Gender

Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female

Income (in $000's)

Table (a)
Sorted Gender
Income
Males
Females
62
Gender
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female

88

Income (in $000's)

Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male

20.10
20.63
20.75
20.89
20.95
21.22
21.37
22.00
22.30
22.40
22.64
23.67
24.25
24.30
25.20
25.21
25.60
26.00
26.50
27.04
27.20
27.50
28.00
28.50
28.50
32.35
32.43
34.20
34.50
34.60
34.86
38.00
41.10
44.00
59.00
91.00
1.50
6.34
7.04
8.01
8.10
9.38
9.95
10.00
10.09
10.70
11.90
12.09
12.09
13.13
13.35
13.42
14.00
14.20

Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male

18.90
19.50
19.70
19.72
19.80
20.10
20.63
20.75
20.89
20.95
21.22
21.37
22.00
22.30
22.40
22.64
23.67
24.25
24.30
25.20
25.21
25.60
26.00
26.50
27.04
27.20
27.50
28.00
28.50
28.50
32.35
32.43
34.20
34.50
34.60
34.86
38.00
41.10
44.00
59.00
91.00
1.50
6.34
7.04
8.01
8.10
9.38
9.95
10.00
10.09
10.70
11.90
12.09
12.09

Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male

14.76
15.50
15.83
16.07
16.10
16.15
16.20
16.58
16.70
17.20
17.64
18.00
18.15
18.21
18.40
18.80
18.90
19.88
21.03
22.20
22.58
22.61
22.85
23.00
23.26
23.68
24.47
24.80
25.70
27.00
27.76
29.30
30.00
30.30
30.65
33.10
41.50
48.30
51.20
56.10
57.00
68.04
77.00
96.00

Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male

13.13
13.35
13.42
14.00
14.20
14.76
15.50
15.83
16.07
16.10
16.15
16.20
16.58
16.70
17.20
17.64
18.00
18.15
18.21
18.40
18.80
18.90
19.88
21.03
22.20
22.58
22.61
22.85
23.00
23.26
23.68
24.47
24.80
25.70
27.00
27.76
29.30
30.00
30.30
30.65
33.10
41.50
48.30
51.20
56.10
57.00
68.04
77.00
96.00

Graph (b)

Number of males and female in the sample

Males

Females

Textbox (c)
The number of females is more than the number of males in the sample, which is 88 and 62 respectively.

Female
Mean
Standard Error
Median
Mode
Standard Deviation
Sample Variance
Kurtosis
Skewness
Range
Minimum
Maximum
Sum
Count

Male
19.955284
1.3095593
17.125
10
12.284755
150.9152
12.673198
2.723688
88.8
2.2
91
1756.065
88

Mean
Standard Error
Median
Mode
Standard Deviation
Sample Variance
Kurtosis
Skewness
Range
Minimum
Maximum
Sum
Count

23.4482257806
2.2045133809
18.1799998
#N/A
17.3583557195
301.3125132849
5.6501400457
2.2276294729
94.5
1.5
96
1453.7899984
62

Bin
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
More

Frequency
0
12
40
25
7
2
1
0
0
0
1
0
0

Bin

Frequency
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110

More

0
8
28
15
3
2
3
1
1
0
1
0
0

n the sample

ch is 88 and 62 respectively.

Bin

M
or
e

10
0

80

60

40

20

15
10
5
0
0

Frequency

Histogram
30
20
10
0

Frequency
Cumulative
%

Frequency
Cumulative
%

Name
Student ID

How Wei Xin

Table (a)
Sorted Gender
Income
Males
Females
62
88

Graph (b)

Number of males and female in the sample

Males
Females

Males

Females

Textbox (c)
The number of females are more than the number of males in the sample, which is 88 and 62
respectively. In other words, 59% of the sample are females and the remaining 41% of them
are males.

Table (d)
Summary
Statistics
Male
Female
Count
62
88
Minimum
1.50
2.20
Maximum
96.00
91.00
Range
94.50
88.80
Mean
23.45
19.96
Std Dev
17.36
12.28
Coefficient of
variation
74.03%
61.56%
Median
18.18
17.13
Lower
quartile
13.57
12.93
Upper
quartile
25.48
24.53
IQR
11.91
11.60
Table (e)
(All tables should be
Cumulative Percentage
formatted)
Frequency
Percentage Frequency(%)
Frequency (%)
Upper bound Midpoint
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
0
-5
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10
5
8
12
12.90
13.64
12.90
13.64
20
15
28
40
45.16
45.45
58.06
59.09
30
25
15
25
24.19
28.41
82.26
87.50
40
35
3
7
4.84
7.95
87.10
95.45
50
45
2
2
3.23
2.27
90.32
97.73
60
55
3
1
4.84
1.14
95.16
98.86
70
65
1
0
1.61
0.00
96.77
98.86
80
75
1
0
1.61
0.00
98.39
98.86
90
85
0
0
0.00
0.00
98.39
98.86
100
95
1
1
1.61
1.14
100.00
100.00
110
105
0
0
0.00
0.00
100.00
100.00

Textbox (f)
Based on the cumulative percentage frequency stated in the table above, approximately 95%, which is
95.16% of male employees earn up to $60,000 anually and approximately 95% which is 95.45% of female
employees earn up to $40,000 annually. The income level is different for the two groups of gender. Male
employees earn approximately $20,000 more than female employees.

5%, which is
5.45% of female
gender. Male

Graph (g) Precentage Frequency Polygons

Percentage frequency of the employees(%)

Percentage frequency polygon of the annual income for both female an

-20

50.00
45.00
40.00
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00

Male
Fema
le

20

40

60

80

Total annual income($000's)

100

120

Textbox (h)
Both the percentage frequency polygons for males and females are unimodal. Besides, both the
percentage frequency polygons are skewed to the right. This shows that most of the employees
(male and female) earn low income, i.e. less than $40000.

Textbox (i)
The four measures of variability are the
MALE FEMALE
-Range
=
94.50
88.80
-Standard deviation
= 17.36
12.28
-Coefficient of variation = 74.03% 61.56%
-Interquartile range(IQR)= 11.91
11.60
The range of annual income of male is higher than female because there are no female
employees earning from $61,000 to $90,000.
The standard deviation of male employees are higher than female employees. This indicates that
in absolute terms, the income of male employees are much more variable than female employees.
The interquartile ranges (IQR) are similar, at about $12000, although male employees' middle 50%
of values are between $13570 and $25480, while female employees' are between $12930 and
$24530.

Textbox (j)
The standard deviation, range and interquartile range are all just slightly higher
for Betown than for Aville. B has a higher range since A has no-one in the
$200000-$210000 class. The interquartile ranges (range of the middle 50% of the
data) are similar, at about $64000, although Avilles middle 50% of values are
between $42000 and $106300, while Betowns are between $103700 and
$168300. The standard deviation is $41600 in Aville which is very similar to the
value $42700 for Betown. This indicates that in absolute terms the incomes in
Betown are just a little more variable than in Aville.
(iv) Coefficient of variation for Aville: 54.31%
Coefficient of variation for Betown: 31.72%
In contrast to the other measures of variation the coefficient of variation is much
higher in Aville than in Betown. This is not surprising since the coefficient of
variation is a measure of relative variability (standard deviation as a percentage of
the mean) and the mean income in Aville is much lower than in Betown.