Mathematics Self-efficacy and Learning Performance among
Senior High School Students
A Research Paper Presented To
The Faculty of Senior High School
Filamer Christian University, Inc. Roxas City, Capiz
In partial fulfillment of
The Requirements for Practical Research 2
Of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)
By
Kenneth Ambion
Khian Amir Daniel
Godwin Delatina
John Roger Fanugon
Quian Kent Gonzales
Kisha Nichole Guinsatao
(CURIE 12)
August 2025
Chapter 2
Review of Related Literature
The Second chapter addresses three topics, namely:(1)
Learning Performance, (2), Mathematics Self-efficacy (3)
Synthesis.
The First Part, explores what Learning Performance is,
the concept of learning performance, factors that influence
it, and its relation to self-efficacy.
The Second Part, discusses mathematics Self-efficacy
theories, definitions, and previous findings related to the
learners’ confidence in their ability to excel in
mathematical tasks.
The Third Part, Synthesis, Presents the summary of
literature and studies reviewed.
Learning Performance
Learning performance has long been a central focus of
educational research, as it reflects the extent to which
students successfully achieve learning goals. According to
Honicke and Broadbent (2016), learning self-efficacy has a
moderate to strong positive relationship with student
performance, suggesting that learners who believe in their
abilities tend to achieve better outcomes. Similarly,
Dunlosky et al. (2015) highlighted that effective learning
strategies such as self-testing, summarization, and spaced
repetition enhance long-term retention and improve
achievement. These findings indicate that performance is
influenced not only by intellectual ability but also by
psychological, motivational, and behavioral factors.
Self-confidence and self-perception are critical
psychological elements influencing performance. In the
context of STEM disciplines, Zeldin and Pajares (2015) found
that female students’ academic choices and performance were
significantly shaped by their confidence levels. Luo et al.
(2022) further demonstrated that students with higher self-
esteem developed stronger learning self-efficacy over time,
leading to better outcomes. Likewise, Komarraju and Nadler
(2016) and Vuong et al. (2015) emphasized that self-
confidence enhances intrinsic motivation, persistence, and
engagement, which directly contribute to higher performance.
More recent studies reinforce this link: Putwain et al.
(2020) reported that confident students adopt adaptive
behaviors like goal setting and persistence, while a 2025
study found that mathematics self-efficacy moderates the
effect of self-regulated learning on problem-solving skills.
Collectively, these findings suggest that confidence-
related constructs play a foundational role in shaping
academic performance. Research has consistently confirmed
that self-efficacy predicts academic success. Sawhney (2011)
found a significant positive correlation between self-
efficacy and achievement among high school students,
underscoring the importance of belief in one’s capabilities.
Mangaoil (2018) also identified psychological factors—such
as study habits, attitudes, and persistence—as significant
determinants of performance, especially in English and
Mathematics. Similarly, Bentil (2023) and Reylan et al.
(2019) argued that effective study habits enhance
reflection, critical thinking, and overall performance,
while poor study habits limit academic growth. These
findings highlight the need to cultivate strong academic
self-efficacy and effective study practices among learners.
Beyond individual factors, the family and learning
environment significantly affect performance. Farook (2020)
found that parental involvement, particularly in the form of
autonomy support and learning assistance, fosters self-
regulated learning and improves academic outcomes. Ma et al.
(2016) and Boonk et al. (2018) similarly emphasized that
parental support positively influences student learning,
though inconsistencies exist in defining the scope of such
involvement (Shute et al., 2011). These findings suggest
that while external factors matter, they interact with
students’ self-efficacy and study habits in shaping
performance.
At the systemic level, international assessments such
as PISA and TIMMS highlight the importance of investing in
education to improve student performance (OECD, 2018;
UNESCO, 2019). Researchers argue that learning performance
is a key determinant of future opportunities (von Stumm et
al., 2011; Flashman, 2012), which underscores the urgency of
identifying predictors of success, such as self-efficacy.
Meta-analyses (Credé & Kuncel, 2008; Credé et al., 2017)
further show that factors like teaching methods, school
resources, and teacher support significantly shape outcomes,
but among these, mathematics self-efficacy consistently
emerges as a strong predictor of performance (Özcan &
Kültür, 2021; NAEP 2019/2024).
Mathematics Self-efficacy
Mathematics self-efficacy, defined as an individual’s belief
in their ability to successfully perform mathematical tasks, has
been consistently identified as a critical predictor of students’
achievement in mathematics. Research shows that students with
higher self-efficacy are more willing to engage in problem-
solving, persist through challenges, and achieve better outcomes
(Pajares, 2016; Zakariya, 2020). Compared to other factors such
as prior knowledge or intelligence, self-efficacy often exerts
stronger predictive power on student performance (Zakariya,
2020).
