Instructions
Page 1
Data Entry
Page 2
Report
Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness
SCORING REPORT
DATE:
NAME:
PRODUCT:
BUSINESS:
Attribute Legend
1 pass
2 fail
Known Population
Sample #
Attribute
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
-
Operator #1
Try #1
Try #2
(1)
3/10/1996
Allied Employee
3313 Spark Plug
F&SP
Operator #2
Try #1
Try #2
All operators
agree within and All Operators
between each
agree with
Other
standard
Operator #3
Try #1
Try #2
% APPRAISER SCORE ->
% SCORE VS. ATTRIBUTE(2) ->
#DIV/0!
Known
Y/N
Agree
Y/N
Agree
#DIV/0!
0%
Known
Known
SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE(3) -> #DIV/0!
SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE vs. ATTRIBUTE(4) -> #DIV/0!
Note:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Operator agrees with him/herself on both trials
Operator agrees on both trials with the known standard
All operators agreed within and between themselves
All operators agreed within and between themselves AND agreed with the known standard
Enter Pass/Fail, Good/Bad, Accept/Reject or other labels which indicate status of inspection
Page 3
Statistical Report - Attribute Gage R&R Study
DATE:
NAME:
PRODUCT:
BUSINESS:
3/10/1996
Allied Employee
3313 Spark Plug
F&SP
% Appraiser1
Operator #1 Operator #2 Operator #3
0
0
0
0
0
0
Source
Total Inspected
# Matched
False Negative (operator biased toward rejection)
False Positive (operator biased toward acceptance)
Mixed
95% UCL
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Calculated Score
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
95% LCL
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Screen % Effective Score3
0
0
Total Inspected
# in Agreement
95% UCL
Calculated Score
95% LCL
0
0
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
95% UCL
Calculated Score
95% LCL
110.0%
110.0%
90.0%
80.0%
80.0%
70.0%
70.0%
% Efficiency
100.0%
40.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
30.0%
20.0%
20.0%
10.0%
10.0%
0.0%
95% UCL
Calculated Score
95% LCL
% Score vs Appraiser
90.0%
50.0%
0
0
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
100.0%
60.0%
0
0
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Screen % Effective Score vs Attribute4
0
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
% Appraiser
% Efficiency
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
%Score vs Attribute2
Operator #1 Operator #2 Operator #3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0%
Operator #1
Operator #2
Operator #3
Operator #1
Operator #2
Operator #3
Notes
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Operator agrees with him/herself on both trials
Operator agrees on both trials with the known standard
All operators agreed within and between themselves
All operators agreed within & between themselves AND agreed with the known standard
Calculations
Known Population
Sample #
Attribute
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
Operator #1
Try #1
Try #2
Page 5
Operator #2
Try #1
Try #2
Operator #3
Try #1
Calculations
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
Page 6
Calculations
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
% Appraiser Score
#DIV/0!
Page 7
#DIV/0!
Calculations
Operator #3
Try #2
Y/N
Agree
Y/N
Agree
Page 8
Calculations
Page 9
Calculations
Page 10