Chapter 1
Introduction to the Study
Chapter 1 consists of five parts: (1) Background and
Theoretical Framework of the Study, (2) Statement of the
Problem and Hypothesis, (3) Significance of the Study, (4)
Definition of Terms, and (5) Delimitation of the Study.
Part One, Background and Theoretical Framework of the
Study, presents the rationale and conditions that motivate
the present researchers, provides the theoretical framework,
discusses the purpose of the study, and shows the conceptual
framework of the study.
Part Two, Statement of the Problem and Hypothesis,
presents the general and specific problems that the study
would like to address and the hypothesis.
Part Three, Significance of the Study, enumerates the
identified beneficiaries of the study and explicitly
discusses how the recipients will benefit from the results
of the study.
Part Four, Definition of Terms, defines important
terms, gives an understanding of the concepts or factors
that will be discussed throughout the study.
Part Five, Delimitation of the Study, specifies the
boundaries of the study in terms of the researcher’s
decision of what to include and exclude.
Background and Theoretical Framework
Math is an essential subject in senior high school, and
it lays the groundwork for higher education and scientific
and technologically related occupations. Nevertheless, most
students do poorly at mathematics, and as a consequence,
their scholastic achievement is lowered and their motivation
is decreased (Artino, 2012). An overriding factor that
accounts for such differences is math self-efficacy—a belief
by the learner that he or she can accomplish mathematical
tasks successfully. In line with Bandura's social-cognitive
model, self-efficacy exerts a significant impact on effort,
persistence, and accomplishment (Artino, 2012). Each study
affirms that higher mathematical self-efficacy is a
predictor of better performance, higher persistence, and
higher learning engagement (Liu & Koirala, 2009; Lee &
Stankov, 2018). Besides, there is the bidirectional
relationship such that the self-efficacy not only predicts
the achievement but is also affected by the prior success or
failure in maths (Zohouri et al., 2023).
Moreover, classroom intervention such as mastery
experience and feedback increase the students' confidence
and performance they are capable. (Béné et al., 2022). In
the Philippines, there were findings showing that
mathematical self-efficacy is a predictor of achievement and
is regulated by teaching behaviors, anxiety, and classroom
climate (Cruz, 2020; Reyes & Castillo, 2019). However, there
is more need for studies since the relationship concerns
particularly for senior high school. Therefore, the current
study focuses on investigating the relationship between
mathematical self-efficacy and mathematical achievement
among senior high school.
The SEEMS framework developed by Hay et al. (2022)
further expands on this theory by operationalizing
mathematics self-efficacy in terms of students’ effort,
persistence, and participation in classroom activities.
Their findings revealed that mathematics self-efficacy
has a strong and consistent positive correlation with
academic performance in both primary and secondary students,
with the correlation being even more pronounced among high
school learners. The SEEMS framework also addresses the
increasing cognitive and academic demands students face as
they progress to higher grade levels, highlighting that
higher self-efficacy is required to meet the challenges of
more complex mathematical concepts.
In this context, mathematics self-efficacy is seen as a
student’s belief in their ability to succeed in mathematics
tasks, which in turn affects their academic behavior, such
as the amount of effort they invest, their willingness to
participate in class, and their resilience when facing
difficult problems. The learning performance of Grade 11
STEM students, measured through grades and assessments, is
thus directly linked to their self-efficacy levels.
This study is anchored on the Expectancy-Value Theory
by Eccles and Wigfield (2002) and supported by the work of
Hay, Stevenson, Winn, et al. (2022) on the Self-Efficacy–
Effort in Mathematics Scale (SEEMS). The Expectancy-Value
Theory explains that a student’s motivation and academic
performance are influenced by two major factors: their
expectancy beliefs (i.e., the belief in their ability to
succeed in a task) and the value they place on the task.
When applied to mathematics education, this theory suggests
that students who believe they can perform well in
mathematics and see it as valuable are more likely to
persist, exert effort, and succeed academically.
The purpose of this study is to determine the influence
of mathematics self-efficacy and the learning performance of
Grade 11 STEM students in Filamer Christian University. This
study is significant for both students and researchers, as
it offers insights into how self-beliefs affect learning
outcomes and how fostering a strong sense of self-efficacy
can lead to improved learning performance in mathematics. It
also encourages the creation of methods that teachers might
employ to improve learning results, student confidence, and
engagement in mathematics classes.
The independent variable in this study is mathematics
self-efficacy, while the dependent variable is the learning
performance of Grade 11 students in mathematics.
Figure 1 shows the conceptual framework of the study.
Independent Variable Dependent Variable
Figure 1. A paradigm showing the relationship that
exists between the mathematics self-efficacy and the
learning performance.
Statement of the Problem and Hypothesis
The major goal of this study is to get an empirically
based understanding of Mathematics self-efficacy and
Learning performance among Grade 11 STEM Student of Filamer
Christian University Inc., Roxas Avenue, Roxas City, Capiz
Specifically, this study seeks to attain the following
questions:
1. What is the level of Mathematics self-efficacy of
Grade 11 STEM students?
2. What is the Learning performance of Grade 11 STEM
students in Mathematics based?
3. Is there a significant relationship between
Mathematics self-efficacy and the Learning performance of
Grade 11 STEM students?
Based on the statement above, the hypothesis will be
tested:
1. There is no significant relationship between the
mathematics self-efficacy and Learning performance among
Grade 11 STEM students.
Significance of the Study
The result of this is beneficial to the following
stakeholders: students, parents, teachers, school
administrators and future researchers.
Students. This study may help them recognize how their
self-perceptions in mathematics influence their performance.
This awareness can encourage them to build confidence,
overcome anxiety, and develop effective study habits.
Parents. This study shows may provide parents with a
deeper understanding of how their support, encouragement,
and attitudes toward mathematics can influence their
children’s self-efficacy and performance.
Teachers. The results can serve as a guide in creating
teaching approaches that foster confidence and motivation in
students. By recognizing how students self-efficacy affects
their performance, teachers can design classroom practices
that not only enhance skills but also nurture belief in
one’s mathematical abilities.
School administrators. This study shows that the it can
use the results to develop intervention programs and support
services for remedial intervention directed at low levels of
self-efficacy in order to enhance overall student
performance.
Future Researchers. The study can serve as a reference
or guide for future research on similar topics, helping to
build upon the existing knowledge base and potentially
leading to new insights or solutions.
Definition of Terms
The following terms were purposely defined
conceptually and operationally for a clearer understanding
of the ideas presented in this study as follows:
Mathematics Self-Efficacy – refers to the students have
faith in themselves that they can successfully complete
mathematical tasks and resolve mathematics problems. It is a
stable and strong belief concerning students’ confidence to
apply their mathematical knowledge to accomplish their
academic tasks (Alviar-Eisma & Campoamor-Olegario, 2022).
In this research, “Mathematics Self-Efficacy” referred
to the students’ scores in the adapted Mathematics Self-
Efficacy Questionnaire Alviar-Eisma and Campoamor-Olegario
(2022)that were used to assess students’ mastery and
vicarious experiences in mathematics. Responses are coded as
Strongly Agree (5), Agree (4), Neutral (3), Disagree (2),
and Strongly Disagree (1). The mean score was coded as Very
High (4.21 – 5.00), High (3.41 – 4.20), Moderate (2.41 –
3.40), Low (1.81 – 2.60), and Very Low (1.00 – 1.80).
Learning performance – refers to the measurable result
of students’ learning, shown through their grades, test
scores, or ranking in a subject area. It reflects how well
learners have met the expected learning outcomes and skills
(Caballero et al., 2020).
In this research, “learning performance” refers to the
final grades in General Mathematics of Grade 11 STEM
students for the first semester of the 2025–2026 school
year, as recorded by the school. The grading scale used by
the Department of Education categorizes scores as follows:
Outstanding (90-100), Very Satisfactory (85-89),
Satisfactory (80-84), Fairly Satisfactory (75-79), Did Not
Meet Expectations (below 75).
To determine the influence of Mathematics self-
efficacy to the learning performance of Grade 11 Student of
Filamer Christian University Inc., Roxas Avenue, Roxas City,
Capiz for academic year 2025-2026.
Delimitation of the study
The major goal of this study was delimited to Grade 11
students under the STEM strands at Filamer Christian
University Inc., Roxas Avenue, Roxas City, Capiz, during the
school year 2025–2026. The focus is specifically on
examining the relationship between Mathematics self-efficacy
and Learning performance in mathematics.
The researchers will gather data from a total of 100
students selected through stratified sampling techniques to
ensure that grade 11 STEM are fairly represented. This means
the population is divided into strata based on strand and
grade level, and participants are proportionally chosen from
each group.
The Independent Variable of this study is Mathematics
Self- efficacy while the Dependent Variable was Learning
Performance.
The statistical tools that were used in the data
analysis are mean, standard deviation and Pearson r. All
inferential tests were set at 0.05 alpha level of
significance.