Verification Examples
2008
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 2
Linear static ............................................................................................................. 3
Supported bar with concentrated loads. ....................................................................................................................... 4
Thermally loaded bar structure. .................................................................................................................................... 5
Continously supported beam with constant distributed load......................................................................................... 6
External prestessed beam........................................................................................................................................... 9
Periodically supported infinite membrane wall with constant distributed load. ........................................................... 11
Clamped beam examination with plane stress elements............................................................................................ 13
Clamped thin square plate.......................................................................................................................................... 16
Plate with fixed support and constant distributed load................................................................................................ 18
Annular plate. ............................................................................................................................................................. 19
All edges simply supported plate with partial distributed load. ................................................................................... 21
Clamped plate with linear distributed load. ................................................................................................................. 23
Hemisphere displacement. ......................................................................................................................................... 25
Nonlinear static...................................................................................................... 27
3D beam structure. ..................................................................................................................................................... 28
Plate with fixed end and bending moment.................................................................................................................. 30
Dynamic................................................................................................................. 33
Deep simply supported beam..................................................................................................................................... 34
Clamped thin rhombic plate........................................................................................................................................ 37
Cantilevered thin square plate.................................................................................................................................... 39
Cantilevered tapered membrane. ............................................................................................................................... 42
Flat grillages. .............................................................................................................................................................. 45
Stability .................................................................................................................. 49
Simply supported beam.............................................................................................................................................. 50
Simply supported beam.............................................................................................................................................. 52
Design ................................................................................................................... 53
N-M interaction curve of cross-section (EN 1992-1-1:2004)....................................................................................... 54
RC beam deflection according to EC2, EN 1992-1-1:2004. ....................................................................................... 55
Required steel reinforcement of RC plate according to EC2, EN 1992-1-1:2004. ...................................................... 57
Earth-quake design using response-spectrum method. ............................................................................................. 59
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 3
Linear static
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 4
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Supported bar with concentrated loads.
Analysis
Type
Linear analysis.
Geometry
Side view
Section Area = 1,0 m
2
Loads
Axial direction forces P
1
= -200 N, P
2
= 100 N, P
3
= -40 N
Boundary
Conditions
Fix ends, at R
1
and R
5
.
Material
Properties
E = 20000 kN / cm
2
= 0,3
Element
types
Beam element
Mesh
Target
R
1
, R
5
support forces
Results
Theory AxisVM %
R
1
[N] 118,00 118,00 0,00
R
5
[N] 22,00 22,00 0,00
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 5
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Thermally loaded bar structure.
Analysis
Type
Linear analysis.
Geometry
Side view
Sections:
Steel: A
S
= x 10
-4
m
2
Copper: A
C
= x 10
-4
m
2
Loads
P = -12 kN (Point load)
Temperature rise of 10 C in the structure after assembly.
Boundary
Conditions
The upper end of bars are fixed.
Material
Properties
Steel: E
S
= 20700 kN / cm
2
, = 0,3 ,
S
= 1,2 x 10
-5
C
-1
Copper: E
C
= 11040 kN / cm
2
, = 0,3 ,
C
= 1,7 x 10
-5
C
-1
Element
types
Beam element
Target
S
max
in the three bars.
Results
Theory AxisVM %
Steel S
max
[MPa] 23824000 23848000 0,10
Cooper S
max
[MPa] 7185300 7198900 0,19
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 6
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Continously supported beam with point loads.
Analysis
Type
Linear analysis.
Geometry
Side view
(Section width = 1,00 m, height
1
= 0,30 m, height
2
= 0,60 m)
Loads
P
1
= -300 kN, P
2
= -1250 kN, P
3
= -800 kN, P
4
= -450 kN
Boundary
Conditions
Elastic supported.
From A to D is K
z
= 25000 kN/m/m.
From D to F is K
z
= 15000 kN/m/m.
Material
Properties
E = 3000 kN/cm
2
= 0,3
Element
types
Three node beam element. Shear deformation is taken into account.
Target e
z
, M
y
, V
z
, R
z
Results
Results
Diagram e
z
Diagram M
y
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 7
Diagram V
z
Diagram R
Reference AxisVM e [%]
e
A
[m] 0,006 0,006 0,00
e
B
[m] 0,009 0,009 0,00
e
C
[m] 0,014 0,014 0,00
e
D
[m] 0,015 0,015 0,00
e
E
[m] 0,015 0,015 0,00
e
F
[m] 0,013 0,013 0,00
Reference AxisVM e [%]
M
A
[KNm] 0,0 0,0 0,00
M
B
[KNm] 88,5 87,5 -1,13
M
C
[KNm] 636,2 632,8 -0,53
M
D
[KNm] 332,8 329,7 -0,93
M
E
[KNm] 164,2 163,3 -0,55
M
F
[KNm] 0,0 0,0 0,00
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 8
Results
Reference AxisVM e [%]
V
A
[KN] 0,0 0,0 0,00
V
B
[KN] 112,1 113,1 0,89
V
C
[KN] 646,8 647,2 0,06
V
D
[KN] 335,0 334,9 -0,03
V
E
[KN] 267,8 267,5 -0,11
V
F
[KN] 0,0 0,0 0,00
Reference AxisVM e [%]
R
A
[KN/m
2
] 145,7 154,0 5,70
R
B
[KN/m
2
] 219,5 219,4 -0,05
R
C
[KN/m
2
] 343,8 346,0 0,64
R
D
[KN/m
2
] 386,9 386,4 -0,13
R
E
[KN/m
2
] 224,5 224,7 0,09
R
F
[KN/m
2
] 201,2 200,8 -0,20
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 9
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
External prestessed beam.
