0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views7 pages

Health Info Sources & Research Tools

This document discusses sources of health information and tools for extracting information from those sources. It identifies websites, journals, databases, search engines, and archives/repositories as key sources. Reliable websites include those run by reputable organizations like the WHO and universities. Journals provide past research but must be checked for being up-to-date. Search engines like Google can find information but results aren't always relevant or academically ranked highest. Databases like PubMed provide vetted medical articles and access depends on credentials. Archives contain historical studies and cases for background research. Care and discretion is needed to determine source reliability and information currency.

Uploaded by

Tennidox
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views7 pages

Health Info Sources & Research Tools

This document discusses sources of health information and tools for extracting information from those sources. It identifies websites, journals, databases, search engines, and archives/repositories as key sources. Reliable websites include those run by reputable organizations like the WHO and universities. Journals provide past research but must be checked for being up-to-date. Search engines like Google can find information but results aren't always relevant or academically ranked highest. Databases like PubMed provide vetted medical articles and access depends on credentials. Archives contain historical studies and cases for background research. Care and discretion is needed to determine source reliability and information currency.

Uploaded by

Tennidox
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

NAME: STEWART WANI REGISTRATION NUMBER: R114504F DEGREE PROGRAM: MBChBI QUESTION: Identify 2 sources of health info and

briefly discuss tools that are needed to remove info from those sources, citing specific examples (50 marks) LECTURER: Mr. Malapela DUE DATE: October 19, 2011

[Link] gives its second definition of information as, Knowledge gained through study, communication, instruction, etc. Information is the data that one gathers in order to help one accurately assess a situation in order to ensure the best chance of a beneficial decision being made. It helps one to paint a picture of a given set of circumstances so that one can determine the course of action to take. It is used by sports coaches in order to call plays. It is used by businessmen in order to decide which deals to make. It is used by juries in order to make decisions about a defendants innocence. More relevantly, it is used by doctors in order to make good life-or-death decisions, and it is used by researchers in order to properly address a problem or an unanswered question. Health information is a more specific type of information which pertains to the medical field, and includes many forms of multimedia and literature pertaining to human health and the conditions which compromise it. Health information of all forms aims at giving its consumers a better understanding of how to preserve all of the processes that occur in the human body. In our present age, due to the development and increasing popularity of the Internet, medical researchers face an unprecedented challenge: as opposed to the lack of information which used to plague the philosophers of old, present medical researchers now face an abundance of information, to the extent that they have to gain the insight to distinguish between what is unreliable, what is irrelevant and what is useful. A vast array of websites, articles and journals, all of which claim to be able to help a medical researcher, are readily available online. Certain tools on the internet help a researcher to

narrow his search through sources on the internet to relevant areas. These tools include search engines, health databases, portals, medical archives and repositories.

There are numerous websites on the internet which serve to provide health information. While many of these websites are useful, some are not so reliable. It is important to be able to differentiate between what is reliable and what is not. An educationally acceptable, reliable website would be a website operated by an organization, government or educational institution, because these sites are more liable to check and make sure their information is accurate, and their access is limited. One good example of such a website is Hinari, a health database operated by the World Health Organization (WHO). Other such websites include links to lectures and papers published by established universities such as Stanford and Harvad. Other websites include Wikipedia, which must be handled with caution, due to the high accessibility to the public, which allows even the most obscure of laymen to edit information on the website. Although there are experts constantly watching the websites content, it is very easy for inaccurate information to be posted and collected from such sites. It is advisable to consider the references which a website such as Wikipedia would cite. One must be cautious when dealing with websites like these, and to always crossreference the data obtained from them against a more reliable source.

Journals are abundant and easily accessible. Even extremely old journals have been virtualized and can be found on the internet. Journals present findings and experiments conducted by previous researchers, and make it easier for future researchers to expand on

their works. However, caution must be taken to consider the date on which the journal was published. Since medicine is a dynamic field of study with new ground-breaking developments occurring frequently, it may not take long before a publication is rendered out of date. A researcher must take care to make sure all of his information is current when dealing with journals.

When going through websites and journals and articles which have been placed on the internet, certain tools can be used to make the search easier. Search engines are tools on the internet which sift through information online in order to find any words matching the words that a searcher is looking for. They present the websites which contain matches to the searcher to work through. A prominent example of a search engine is Google, which searches every page on the internet in order to find any word that has been typed in its search field. This tool is useful because it pulls relevant websites towards the searcher and saves the searcher the time and effort that it would take to look for the websites manually. However, search engines such as Google have their downfalls. As a search engine which generates results based on the words that it can find in websites, it has a propensity to generate some results which are irrelevant to the topic that the researcher would be looking up. Care must also be taken with Google, because it is, above all, a commercial enterprise. The results are generated not in order of academic relevance, but in terms of which companies have paid for the top places on search lists. Subsidiaries such as Google Scholar and Google Books work slightly differently. Google Books searches through

only books, while Google Scholar searches through journals and articles, and lists them based on the number of citations for each paper. Again, this should be regarded with caution, because the older (and possibly out of date) articles are more likely to have more citations because they have been around for longer. Care must be taken when using search engines to ensure that information gathered is both relevant and up-to-date.

