100% found this document useful (1 vote)
1K views20 pages

Introduction to ANSYS FEA Methods

The document provides an overview of the finite element method (FEM) and its use in numerical analysis software ANSYS. It describes FEM as subdividing a domain into smaller elements where differential equations are approximated. The key steps are preprocessing to define the problem, solution to apply loads/constraints and solve, and postprocessing to view and interpret results. ANSYS allows modeling via its APDL command language interface or graphical Workbench interface, with APDL providing more flexibility and Workbench being more user-friendly.

Uploaded by

kpvraj
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
1K views20 pages

Introduction to ANSYS FEA Methods

The document provides an overview of the finite element method (FEM) and its use in numerical analysis software ANSYS. It describes FEM as subdividing a domain into smaller elements where differential equations are approximated. The key steps are preprocessing to define the problem, solution to apply loads/constraints and solve, and postprocessing to view and interpret results. ANSYS allows modeling via its APDL command language interface or graphical Workbench interface, with APDL providing more flexibility and Workbench being more user-friendly.

Uploaded by

kpvraj
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Introduction to Finite Element Method
  • Introduction to ANSYS
  • Structural Analysis
  • Introduction to Ansys Workbench

1.

Introduction to Finite Element Method (FEM)


In order to analyze an engineering system, a mathematical model is developed to
describe the system. While developing the mathematical model, some assumptions
are made for simplification. Finally, the governing mathematical expression is
developed to describe the behaviour of the system. The mathematical expression
usually consists of differential equations and given conditions. The best way to
solve any physical problem governed by a differential equation is to obtain the
analytical solution. There are many situations, however, where the analytical
solution is difficult to obtain. The region under consideration may be so irregular
that it is mathematically impossible to describe the boundary. The configuration
may be composed off several different materials whose regions are mathematically
difficult to describe. Problems involving anisotropic materials are usually difficult
to solve analytically, as are equations having non-linear terms.
A numerical method can be used to obtain an approximate solution when an
analytical solution cannot be developed. Especially, the finite element method has
been one of the major numerical solution techniques. One of the major advantages
of the finite element method is that a general purpose computer program can be
developed easily to analyze various kinds of problems. In particular, any complex
shape of problem domain with prescribed conditions can be handled with ease
using the finite element method. The underlying premise of the method states that
a complicated domain can be sub-divided into a series of smaller regions in which
the differential equations are approximately solved. By assembling the set of
equations for each region, the behaviour over the entire problem domain is
determined. Each region is referred to as an element and the process of
subdividing a domain into a finite number of elements is referred to as
discretization. Elements are connected at specific points, called nodes, and the
assembly process requires that the solution be continuous along common
boundaries of adjacent elements.

When modeling a problem using a finite element program, it is very important to check whether the
solution has converged. The word convergence is used because the output from the finite element
program is converging on a single correct solution. In order to check the convergence, more than one
solution to the same problem are required. If the solution is dramatically different from the original
solution, then solution of the problem is not converged. However, if the solution does not change much
(less than a few percent difference) then solution of the problem is considered converged.
Currently, two types method are used to demonstrate the numerical convergence of the solution :
1). h method
2). p method
The h- and p- versions of the finite element method are different ways of adding degrees of freedom (dof)
to the model.

h-method > The h-method improves results by using a finer mesh of the same type of element. This
method refers to decreasing the characteristic length (h) of elements, dividing each existing element into
two or more elements without changing the type of elements used.
p-method > The p-method improves results by using the same mesh but increasing the displacement
field accuracy in each element. This method refers to increasing the degree of the highest complete
polynomial (p) within an element without changing the number of elements used.
The difference between the two methods lies in how these elements are treated. The h-method uses
many simple elements, whereas the p-method uses few complex elements.