Numerous studies confirm the strong link between
mathematics self-efficacy and academic achievement. Ayotola
and Adedeji (2017) found that undergraduates with higher
self-efficacy performed better in advanced mathematics
courses. Similarly, Çiftçi and Yıldız (2019), using TIMSS
data, concluded that students with higher confidence
consistently outperformed peers with lower confidence. Yao
et al. (2024) further demonstrated, through a large-scale
quantitative study in the U.S., that mathematics self-
efficacy was a significant predictor of achievement even
after controlling for demographic variables, with each one-
point gain in self-efficacy translating to a 7–9 point
increase in math scores. This evidence underscores that
confidence in mathematical ability not only influences
individual success but also contributes to school-wide
performance.
Beyond direct achievement, mathematics self-efficacy
interacts with other psychological constructs. For example,
Suárez-Álvarez et al. (2016) and Sari et al. (2022) found
that self-efficacy reduces the negative effects of math
anxiety, thereby supporting emotional well-being and
achievement. Villavicencio and Bernardo (2016), in a
Philippine context, also reported that self-efficacy
indirectly affects achievement by lowering academic anxiety
and promoting positive achievement emotions. In Ghana,
Agbornu and Edekor (2020) revealed that 32% of variance in
mathematics achievement could be explained by differences in
self-efficacy, suggesting that task-specific confidence is
more influential than general self-concept.
The role of mathematics self-efficacy has also been
studied in varying educational contexts. During the COVID-19
pandemic, Bandura-based interventions were used to
strengthen students’ confidence in online mathematics
classes (Hartmann et al., 2021). Results showed that
students with higher self-efficacy adapted more effectively
to digital learning environments. Similarly, cultural
settings also highlight different dimensions: in Indonesia,
mathematics self-efficacy was found to be at a moderate
level yet positively correlated with numeracy skills, while
in Nigeria, Asanre et al. (2024) reported that behavioral,
emotional, and cognitive engagement significantly predicted
students’ self-efficacy levels. These findings indicate that
both internal beliefs and external learning environments
play important roles in shaping self-efficacy.
Gender differences in mathematics self-efficacy
continue to draw attention. Huang (2016) found that male
students often report higher self-efficacy, yet
collaborative learning and contextualized problem-solving
reduce this gap. Chen et al. (2021) confirmed that female
students particularly benefit from collaborative learning
strategies, which enhance self-efficacy and improve
mathematics outcomes. Teacher support and feedback also play
a central role, as Phan and Ngu (2017) highlighted that
mastery experiences and constructive feedback significantly
boost students’ confidence in mathematics.
Systematic reviews have shown that interventions
targeting self-efficacy are most effective when they
emphasize mastery experiences, peer modeling, and feedback
(Frontiers in Psychology, 2022). A recent intervention study
in 2024 used Solution-Focused Based Therapy (SFBT) to
enhance mathematics self-efficacy among college students,
demonstrating measurable improvements. These findings
suggest that building students’ confidence requires
intentional instructional practices and combined strategies
rather than isolated interventions.
Taken together, this body of research establishes
mathematics self-efficacy as both a cognitive and emotional
regulator of learning. It influences not only academic
performance but also engagement, persistence, and career
pathways. For instance, Wang et al. (2015) found that
adolescents with strong self-efficacy were more likely to
pursue mathematics-intensive majors, which has direct
implications for senior high school learners preparing for
STEM-related careers. By fostering self-efficacy, educators
can help students overcome anxiety, engage more deeply in
learning, and access broader opportunities in higher
education and professional fields.
Synthesis
Learning performance is shaped not only by intellectual
ability but also by psychological and motivational factors that
influence how students approach learning. Among these, self-
efficacy plays a central role. Students who believe in their
abilities are more likely to engage actively, persist through
challenges, and adopt effective study habits, all of which lead
to improved outcomes. Conversely, low confidence often results in
anxiety, disengagement, and poor achievement. This highlights
that confidence-related factors are fundamental in determining
students’ overall learning performance.
Within this framework, mathematics self-efficacy
consistently emerges as a strong predictor of mathematics
achievement. Learners with higher confidence in their
mathematical abilities achieve better results, adapt more
effectively to academic demands, and demonstrate resilience
in facing difficulties. Mathematics self-efficacy also
regulates emotional aspects of learning by lowering anxiety
and fostering positive attitudes, which directly enhances
performance. Beyond grades, it influences motivation,
persistence, and even career choices, often proving to be a
stronger predictor of success than prior knowledge or
intelligence.