Health Databases have proven to be very useful when extracting health information from the internet. These are websites which provide access to journals and articles specifically related to the medical field. One such example is PubMed, which provides access to medical journals and articles, clinical queries and trials and news on new developments. A simple search engine at the top of the page helps to navigate a searcher to specific papers related to his topic of study. PubMed provides a certain level of access to the public, and grants even greater access to anybody with an affiliation to a medical or educational institute (such as a lecturer or a doctor). All of the literature found in health databases is well-established and reputable. The only downfall to a researcher would be its limited access to certain articles if the researcher lacks the necessary credentials.

Web portals are multi-purpose websites which bring together information from diverse sources, and provide links to these sources, as well as other services such e-mail, news, stock prices, information, databases and entertainment. A prominent example of a portal is Yahoo! which offers vast amounts of information about numerous fields, although there is a lack of health information.

Archives and repositories are useful because they contain old studies and medical cases which serve to provide adequate secondary information for any researcher. These can be accessed from hospital or government websites.

In conclusion, there are numerous sources of information, and numerous ways to extract the information that a researcher would need. It is imperative for researchers to become proficient in handling information from information sources on the internet, knowing where to find it and judging its worth.

REFERENCES: [Link] (viewed on 17 October 2011) [Link] (viewed on 18 October 2011)

Common questions

Powered by AI

Researchers face the challenge of distinguishing between reliable and unreliable information due to the vast amount of medical information available online. This can be mitigated by using trusted health databases operated by reputable organizations, verifying websites for credibility, checking publication dates to ensure information is current, cross-referencing data from less reliable sources like Wikipedia, and relying on search engines in conjunction with health databases to ensure that the information gathered is both relevant and accurate .

Credibility plays a crucial role in determining the reliability of health-related websites. Websites operated by reputable organizations, governments, or educational institutions are more credible as they are likely to verify the accuracy of their information and limit access to ensure quality. In contrast, websites that allow public editing or lack rigorous review processes might present unreliable data. Researchers should assess the source's credentials, cross-check information, and prioritize sites with a record of academic or governmental oversight to ensure reliability .

Search engines and health databases complement each other by serving different roles in the information retrieval process. Search engines like Google provide a wide-ranging search capability across the entire internet, helping to identify potential sources of information, though they may return results that are irrelevant or not academically rigorous. In contrast, health databases such as PubMed concentrate specifically on credible medical literature, offering targeted searches within a refined scope of trusted sources. The combination allows researchers to broadly identify possible sources with a search engine and then verify and deepen their findings using specialized databases .

To ensure research is current and relevant, researchers can adopt several strategies: using health databases like PubMed that provide regularly updated content; verifying the publication dates of journals and articles to ensure the data is recent; cross-referencing findings with multiple reliable sources; using specialized search tools such as Google Scholar to prioritize scholarly over commercial content; and continuously reviewing recent clinical trials and developments from reputable sources .

Outdated journals can negatively impact medical research by providing misleading or obsolete information that does not align with current scientific understanding or practices. As medicine is a dynamic field with frequent developments, relying on outdated sources can skew research outcomes and lead to incorrect conclusions. To mitigate this impact, researchers should carefully check publication dates and prioritize recent studies, cross-reference findings with up-to-date sources, and use health databases that are continuously updated to reflect new medical discoveries and trends .

The limitations of using search engines for medical research include the potential retrieval of irrelevant results due to the commercial ranking of websites and the lack of specificity towards medical content. Commercial considerations often affect the order in which results are displayed, potentially misleading researchers toward less credible sources. These issues can be addressed by using specialized search engines like Google Scholar, which prioritize academic content, and by incorporating health databases that focus specifically on medical literature, thereby ensuring the researcher accesses high-quality information .

Health databases are considered reliable sources for medical research because they provide access to well-established and reputable journals and articles specifically related to the medical field. Databases like PubMed offer a detailed search engine to navigate papers related to specific topics, ensuring that the information is relevant and credible. Access to these databases is often restricted to individuals with affiliations to medical or educational institutions, further ensuring the quality of the information. Additionally, these databases have literature that is regularly updated, helping researchers to maintain access to current information .

Web portals and archives contribute to medical research by aggregating information from a range of sources and providing links to them, which can facilitate data accessibility and secondary information acquisition. Archives, for instance, are valuable as they contain old studies and medical cases, offering historical context and background for current research. Although not focused exclusively on health, web portals like Yahoo! provide diverse information that can indirectly support medical research. The limitation is that portals may lack specialized medical information compared to dedicated health databases .

Google Scholar differs from traditional search engines because it specifically indexes scholarly articles and journals and ranks them based on the number of citations rather than commercial priorities. This focus on academic content ensures that the results are more relevant to researchers seeking scholarly information, though caution is still advised to ensure the data is current, as older articles might have more citations simply due to their age .

Cross-referencing data from sources like Wikipedia with more reliable information is essential because Wikipedia allows public editing, which raises the risk of inaccurate information being posted. While there are experts monitoring the content, the open-edit nature means that data must be verified against verified sources to confirm accuracy and reliability in medical research. This process ensures that researchers use information that is both credible and academically acceptable .

You might also like