Analysis
Type
Linear analysis.
Geometry
Side view
Loads
p = -50 kN /m distributed load
Length change = -6,52E-3 at beam 5-6
Boundary
Conditions
eY = eZ = = 0 at node 1
eX = eY = eZ = 0 at node 4
Material
Properties
E = 2,1E11 N / m
2
Beam 1-5, 5-6, 6-4 A = 4,5E-3 m
2
I
z
= 0,2E-5 m
4
Truss 2-5, 3-6 A = 3,48E-3 m
2
I
z
= 0,2E-5 m
4
Beam 1-4 A = 1,1516E-2 m
2
I
z
= 2,174E-4 m
4
Mesh
Element
types
Three node beam element, 1-5, 5-6, 6-4, 1-4 (shear deformation is taken into account)
Truss element 2-5, 3-6
Target
N
X
at beam 6-7
M
y,max
at beam 2-3
e
z
at node 2
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 10
Results
1 2 3 4
5 6
2,000 4,000 2,000
8,000
0
,
6
0
0
X
Z
Diagram e
z
ROBOT V6
AxisVM %
N
x
[kN] 584,56 585,70 0,19
M
y
[kNm] 49,26 49,60 0,68
e
z
[mm] -0,5421 -0,5469 0,89
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 11
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Periodically supported infinite membrane wall with constant distributed load.
Analysis
Type
Linear analysis.
Geometry
Side view
(thickness = 20,0 cm)
Loads
p = 200 kN / m
Boundary
Conditions
vertical support at every 4,0 m support length is 0,4 m
Material
Properties
E = 880 kN / cm
2
= 0,16
Element
types
Parabolic quadrilateral membrane (plane stress)
Mesh
Target
S
xx
at 1-10 nodes (1-5 at middle, 6-10 at support)
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 12
Results
Node
Analytical [kN/cm
2
] AxisVM [kN/cm
2
]
%
1 0,1313 0,1310 -0,23
2 0,0399 0,0395 -1,00
3 -0,0093 -0,0095 2,15
4 -0,0412 -0,0410 -0,49
5 -0,1073 -0,1070 -0,28
6 -0,9317 -0,9270 -0,50
7 0,0401 0,0426 6,23
8 0,0465 0,0469 0,86
9 0,0538 0,0540 0,37
10 0,1249 0,1240 -0,72
Reference:
Dr. Blcskey Elemr Dr. Orosz rpd:
Vasbeton szerkezetek Faltartk, Lemezek, Trolk
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 13
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Clamped beam examination with plane stress elements.
Analysis
Type
Linear analysis.
Geometry
Side view
Loads
p = -25 kN/m
Boundary
Conditions
Both ends built-in.
Material
Properties
E = 880 kN / cm
2
= 0
Element
types
Parabolic quadrilateral membrane (plane stress)
Mesh
C
Clamped
edge
1
3,000 0,250
0
,
5
0
0
0,375
C
Clamped
edge
X
Z
Side view
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 14
Target
xy, max
at section C
Results
Diagram
xy
5,28
791,56
5,14
5,28
791,56
5,14
5,28
791,56
5,14
5,28
791,56
5,14
Y
Z
Diagram
xy
at section C
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 15
2
'
4
3 '
/ 5 , 787
00260416 , 0 25 , 0
0078125 , 0 625 , 65
00260416 , 0
25 , 0
0078125 , 0
) ( 625 , 65
m kN
I b
S V
m I
m b
m S
theory beam from kN V
y
y
xy
y
y
=
=
=
=
=
=
AxisVM result
xy
= 791,6 kN / m
2
Difference = +0,52 %
AxisVM result
kN n V
xy
34 , 65 = =
Difference = +0,43 %
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 16
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Clamped thin square plate.
Analysis
Type
Linear analysis.
