Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

CHAPTER FOUR

THE LAGOS MULTI-DOOR COURTHOUSE (LMDC)

4.1 THE MULTI-DOOR COURTHOUSE AND THE COURT-

CONNECTION CONCEPT

A cursory glance at the court systems of most countries readily

reveal that one of their greatest weaknesses is that cases too

numerous to adequately handle are filed daily and this inevitably

leads to problems in obtaining trial dates and eventual delay in

the process of obtaining justice. It is against this backdrop that

the concept of the multi-door courthouse was developed.

A multi-door courthouse is a dispute resolution centre designed

to involve courts and communities in discovering ways to offer

citizens alternatives to courtroom trials for resolving disputes.1

The multi-door courthouse was introduced to reduce the

concentration on litigation as the only method of resolving

disputes in the courts. This is achieved by annexing a centre of

dispute resolution to the conventional courts. Thus the courts do

1
Dele Peters, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Nigeria – Principles and Practice, 2004, Lagos,
Dee-Sage Nig. Ltd, p. 165

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 61 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

not merely present litigation as the only avenue or ‘door’ open

to disputants, but also present other ‘doors’ like early neutral

evaluation, mini-trials, mediations and arbitrations, etc. At a

multi-door courthouse, each matter is screened to determine the

most suitable mode of resolution and sent through an

appropriate ‘door’ for resolution.2

It is from this relationship that the tag “court-connected” or

“court-annexed” ADR derives. Bringing ADR into the domain of

the courts in this manner gives it all the more force, especially

where the enforceability and compellability of the courts is

concerned. In most cases where court-connected ADR is being

practiced, judges mandatorily require disputants to attempt the

resolution of their grouses before the case comes before the

judge. According to Brooke LJ in the much celebrated British

case of Dunnet v. Railtrack Plc 3:

“…parties and their lawyers might have to face

uncomfortable cost consequences if they turn
down out of hand the chance of ADR when
suggested by the court.”

2
Kehinde Aina, The Multi-Door Courthouse Concept: A Review, (Unpublished), p. 11
3
(2002) 2 All ER 850

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 62 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

In that case, Ms. Dunnet had sued Railtrack Plc. which had

replaced a field gate on her property without a lock causing four

of her horses to be killed by a train after straying through an

open gate. Ms. Dunnet lost the suit and appealed. The Appeal

Judge, Schiemann LJ, recommended mediation but the

respondent refused on two different occasions. Ms. Dunnet lost

on the merits of the appeal, but the court declined to award

Railtrack Plc. the cost of their appeal because they had refused

the recommendation of ADR. Thus it was established that parties

should seek to resolve disputes out of court, especially when

recommended by the court, and that a refusal to mediate, where

mediation offered a realistic prospect of a resolution of the

dispute, could result in that party being penalized in costs.

This involvement of the courts in suggesting or mandating ADR

goes a long way in achieving the purposes of ADR in a more

formalized manner. Increasingly, court-mandated ADR is

becoming a prerequisite to initiating litigation, especially in the

United States of America and Britain. In a number of instances,

certain categories of cases are sent wholesale to ADR. For

example, in California, USA, all child custody cases must first be

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 63 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

mediated before resort can be made to litigation by any of the

parties.4 Even in Nigeria, according to the new Lagos State Civil

Procedure Rules, parties are expected to demonstrate efforts

made at settlement before proceeding to litigation.5However, it is

argued that ADR ought to be wholly voluntary and that the

courts could recommend ADR as an alternative to full court trials,

but that they shouldn’t compel parties to submit to ADR or

penalize them when they do not, whether as part of the multi-

door courthouse concept or not. The consensus in general,

notwithstanding, is that the courts should direct the exploration

of the matter via ADR where the judge finds it to be applicable in

the resolution of a particular dispute according to its facts.6

In Shirayama Shokusan v. Danovo Ltd.7 it was said that the

court demonstrated both the will and the power to direct parties

to mediation even when one of the parties was not willing. The

court based its reasoning on the premise that the case

management powers conferred on the court entitled it to order

ADR even against the wishes of one party and that nothing

4
Kehinde Aina, The Lagos Multi-Door Courthouse – One Year After, p. 21
5
The Lagos Multi-Door Courthouse – A GUIDE, p. 5
6
Kehinde Aina, Op. cit. p. 9
7
(2003) EWHC 3006

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 64 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

confined such power to where both parties wanted to mediate.

