0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views4 pages

Errata: Last Updated 5 December 2011

Errata CMOS VLSI Design 4th Edition Last updated 5 December 2011 Send your corrections to p. 188, Figure 5.12: the activity factors fail to take into account the fact that the internal nodes are not statistically independent. These revised activity factors should be used in EQ (5.17)

Uploaded by

jacksparrow868
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views4 pages

Errata: Last Updated 5 December 2011

Errata CMOS VLSI Design 4th Edition Last updated 5 December 2011 Send your corrections to p. 188, Figure 5.12: the activity factors fail to take into account the fact that the internal nodes are not statistically independent. These revised activity factors should be used in EQ (5.17)

Uploaded by

jacksparrow868
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Errata

CMOS VLSI Design 4th Edition Last updated 5 December 2011 Send your corrections to bugs@[Link] p. 188, Figure 5.12: The activity factors fail to take into account the fact that the internal nodes are not statistically independent. By writing out a truth table and considering each possible input, we can compute the corrected node probabilities to be p4 = 1/8, p5 = 7/8 and activity factors 4 = 5 = 7/64. These revised activity factors should be used in EQ (5.17). ( J. Frenzel 9/28/11) p. 511, 4th sentence of paragraph under Example: to drive a global wordline -> to drive a global bitline. (J. Frenzel 12/5/2011) The following corrections have been made in the 2nd printing (Summer 2011): p. 67, EQ 2.9: add a superscript 2 after the close parenthesis V. Ramachandra 3/27/10 p. 67, EQ 2.11: A -> A Yihuan Huang 9/25/10 p. 148, Example 4.2 Solution 1st paragraph: Two pMOS -> Three pMOS M. Kulkarni 1/8/11. p. 152, Figure 4.15(b) shows the equivalent circuit for the falling -> Figure 4.15(b) shows the equivalent circuit for the rising (J. Ma, 5/22/10) p. 183, EQ 5.8: EC -> EVDD DMH 2/16/10 p. 183: EQ 5.8: C -> CL (K.T. Lau 5/6/10) p. 183: Figure 5.5: The vertical scale on the energy plots was distorted. DMH 12/30/10
(V)
1

(mA)
1

(mW)
1

saturation

Vin

0.5

0.5

Pp

Ip

linear

short circuit current


0.8 1

Pp = Ip(VDD-Vout)
0.5

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

Vout

0.5

Vout
0 0 0.2 0.4

1 IC dt C
0.6 0.8 1

0.5

Pn
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

In

Pn = InVout
0.5

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

t (ns)
1 0.5 0

(fJ) Ic = Ip - In
1 0.5

Pc = IcVout

Pc

E c = Pc dt
Ec
75 0

0 -0.5

Ic

-0.5 -1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

-1

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

Pvdd = IpVDD

Pvdd

150 75 0

0.5

E vdd = Pvdd dt
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

Evdd

p. 195, EQ 520: switch N2 and N1 (DMH 12/30/10) p. 196, Table 5.2 has some garbles. Corrected values are shown in bold (DMH 12/31/10) Input State (ABC) Isub Igate Itotal 000 0.4 0 0.4 001 0.7 0 0.7 010 1.3 0.7 2.0 011 3.8 0 3.8 100 0.7 6.3 7.0 101 3.8 6.3 10.1 110 5.6 12.7 18.3 111 28.3 19.0 47.3 p. 209, problem 5.8: 4 FO4 -> 5 FO4 DMH p. 237, EQ. 6.39: Cwi+1 -> Cwi , close parenthesis damaged (J. Frenzel 10/26/11) p. 253, Figure 7.12: the emitter of the npn transistor should connect to the nMOS source rather than drain (because the emitter goes to ground) (J. Nestor 2/4/11)

p. 273 example: solve for Ys -> solve for Yc DMH 12/26/10 p. 282, Figure 7.36 caption: Pentium III -> Pentium 4 (J. Dong 10/26/2011) p. 292 last paragraph of 8.2.2: source Vgs -> source Vds p. 346 Example 9.6: H > 2.9 -> H > 6.2 (T. Nguyen 2/1/11) p. 347 Figure 9.43(c) should be (T. Nguyen 2/1/11)

p. 351: line 1: swap V and Vbar (I. Tseng 12/20/10)

p. 406: (J. Frenzel 11/30/10) eliminate tar, taf, define a new ta0 and ta1 as the time that the input must remain low or high, respectively to be correctly sampled at that value. Modify 10.20 to read: ta0 = tsetup0 + thold0 ta1 = tsetup1 + thold1 Change Figure 10.36 to be:

p. 462, Table 11.4: C -> Cbar in unsigned comparison of A > B DMH p. 466: 11.5.4 Linerar -> 11.5.4 Linear p. 473, Table 11.11: rows are in the wrong order. The shift type column should read: DMH Rotate Right Logical Right Arithmetic Right Rotate Left Logical / Arithmetic Left p. 474, Figure 11.66: ZN-2:N -> Z2N-2:N (V. Berrios 10/31/10) p. 493, Figure 11.97(b): Y3 should be B2 * (B1 + B0) (S. Maurya 6/24/10)
B2 B1 B0 0 Y7 Y6 Y5 Y4 Y3 Y 2 Y 1 Y 0 (b)

p. 501, Figure 12.5, out_v1r -> out_b_v1r in label for waveforms (I. Tseung 12/20/2010) p. 505, Figure 12.15 should be (D. Matthews 12/5/10)

p. 709, Table A.4: 161 -> 171 (V. Pedroni 3/2011) p. 740, VHDL next to last paragraph: -231 -> -(231-1) (V. Pedroni 3/2011) p. 831: phase-locked loops should be listed under PLLs rather than PPLs Cosmetic corrections (DMH) p. 187, 6th line: overbar on P is too far right DMH p. 231: too much space between t and pd in many places p. 237: right edge of 6.39 is cut off p. 506, Figure 12.19: poly stipples broken in several places p. 582, Figure 13.35: swap + and terminals on op-amp (P. Jnanendra 2/26/2011) p. 830: See PPLs -> See PLLs (J. Frenzel 4/20/2011) p. 831: PPLs -> PLLs (J. Frenzel 4/20/2011)

You might also like