0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views2 pages

Example 08

This document describes a dynamic response spectrum analysis of a two-story, three-dimensional frame building. The frame is subjected to a constant 0.4g response spectrum. Results from ETABS 2013 are compared to two references and show acceptable agreement, validating the software.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views2 pages

Example 08

This document describes a dynamic response spectrum analysis of a two-story, three-dimensional frame building. The frame is subjected to a constant 0.4g response spectrum. Results from ETABS 2013 are compared to two references and show acceptable agreement, validating the software.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Software Verification

PROGRAM NAME: ETABS 2013


REVISION NO.: 0


Two-Story, Three-Dimensional Frame - Dynamic Response Spectrum Analysis 8 - 1
Err






EXAMPLE 8
Two-Story, Three-Dimensional Frame - Dynamic Response Spectrum Analysis
Problem Description
This is a two-story, three-dimensional building frame subjected to a response spectrum of
constant amplitude. The three-dimensional structure is modeled as a single frame with nine
column lines and twelve bays. Kip-foot-second units are used.
For consistency with the models documented in other computer programs with which the
ETABS 2013 results are compared (see Table 8-1), no story mass moments of inertia are
assigned in the ETABS model.
Geometry, Properties and Loads
The geometry of the structure is shown in Figure 8-1.

13'
13'
35' 35'
25'
25'
Z
Y
X
STORY 1 CENTER OF MASS AT (38,27,13)
STORY 2 CENTER OF MASS AT (38,27,26)
TYPICAL STORY MASS = 6.212 kip-sec
2
/ft
B5 B6
B3 B4
B10 B12 B8
B7
B9
B1 B2
B11
C1 C2 C3
C4 C5 C6
C7 C8 C9
GLOBAL
AND FRAME
REFERENCE POINT

Figure 8-1 Two-Story Three-Dimensional Frame

Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS 2013
REVISION NO.: 0


Two-Story, Three-Dimensional Frame - Dynamic Response Spectrum Analysis 8 - 2
Err






A response spectrum with a constant value of 0.4g is used. Other parameters associated
with the structure are as follows:
Columns Beams
Axial area 4 ft
2
5 ft
2

Minor moment of inertia 1.25 ft
4
1.67 ft
4

Major moment of inertia 1.25 ft
4
2.61 ft
4

Modulus of elasticity 350000 ksf 500000 ksf

Technical Features of ETABS 2013 Tested
Three-dimensional frame analysis
User-specified section properties
Dynamic response spectrum analysis
Comparison of Results
This example is also analyzed in Wilson and Habibullah (1992) and Peterson (1981). A
comparison of the key ETABS 2013 results with Wilson and Habibullah (Reference 1) and
Peterson (Reference 2) is shown in Table 8-1.
Table 8-1 Comparison of Results
Quantity ETABS Reference 1 Reference 2
Period, Mode 1 0.22708 0.22706 0.22706
Period, Mode 2 0.21565 0.21563 0.21563
Period, Mode 3 0.07335 0.07335 0.07335
Period, Mode 4 0.07201 0.07201 0.07201
X-Displacement
Center of mass, 2
nd
Story
0.0201 0.0201 0.0201
Computer File
The input data file is [Link]. This file is provided as part of the ETABS 2013 installa-
tion.
Conclusion
The results comparison shows acceptable agreement between ETABS 2013 and the refer-
ences.

You might also like