Blackburne J said:

“I take the view that the court does have

jurisdiction to direct ADR even though one
party may not be willing to have the dispute
submitted to ADR…. I am not impressed by
the argument that making an order of this
kind, with opposition by one side, risks
breaching…privilege in any way.” 8

4.2 A SHORT HISTORY

In the late sixties, the United States of America began to pay more attention to the

resolution of disputes by alternative means. This came about due to the alarming

increase in cost of litigation, rising court costs and increasingly heavy court

dockets which brought frustration to disputants.9

Eventually, in 1976 at the Pound Conference in Minnesota, U.S.A, Professor

Frank Sander presented the revolutionary concept of the “Multi-Door

Courthouse” as a means of decongesting the courts and providing effective

alternative methods of resolving disputes in the country’s failing judicial system.

He insisted that a courthouse ought to have many ‘doors’ and that people ought to

be able to choose what form of dispute resolution might best fit their needs. For

8
Ibid.
9
Dele Peters, Op. cit. p. 167

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 65 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

example, through one door, they might get a trial, through another door, just

information – or perhaps mediation, or a neutral case evaluation. In other words,

the Multi-Door Courthouse is a systematic means of providing ADR to the public

and a method for streamlining the way courts operated. 10 This concept was first

implemented in Washington D.C., Texas and Oklahoma in 1985.11

In Nigeria, the judiciary has also suffered greatly in the hands of case overloads

and over time, the personnel and finances of the courts have been highly

insufficient in effectively all the cases brought before them. Thus the concept of

the Multi-Door Courthouse was most welcome.

The Multi-Door Courthouse concept was brought into Nigeria as a private

initiative which later garnered the support of the Ministry of Justice. In November

2001, the Negotiation and Conflict Management Group (NCMG) under the

leadership of Kehinde Aina12 approached the Ministry of Justice and the Lagos

State Judiciary for partnership in establishing the Lagos Multi-Door Courthouse

(LMDC). The LMDC was eventually launched at the High Court premises on

Thursday June 11, 2002 with a financial grant of N6,035,092 from the U.S.

Embassy.13

10
Kehinde Aina, op. cit.
11
Ibid.
12
An Ashoka fellow, partner in the law firm of Aina, Blankson & Co., Executive Director of the NCMG
and Director of the Lagos Multi-Door Courthouse.
13
Kehinde Aina, Justice Reform in Africa – The Nigerian Multi-Door Courthouse Approach As A Case
Study, p. 4; Dele Peters, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Nigeria – Principles and Practice,

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 66 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

The Lagos Multi-Door Courthouse was established as a multi-faceted ADR centre

which, as a first in Nigeria, offers court users a viable, cost effective and time-

saving alternative to resolving disputes of diverse nature. Now, instead of the

single ‘door’ of litigation known in all courts of Nigeria prior, the LMDC

provides these three other supplementary ‘doors’ as part of the court system:

mediation, neutral evaluation, arbitration.14

The overriding objective of the LMDC as contained in its Practice Direction15 is

to:

“enlarge resources for justice by providing enhanced,

timely cost-effective and user-friendly access to justice
for would-be and existing plaintiffs and defendants.”

4.3 THE CASE PROCESS AT THE LMDC

The process of receiving a case and seeing the same through to resolution is

broken down into four (4) stages:

i) Initiation of case

2004, Lagos, Dee-Sage Nig. Ltd, p. 171

14
Dele Peters, Ibid.
15
The Lagos Multi-Door Courthouse Practice Direction (Pursuant to Section 274, Constitution of the
Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999)

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 67 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

ii) Submission to ADR

iii) Intake Screening / Referral

iv) Fees

STAGE 1: Initiation

At the LMDC, cases can be initiated in any of the three (3) following ways:

- By walk-ins: Any one of the disputing parties or both parties with or without

their counsel may initiate mediation, arbitration or any of the other ‘doors’ by

writing to the Director of the LMDC or by simply walking into the ADR

centre.

- By court referrals: The presiding judge in any case before the court before or

during litigation may refer parties to the ADR centre when the circumstances

of the case show potential resolution via ADR.