The development of mathematics self-efficacy depends on
both internal and external influences. Mastery experiences,
constructive feedback, and peer modeling strengthen
students’ self-beliefs, while teacher support, instructional
practices, and parental involvement provide external
reinforcement. Studies have also shown that gender
differences exist, with males often reporting higher self-
efficacy; however, collaborative and contextualized learning
approaches help narrow this gap, particularly benefiting
female students. Cultural and environmental contexts
likewise play a role, as levels of self-efficacy and its
relationship with performance vary across learning settings.
Overall, the literature emphasizes that mathematics
self-efficacy is both a cognitive and emotional regulator
that consistently predicts learning performance. Yet,
despite extensive global research, limited studies focus on
senior high school students in the Philippines. This gap
highlights the need to explore how mathematics self-efficacy
directly influences the learning performance of Filipino
learners. Addressing this will not only deepen understanding
of student achievement but also provide insights for
educators and policymakers to design strategies that enhance
confidence in mathematics, ultimately improving academic
performance and future opportunities.
References
Asanya, A. A., Sondlo, A., Chinaka, T., & Oluwadoyo, T. A.
(2025). Mathematics self-efficacy and study habits as
predictors of achievement of senior secondary school
students. Mathematics Education Journal. 8(2).
Asanre, A., Abiodun, T. O., Akinosi, J. A., & Xulu, N. S.
(2015). Attitude and self-efficacy as correlates of
mathematics academic achievement of senior secondary
school students in Remo North. Mathematics Education
Journal. DOI:10.22219/mej.v9i1.40823
Ayotola, A., & Adedeji, T. (2017). Mathematics self-
efficacy as a predictor of academic performance in
mathematics among university undergraduates. Journal
of Educational Research and Review, 5(6), 90-96.
[Link]
Adu, E. O., & Adusei, M. (2020). Relationship between
senior high school students’ mathematics self-
efficacy, self-concept and achievement in Ghana.
American Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 770–
775. [Link]
Çiftçi, Ş. K., & Yıldız, P. (2019). The effect of self-
confidence on mathematics achievement: The meta-
analysis of Trends in International Mathematics and
Science Study (TIMMS). International Journal of
Instruction, 12(2), 683-694.
[Link]
/10.29333/iji.2019.12243a
Czocher, J. A., Melhuish, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2020).
Building
mathematics self-efficacy of STEM undergraduates through
mathematical modelling. International
Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,
51(6), 807-834.
Chen, J. A., Tutwiler, M. S., & Rigdon, J. P. (2021).
Examining
gender differences in high school students’ mathematics
self-efficacy through collaborative learning. Journal of
Educational Research, 114(3), 271–284.
[Link]
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., &
Willingham, D. T. (2015). Improving students’ learning
with effective learning techniques: Promising
directions from cognitive and educational psychology.
Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1),
4-58. [Link]
Frontiers in Psychology. (2022). Improving students’
mathematics self-efficacy: A systematic review of
intervention studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13,
986622.
[Link]
n0search9
Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of
academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A
systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17,
63-84.
[Link]
Hartmann, F., Barzel, B., & Biehler, R. (2021). Supporting
students self-efficacy in mathematics learning in
times of remote education: A longitudinal study. ZDM-
Mathematics Educations, 53, 825-840.
[Link]
Huang, C. (2016). Gender differences in academic self-
efficacy: A meta-analysis. European Journal of
Psychology of Education, 28(1), 1–35.
[Link]
Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D. (2016). Self-efficacy and
academic achievement: Why do self-confidence students
perform better? Journal of Educational Psychology,
108(3), 450-462.
Kim, D. (2024). The relationship between mathematics self-
efficacy and mathematics achievement: A multilevel
analysis with NAEP 2019. Large-scale Assessments in
Education, 12, 8.
[Link]
com/articles/10.1186/s40536-024-00204-z
Luo, Y., Gao, W., & Liu, X. (2022). Longitudinal
relationship between self-esteem and academic self-
efficacy among college students in China: Evidence
from a cross-lagged model. Frontiers in Psychology,
13, 877343. [Link]
Liu, X., & Koirala, H. P. (2019). The effect of mathematics
self-efficacy on mathematics achievement of high
school students. International Journal of Research in
Education and Science, 5(2), 452–471.
[Link]
Morris, P., Agbonlahor, O., & Winters, R., et al. (2023).