Geometry
Top view
(thickness = 5,0 cm)
Loads
P = -10 kN (at the middle of the plate)
Boundary
Conditions
eX = ez = eZ = fiX = fiY = fiZ = 0 along all edges
Material
Properties
E = 20000 kN / cm
2
= 0,3
Element
types
Plate element (Parabolic quadrilateral, heterosis)
Mesh
4,000
4
,
0
0
0
X
Y
Target
Displacement of middle of the plate
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 17
Results
-0,001
-0,006
-0,012
-0,019
-0,024
-0,026
-0,026
-0,024
-0,019
-0,012
-0,006
-0,001
-0,006
-0,022
-0,043
-0,065
-0,081
-0,087
-0,087
-0,081
-0,065
-0,043
-0,022
-0,006
-0,012
-0,043
-0,084
-0,125
-0,156
-0,168
-0,168
-0,156
-0,125
-0,084
-0,043
-0,012
-0,019
-0,065
-0,125
-0,187
-0,237
-0,257
-0,257
-0,237
-0,187
-0,125
-0,065
-0,019
-0,024
-0,081
-0,156
-0,237
-0,307
-0,337
-0,337
-0,307
-0,237
-0,156
-0,081
-0,024
-0,026
-0,087
-0,168
-0,257
-0,337
-0,383
-0,383
-0,337
-0,257
-0,168
-0,087
-0,026
-0,026
-0,087
-0,168
-0,257
-0,337
-0,383
-0,383
-0,337
-0,257
-0,168
-0,087
-0,026
-0,024
-0,081
-0,156
-0,237
-0,307
-0,337
-0,337
-0,307
-0,237
-0,156
-0,081
-0,024
-0,019
-0,065
-0,125
-0,187
-0,237
-0,257
-0,257
-0,237
-0,187
-0,125
-0,065
-0,019
-0,012
-0,043
-0,084
-0,125
-0,156
-0,168
-0,168
-0,156
-0,125
-0,084
-0,043
-0,012
-0,006
-0,022
-0,043
-0,065
-0,081
-0,087
-0,087
-0,081
-0,065
-0,043
-0,022
-0,006
-0,001
-0,006
-0,012
-0,019
-0,024
-0,026
-0,026
-0,024
-0,019
-0,012
-0,006
-0,001
X
Y
Z
Displacements
Mode Mesh Book
1
Timoshenko
2
AxisVM Diff
1
[%] Diff
2
[%]
1 2x2 0,402 0,420 4,48 10,53
2 4x4 0,416 0,369 -11,30 -2,89
3 8x8 0,394 0,381 -3,30 0,26
4 12x12 0,387 0,383 -1,03 0,79
5 16x16 0,385 0,383 -0,52 0,79
0,38
References:
1.) The Finite Element Method (Fourth Edition) Volume 2.
/O.C. Zienkiewicz and R.L. Taylor/ McGraw-Hill Book Company 1991 London
2.) Result of analytical solution of Timoshenko
Convergency
-15,00
-10,00
-5,00
0,00
5,00
10,00
15,00
1 2 3 4 5
Mesh density
D
i
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
Diff1 [%]
Diff2 [%]
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 18
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: plate2_1.axs
Thema
Plate with fixed support and constant distributed load.
Analysis
Type
Linear analysis.
Geometry
Top view
(thickness = 15,0 cm)
Loads P = -5 kN / m
2
Boundary
Conditions
eX = eY = eZ = fiX = fiY = fiZ = 0 along all edges
Material
Properties
E = 990 kN/cm
2
= 0,16
Element
types
Parabolic triangle plate element
Mesh
Target Maximal eX (found at Node1) and maximal m
x
(found at Node2)
Results
Component Nastran AxisVM %
eZ,max [mm] -1,613 -1,593 -1,24
mx,max [kNm/m] 3,060 3,059 -0,03
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 19
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Annular plate.
Analysis
Type
Linear analysis.
Geometry
Top view
(thickness = 22,0 cm)
Loads
Edge load: Q = 100 kN / m
Distributed load: q = 100 kN / m
2
Boundary
Conditions
Material
Properties
E = 880 kN / cm
2
= 0,3
Element
types
Plate element (parabolic quadrilateral, heterosis)
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 20
Mesh
4,000
1,000 3,000
X
Y
Target S
max
, e
max
Results
Theory AxisVM
Model
S
max
S
max %
[kN/cm2] [kN/cm2]
a.) 2,82 2,78 -1,42
b.) 6,88 6,76 -1,74
c.) 14,22 14,10 -0,84
d.) 1,33 1,33 0,00
e.) 2,35 2,25 -4,26
f.) 9,88 9,88 0,00
g.) 4,79 4,76 -0,63
h.) 7,86 7,86 0,00
Theory AxisVM
Model
e
max
e
max %
[mm] [mm]
a.) 77,68 76,10 -2,03
b.) 226,76 220,84 -2,61
c.) 355,17 352,89 -0,64
d.) 23,28 23,42 0,60
e.) 44,26 44,50 0,54
f.) 123,19 123,17 -0,02
g.) 112,14 111,94 -0,18
h.) 126,83 126,81 -0,02
Reference:
S. Timoshenko and S. Woinowsky-Krieger: Theory of Plates And Shells
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 21
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
All edges simply supported plate with partial distributed load.
Analysis
Type
Linear analysis.
Geometry
Top view
(thickness = 22,0 cm)
Loads
Distributed load: q = -10 kN / m
2
(middle of the plate at 2,0 x 2,0 m area)
Boundary
Conditions
a.) eX = eY = eZ = 0 along all edges (soft support)
b.) eX = eY = eZ = 0 along all edges = 0 perpendicular the edges (hard support)
Material
Properties
E = 880 kN / cm
2
= 0,3
Element
types
Plate element (Heterosis)
Mesh
5,000
1
0
,
0
0
0
X
Y
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 22
Target
m
x, max
, m
y, max
Results a.)
Moment Theory AxisVM %
m
x, max
[kNm/m]
7,24 7,34 1,38
m
y, max
[kNm/m]
5,32 5,39 1,32
b.)
Moment Theory AxisVM %
m
x, max
[kNm/m]
7,24 7,28 0,55
m
y, max
[kNm/m]
5,32 5,35 0,56
Reference:
S. Timoshenko and S. Woinowsky-Krieger: Theory of Plates And Shells
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 23
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Clamped plate with linear distributed load.