- By direct intervention: The LMDC may, through its Director, in cases where

the public interest is high or when the interests of the disputing parties require

it, approach the parties with a view to assisting the fast and amicable

resolution of their dispute.16

STAGE 2: Submission to ADR

16
The Lagos Multi-Door Courthouse – BROCHURE, p. 7

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 68 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

According to the LMDC Practice Direction, actions are commenced upon the

filling of a duly completed form (Form 1) by any of the disputing parties or their

counsel. The request form is to be submitted along with four (4) copies of the

statement of issues, which briefly describes the factual and legal issues in the

dispute, including the interest of the party. Other relevant documents of huge

importance may be submitted along with the request form. After a week, the

LMDC will send a Notice of Referral to the other party along with a Submission

Form (Form 2) and a Memorandum to Parties (Form 3). The party receiving these

documents is expected to fill the submission form, thereby submitted the dispute

to the LMDC. He is expected to forward the Request Form 2 with four (4) copies

of his Statement in Response to the Registrar of the LMDC within 7 days.17

STAGE 3: Intake Screening / Referral

Intake Screening

When the Statements of Issues of both parties are received, the Registrar of the

LMDC allocates the file to a Dispute Resolution Officer (DRO) who shall

17
Ibid.

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 69 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

exchange the Statements with the parties and may then invite them for a

preliminary meeting or screening. This intake screening session is designed to

first diagnose the dispute. An Individual Screening Conference is set up in

appropriate cases. This conference is confidential in nature and there is no report

made on the court file or to the judge (when the case has been referred by the

court). The confidentiality of the ADR process is protected by statute and this

promotes frank and honest discussion of both the legal and non-legal issues of the

dispute. This conference involves information exchange with a view to problem-

solving and resolution. The screener gathers information relevant to an

understanding of the nature and dynamics of the case. The parties make a short

and informal uninterrupted presentation of the legal issues of the case; the

procedure they want followed; interests sought and any other details they desire.

Sometimes common ground and bases for further settlement discussions are

established at this time. This process enables the participants to practically assess

the peculiar needs of their case.18

The parties are introduced to the working of the Multi-Door Courthouse and ADR

in general and this review of the process and protocol of the programme helps to

carry along the parties at every stage. A skillful screener helps to uncover the

underlying concerns of the parties and identifies what is required to resolve the

matter. A large number of cases are straightforward, but most are complicated by
18
Kehinde Aina, ADR IN AFRICA: THE PROSPECT FOR THE MULTI-DOOR COURTHOUSE
CONCEPT, p. 9

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 70 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

concerns, hidden emotions and resentments. The common obstacles to resolution

of disputes include no communication or poor communication, unrealistic

expectations, client control issues, delays in discovery and other underlying issues

of power or control either from the clients or the counsel.19

The Referral

When the dynamics of the case and impediments to its settlement have been duly

examined, the screener reviews the full range of ‘doors’ available, discusses the

scheduling procedures and then makes a recommendation. The key to maximizing

the potential of the programme is to identify the needs and status of the case

progressively and determine and design the best approach to removing the

obstacle to amicable resolution of the dispute. When the recommendation as to

what process or ‘door’ to follow has been made, the parties may wish to leave the

ADR process and go for litigation or settle among themselves, or they may

continue with one of the available options. This decision must be mutual between

the parties. Then a Neutral is assigned to the case. Neutrals are assigned from the

Multi-Door Courthouse panels and are assigned to cases on the basis of their

expertise, availability and personal suitability, according to the facts of each case.

The parties are sent a confirmation notice and the biographical information of the

Neutral assigned.20
19
Ibid. p. 10
20
Ibid. p. 11

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 71 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

STAGE 4: Fees

Once the Statement of Issues and the Statement in Response are filed, the parties

are required to make a deposit of a non-refundable administrative fee with the

LMDC. After screening, the parties each deposit with the LMDC such fees as

cover the cost of the Mediation/Arbitration sessions and all other appropriate

expenses of the proceedings as may be prescribed by the Scale of Fees or

approved by the Registrar.21

Also, the walk-in cases and other cases not referred by the court, the cost of using

the LMDC rooms or hiring other venues will be equally shared by the parties

except otherwise agreed between them. The payments for the

Mediation/Arbitration session are to be paid not later than 14 days prior to the

session. Whenever any portion of the deposits made by the parties is not utilized,

they shall be refunded. Where a session is cancelled, cancellation fees shall be

paid by the party cancelling the session.