Self-efficacy curriculum and peer leader support in
gateway college mathematics. Learning Environments
Research, 26, 219-240. [Link]
022-09424-y
OECD. (2016). Equity and quality in education: Supporting
disadvantaged students and schools. OECD Publishing.
Özcan, B., & Kültür, Y. Z. (2021). The relationship between
sources of mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics
test and course achievement in high school seniors.
SAGE Open, [Article].
[Link]
Putwain, D. W., Sander, P., & Larkin, D. (2020). Academic
self-confidence in university students: The role of
academic emotions and motivation. Education
Psychology, 40(4), 471-489.
[Link]
Pajares, F. (20160. Motivational role of self-efficacy
beliefs in self-regulated learning. Theory Into
Practice, 44(2), 131-138.
[Link]
Phan, H. P., & Ngu, B. H. (2017). Positive psychology and
educational achievement: The influence of self-
efficacy and well-being. Educational Psychology,
37(8), 965–979.
[Link]
Roslan, N. A., & Maat, S. M. (2019). Systematic literature
review on secondary school students’ mathematics
self-efficacy. International Journal of Academic
Research in Progressive Education and Development,
8(4), [pp. reference]. DOI:10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i4/6817
Roick, T., & Ringeisen, T. (2018). Self-efficacy, test
anxiety, and academic success: A longitudinal
validation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 985.
[Link]
8.00985/full
Sawhney, N. (2011). Self-efficacy and academic achievement
in high school students. Research Journal of
Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(2). Retrieved from
[Link]
[Link]/[Link]/Rjhss/article/view/185978
Sari, M. M. R., & Suryanawa, I. K. (2022). The role of
mathematics self-efficacy in mediating the effect of
math anxiety on academic achievement. E-Journal of
Mathematics Education, 7(1), 55-67.
[Link]
Suárez-Álvarez, J., Fernández-Alonso, R., & Muñiz, J.
(2016). Self-concept, motivation, expectations, and
socioeconomic level as predictors of academic
performance in mathematics. Learning and Individual
Differences, 45, 275–281.
[Link]
Tziraki, 2013; Phillipson & Phillipson, 2012); a negative
relationship (Dumont et al, 2012; Gonida & Cortina,
2014; Xu et al, 2010; Stright & Yeo, 2013) or lack of
a relationship (Altschul, 2011; Hayes, 2012;
Johnson & Hull, 2014; Phillipson & Phillipson, 2012).
[Link]
Yang, Y., Maeda, Y., & Gentry, M. (2024). The relationship
between mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics
achievement: multilevel analysis with NAEP 2019.
Large-scale Assessments in Education, 12, Article 16.
[Link]
Yu, W., Zhou, Y. (2024). Intervention on mathematics self-
efficacy: Solution-focused brief therapy. Psychology
Research and Behavior Management, 17, 129-145.
[Link]
Yang, Y., & Xu, Z. (2022). The reciprocal relationship
between mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics
performance: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in
Psychology, 13, 941253.
[Link]
es/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941253/full
Vuong, M., Brown-Welty, S., & Tracz, S. (2015). The effects
of self efficacy on academic succuss of first
generation college sophomore students. Journal of
College Students Development, 56(8), 848-856.
[Link]
Villavicencio, F. T., & Bernardo, A. B. I. (2016). Beyond
math anxiety: Positive emotions predict mathematics
achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy. Asia
Pacific Education Review, 17(3), 279–290.
[Link]
Wang, M. T., Eccles, J. S., & Kenny, S. (2015). Not lack of
ability but more choice: Individual and gender
differences in choice of careers in science,
technology, engineering, and mathematics.
Psychological Science, 24(5), 770–775.
[Link]
Zeldin, A. L., & Parajes, F. (2015). Against the odds:
Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical,
scientific, and technological careers. American
Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 701-736.
Zakariya, Y. F. (2020). Effects of mathematics self-
efficacy on mathematics achievement of secondary
school students. Educational Psychology, 40(4), 1–15.
[Link]
Zakariya, Y. F. (2021). Self-efficacy and mathematics
achievement: A meta-analysis of 59 studies.
International Electronic Journal of Mathematics
Education, 16(3), em0655.
[Link]
es/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986622/full
Zakariya, Y. F., & Nilsen, T. (2024). Mathematics
achievement in high schools: The role of mathematics
self-efficacy among high school students in Australia.
ResearchGate.
[Link]
hematics_achievement_in_high_schools_the_Role_of_mathe
matics%27_self-
efficacy_and_Mathematics_achievement_of_high_school_st
udents_in_Australia