Analysis
Type
Linear analysis.
Geometry
Top view
(thickness = 22,0 cm)
Loads
Distributed load: q = -10 kN / m
2
Boundary
Conditions
eX = eY = eZ = fiX = fiY= fiZ = 0 along all edges
Material
Properties
E = 880 kN / cm
2
= 0,3
Element
types
Plate element (Heterosis)
Mesh
1 2 3
4
q
10,000
1
0
,
0
0
0 1 2 3
4
q
X
Y
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 24
Target
m
x
, m
y
Results
Results Theory AxisVM %
m
x, 1
[kNm/m] 11,50 11,48 -0,17
m
y, 1
[kNm/m] 11,50 11,48 -0,17
m
x, 2
[kNm/m] 33,40 33,23 -0,51
m
x, 3
[kNm/m] 17,90 17,83 -0,39
m
y, 4
[kNm/m] 25,70 25,53 -0,66
Reference:
S. Timoshenko and S. Woinowsky-Krieger: Theory of Plates And Shells
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 25
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Hemisphere displacement.
Analysis
Type
Linear analysis.
Geometry
Hemisphere (Axonometric view)
t = 0,04 m
Loads
Point load P = 2,0 kN
2,0 kN
2,0 kN
A
B
C
2,0 kN
2,0 kN
A
B
C
X Y
Z
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 26
Boundary
Conditions
eX = eY = eZ = 0 at A
eX = eY = eZ = 0 at B
Material
Properties
E = 6825 kN / cm
2
= 0,3
Element
types
Shell element
1.) guadrilateral parabolic
2.) triangle parabolic
Target
e
x
at point A
Results
e
x
[m] e
[%]
Theory 0,185
AxisVM quadrilateral 0,186 0,54
AxisVM triangle 0,185 0,00
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 27
Nonlinear static
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 28
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
3D beam structure.
Analysis
Type
Geometrical nonlinear analysis.
Geometry
F
z
=-600,00 kN
F
y
=-300,00 kN
F
z
=-600,00 kN
F
y
=-300,00 kN
F
z
=-600,00 kN
Node1
Beam1
A
B
C
D
F
z
=-600,00 kN
F
y
=-300,00 kN
F
z
=-600,00 kN
F
y
=-300,00 kN
F
z
=-600,00 kN
Node1
Beam1
A
B
C
D
X
Y
Z
3,000 m
1
,
7
3
2
m
1,732 m 1,732 m
3
,
0
0
0
m
1
,
7
3
2
m
X
Y
4
,
0
0
0
m
X
Z
Loads
Py = -300 kN
Pz = -600 kN
Boundary
Conditions
eX = eY = eZ = 0 at A, B, C and D
Material
Properties
S 275
E = 21000 kN / cm
2
= 0,3
Cross-
Section
Properties
HEA 300
Ax = 112.56 cm
2
; Ix = 85.3 cm
4
; Iy = 18268.0 cm
4
; Iz = 6309.6 cm
4
Element
types
Beam
Target
eX, eY, eZ, at Node1
Nx, Vy, Vz, Tx, My, Mz of Beam1 at Node1
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 29
Results
Comparison with the results obtained using Nastran V4
Component
Nastran
AxisVM %
eX [mm] 17,898 17,881 -0,09
eY [mm] -75,702 -75,663 -0,05
eZ [mm] -42,623 -42,597 -0,06
Nx [kN] -283,15 -283,25 0,04
Vy [kN] -28,09 -28,10 0,04
Vx [kN] -106,57 -106,48 -0,08
Tx [kNm] -4,57 -4,57 0,00
My [kNm] -519,00 -518,74 -0,05
Mz [kNm] 148,94 148,91 -0,02
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 30
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Plate with fixed end and bending moment.
Analysis
Type
Geometrical nonlinear analysis.
Geometry
Edge1
Edge2
12,0 m
Edge1
Edge2
1
,
0
m
X
Y
Z
Loads Mz = 2600 kNm (2x1300 Nm) acting on Edge2
Boundary
Conditions
eX = eY = eZ = fiX = fiY = fiZ = 0 along Edge1
Material
Properties
E = 20000 N / mm
2
= 0
Cross
Section
Properties
Plate thickness: 150 mm
Rib on Edge2: circular D = 500 mm (for distributing load to the mid-side-node)
Element
types
Parabolic quadrilateral shell (heterosis)
Rib on Edge2 for distributing load to the mid-side-node
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 31
Target
Z
at Edge2
Results
Edge1
Edge2
5,5502 rad
12,0 m
Edge1
Edge2
5,5502 rad
1
,
0
m
X
Y
Z
Theoretical results based on the differential equation of the flexible beam:
rad
Nm M
m
m N E
b a
I
E I
M
E I
M
z
plate
plate
plate
plate plate
plate
z
plate z
plate plate
5467 . 5
10 2 10 8125 . 2
12 10 6 . 2
10 6 . 2
12
10 2
10 8125 . 2
12
15 . 0 1
12
10 4
6
6
2 10
4
3 3
=
=
=
=
=
=
= =
=
=
=
l
l
l
Comparison the AxisVM result with the theoretical one:
Component Theory AxisVM %
fiZ [rad] 5,5467 5,5502 0,06
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 32
BLANK
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 33
Dynamic
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 34
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Deep simply supported beam.