Lastly, in part-fulfillment of its desire to bring access to justice to all, the LMDC

provides pro-bono services to or review fees payable by any party that meets the

requirements set by the Pro-Bono Committee.22

21
The Lagos Multi-Door Courthouse – BROCHURE, p. 8
22
Ibid. p.13

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 72 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

4.4 THE ‘DOORS’ OF THE LMDC

The LMDC has three ‘doors’ available to clients at present. They are: Mediation,

Early Neutral Evaluation and Arbitration.23

Door One: MEDIATION

In this process, a neutral third-party (the mediator) helps the parties in the dispute

to communicate their positions on the issues of the dispute and explore possible

solutions or settlements.24

This mediation session begins with an initial joint meeting between the parties

and the mediator. Here the procedures and rules concerning each party’s

opportunity to speak, order of presentation, decorum, caucuses and confidentiality

are outlined. After clarifications and preliminary deliberations have been made,

the mediator could request to meet each party in private caucuses to explore

23
Ibid. p. 12
24
Ibid.

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 73 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

possible options of resolving the case and determining the posture of each party as

touching these options.

Once common ground is achieved, a joint session is convened. The mediator

narrows down the differences between the parties and highlights the progress that

has been made on both sides and presents the offers in a bid to reach an

agreement. The settlement is put in writing in the Terms of Settlement and is duly

signed by the parties.25

Door Two: EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION

The Early Neutral Evaluation offers an impartial assessment of the strengths and

weaknesses of the case. This process is conducted by a retired or serving judge,

seasoned lawyer of repute or an expert in a particular field.26 The evaluator assists

the parties in settlement negotiations and/or renders an oral advisory opinion as to

settlement value if the parties as him to. This process is most effective in some

civil cases and, just like mediation, is confidential.27

Door Three: ARBITRATION

25
The Lagos Multi-Door Courthouse – BROCHURE, p. 9
26
Ibid. p. 11
27
Kehinde Aina, Justice Reform in Africa…, p. 10

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 74 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

Arbitration is a process where a third party (the arbitrator) presides over a forum

where the issues referred to him/her are presented in a near-court hearing manner

where legal arguments are presented and at the end of the hearing of the case

presentations of both parties renders a binding and enforceable award.28

This session begins with a preliminary meeting with both parties in attendance.

Here, a number of issues will be determined which include; the anticipated length

of time for the process, the mode of arbitration (by hearing or documentation) and

other pertinent procedural issues. Sequel to this meeting, the pleadings of both

parties, along with all necessary documents will be filed. Upon conclusion of the

Arbitration proceedings, an Award will be given by the Arbitrator in accordance

to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 29.

4.5 THE QUESTION OF ENFORCEMENT OF ADR AGREEMENTS

Most of the cynicism concerning ADR in Nigeria border on whether or not ADR

decisions are enforceable. Many rashly conclude that ADR in Nigeria amounts to

a wild-goose chase.

28
Ibid.
29
Cap A18, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 75 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

On the contrary, ADR decisions especially those reached via the instrumentality

of the Lagos Multi-Door Courthouse are highly enforceable, indeed, as

enforceable as the decisions of the courts.

When parties to a dispute reach an agreement and the Terms of Settlement are

drafted with the assistance of the Mediator, the Terms of Settlement are

forwarded to the referral judge for endorsement in the case of court-referred

matters while for walk-in matters, the ADR Judge (the Chief Judge of Lagos

State) endorses such agreement as an enforceable Consent Judgment.30 Once filed

at the court registry, it becomes an enforceable judgment of the court as good as a

ruling of a judge in court following litigation.

4.6 THE LMDC FIVE YEARS ON:

From its inception on June 11, 2002, the LMDC has garnered increasing support

from the rank and file of the judiciary of the country and the populace in general.

The great enthusiasm and acceptance being demonstrated by the Bench towards

the court-connected ADR initiative shows the LMDC as a veritable vehicle of

positive change in Nigeria.31 The establishment of the Abuja Multi-Door

Courthouse at the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja in

30
The Lagos Multi-Door Courthouse – BROCHURE, p. 11
31
NCMG NEWS (A quarterly newsletter of the Negotiation and Conflict Management Group), First
Quarter, 2007, p.1

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 76 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

November 2003 transformed the court-connected ADR concept into a beautiful

bride sought after by all the states of the Federation. Indeed, the highly esteemed

former Justice of the Nigerian Supreme Court, Honourable Justice Kayode Eso

was of the profound hope that by the year 2015, every State High Court should

have a court-connected ADR Centre.32

Although the LMDC did not begin full operations until six months later, its first

matter to be resolved came in on December 15, 2002. Between 2002 and 2004,

the LMDC received a total of 420 enquiries. The Court referred a whopping

number of 82 cases – which goes to highlight the faith and support of the Lagos

High Court of the LMDC. Of these 82 cases, 17 were concluded amicably, 39

were at the time still ongoing and have been resolved one way or another. Sadly, a

total of 26 cases refused to submit to ADR and probably opted for conventional

court litigation.33

It is encouraging to note that 57 cases came into the LMDC by mere walk-ins.

