0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views4 pages

Importance of Failure Data in Reliability

The document discusses reliability engineering concepts including purposes of collecting failure data, tasks of a reliability engineer, responsibilities of a reliability engineering department, and reliability cost categories. It also provides an overview of the Markov method for modeling systems with dependent failure and repair modes, including equations to represent state transition probabilities over time.

Uploaded by

Praveen P Jose
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views4 pages

Importance of Failure Data in Reliability

The document discusses reliability engineering concepts including purposes of collecting failure data, tasks of a reliability engineer, responsibilities of a reliability engineering department, and reliability cost categories. It also provides an overview of the Markov method for modeling systems with dependent failure and repair modes, including equations to represent state transition probabilities over time.

Uploaded by

Praveen P Jose
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Purposes of Collecting Failure Data To calculate hazard rate (failure rate) of an item.

To make decisions regarding the introduction of a redundant item. To perform trade-off studies (cost-reliability studies). To conduct the items replacement studies. To perform preventive maintenance studies of the item. To conduct effective design reviews. To determine the maintenance needs of a new item. To perform life cycle cost studies. To predict the reliability and the availability of the item. To recommend design changes for improving the items reliability. Tasks of a Reliability Engineer: Performing analysis of a proposed design. nalyzing customer complaints with reliability. !nvestigating field failures. "unning tests on the system# sub-system and parts. $eveloping tests on the system# subsystem and components. %udgeting the tolerable system failure down to the component level. $eveloping a reliability program plan. $etermining reliability of alternative designs. Providing information to designers or management concerning reliability. &onitoring sub-contractors reliability performance. Participating in evaluating re'uests for proposals. $eveloping reliability models and techni'ues. Participating in design reviews. Reliability Engineering Department Responsibilities: (stablishing reliability policy# plan# and procedures. "eliability allocation. "eliability prediction (&!)-*$%+-,-.). /pecification and design reviews with respect to reliability. "eliability growth monitoring. Providing reliability related inputs to design specification and proposals. "eliability demonstration (&!)-/T$-0.-). Training reliability manpower and performing reliability-related research and development work. &onitoring subcontractors# if any# reliability activities. uditing the reliability activities.

1ailure data collection and reporting. 1ailure data analysis. - 2onsulting.

Reliability Cost Categories: 3 P24 2 4 !12 4 (12 Prevention Cost: "edundancy-Parts-*ourly cost and overhead rates for design engineers# reliability engineers# etc5 Appraisal Cost: *ourly cost and overhead rates for evaluation# reliability 'ualification# reliability demonstration# life-testing# etc5 6endor assurance cost for new component 'ualification# inspection# etc5 (tc5 Internal Failure Cost: *ourly cost and overhead rates for troubleshooting and repair# retesting# failure analysis# etc5 - "eplaced parts cost. - /pare parts inventory. - (tc5 External Failure Cost: 2ost to failure or repair. - "eplaced parts cost. - 2ost of failure analysis. - 7arranty administration and reporting cost. - )iability insurance. - (tc5 uality Costs: Post delivery failure costs8 7arranty charges- 2omplain ad9ustment- "eturned material - (tc5 Prevention costs8 :uality planning $esign review - /upplier evaluation - Process control ; Training - ('uipment calibration - (tc5 - 2osts of internal failures8 "epair and rework ; /crap - "einspection - $owntime of facilities because of defects - (tc5 (valuation 2osts8 !ncoming material inspection - !n process inspection - ssembly inspection "eview and recording data - uditing the 'uality system - (tc5 !arkov !et"o# : &arkove method is useful to model systems with dependent failure and repair modes and is based on following assumptions8 The probability of transition from one system state to another in a finite time interval rate (e.g. constant failure rate or repair rate) from one state to another. The probability of more than one transition in time interval state to ne<t state is negligible. ( . The occurrences are independent of each other.

is given by

. t

# where

is the transition

t from one . t . t 0)

1) Po (t + t ) = Po (t )(1 f t )(1 p t ) + Pf (t ) f t+ Pp (t ) p t 2) Pf (t + t ) = Pf (t )(1 f t ) + Po (t )f t 3) Pp (t + t ) = Pp (t )(1 p t ) + Po (t )p t

p
Robot down for preventive

f
Robot Operati ng Robot Failed

maintenance

i denotes the ith sate of the robot: i = O (operating) i = p (preventive maintenance), i = f (failed) Pi(t) is the probability that the robot is in state i at time t. p is the robot preventive maintenance constant rate f is the robot constant failure rate. p is the robot constant repair rate due to preventive maintenance. f is the robot constant repair rate.