Analysis
Type
Dynamic analysis.
Geometry
Beam (Axonometric view)
Cross section (square 2,0 m x 2,0 m)
Loads
Self-weight
Boundary
Conditions
eX = eY = eZ = fiX = 0 at A
eY = eZ = 0 at B
Material
Properties
E = 20000 kN / cm
2
= 0,3
= 8000 kg / m
3
Element
types
Three node beam element (shear deformation is taken into account)
Target
First 7 mode shapes
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 35
Results
Mode 1: f = 43,16 Hz
Mode 3: f = 124,01 Hz
Mode 5: f = 152,50 Hz
Mode 7: f = 293,55 Hz
Mode 2: f = 43,16 Hz
Mode 4: f = 152,50 Hz
Mode 6: f = 293,55 Hz
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 36
Results
Comparison with NAFEMS example
Mode NAFEMS (Hz) AxisVM (Hz) %
1 42,65 43,16 -1,20
2 42,65 43,16 -1,20
3 125,00 124,01 0,79
4 148,31 152,50 -2,83
5 148,31 152,50 -2,83
6 284,55 293,55 -3,16
7 284,55 293,55 -3,16
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 37
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Clamped thin rhombic plate.
Analysis
Type
Dynamic analysis.
Geometry
Top view of plane
(thickness = 5,0 cm)
Loads
Self-weight
Boundary
Conditions
eX = eY = fiZ = 0 at all nodes (ie: eX, eY, fiZ constained at all nodes)
eZ = fiX = fiY = 0 along the 4 edges
Material
Properties
E = 20000 kN / cm
2
= 0,3
= 8000 kg / m
3
Element
types
Parabolic quadrilateral shell element (heterosis)
Mesh
10,000
1
0
,
0
0
0
X
Y
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 38
Target
First 6 mode shapes
Results
eR
0,506
0,470
0,433
0,397
0,361
0,325
0,289
0,253
0,217
0,181
0,144
0,108
0,072
0,036
0
Mode 1: f = 8,02 Hz
eR
0,486
0,451
0,416
0,382
0,347
0,312
0,278
0,243
0,208
0,174
0,139
0,104
0,069
0,035
0
Mode 3: f = 18,41 Hz
eR
0,498
0,462
0,427
0,391
0,356
0,320
0,284
0,249
0,213
0,178
0,142
0,107
0,071
0,036
0
Mode 5: f = 24,62 Hz
eR
0,463
0,429
0,396
0,363
0,330
0,297
0,264
0,231
0,198
0,165
0,132
0,099
0,066
0,033
0
Mode 2: f = 13,02 Hz
eR
0,520
0,483
0,446
0,409
0,372
0,335
0,297
0,260
0,223
0,186
0,149
0,112
0,074
0,037
0
Mode 4: f = 19,33 Hz
eR
0,449
0,417
0,385
0,353
0,321
0,289
0,257
0,225
0,192
0,160
0,128
0,096
0,064
0,032
0
Mode 6: f = 28,24 Hz
Results
Comparison with NAFEMS example
Mode NAFEMS (Hz) AxisVM (Hz) %
1 7,94 8,02 1,01
2 12,84 13,02 1,40
3 17,94 18,41 2,62
4 19,13 19,33 1,05
5 24,01 24,62 2,54
6 27,92 28,24 1,15
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 39
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Cantilevered thin square plate.
Analysis
Type
Dynamic analysis.
Geometry
Top view
(thickness = 5,0 cm)
Loads
Self-weight
Boundary
Conditions
eX = eY = eZ = fiX = fiY = fiZ = 0 along y-axis
Material
Properties
E = 20000 kN / cm
2
= 0,3
= 8000 kg / m
3
Element
types
Parabolic quadrilateral shell element (heterosis).
Mesh
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 40
Target
First 5 mode shapes
Results
Mode 1: f = 0,42 Hz
Mode 3: f = 2,53 Hz
Mode 5: f = 3,68 Hz
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 41
Mode 2: f = 1,02 Hz
Mode 4: f = 3,22 Hz
Comparison with NAFEMS example
Mode NAFEMS (Hz) AxisVM (Hz) %
1 0,421 0,420 -0,24
2 1,029 1,020 -0,87
3 2,580 2,530 -1,94
4 3,310 3,220 -2,72
5 3,750 3,680 -1,87
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 42
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Cantilevered tapered membrane.
Analysis
Type
Dynamic analysis.
Geometry
Side view
(thickness = 10,0 cm)
Loads
Self-weight
Boundary
Conditions
eZ = 0 at all nodes (ie: eZ constained at all nodes)
eX = eY = 0 along y-axis
Material
Properties
E = 20000 kN / cm
2
= 0,3
= 8000 kg / m
3
Element
types
Parabolic quadrilateral membrane (plane stress)
Mesh
10,000
1
,
0
0
0
5
,
0
0
0
X
Y
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 43
Target
First 4 mode shapes
Results
Mode 1: f = 44,33 Hz
10,000
1
,
0
0
0
5
,
0
0
0
X
Y
Mode 2: f = 128,36 Hz
10,000
1,000
5,000
X
Y
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 44
10,000
1
,
0
0
0
5
,
0
0
0
X
Y
Mode 3: f = 162,48 Hz
10,000
1
,
0
0
0
5
,
0
0
0
X
Y
Mode 4: f = 241,22 Hz
Results
Comparison with NAFEMS example
Mode NAFEMS (Hz) AxisVM (Hz) %
1 44,62 44,33 -0,65
2 130,03 128,36 -1,28
3 162,70 162,48 -0,14
4 246,05 241,22 -1,96
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 45
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Flat grillages.
