0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views51 pages

Spatial Uncertainty Modeling Techniques

This document discusses modeling spatial uncertainty through various techniques including spatial stochastic simulation, variogram-based simulation, and sequential simulation. Spatial stochastic simulation involves generating multiple unconditional or conditional Earth models using techniques like object-based Boolean simulation or training-image-based simulation. Variogram-based simulation techniques like kriging are introduced which find the best linear estimate of unknown values accounting for spatial correlation and redundancy between data points. Sequential simulation algorithms loop through grid cells, determining probabilities conditioned on existing data and previously simulated values, and drawing new values to add to the data set.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views51 pages

Spatial Uncertainty Modeling Techniques

This document discusses modeling spatial uncertainty through various techniques including spatial stochastic simulation, variogram-based simulation, and sequential simulation. Spatial stochastic simulation involves generating multiple unconditional or conditional Earth models using techniques like object-based Boolean simulation or training-image-based simulation. Variogram-based simulation techniques like kriging are introduced which find the best linear estimate of unknown values accounting for spatial correlation and redundancy between data points. Sequential simulation algorithms loop through grid cells, determining probabilities conditioned on existing data and previously simulated values, and drawing new values to add to the data set.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Modeling spatial uncertainty

Modeling Uncertainty in the Earth Sciences Jef Caers Stanford University

A reminder: models of uncertainty


Models of uncertainty P(A) P(A|B b) f X ( X Y y) Samples: x1 , x2 , x3 ,..., xn

A set of samples drawn by Monte Carlo simulation are a valid model of uncertainty

Motivation
uncertain uncertain certain or uncertain uncertain

Spatial Input parameters

Spatial Stochastic model

Physical model

response

Forecast and decision model

uncertain

Datasets

Physical input parameters


uncertain

Raw observations
uncertain/error

Spatial stochastic simulation


Modeling spatial uncertainty

Spatial stochastic simulation


Seed 1 Seed 2 Earth models (input uncertainty)

input

Spatial Stochastic simulator


(spatial uncertainty)

Data
(samples, well, geophysics)

Conditional simulation = constrained to data Unconditional simulation = not constrained to any data

Hard data
Definition: Hard data = direct, exact information at

the scale of modeling


All the rest is soft data

If you dig out a volume of this size at that location and measure the variable of interest than you have hard data

Example
Size of the core = 5 miles Grid cells 6 inch x 6 inch x 12 inch 1 grid cell = 200ft x 200 ft x 3 ft

If we assume the core to be hard data, i.e. assign it to a grid cell then we basically assume that there is NO spatial variation in that grid cell

Example spatial stochastic simulation


Input uncertainty: Range horizontal= [15,25] Range vertical = 5 Isotropy or horizontal anisotropy max range = [20,25] min range = [10,15] Azm=45

Example spatial stochastic simulation


If I take a fixed input Range horizontal= 25, Range vertical = 5 Horizontal Isotropy

Result
horizontal

vertical

The Earth model reflects our knowledge about The sampled values at their location The interpreted spatial continuity model

Spatial uncertainty

and infinitely more if you want

Input and spatial uncertainty

and infinitely more if you want

Object-based stochastic simulation


Modeling spatial uncertainty

Unconditional simulation
Principle mostly used : rejection sampler
Place an object drawn from the pdfs of the various

parameters defining the object Place the object, either randomly or according to trend If object violates interaction or other rules
Then reject Else accept

This will make sure that the 3D Earth model created

reflects exactly the Boolean model specified

Conditional simulation
Use rejection sampler: slow Use Metropolis sampler
Create an initial 3D Earth model: it probably violates data

constraints Propose a perturbation


Move an object Remove an object Add an object

Accept the change with a probability a, where a is dependent

on how much improvement was made


These methods are iterative methods, hence slow and

may not converge

Example: conditional simulation


After 198 iterations Some well data still not honored After 200 iterations

Final result: constrained to all wells

Channel position changes After 202 iterations After 204 iterations

Channel added

Same channel removed


Courtesy: Norwegian Computing Center

Conditional Boolean simulation


Too slow for practical Earth modeling involving

uncertainty
Any conflict between model and data makes it even

slower
Can only be constrained to
Limited amount of well data Not to geophysical data or more complex data

Training-image-based simulation
Modeling spatial uncertainty

Conditional Earth model

Idea
Generate a single unconditional Boolean Earth model

Anchor patterns to data

Actual Data Extract 3D Patterns

Principle of sequential simulation


A training image A reservoir with a 2x2 grid
Another realization

Step 1. Pick a cell

Step 2. Assign probability 50%

Step 3. Assign color

Step 4. Pick a cell

100%

Step 5. Assign color

Step 6. Final result

In general
= data

data event

P(A|B)?

Algorithm
Generic sequential simulation algorithm (1) Assign any hard data to grid cells if required (2) Define a random path (3) Loop over all grid cells (1) Determine P(A|B) B=any data and previously simulated values (2) Draw from P(A|B) a value (3) Add that value to the data set

How to use the training image ?


Simulation grid with some data points

u2 u4

u?
u1

u3

Using a training image


Training image

P(A|B)=1/4 A = blue

Scanning is CPU-demanding
Simulation grid with some data points

u2

u?
u4 u1

u3

Template

Create a data-base
Training image

Search tree
14 11

Construction requires scanning training image one single time


5 3

Minimizes memory demand


3 1 2 5 3 0 1 1

Allows retrieving all training probabilities for the template adopted

0 2

Spatial continuity at large scale


Training image Freeze coarse grid nodes and use them as conditioning data to simulate finer grid nodes Finer simulation grid

Coarse simulation grid

fine template

Coarse template

Example
Facies type Tidal bars Conceptual description Elongated ellipses w/ upper sigmoidal cross-section Sheets (rectangles) Stratigraphy Length (m) 2000 to 4000 Width (m) 500 Thickness (ft) 3 to 7 Anywhere

Tidal sand flats Estuarine sands Transgr. Lags

Anywhere, eroded by sand bars Top of reservoir Top of estuarines

2000

1000

Sheets (rectangles) Sheets (rectangles)

4000 3000

2000 1000

8 4

Training image Background shales Tidal sand flats Transgressive lags Tidal bars Estuarine sands

Example
N

Aerial proportion maps


Estuarine sands

Plan view of stratigraphic grid with location of the 140 wells

Sand bars

Background shale Vertical proportion curves Background shale Estuarine sands 1

Facies model

Sand bars

Variogram-based simulation
Modeling spatial uncertainty

Introduction to spatial estimation


Data point

uj ?

Spatial estimation = What is the best guess for the value at the location where no data was taken ?
There is only one single guess that is the best Depends on what you determine as best

What is best?
Best = as close as possible to the unknown truth Consider a situation where you want to estimate the

total amount of pollution of Pb at a specific location. You have two methodologies do so. Consider that you apply these methodologies to 10 sites

Estimation: principles
site 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 estimation estimation unknown error method 1 (1) 1 m (1) m 2 (1) m 3 (1) m 4 (1) m 5 (1) m 6 (1) m 7 (1) m 8 (1) m 9 (1) 10 m method 2 (2) 1 m (2) m 2 (2) m 3 (2) m 4 (2) m 5 (2) m 6 (2) m 7 (2) m 8 (2) m 9 (2) 10 m real# Pb m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m7 m8 m9 m10 error method 1 method 2 (1) (2) e1 e1
(1) e2 (1) e3 (1) e4 (1) e5 (1) e6 (1) e7 (1) e8 (1) e9 (1) e10 (2) e2 (2) e3 (2) e4 (2) e5 (2) e6 (2) e7 (2) e8 (2) e9 (2) e10

Estimation: principles
Unbiased: the average error is zero (it is a property

measured over many trials Best ?