1) Po (t + t ) = Po (t )(1 f t )(1 p t ) + Pf (t ) f t + Pp (t ) p t 2) Pf (t + t ) = Pf (t )(1 f t ) + Po (t )f t 3) Pp (t + t ) = Pp (t )(1 p t ) + Po (t )p t

1) Po (t + t ) = Po (t ) ( f + p ) Po (t ) t + Pf (t ) f t + Pp (t ) p t Po (t + t ) Po (t ) = ( f + p ) Po (t ) + Pf (t ) f + Pp (t ) p t 0 t dPo (t ) = ( f + p ) Po (t ) + Pf (t ) f + Pp (t ) p dt lim
rom !) and ")

dPp (t ) dt dPf (t ) dt

+ p Pp (t ) = Po (t )p + f Pf (t ) = Po (t ) f

At ! time ! t = 0 Po (0) = 1 Pp (0) = Pf (0) = 0

Laplace ! transform " p ( s ) = e st p (t ) dt


0

p (t )
e
at

p( s)

dp (t ) dt
inal value #heorem:
lim f (t ) = lim sf ( s )
t s 0

1 s +a sp ( s ) p (0)

rom $) and %alue theorem: sPo ( s ) Po (0) + (f + p ) Po ( s ) = Pp ( s ) p + Pf ( s ) f

sPo ( s ) 1 + (f + p ) Po ( s ) = Pp ( s ) p + Pf ( s ) f
rom !) and ") and %alue theorem: 2) sPp ( s ) Pp (0) + p Pp ( s ) = Po ( s )p

(&)

sPp ( s ) + p Pp ( s ) = Po ( s )p Pp ( s ) = Po ( s )p s + p

(&&)

3) sPf ( s ) Pf (0) + f Pf ( s ) = Po ( s )f sPf ( s ) + f Pf ( s ) = Po ( s )f Pf ( s ) = Po ( s )f s + f


(&&&)

'eplace (&&) and (&&&) in (&), (e have)

sPo ( s ) 1 + ( f + p ) Po ( s ) =
#hen)

Po ( s ) f s + f

p +

Po ( s )p s + p

Po ( s )$ s + ( f + p )

f p
s + f

p f
s + p

# =1

Po ( s ) =

s s + s( f + p + p + f ) + f p + p f + f p
2

( s + f )( s + p ) ( s + f )( s + p )
2

] ]

sPo ( s) =

A = s 2 + s( f + p + p + f ) + f p + p f + f p

[s

+ s( f + p + p + f ) + f p + p f + f p

sPp ( s) = sPf ( s) =

f (s + p )
A p (s + f ) A
s 0

Ass = Po = lim sPo ( s ) =

f p f p + p f + f p

B = f p + p f + f p Pp = Pf =

f p
B p f B

Robot -p Robot .own

o
1) Po (t + t ) = Po (t )(1 t ) + Pf (t ) t 2) Pf (t + t ) = Pf (t )(1 t ) + Po (t )t

1)

Po (t + t ) Po (t ) = Po (t ) + Pf (t ) t Pf (t + t ) Pf (t ) 2) = Pf (t ) + Po (t ) t
2) sPf ( s ) Pf (0) = Pf ( s ) + Po ( s ) sPf ( s ) = Pf ( s ) + Po ( s )

1) sPo ( s ) Po (0) = Po ( s ) + Pf ( s ) sPo ( s ) 1 = Po ( s ) + Pf ( s )

From 2) %
Pf ( s ) =

Po ( s ) (&) s +

'( )*b)tit*ting (&) in 1)%


Po ( s ) s +

sPo ( s ) 1 = Po ( s ) +

+fter )ome ad,*)tment%

sPo ( s ) =

s + s + +

lim sPo ( s ) =
s 0

You might also like