Analysis
Type
Dynamic analysis.
Geometry
Top view
Loads
Self-weight
Boundary
Conditions
eX = eY = eZ = 0 at the ends (simple supported beams)
Material
Properties
E = 20000 kN / cm
2
G = 7690 kN / cm
2
= 0,3
= 7860 kg / m
3
Cross
Section
A = 0,004 m
2
Ix = 2,5E-5 m
4
Iy = Iz = 1,25E-5 m
4
Element
types
Three node beam element (shear deformation is taken into account)
Mesh
1,500 1,500 1,500
1
,
0
0
0
2
,
0
0
0
0,500 1,000 4,500
1,000 0,500
X
Y
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 46
Target
First 3 mode shapes
Results
1
,
8
7
9
1
,
5
8
6
1
,
2
4
1
1
,
1
1
4
1
,
6
0
5
1
,
6
3
8
1
,
0
3
5
1
,
6
7
9
X
Y Z
Mode 1: f = 16,90 Hz
-
2
,
0
6
5
0
,
8
5
6
2
,
2
5
4
2
,
0
4
0
-
1
,
8
1
3
1
,
9
3
8
-
1
,
8
3
7
X
Y Z
Mode 2: f = 20,64 Hz
-
1
,
6
2
0
1
,
5
8
5
-
1
,
9
9
2
-
1
,
6
6
7
-
1
,
5
8
1
1
,
7
2
1
-
1
,
8
4
5
-
1
,
1
3
0
2
,
0
4
0
X
Y Z
Mode 3: f = 51,76 Hz
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 47
Mode Reference AxisVM (Hz) %
1 16,85 16,90 0,30
2 20,21 20,64 2,13
3 53,30 51,76 -2,89
Reference:
C.T.F. ROSS: Finite Element Methods In Engineering Science
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 48
BLANK
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 49
Stability
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 50
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Simply supported beam.
Analysis
Type
Buckling analysis.
Geometry
Front view
1
2 3
4 5
6
7
8
9
S
G
1
2
10,0
1
,
0
2
0
,
0
y
z
Cross section (I
z
=168,3 cm
4
, I
t
=12,18 cm
4
, I
w
=16667 cm
6
)
Loads
Bending moment at both ends of beam
M
A
= 1,0 kNm, M
B
= -1,0 kNm
Boundary
Conditions
eX = eY = eZ = 0 at A
eX = eY = eZ = 0 at B
k
z
= k
w
= 1
Material
Properties
E = 20600 kN / cm
2
= 0,3
G = 7923 kg / m
2
Element
types
Parabolic quadrilateral shell element (heterosis)
Mesh
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 51
Target
M
cr
= ? (for lateral torsional buckling)
Results
Analytical solution
Z
t
Z
W Z
cr
I E
I G L
I
I
L
I E
M
+
=
2
2
2
2
kNm kNcm M
cr
51 , 124 12451
3 , 168 20600
18 , 12 7923 200
3 , 168
16667
200
3 , 168 20600
2
2
2
2
= =
+
=
AxisVM result
M
cr
= 125,3 kNm
Difference
+0,6%
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 52
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Simply supported beam.
Analysis
Type
Buckling analysis.
Geometry
Front view (L = 1,0 m)
1
2
3 4
5
S
G
1
2
12,0
1
0
,
0
y
z
1
2
3 4
5
S
G
2
30,0
1
0
,
0
y
z
Section A
1
Section A
2
Cross-sections
Loads
P = -1,0 N at point B.
Boundary
Conditions
eX = eY = eZ = 0 at A
eY = eZ = 0 at B
Material
Properties
E = 20000 kN / cm
2
= 0,3
Element
types
Beam element
Target
P
cr
= ? (for inplane buckling)
Results
Theory AxisVM e [%]
P
cr
[N] 3340,0 3337,0 -0,09
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 53
Design
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 54
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: RC [Link]
Thema
N-M interaction curve of cross-section (EN 1992-1-1:2004).
Analysis
Type
Linear static analysis+design.
Geometry
220
328
Section: 300x400 mm
Covering: 40 mm
Loads
Boundary
Conditions
Material
Properties
Concrete:
f
cd
=14,2 N/mm
2
e
c1
=0,0007 e
cu
=0,0035 (rectangular - diagram)
Steel:
f
sd
=348 N/mm
2
e
su
=0,015
Target
Compare the program results with with hand calculation at keypoints of M-N interaction
curve.
Results
N
1
2
6
5 3
4
Reference: Dr. Kollr L. P., Vasbetonszerkezetek I. Megyetemi kiad
N [kN] M [kNm] M(N) AxisVM e%
1 -2561 +61 +61,4 +0,7
2 -1221 +211 +212,3 +0,6
3 0 +70 +70,5 +0,7
4 +861 -61 -61,4 +0,7
5 0 -190 -191,2 +0,6
6 -362 +211 +212,3 +0,6
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 55
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
RC beam deflection according to EC2, EN 1992-1-1:2004.
