results on Fiber and Exam Means

The document contains computations and analyses of three separate ANOVA tests with the following conclusions: 1) For Problem 14, the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in fiber content among breakfast cereals, fruits and vegetables fails to be rejected. 2) For Problem 15, the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in means of comprehensive exam results for three reading classes also fails to be rejected. 3) For Problem 16, the final null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in means of three groups of students is also not rejected.

Uploaded by

Rachel Macanas Fabilane-Dela Peña
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Leyte Normal University

GRADUATE SCHOOL DEPARTMENT


Tacloban City
Rachel M. Fabilane

[Link] Educl Mgt


PROBLEM SET NO. 8

Problem 14
Ho: There is no significant difference in the mean fiber content among breakfast cereals, fruits
and vegetables.
Ha: At least one mean is significantly different from the others.
= 0.05
Test statistic: ANOVA (F-test)
Computation:
a.
x1 = 5.67
x2 = 3.51
x3 = 4.21
b.
x

GM

=
Nt

c.
S2B =

s21 = 4.75
s22 = 2.04
s23 = 7.62

= 3 + 4 + 6 + ..... + 3
9+7+8

N (x x GM ) 2
K1

109

4.56

24
=

9(5.67 4.56)2 + 7(3.51 - 4.56)2 + .. + 8(4.21

4.56)2
3-1
=
d.
S2W =

3-1

9.9

n
(1)

(n1) Si2

= (9 1) (4.75) + (7 1) (2.04) + (8 1) (7.62)


91
= 14.41

e.

F = S2B
S2W

=
14.41

9.9

dfN = K 1 = 3 1 = 2
dFD = N K = 24 3 = 21
F(2,21) = 3.4668

71

0.69

8-1

Fc = 0.69 Ft = 3.47
Since the Fc of 0.69 is less than the Ft of 3.4, df (2,21), the Ho stating that there is no
significant difference in the mean fiber content among breakfast cereals, fruits and vegetables
cannot be rejected.
Problem 15
Ho: There is no significant difference in the means of the comprehensive examination results
given to three reading classes.
Ha: At least one mean is significantly different from the others.
= 0.05
Test statistic: ANOVA (F-test)
Computation:
a.
x1 = 74
x2 = 65.8
x3 = 90.6
b.

GM

Nt
c.

S2B =

s2a = 368
s2b = 258.7
s2c = 25.3
= 87 + 92 + ..... + 91
5+5+5

N ( x x GM )2
K1

d.

S2W =

76.8

3-1

3-1

798.2

n
(1)
(n1) Si2

F = S2B
S2W

= 5(74 76.8)2 + 5(65.8 - 76.8)2 + 5(90.6 76.8)2

= (5 1) (368) + (5 1) (258.7) + (5 1) (25.3)


51
= 652

e.

1152

15

3-1
=

798.2 =

51

5-1

1.22

652

dfN = K 1 = 3 1 = 2
dFD = N K = 15 3 = 21
F(2,12) = 3.8853
Fc = 1.22

Ft = 3.89

Since Fc of 1.22 is less than the Ft of 3.89, df (2,21), the null hypothesis cannot be
rejected.

Problem 16
Ho: There is no significant difference on the mean of the three groups of students.
Ha: At least one mean is significantly different from the others.
= 0.05
Test statistic: ANOVA (F-test)
Computation:
a.

s21 = 12.95
s22 = 15.33
s23 = 38.29

x1 = 19.57
x2 = 19
x3 = 18.57

b.
x

GM

Nt
c.
S2B =

= 15 + 16 + ..... + 25
7+7+7

N ( x x GM )2
K1

400

19.05

21

= 7(19.57 19.05)2 + 7(19 - 19.05)2 + 7(18.57 19.05)2


3-1

3-1

3-1

= 1.77

d.

n
(1)
S2W =
(n1) Si2

= (7 1) (12.95) + (7 1) (15.33) + (7 1) (38.29)


71
= 66.57

71

7-1

66.57
e.

F = S2B
S2W

=
66.57

1.77

0.03

dfN = K 1 = 3 1 = 2
dFD = N K = 21 3 = 21
F(2,18) = 3.5546
Fc = 0.03

Ft = 3.55

Since the Fc of 0.03 is less than the Ft of 3.55, df (2, 18), the null hypothesis cannot be
rejected.

You might also like