This also shows just how much the court-connected ADR initiative has caught on

with the public and general citizenry. Of the 53 cases, 27 refused to submit, 13

were concluded and 17 were ongoing at the time of the computation of the records

32
Ibid. p.2
33
Kehinde Aina, The Multi-Door Courthouse Concept: A Review, pp. 16 – 18.

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 77 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

between the 2002 inception and 200434. Obviously, looking back over the last five

years will yield much more encouraging results.

Perhaps one of the most renown of the cases resolved at the LMDC is the 17 year

land dispute involving a former vice-president of Nigeria, Chief Alex Ekwueme,

which was eventually referred to the LMDC. Over the 17 years, the former vice-

president would fly into Lagos to be in attendance only to have the case adjourned

time and time again. Upon the filing of the case at the LMDC, mediation was

recommended and on the due date, the parties and their counsel got to the LMDC

at 10am. By 8:30pm on the same day, the parties had signed the Terms of

Settlement and shook hands for the first time in 17 years!35 The strength of the

ADR process is shown thus to be most viable.

The need to amend the Practice Direction is rife, however, in light of the spate of

refusals to submit to ADR. After all, parties do not have the liberty to choose

whether to respond to a court summons or subpoena. An element of

compellability should be included in the Practice Direction of the LMDC so that it

has the power to compel parties to come to it. If there is no consensus as to the

‘door’ to pursue or in the process of mediation, however, the parties could

34
Ibid.
35
Although ADR and the LMDC function under codes of strict confidentiality, the parties had granted their
consent to the publicising of this particular case.* Courtesy, The Lagos Multi-Door Courthouse.

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 78 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

subsequently be allowed to move on to the ‘door’ or arbitration or even resort to

litigation.

Seminars and workshops are conducted by the LMDC and the NCMG to further

educate and reorient both members of the bar and the public to the aims, purposes

and processes of ADR in the revamping of the nation’s judiciary. These seminars

are highly effective as they remove the last strains of resistance in the minds of

individuals who are wholly or partly ignorant of ADR and the Multi-Door

Courthouse concept and their benefits. Most of the resistance by some individual

members of the bar has been the supposition that ADR will eventually reduce the

relevance, clientele and eventual income of lawyers in the country. In refuting

these claims, the officers of the LMDC posit that, to the contrary, lawyers who

educate themselves in ADR and train themselves to negotiate, mediate or arbitrate

are those who will become more relevant in the practice of ADR in the country

and they will be more highly sought after eventually because ADR and the Multi-

Door Courthouses have come to stay.

The advantages and prospects of the LMDC are too numerous to exhaust.

Increased access and fairness in justice has been achieved and continues to be

pursued. The LMDC promises speedy and more efficient dispensation of justice

in Lagos State and invariably all over Nigeria and this has increase the public

satisfaction of the public in Lagos State with the justice system. Relationships like

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 79 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

those in the case involving the former vice-president are salvaged and the

possibility of future business relations between disputing parties are increased.

One near silent advantage of this project is the fact that it increases foreign

investments because the difficulty in obtaining swift and fair justice in the country

has served as a major setback in terms of foreign investment. Sir Henry Brooke of

the British Court of Appeal is quoted as saying:

“if Nigeria is to continue to attract direct foreign

investment, it has got to instill confidence in its dispute
resolution processes.” 36
The NCMG has also initiated a mediation scheme at the Court of Appeal known

as The Court of Appeal Mediation Program (The CAMP).37 Such laudable

projects working their way to the top of the country’s judiciary are bound to have

positive impacts on the delivery of justice in Nigeria and mark her out as a

champion of ADR and revolution in justice systems in Africa.

The LMDC project that started as a humble dream in the hearts of a few has the

potential to reroute the future of the Nigerian Judiciary and should be given the

requisite support in implementing their projects all over the country. As the

Deputy Director General of the Nigerian law School, Lagos Campus, Dr.

Olanrewaju Onadeko noted in the visitors’ book when he visited the LMDC in

December, 2006: it is “the highway to the future of legal practice.” 38

36
NCMG NEWS, Op. cit. p.8
37
Kehinde Aina, The Multi-Door Courthouse Concept: A Review, p. 18
38
Ibid. p. 7

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 80 -
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) As Panacea to the Shortcomings of the Nigerian Legal System.

Ayokunle B. Oyawale (LAW/2001/099), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA.

- 81 -