Analysis
Type
Material nonlinear analysis.
Geometry
q = 17 kN/m
L = 5,60 m
Side view
220
35 cm covering = 3 cm
= 0,5
420
25 cm
Section
Loads
q = 17 kN /m distributed load
Boundary
Conditions
Simply supported beam.
Material
Properties
Concrete: C25/30, = 2,1
Steel: B500B
Element
types
Parabolic quadrilateral plate element (Heterosis)
Target
e
z, max
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 56
Results
-
0
,
0
0
2
-
0
,
0
0
2
-
0
,
0
0
2
-
0
,
0
0
2
-
5
,
2
3
9
-
5
,
2
3
9
-
1
0
,
1
0
1
-
1
0
,
1
0
1
-
1
4
,
2
4
2
-
1
4
,
2
4
2
-
1
7
,
3
9
3
-
1
7
,
3
9
3
-
1
9
,
3
6
0
-
1
9
,
3
6
0
-
2
0
,
0
2
9
-
2
0
,
0
2
9
-
1
9
,
3
6
0
-
1
9
,
3
6
0
-
1
7
,
3
9
3
-
1
7
,
3
9
3
-
1
4
,
2
4
2
-
1
4
,
2
4
2
-
1
0
,
1
0
1
-
1
0
,
1
0
1
-
5
,
2
3
9
-
5
,
2
3
9
-
5
,
2
3
9
-
5
,
2
3
9
-
1
0
,
1
0
1
-
1
0
,
1
0
1
-
1
4
,
2
4
2
-
1
4
,
2
4
2
-
1
7
,
3
9
3
-
1
7
,
3
9
3
-
1
9
,
3
6
0
-
1
9
,
3
6
0
-
2
0
,
0
2
9
-
2
0
,
0
2
9
-
2
0
,
0
2
9
-
2
0
,
0
2
9
-
1
9
,
3
6
0
-
1
9
,
3
6
0
-
1
7
,
3
9
3
-
1
7
,
3
9
3
-
1
4
,
2
4
2
-
1
4
,
2
4
2
-
1
0
,
1
0
1
-
1
0
,
1
0
1
-
5
,
2
3
9
-
5
,
2
3
9
-
5
,
2
3
9
-
5
,
2
3
9
-
1
0
,
1
0
1
-
1
0
,
1
0
1
-
1
4
,
2
4
2
-
1
4
,
2
4
2
-
1
7
,
3
9
3
-
1
7
,
3
9
3
-
1
9
,
3
6
0
-
1
9
,
3
6
0
-
2
0
,
0
2
9
-
2
0
,
0
2
9
-
2
0
,
0
2
9
-
2
0
,
0
2
9
-
1
9
,
3
6
0
-
1
9
,
3
6
0
-
1
7
,
3
9
3
-
1
7
,
3
9
3
-
1
4
,
2
4
2
-
1
4
,
2
4
2
-
1
0
,
1
0
1
-
1
0
,
1
0
1
-
5
,
2
3
9
-
5
,
2
3
9
X
Z
Diagram e
z
Aproximate calculation:
mm e e e
I II
_ 06 , 20 ) 1 ( = + =
where,
e
I
is the deflection which was calculated with the uncracked inertia moment
e
II
is the deflection which was calculated with the cracked inertia moment
2
1
|
|
\
|
=
s
sr
Calculation with integral of :
e = 19,82 mm
Calculation with AxisVM:
e = 20,03 mm (different +1,1%)
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 57
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Required steel reinforcement of RC plate according to EC2, EN 1992-1-1:2004.
Analysis
Type
Linear analysis.
Geometry
50 kN 50 kN
4,0
X
Y
Szabvny : Eurocode
Eset : ST1
Side view
Cross-section
Loads
Pz = -50 kN point load
Boundary
Conditions
Clamped cantilever plate.
Material
Properties
Concrete: C25/30
Steel: B500A
Element
types
Parabolic quadrilateral plate element (heterosis)
Mesh
Clamped
edge
4,0
1
,
0
Clamped
edge
X
Y
Szabvny : Eurocode
Eset : ST1
Top view
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 58
Target
A
XT
steel reinforcement along x direction at the top of the support
Results
Clamped
edge
ST1, axf: 2093 mm
2
/m
4
,
0
1
,
0
Clamped
edge
ST1, axf: 2093 mm
2
/m
X Y
Z
Lineris szmts
Szabvny : Eurocode
Eset : ST1
E (W) : 1,09E-11
E (P) : 1,09E-11
E (ER) : 8,49E-13
Komp. : axf [mm2 /m]
Diagram A
XT
Calculation according to EC2:
2
/ 6 , 16
5 , 1
25
mm N f
cd
= =
2
/ 435
15 , 1
500
mm N f
yd
= =
54 , 0
435 20000 0035 , 0
20000 0035 , 0 85 , 0
0
=
+
=
+
=
yd S cu
S cu
c
f E
E c
d = 300 53 = 247 mm
kNm
x
d f x b M M
c
cd c Rd sd
200
2
=
|
\
|
= =
)
`
>
=
55
439 h
x
c
54 , 0 22 , 0
247
55
0
= < = = =
c
c
c
d
x
Steel reinforcement is yielding
2
2099
435
6 , 16 1000 55
mm
f
f x b
A
yd
cd c
S
=
=
=
Calculation with AxisVM:
A
XT
= m mm / 2093
2
Different = -0,3 %
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 59
Software Release Number: R2
Date: 12. 03. 2008.