Average square error is zero ? Absolute value of error is zero ?

loss

-error

+error

Introduction to Kriging
What is kriging ? Is an estimation method Finds the best (Least Square) linear estimate of the unknown Accounts for the variogram

* Spatial correlation between unknown and data * Redundancy between data But is mostly used in sequential simulation

Linear estimation
Problem Inverse distance solution
1 1 e.g. 3
2 i 2

z1=0.5 d
1
z izi
i1 3

z2=0.9 d
2

d 1

2 i

1d 1d
1 2

2 d3

1d 3

d
3

z3=1.5

h13 h12 1

Layered system

Inverse distance mapping


d i i 1 di 1
1 2 1 2

3 Situation 1 2=1/3 1=1/3 1=1/4

3 Situation 2 2=1/4

3=1/3 Inverse distance

3=1/2
kriging

Linear estimation
To be estimated

Z* SK (uj )
,n

Data Z(ua ), a 1,

uj ?
Direction of major continuity

Z (uj ) a Z(ua ), what is a ?


* SK a1

Principle 1:

a datum close in geological distance to the unknown should get a large weight

Principle 2:

Data close together are redundant and should share their weight

How does kriging do it?


z(u1)=0.5 h12
z(u) izi
i1 3

z(u2)=0.9

h13

h23

z(u3)=1.5

Record all the distance between Data locations Data location vs location of unknown Calculate the covariance function for those distances

How does kriging do it?


Var ( z ) C (h12 ) C (h13 ) 1 C (h 01 ) C (h ) Var ( z ) C (h ) C ( h ) 12 23 02 2 C ( h13 ) C ( h 23 ) Var ( z ) 3 C (h 03 )

Solve this linear system of equations


u j ) a z(ua ) is the kriging estimate z(
a1 n

Note: mean = assumed zero

What is the average error we make?


Var ( z ) C (h12 ) C (h13 ) 1 C (h 01 ) C (h ) Var ( z ) C (h ) C ( h ) 12 23 02 2 C ( h13 ) C ( h 23 ) Var ( z ) 3 C (h 03 )

Solve this linear system of equations

2 (u j ) 2 a C (h0a ) is the kriging variance


a1

Note: mean = assumed zero

Example
e d ? d

Var (z) Var (z) C (2d) 1 C (d) Var (z) Var (z) C (2d) C (d) 2 C (2d) C (2d) Var (z) 3 C (d)

1 1 / 4 1 / 4 2 3 1 / 2

1 1 1 2 (u) var(z) C (d) C (d) C (d) var(z) C (d) 4 4 2


Note: mean = assumed zero

Various flavors of kriging


Simple kriging
You assume there is no trend You assume you know the mean of the variable over the

domain
Ordinary kriging
You dont want to assume anything explicitly

Kriging with locally varying mean


You assume there is a trend and you know that trend exactly

Kriging with trend


You assume there is trend but you only know the type of

trend (dont know it exactly its magnitude)

Example

Back to sequential simulation


(1) Assign any hard data to grid cells if required (2) Define a random path (3) Loop over all grid cells (1) Determine P(A|B) B=any data and previously simulated values (2) Draw from P(A|B) a value (3) Add that value to the data set

Kriging is not simulation !


Kriging: what is the best guess?

uj ?

uj ?
Simulation: what is the uncertainty as expressed through a probability or probability distribution or a set of Possible outcomes

Gaussian simulation

Variance: 2

uj ?
Mean: m

mean: Z (u j ) a Z (ua ) is the simple kriging mean


* SK a1

variance: (u j ) 1 a Cov(u j ua ) is the kriging variance


2 SK a1

Transformation of the data


Gaussian simulation assumes the data is Gaussian
Problem ?

Prior to simulation, perform a normal score transform of the hard data


After sequential visit of all cells, perform a back-transform which is the exact reverse of the normal score transform

Normal score transform

Unit free

Complete SGS algorithm


(1) Transform the data into normal score domain
(2) Assign any hard data to grid cells if required

(3) Define a random path


(4) Loop over all grid cells (1) Determine, using kriging, the distribution P(A|B) B=any data and previously simulated values (2) Draw from P(A|B) a value (3) Add that value to the data set

(5) Back-transform all simulated values (requires extra/interpolation)

Example

You might also like