In general, a finite element solution may be classified into the following three stages. This is a general
guideline that can be used for setting up any finite element analysis.
1. Preprocessing: defining the problem
The major steps in preprocessing are given below:
Define key points/lines/areas/volumes
Define element types and material/geometrical properties
Mesh lines/areas/volumes as required
2. Solution: assigning loads, constraints and solving
In the solution level, the loading conditions such as point load or pressure and constraints or
boundary conditions are specified and finally the resulting sets of equations are solved.
3. Post processing: further processing and viewing of the results
This stage provides different tools to view the results including:
Lists of nodal displacements
Element forces and moments
Deflection plots
Stress contour diagrams

In this level our job as an engineer is to interpret the output results and verify their accuracy.
Typically with increasing number of elements (using finer mesh), we should expect to more
accurate results.

Introduction to ANSYS
ANSYS is a powerful general purpose finite element modeling package to numerically solve a wide
variety of mechanical, structural and non-structural problems. These problems include: static/dynamic
structural analysis (both linear and non-linear), heat transfer and fluid problems, as well as acoustic and
electro-magnetic problems
Ansys, as most of other FEA packages, has two major interfaces: an old one (Classical GUI, now named
Mechanical APDL) and a new one (Workbench, also named Ansys Mechanical). Mechanical APDL
is not so convenient to use, but is very useful when you want to solve some specific problem which is not
ordinary. Mechanical APDL could be driven via text commands, thus its liked by experienced users.
Workbench is more user friendly, and allows the easy usage of the geometry from modern CAD packages,
maintaining the associativity through the whole FEA process. However, Workbench has few limitations; it
is not as flexible as APDL. In APDL we can program everything that can imagine, for instance we can
implement our own finite elements. But for ordinary problems, Workbench is quicker and simpler to use.

1. Introduction to ANSYS Mechanical APDL


ANSYS Mechanical APDL is a very powerful tool that allows the user to explore the versatile capabilities
of the software fully. APDL stands for ANSYS Parametric Design Language, a scripting language that we
can use to automate common tasks or even build our model in terms of parameters (variables). In the
mechanical structure mechanics analysis, there are generally two kinds of analysis methods: (1)
Command flow mode. (2) GUI mode. In two kinds of modes, the command flow mode is provided by
ANSYS APDL analysis method.
ANSYS Mechanical APDL Graphical User Interface (GUI) is split into four main areas. The graphics
area, the utility menu, the main menu and the ANSYS toolbar.

Pre-processor
Within the pre-processor the model is set up. It includes a number of steps and usually in the following
order:
Build geometry. Depending on whether the problem geometry is one, two or three dimensional, the
geometry consists of creating lines, areas or volumes. These geometries can then, if necessary, be used to
create other geometries by the use of boolean operations. The key idea when building the geometry like
this is to simplify the generation of the element mesh. Hence, this step is optional but most often used.
Nodes and elements can however be created from coordinates only.
Define materials. A material is defined by its material constants. Every element has to be assigned a
particular material.
Generate element mesh. The problem is discretized with nodal points. The nodes are connected to form
finite elements, which together form the material volume. Depending on the problem and the assumptions
that are made, the element type has to be determined. Common element types are truss, beam, plate, shell
and solid elements. Each element type may contain several subtypes, e.g. 2D 4-noded solid, 3D 20-noded
solid elements. Therefore, care has to be taken when the element type is chosen.