Tested by: InterCAD
Page number:
File name: [Link]
Thema
Earth-quake design using response-spectrum method.
Analysis
Type
Linear frequency analysis with 5 modes.
Linear static analysis.
Geometry
6
,
0
0
0
7,000
8
,0
0
0 30,0
5
,
1
9
6
5
,0
0
0
90,0
90,0
X
Y
Code : Eurocode
Case : FR +
Top view
4
,
0
0
0
3
,
5
0
0
X
Z
Code : Eurocode
Case : FR +
Front view
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 60
All columns 60x40 cm
All nodal masses are Mx=My=Mz=100000 kg
Column A
Column B
All beams 60x40 cm
Inertia about vertical axis is multiplied by 1000.
All supports are constrained in all directions.
eX=eY=eZ=fiX=fiY=fiZ=0
Support C
Node D
All columns 60x40 cm
All nodal masses are Mx=My=Mz=100000 kg
Column A
Column B
All beams 60x40 cm
Inertia about vertical axis is multiplied by 1000.
All supports are constrained in all directions.
eX=eY=eZ=fiX=fiY=fiZ=0
Support C
Node D
X
Y
Z
Code : Eurocode
Case : ST1
Perspective view
Section beams: 60x40 cm
Ax=2400 cm2 Ay=2000 cm2 Az=2000 cm2
Ix=751200 cm4 Iy=720000 cm2 Iz=320000000 cm4
Section columns: 60x40 cm
Ax=2400 cm2 Ay=2000 cm2 Az=2000 cm2
Ix=751200 cm4 Iy=720000 cm2 Iz=320000 cm4
Loads
Nodal masses on eight nodes. Mx=My=Mz=100000 kg
Model self-weight is excluded.
Spectrum for X and Y direction of seismic action:
S
d
[m/s
2
]
T[s]
1,150
2,156
0,300
2,0000
0,709
T[s] S
d
1 0 1,150
2 0,2000 2,156
3 0,6000 2,156
4 1,3000 0,995
5 3,0000 0,300
6 4,0000 0,300
. . . . . .
Boundary
Conditions
Nodes at the columns bottom ends are constrained in all directions.
eX=eY=eZ=fiX=fiY=fiZ=0
Material
Properties
C25/30
E=3050 kN/cm2 =0,2 = 0
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 61
Element
types
Three node straight prismatic beam element. Shear deformation is taken into account.
Target
Compare the model results with SAP2000 v6.13 results.
The results are combined for all modes and all direction of spectral acceleration.
CQC combination are used for modes in each direction of acceleration.
SRSS combination are used for combination of directions.
Results
Period times of first 5 modes
Mode T[s] SAP2000 T[s] AxisVM Difference [%]
1 0,7450 0,7450 0
2 0,7099 0,7099 0
3 0,3601 0,3601 0
4 0,2314 0,2314 0
5 0,2054 0,2054 0
Modal participating mass ratios in X and Y directions
Mode X
SAP2000
X
AxisVM
Difference
%
Y
SAP2000
Y
AxisVM
Difference
%
1 0,5719 0,5719 0 0,3153 0,3154 +0,03
2 0,3650 0,3650 0 0,4761 0,4760 -0,02
3 0 0 0 0,1261 0,1261 0
4 0,0460 0,0460 0 0,0131 0,0131 0
5 0,0170 0,0170 0 0,0562 0,0562 0
Summ 1,0000 1,0000 0 0,9868 0,9868 0
Internal forces at the bottom end of Column A and Column B
Column A
SAP2000
Column A
AxisVM
Difference
%
Column B
SAP2000
Column B
AxisVM
Difference
%
Nx [kN] 315,11 315,15 +0,01 557,26 557,29 +0,005
Vy [kN] 280,34 280,34 0 232,88 232,88 0
Vz [kN] 253,49 253,49 0 412,04 412,04 0
Tx [kNm] 34,42 34,41 -0,03 34,47 34,46 -0,03
My [kNm] 625,13 625,12 -0,002 1038,74 1038,70 -0,004
Mz [kNm] 612,31 612,31 0 553,41 553,41 0
Support forces of Support C
Support C
SAP2000
Support C
AxisVM
Difference
%
Rx [kN] 280,34 280,34 0
Ry [kN] 253,49 253,49 0
Rz [kN] 315,11 315,15 +0,01
Rxx [kNm] 625,13 625,12 -0,002
Ryy [kNm] 612,31 612,31 0
Rzz [kNm] 34,42 34,41 -0,03
Displacements of Node D
Node D
SAP2000
Node D
AxisVM
Difference
%
eX [mm] 33,521 33,521 0
eY [mm] 19,944 19,945 +0,005
eZ [mm] 0,229 0,229 0
X [rad] 0,00133 0,00133 0
Y [rad] 0,00106 0,00106 0
Z [rad] 0,00257 0,00257 0
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 62
Normal forces:
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 63
Bending moments:
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 64
AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 65
Displacements: