2/19/2010
Montgomery County Revised Zoning Code
PROJECT BRIEFING
FEBRUARY 2010
CODE STUDIO
Farr Associates
Rhodeside & Harwell
Nelson\\Nygaard
Nelson
Bob Sitkowski
Today’s Presentation
Project Update
Approach
Project Objectives
Layout and Format
Annotated Outline
S
Sustainability
i bili A Audit
di
Next Steps
1
2/19/2010
Montgomery County Revised Zoning Code
PROJECT UPDATE
2
2/19/2010
Scope of Work
Three Phases
Annotated Outline
Code Drafting
Implementation (Optional)
Phase 1: Annotated Outline
1.4 Draft Annotated Outline
1.5 Draft Approach Report
1.6 Staff/Zoning Advisory Panel Meeting
1.7 Final Annotated Outline/Approach Report
1.8 Council Update/Community Forums
Zoning Discovery
White Paper
Technical Appendix
Fact Sheets
“Green” Papers
3
2/19/2010
Zoning Discovery (cont)
Goals:
Simplify and streamline the standards and process
Match land use to development patterns
Rationalize development standards
Accommodate change, recognize consistency
Update technology
Zoning Discovery (cont)
Key Policy Issues
Changing residential growth from greenfields to infill
Designing for people
Designing for green
Designing for connections
Focus on accommodating right growth in right place
4
2/19/2010
Montgomery County Revised Zoning Code
APPROACH
Basis of Analysis
Zoning Discovery
Stakeholder Sessions
Critical Review
Regulations, plans,
reports, studies
Best Practices
Consultant Experience
5
2/19/2010
Document Contents
Montgomery County Revised Zoning Code
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
6
2/19/2010
Objectives
1. Shift Emphasis from Greenfields to Infill
Greenfields almost gone
Redevelopment, infill will become more common
2. Re-Think the Planning and Zoning Framework
Master plan --> Code --> Design Guidelines
“Toolkit” in p
place of “one-off’s”
3. Match Regulations to Impacts
Right rules, right place (context)
4. Improve the Quality of Development
Objectives (continued)
5. Incentivize Public Benefits
Insure development benefits the community
6. Simplify and Streamline Standards and Process
Single, unified plan review
Consolidated districts, “families” = similar approach
7. Match Land Use and Development Patterns
Encourage mixed use
Focus on physical design (built form)
7
2/19/2010
Objectives (continued)
8. Provide Easy Access and Use of Code
Improve web interface, update speed
User-friendly features, plain English
9. Modernize and Consolidate
Intuitive Table of Contents
Consistent,, modern uses
10. Efficient and Effective Implementation Strategy
Text amendment, map changes
For future discussion . . .
Montgomery County Revised Zoning Code
LAYOUT AND FORMAT
8
2/19/2010
Document Improvements
Plain English
Dump the
Footnotes!
Digital
Enhancements
Clickable Table
of Contents,
Cross-References
Page Layout
Running header
Titles
Graphics, tables
Indented Text
White Space
V i (d
Version (date))
9
2/19/2010
Page Layout Example
Outline
Current Proposed
A. In General A. General Provisions
B. E
Exemption
i From
F C
Controls
l B. Z i Districts
Zoning Di i EEstablished
bli h d
C. Zoning Districts, Regulations C. Uses and Use Standards
D. Zoning Districts – Approval D. District Regulations
Procedures E. General Development
E. Off-Street Parking and Standards
Loading
g F
F. Administration and
F. Signs Enforcement
G. Special Exceptions, G. Definitions
Variances , and
Nonconforming Uses
H. Amendment Procedures
10
2/19/2010
Montgomery County Revised Zoning Code
ANNOTATED OUTLINE
11
2/19/2010
A. General Provisions
Key Legal Provisions
Transitional Provisions
Rules for Application After Adoption
May Include District Conversion Table
B. Zoning Districts Established
Convert TDR’s to an Overlay
Retain same base districts
Group Districts in Families
Similar approach to all districts within the family
12
2/19/2010
C. Uses and Use Standards
Use Interpretation (administrative)
Allowed Use Table(s)
Use Categories
Consolidate uses into groups like “retail sales”
Use Standards
Apply to a specific use
use, linked from table to text
Replaces footnotes
Accessory Uses
Temporary Uses
D. District Regulations
Measurement and Exceptions
Visual, where possible
Development Typologies
Alternative to MPDU, Cluster and TDR Methods
Density Incentive for Providing Public Benefits
• Environment, Design, Diversity, Connectivity
13
2/19/2010
Development Typologies
Possible Patterns/Templates:
Conservation Subdivision
Cottage Housing
Neighborhood Center
Building Types
Supplement
pp traditional height,
g , bulk,, setback
Standards for multiple building types where allowed
together in the same district
Often described as “form standards”
Sample Building Type Palette
14
2/19/2010
D.4. Agricultural Districts
D.5. Residential Districts
15
2/19/2010
D.5. Residential Districts (cont.)
D.6. Mixed Use Districts
16
2/19/2010
D.7. Mixed Campus District
D.8. Industrial Districts
17
2/19/2010
Overlay Districts
New TDR Overlays
Retain Environmental Overlays
Seek to Replace Design Overlays
E. General Development Standards
Streetscape
Access Management
Parking and Loading
Landscaping and Screening
Outdoor Site Lighting
Si
Signs
Outdoor Display and Storage
Resource Protection
18
2/19/2010
F. Administration and Enforcement
Review Bodies
Common Review Procedures
Development Review
Nonconformities
Enforcement
G. Definitions
Word Usage
Abbreviations
Defined Terms
19
2/19/2010
Montgomery County Revised Zoning Code
SUSTAINABILITY AUDIT
Sustainability Audit
Buildings and Neighborhoods
Stormwater
Parking
Tree Canopy and Heat Island
Water Reuse and Irrigation
E
Energy
Food Production
Lighting
Waste Reduction
20
2/19/2010
Sustainability Audit
Sustainability Audit
Comments Needed
Zoning Advisory Panel
Executive Agencies
Strategy
Gauge Willingness to Implement Concepts
Not All Elements Found in Zoningg
Requires Coordinated Approach
21
2/19/2010
Montgomery County Revised Zoning Code
NEXT STEPS
Next Steps
Council Briefing
Public Open House/Briefing (targeted for April)
Zoning Advisory Panel Discussion
Drafting Direction (Council)
O di
Ordinance D
Drafting
f i (2010
(2010-2011)
2011)
22
2/19/2010
Discussion . . .
More Information:
[Link]
Lois
L i Vill
Villemaire
i
M-NCPPC Montgomery County
[Link]@[Link]
23