The element mesh can in ANSYS be created in several ways. The most common way is that it is
automatically created, however more or less controlled. For example you can specify a certain number of
elements in a specific area, or you can force the mesh generator to maintain a specific element size within
an area. Certain element shapes or sizes are not recommended and if these limits are violated, a warning
will be generated in ANSYS. It is up to the user to create a mesh which is able to generate results with a
sufficient degree of accuracy.
PREP7 pre-processor is used to define the element types, element real constants, material properties, and
the model geometry.
Solution processor
Here you solve the problem by gathering all specified information about the problem:
Apply loads: Boundary conditions are usually applied on nodes or elements. The prescribed quantity can
for example be force, traction, displacement, moment, rotation. The loads may in ANSYS also be edited
from the pre-processor.
Obtain solution: The solution to the problem can be obtained if the whole problem is defined.
Postprocessor
Within this part of the analysis you can for example:
Visualize the results: For example plot the deformed shape of the geometry or stresses.
List the results: If you prefer tabular listings or file printouts, it is possible
Two postprocessors are available:
(1) POST1: The general postprocessor is used to review results at one substep (time step) over the entire
model or selected portion of the model.
(2) POST26: The time history postprocessor is used to review results at specific points in the model over
all time steps.
There are two methods to use ANSYS; Graphical Interface and Command File Coding. The
graphical user interface or GUI follows the conventions of Windows based programs. This method is
probably the best approach for new users. The command approach is used by professional users. It has the
advantage that an entire analysis can be described in a small text file, typically in less than 50 lines of
commands. This approach enables easy model modifications and minimal file space requirements.
Types of Analysis with ANSYS
Structural Analysis
Thermal Analysis
CFD Analysis
Electromagnetic Analysis
Field and Coupled-Field Analysis

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Structural analysis is probably the most common application of the finite element method. The term
structural (or structure) implies not only civil engineering structures such as bridges and buildings, but
also naval, aeronautical, and mechanical structures such as ship hulls, aircraft bodies, and machine
housings, as well as mechanical components such as pistons, machine parts, and tools
Types of Structural Analysis
We can perform the following types of structural analyses:
Static Analysis -- Used to determine displacements, stresses, etc. under static loading conditions. Both
linear and nonlinear static analyses. Nonlinearities can include plasticity, stress stiffening, large
deflection, large strain, hyper elasticity, contact surfaces, and creep.
Modal Analysis -- Used to calculate the natural frequencies and mode shapes of a structure. Several
mode extraction methods are available.
Harmonic Analysis -- Used to determine the response of a structure to harmonically time-varying loads.
Transient Dynamic Analysis -- Used to determine the response of a structure to arbitrarily time-varying
loads. All nonlinearities mentioned under Static Analysis above are allowed. Spectrum Analysis -- An
extension of the modal analysis, used to calculate stresses and strains due to a response spectrum or a
PSD input (random vibrations).
Buckling Analysis -- Used to calculate the buckling loads and determine the buckling mode shape. Both
linear (Eigen value) buckling and nonlinear buckling analyses are possible.
Explicit Dynamic Analysis -- This type of structural analysis is available via the ANSYS LS-DYNA
product, which provides an interface to the LS-DYNA explicit finite element program. Explicit dynamic
analysis calculates fast solutions for large deformation dynamics and complex contact problems.
Several special-purpose structural analysis capabilities are available:
Fracture mechanics
Composites
Fatigue
Beam analyses and cross sections
Type of Elements in Structural Analysis

a)Static Analysis
1. Axially loaded stepped bars

The structure consists of two stepped bars. An axially load, P= 15 kN is loaded as shown in
figure. Take, Esteel = 20 x 106 N/cm2, Eal = 7.6 x 106 N/cm2. Poisson, ratio for steel & aluminum
are 0.27 and 0.3 respectively. Determine the following.
i.
Nodal displacements
ii.
Stress in each bar
iii.
Reaction forces

2. 2DTruss
Determine the axial force in each member of the truss loaded as shown in the figure given below. Also
find the support reactions and nodal deflections. Take E = 200GPa, = 0.3, Area = 5000 mm 2

3. Beams

Construct the Shear force and bending moment diagrams for the beam shown and find the maximum
deflection. Assume rectangular c/s area of 0.2 m x 0.3 m, Youngs modulus of 210 GPa, Poissons ratio
0.27. What is the maximum bending moment? Locate the points of contraflexure, if any. Also find the
magnitude & location of the maximum deflection of the beam.

4. Frames
In the frame shown in figure below members 1, 2, 3 ,4, and 5 are aluminum beams and have a hollow
square cross-section with outer wall size 2 cm and wall thickness 2 mm, and member 6 is a steel wire
with diameter 2 mm. The applied force is 100 N. Find the loads and stresses in the members of the frame.

5. Plain Stress Analysis


Plane Stress: Plane stress assumes zero stress in the Z direction. Valid for components in which the Z
dimension is smaller than the X and Y dimensions. Z-strain is non-zero. Optional thickness (Z direction)
allowed. Used for structures such as flat plates subjected to in-plane loading, or thin disks under pressure
or centrifugal loading.
The corner angle bracket is shown below. The upper left hand pin-hole is constrained around its entire
circumference and a tapered pressure load is applied to the bottom of lower right hand pin-hole. Compute
Maximum displacement, Von-Mises stress.

6. Plain Strain Analysis


Plane Strain: Plane strain assumes zero strain in the Z direction. Valid for components in which the Z
dimension is much larger than the X and Y dimensions. Z-stress is non-zero. Used for long, constant
cross-section structures such as structural beams.
Examine the expansion of a pressure vessel due to an internal pressure. Determine the principal stresses in
the pressure vessel due to the applied loading and boundary conditions. Use a two-dimensional plane
strain element for this analysis. The vessel is made from steel (E = 207 Gpa, v = 0.27) and the internal
pressure is 10,000 Pa.

A plane strain analysis assumes that all strains occur in the X-Y and there are no strains in the Z-direction.
This does allow for stresses in the Z-direction as stresses may be required to prevent displacement in the
Z-direction. We can use a plane strain analysis in this case by taking a slice through the pressure vessel at

its midpoint. We are assuming that the mid point doesn't move and we are modeling this non-vertically
moving mid plane.

Figure 2 shows an overview of the plane strain model of the pressure vessel. The model on the left hand
side is a full plane strain model of a slice through the pressure vessel. By recognising the symmetry in the
problem we can reduce this model to a 1/4 symmetry plane strain model as shown on the right hand side
of figure 2. In this tutorial, we will build the 1/4 symmetry plane strain model as it easily allows for the
application of boundary conditions (which are not so easily applied to the full model).

7. Axisymmetric Analysis
Axisymmetric: Axisymmetry assumes that the 3-D model and its loading can be generated by revolving a
2-D section 360 about the Y axis. Axis of symmetry must coincide with the global Y axis. Negative X
coordinates are not permitted. Y direction is axial, X direction is radial, and Z direction is circumferential
(hoop) direction. Hoop displacement is zero; hoop strains and stresses are usually very significant. Used
for pressure vessels, straight pipes, shafts, etc.
Consider the problem of finding the stresses in a thick open-ended cylinder with an internal pressure
(such as a pipe discharging to the atmosphere). The steel cylinder below has an inner radius of 5 inches
and an outer radius of 11 inches.

A cross section is shown below

The length of the object is arbitrary and represents a segment of a long, open-ended cylinder. The Y axis
is the axis of symmetry. The cylinder can be generated by revolving a rectangle 6 inches wide and of
arbitrary height 360 degrees about the Y axis.
Since the height of the segment considered is arbitrary, we will use a segment 1 inch in height for the
finite element model. The geometry is shown below.

8. Analysis of thin walled channels ( Use of Shell type elements)


Thin plate or shell elements find applications in many practical situations such as structural angle
brackets, automotive hoods or trunk lid attachments and similar thin components with fairly complex
shape.
Find the deformations and stress in a cantilevered thin walled channel subject to an end load. The 6 x 2 x
0.2 inch thick steel channel shown below is 30 inches long and has a total load of 1 lbf divided among the
four corner points on the right end as shown.

9. Analysis of a bicycle frame. ( Use of Pipe Elements)


The problem to be modeled is a simple bicycle frame shown in the following figure. The frame is to be
built of hollow aluminum tubing having an outside diameter of 25mm and a wall thickness of 2mm.

10. Static Analysis with 3D elements - Pillow Block

11. Model the object using tetrahedral 10 node element. Assume the structure as made of steel
with modulus of elasticity E = 200GPa. The object is fixed around the inner surface of the
hole. The object is loaded uniformly (1000 N/cm2) along the top surface of the extended
beam. Plot the deformed shape. Determine the principal stress and Von-mises stress.

b)Dynamic Analysis

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS: MODAL AND TRANSIENT ANALYSES

Modal Analysis of Cantilever beam for natural frequency determination. Modulus of elasticity
= 200GPa, Density = 7800 Kg/m3

Free Vibration: Solid Structure (Modal Analysis)


Obtain natural frequencies and mode shapes of free squared isotropic plate using ANSYS Modal
Analysis

Length (a)
Width (b)
Thickness (h)
Material: Aluminium
Youngs modulus
Density
Poissons ratio

0.3m
0.3m
6.35*10-3m
73.1 GPa
2780 Kg/m3
0.3

Modal or Dynamic Analysis of an Airplane Wing


The wing is of uniform configuration along its length and its cross-sectional area is defined to be a
straight line and a spline as shown. It is held fixed to the body of the airplane on one end and hangs
freely at the other. Find the wing's natural frequencies and mode shapes. The dimensions of the wing
are as shown above. The wing is made of low density polyethylene with a Young's modulus of
38x103 psi, Poisson's ration of 0.3, and a density of 1.033E-3 slugs/in3 .

Determine transient response of mass 2 of the system shown in Figure

1. Introduction to Ansys Workbench


ANSYS Workbench is a simulation platform that enables and solves a wide range of engineering
problems using the FEA. It provides access to the ANSYS family of design and analysis modules in an
integrated simulation environment. The workbench interface is composed primarily of a Toolbox region
and a Project Schematic region.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The choice of element type significantly impacts both accuracy and computational efficiency of finite element models by determining the type and complexity of the physical behavior each element can simulate . Elements such as trusses, beams, shells, or solids are selected based on the specific problem type and geometry; for instance, shell elements can efficiently model thin-walled structures . Key considerations include compatibility with expected load conditions, geometry representation, computational resource availability, and the desired accuracy, as some elements might require finer meshing or higher polynomial orders to achieve precise results . The balance between model accuracy and computational feasibility drives the careful selection of element types .

Nodal points serve as the primary reference locations where boundary conditions and loads are applied in a finite element model. They define the geometry and discretization of the domain, and each node represents a point where equations of motion or equilibrium are solved . Boundary conditions, such as constraints on movement, and loads like forces or pressures, are specified at these nodes, which ultimately influence the distribution of these conditions across the elements . Proper placement and definition of nodal points are crucial for accurately capturing the physical behavior of the system and solving the governing equations accurately .

The discretization process breaks down a complex domain into smaller, manageable finite elements, enabling the solution of otherwise analytically unsolvable differential equations . This allows handling complex shapes, materials, and conditions with greater flexibility, as different elements can model various features and complexities within the domain . However, challenges include ensuring accurate boundary conditions, choosing appropriate element types, and checking solution convergence. Incorrect discretization can lead to inaccurate results or excessive computational cost, particularly if the mesh is too coarse or too fine .

The primary stages of setting up a finite element analysis include preprocessing, solution, and postprocessing . In preprocessing, the problem is defined by establishing the domain geometry, element types, and mesh, which lays the foundation for accurate simulation results by capturing the physical characteristics and conditions appropriately . During the solution stage, loads and boundary conditions are applied, and the equations governing the system's behavior are solved to determine the response . Finally, postprocessing involves interpreting results like nodal displacements, stresses, and strains to verify the simulation's accuracy and reliability, ensuring that the setup correlates well with expected physical behaviors .

Element stiffness matrices play a pivotal role in finite element analysis as they define the relationship between nodal displacements and applied forces within each discrete element . These matrices are constructed by discretizing the governing differential equations over each element and applying the variational principle or weighted residual methods, like the Galerkin method, to ensure compatibility and equilibrium fidelity . The local stiffness matrices are then assembled into a global stiffness matrix representing the entire system, allowing for the solution of the overall equilibrium equations . Accurate construction of element stiffness matrices ensures realistic modeling of material behavior and structural response .

Engineers may select ANSYS Workbench over Mechanical APDL for its user-friendly interface and integration with modern CAD systems, which simplifies the process and reduces setup time for typical engineering problems . Workbench maintains geometry associativity, facilitates easier geometry manipulation, and accelerates the workflow for standardized analyses . However, its flexibility is limited compared to Mechanical APDL, which offers a comprehensive scripting environment (APDL) for customizing analyses and handling complex, non-standard problems . Trade-offs include sacrificing some advanced customization and scripting capabilities for ease of use and reduced setup time when using Workbench .

Plane stress analysis assumes zero stress in the thickness (or z) direction and is suitable for thin, flat structures such as plates under in-plane loads . It works well where the z-dimension is much smaller compared to in-plane dimensions, like thin countertops or metal sheets under lateral loading . Conversely, plane strain analysis assumes zero strain in the z-direction, applicable to long structures under uniform loading such as dams or tunnels where the z-dimension significantly exceeds the in-plane dimensions . It captures the scenario where deformation out-of-plane is minimal while ensuring stress equilibrium in all dimensions .

Convergence in finite element analysis is crucial to ensure accuracy and reliability of results as it indicates that the solution is approaching the correct one, regardless of the discretization level used . Indicators of a converged solution include minimal changes in results with further mesh refinement or increases in polynomial order (typically less than a few percent difference between iterations). If solutions vary significantly with these method refinements, it implies potential errors in setup or insufficient resolution, necessitating further refinement or verification of the model . Ensuring convergence validates the correctness of the numerical method employed and the appropriateness of the model setup .

The h-method and p-method differ primarily in how they achieve solution accuracy. The h-method improves results by refining the mesh, thereby decreasing the characteristic length of elements by subdividing existing elements into smaller ones without changing their type . In contrast, the p-method enhances solution accuracy by increasing the polynomial order of the elements without altering their mesh density . These methods impact convergence as more elements (h-method) or higher-order polynomials (p-method) lead to a more accurate approximation of the differential equation solutions. The h-method typically uses many simple elements, while the p-method uses fewer, more complex elements, leading to differences in computational efficiency and potentially differing convergence rates .

Axisymmetric analysis is preferred for structures that are symmetric around an axis, such as cylindrical pressure vessels, pipes, or shafts, where the 3D problem can be accurately represented by revolving a 2D section about an axis . This reduces computational complexity and time by limiting the analysis to a 2D model while capturing the essential 3D behavior . The main assumptions required include symmetry of geometry and loading, and the absence of axial displacement (hoop displacement is zero). Deviations from symmetry or the presence of axial movements would necessitate a more complex analysis approach .

1.Introduction to Finite Element Method (FEM)
In order to analyze an engineering system, a mathematical model is developed
When modeling a problem using a finite element program, it is very important to check whether the
solution has converged. The
h-method –> The h-method improves results by using a finer mesh of the same type of element. This
method refers to decreasing
In this level our job as an engineer is to interpret the output results and verify their accuracy.
Typically with increasing
Pre-processor 
Within the pre-processor the model is set up. It includes a number of steps and usually in the following
order
The element mesh can in ANSYS be created in several ways. The most common way is that it is
automatically created, however mo
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 
Structural analysis is probably the most common application of the finite element method. The term
struc
a)Static Analysis
1.
Axially loaded stepped bars
The structure consists of two stepped bars. An axially load, P= 15 kN is loaded as shown in
figure. Take, Esteel = 20 x 106 N
Construct the Shear force and bending moment diagrams for the beam shown and find the maximum
deflection. Assume rectangular

You might also like