Display PDF Copy
Display PDF Copy
PRESENT
WRIT PETITION NOS: 1024, 834, 692, 608, 600, 266/2018 & 42732, 42998,
44246, 44249, 44251, 44935, 44557 of 2017
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to to grant appropriate relief more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the action of the
Respondents in not paying minimum time scale and other benefits to the
Petitioners attached to the post of Assistant Professor as per revised pay
scales applicable to regular Assistant Professors working under the 1st
Respondents University, i.e. Rs.21,600/ plus 132 per cent D.A., in terms of
[Link] No.38 dated 23.06.2016, as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory and
unconstitutional violating Article 14 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India apart
from violating Article 41 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the
principle of law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court in case of State of
Punjab and others V Jagjit Singh and others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC
738, and issue consequential directions, directing the Respondents to
forthwith pay minimum time scale and other benefits to the Petitioners
attached to the post of regular Assistant Professor as per revised pay scales
applicable to regular Assistant Professors, working in the 1st Respondents
University in terms of [Link].38 dated 23.06.2016 and also taking into
account the and also taking into account the principle of law laid down by the
Honorable Supreme Court in case of State of Punjab and others V. Jagith
Sing and Others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC 738, with effect from the date
of their initial appointment with all other consequential benefits and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
direct the Respondents to forthwith pay minimum time scale and other
benefits to the Petitioners attached to the post of regular Assistant Professor
4
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
IA NO: 2 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith pay minimum time scale and
other benefits to the petitioners attached to the post of regular assistant
professor as per revised pay scales applicable to regular assistant professors
working in the 1st respondents university i.e.,Rs 21,600 plus 132 per cent
D.A., in terms of [Link].38 dated 23-06-2016 and also taking onto account
the principle of law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court in case of
State Of Punjab and Others [Link] Singh and Other reported in 2016
INDLAW SC 738 and continue the petitioners services without any break
pending disposal of the writ petition
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
Pleased to vacate the interim order dated 5-1-2018 passed by this Homnble
court in IA. 1/2018 in the writ petition no 1024/2018 in the interest of justice
and pass
1. P V KRISHNAIAH
3. .
5
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased toto issue any writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of
WRITE OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondent university in
not absorbing the petitioners into the cadre posts of faculty in the category of
Assistant Professors as arbitrary and illegal, offending Article 14 and 16 of the
constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents to absorb the
Petitioners into the regular service of the respondent forthwith w.e.f. the date
of their joining in the category of Assistant professors with all consequential
fixation of pay and benefits and also extend their remuneration on par with
regularly appointed Assistant Professor in terms of Para 13.1 of UGC
Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other
Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the
Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education, 2010
IA NO: 1 OF 2018
7
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the above writ petition
it is hereby prayed that this Hon'bleCourt may be pleased may be pleased to
direct the 1st Respondent University to continue the Petitioners as Teaching
Associates in service in the 1st Respondent University pending disposal of the
above writ petition and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and
proper in the circumstances of the case.
IA NO: 2 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the above Writ Petition
it is hereby prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the
Respondents to pay minimum time scale and allowances on par with regularly
appointed Assistant Professor in terms of Para 13.1 of UGC Regulations on
Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Saff
in Universities and Colleges and measures for the maintenance of Standards
in Higher Education, 2010 pending disposal of the above writ petition and
pass such other order or orders may deems fit and proper in the
circumstances of the case.
IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to grant leave receive the additional counter affidavit copies on
record by allowing the leave petition/delay petition in the above writ petition
and pass
1. A V S LAXMI
1. V SAI KUMAR
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased toto grant appropriate relief more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the action of the
Respondents in not paying minimum time scale and other benefits to the
Petitioners attached to the post of Assistant Professor as per revised pay
scales applicable to regular Assistant Professors working under the 1st
Respondents University, i.e. Rs.21,600/- plus 132 per cent D.A., in terms of
[Link] No.38 dated 27.06.2016, as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory and
unconstitutional violating Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India
apart from violating Article 41 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the
principle of law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in case of State of
Punjab and others V Jagjit Singh and others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC
738, and issue consequential directions, directing the Respondents to
9
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
forthwith pay minimum time scale and other benefits to the Petitioners
attached to the post of regular Assistant Professor as per revised pay scales
applicable to regular Assistant Professors, working in the 1st Respondents
University in terms of [Link] No.38 dated 23.06.2016 and also taking into
account the and also taking into account the principle of law laid down by the
Honorable Supreme Court in case of State of Punjab and others V. Jagith
Singh and Others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC 738, with effect from the date
of their initial appointment with all other consequential benefits and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
direct the Respondents to forthwith pay minimum time scale and other
benefits to the Petitioner attached to the post of regular Assistant Professor as
per revised pay scales applicable to regular Assistant Professors working in
the 1st Respondent's University, i.e. Rs.21,600/- plus 132 per cent D.A., in
terms of [Link]. No.38 dated 23.06.2016, and also taking into account the
principle of law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court in case of State of
Punjab and others V. Jagith Singh and Others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC
738, and continue the Petitioner's services without any break pending disposal
of the writ petition and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to extend the time for filing counter affidavit in the WP No.692 of 2018
and permit the petitioner university to file the counter affidavit and pass
1. P V KRISHNAIAH
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased toto grant appropriate relief more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the action of the
Respondents in not paying minimum time scale and other benefits to the
11
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
direct the Respondents to forthwith pay minimum time scale and other
benefits to the Petitioners attached to the post of regular Assistant Professor
as per revised pay scales applicable to regular Assistant Professors working
in the 1st Respondent's University, i.e. Rs.21,600/- plus 132 per cent D.A., in
terms of [Link]. No.38 dated 23.06.2016, and also taking into account the
principle of law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court in case of State of
Punjab & others V. Jagith Singh & Others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC 738,
and continue the Petitioner's services without any break pending disposal of
the writ petition.
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to VACATE the interim order dated 05-01-2018, in [Link]. 1 of 2018
In [Link]. 608of 2018 to meet ends of justice, and pass such other order or
orders which
12
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
1. P V KRISHNAIAH
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
13
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased toto grant appropriate relief more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the action of the
Respondents in not paying minimum time scale and other benefits to the
Petitioners attached to the post of Assistant Professor as per revised pay
scales applicable to regular Assistant Professors working under the 1st
Respondents University, i.e. Rs.21,600/- plus 132 per cent D.A., in terms of
[Link] No.38 dated 27.06.2016, as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory and
unconstitutional violating Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India
apart from violating Article 41 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the
principle of law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in case of State of
Punjab and others V Jagjit Singh and others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC
738, and issue consequential directions, directing the Respondents to
forthwith pay minimum time scale and other benefits to the Petitioners
attached to the post of regular Assistant Professor as per revised pay scales
applicable to regular Assistant Professors, working in the 1st Respondents
University in terms of [Link] No.38 dated 23.06.2016 and also taking into
account the and also taking into account the principle of law laid down by the
Honorable Supreme Court in case of State of Punjab and others V. Jagith
Singh and Others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC 738, with effect from the date
of their initial appointment with all other consequential benefits and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
direct the Respondents to forthwith pay minimum time scale and other
benefits to the Petitioner attached to the post of regular Assistant Professor as
per revised pay scales applicable to regular Assistant Professors working in
the 1st Respondent's University, i.e. Rs.21,600/- plus 132 per cent D.A., in
terms of [Link]. No.38 dated 23.06.2016, and also taking into account the
principle of law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court in case of State of
Punjab & others V. Jagith Singh & Others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC 738,
and continue the Petitioner's services without any break pending disposal of
the writ petition.
IA NO: 1 OF 2022
14
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to extend the time for filing counter affidavit in the WP No,600 of 2018
and permit the petitioner university to file the counter affidavit and pass
1. P V KRISHNAIAH
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
15
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased toto grant appropriate relief more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the action of the
respondents in not paying minimum time scale and other benefits to the
petitioners attached to the post of Assistant Professor as per revised pay
scales applicable to regular Assistant Professors working under the 1st
respondent's university, i.e., Rs.21,600/- plus 132 per cent D.A. in terms of
[Link].38 dated 27.06.2016, as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory and
unconstitutional violating Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India
apart from violating Article 41 of the Constitution of India apart from violating
Article 41 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the principle of law laid
down by the Honble Supreme Court in case of State of Punjab and Others
Vs. Jagjit Singh and others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC 738, and issue
consequential, directions, directing the respondents to forthwith pay minimum
time scale and other benefits to the petitioners attached to the post of regular
Assistant Professor as per revised pay scales applicable to regular Assistant
Professor as per revised pay scales applicable to regular Assistant
Professors, working in the 1st respondent's University in terms of
[Link].38 dated 23.06.2016 and also taking into account the and also
taking into account the principles of law laid down by the Honble Supreme
Court in case of State of Punjab and Others V. Jagith Singh and Others
reported in 2016 INDLAW SC 738, with effect from the date of their initial
appointment with all other consequential benefits and pass
16
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
IA NO: 2 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
direct the respondents to forthwith pay minimum time scale and other benefits
to the petitioners attached to the post of regular Assistant Professor as per
revised pay scales applicable to regular Assistant Professors working in the
1st respondent's University, i.e., Rs.21,600/- plus 132 per cent D.A. in terms
of [Link].38, dated 23.06.2016, and also taking into account the
principles of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Tate of
Punjuab and Others Vs. Jagith Singh & Others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC
738, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased toto grant appropriate relief more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the action of the
Respondents in not paying minimum time scale and other benefits to the
Petitioners attached to the post of Assistant Professor as per revised pay
scales applicable to regular Assistant Professors working under the 1st
Respondent's University, i.e. Rs.21,600/- plus 132 per cent D.A., in terms of
[Link] No.38 dated 27.06.2016, as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory and
unconstitutional violating Article 14 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India apart
from violating Article 41 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the
principle of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of State of
Punjab & others V Jagjit Singh and others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC 738,
and issue consequential directions, directing the Respondents to forthwith pay
minimum time scale and other benefits to the Petitioners attached to the post
of regular Assistant Professor as per revised pay scales applicable to regular
Assistant Professors, working in the 1st Respondent's University in terms of
20
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
[Link] No.38 dated 23.06.2016 and also taking into account the and also
taking into account the principle of law laid down by the Honorable Supreme
Court in case of State of Punjab & others V. Jagith Sing & Others reported in
2016 INDLAW SC 738, with effect from the date of their initial appointment
with all other consequential benefits and pass
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
direct the Respondents to forthwith pay minimum time scale and other
benefits to the Petitioners attached to the post of regular Assistant Professor
as per revised pay scales applicable to regular Assistant Professors working
in the 1st Respondent's University, i.e. Rs.21,600/- plus 132 per cent DA., in
terms of [Link]. No.38 dated 23.06.2016, and also taking into account he
principle of law laid dawn by the Honorable Supreme Court in case of State of
Punjab & others V. Jagith Singh & Others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC 738,
pending cfriposal of the writ petition.
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
amend the cause title in respect of Petitioners No. 2, 4 and 6 respectively, in
substituting the following Departments and Surname, in the writ petition and
W.P.M.P. i.e., 2] Dr. I. Narender Kumar s/o I. Subba Narasimulu, 50 years,
Academic Consultant/Teaching Assistant/ Assistant Professor, Department of
Econometrics SV University, Tirupathi, Chittoor District 4] Dr. V. Mallikarjuna
Reddy s/o Krishna Reddy, Aged 48 years, Academic Consultant/Teaching
Assistant/Assistant Professor, Department of History SV University, Tirupathi,
Chittoor District 6] Dr. S. Haseena Begum w/o Professor S. Abdul Sattar
[retired] Aged 52 years, Academic Consultant/Teaching Assistant/Assistant
Professor, Department of Urdu, SV University Tirupathi, Chittoor District in the
interest of justice, as otherwise the petitioner will be put to irreparable loss and
injury, and pass such other order or orders.
IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
21
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
IA NO: 2 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
vacate the interim orders dt.15-12-2017 passed in [Link], 52996 of
2017 in [Link]. 42732 of 2017 and ton pass
IA NO: 3 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
1. P V KRISHNAIAH
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased toto grant appropriate relief more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the action of the
Respondents in not paying minimum time scale and other benefits to the
Petitioners attached to the post of Assistant Professor as per revised pay
scales applicable to regular Assistant Professors working under the 1st
Respondent's University, i.e. Rs.21,600/- plus 132 per cent D.A., in terms of
[Link] No.38 dated 27.06.2016, as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory and
unconstitutional violating Article 14 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India apart
from violating Article 41 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the
principle of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of State of
Punjab & others V Jagjit Singh and others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC 738,
and issue consequential directions, directing the Respondents to forthwith pay
minimum time scale and other benefits to the Petitioners attached to the post
of regular Assistant Professor as per revised pay scales applicable to regular
Assistant Professors, working in the 1st Respondent's University in terms of
[Link] No.38 dated 23.06.2016 and also taking into account the and also
taking into account the principle of law laid down by the Honorable Supreme
Court in case of State of Punjab & others V. Jagith Sing & Others reported in
2016 INDLAW SC 738, with effect from the date of their initial appointment
with all other consequential benefits
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
direct the Respondents to forthwith pay minimum time scale and other
benefits to the Petitioners attached to the post of regular Assistant Professor
as per revised pay scales applicable to regular Assistant Professors working
in the 1St Respondent's University, .e. Rs.21,600/- plus 132 per cent D.A., in
terms of [Link]. No.38 dated 23.06.2016, and also taking into account the
principle of law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court in case of State of
Punjab & others V. Jagith Singh & Others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC 738,
pending disposal of the writ petition.
IA NO: 4 OF 2017
25
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
amend the cause title in respect of Petitioners Nos. 2 and 4 respectively, in
substituting the following names in the above writ petition and WPMP, i.e, 2]
Dr. K. Ekambaram, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged About 47 years, Academic
Consultant/Teaching Assistant/Assistant Professor, Vikrama Simhapuri
University, P.G. Centre, Kavali, Neilore Dist., A.P. 4] Dr. B. Ramesh Kumar,
S/o. T. D. Bhaskaram, Aged About 40 years, Academic Consultant/Teaching
Assistant/Assistant Professor, Vikrama Simhapuri University, P.G. Centre,
Kavali, Nellore Dist., A.P In the interest of justice, as otherwise the Petitioners
will be put to irreparable loss and injury and pass
1. P V KRISHNAIAH
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased toto grant appropriate relief more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the action of the
Respondents in not paying minimum time scale and other benefits to the
Petitioners attached to the post of Assistant Professor as per revised pay
scales applicable to regular Assistant Professors working under the 1st
Respondent's University, i.e. Rs.21,600/- plus 132 per cent D.A., in terms of
[Link] No.38 dated 27.06.2016, as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory and
unconstitutional violating Article 14 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India apart
from violating Article 41 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the
principle of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of State of
Punjab & others V Jagjit Singh and others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC 738,
and issue consequential directions, directing the Respondents to forthwith pay
minimum time scale and other benefits to the Petitioners attached to the post
of regular Assistant Professor as per revised pay scales applicable to regular
Assistant Professors, working in the 1st Respondent's University in terms of
29
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
[Link] No.38 dated 23.06.2016 and also taking into account the and also
taking into account the principle of law laid down by the Honorable Supreme
Court in case of State of Punjab & others V. Jagith Sing & Others reported in
2016 INDLAW SC 738, with effect from the date of their initial appointment
with all other consequential benefits and pass
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
direct the Respondents to forthwith pay minimum time scale and other
benefits to the Petitioners attached to the post of reguiar Assistant Professor
as per revised pay scales appicable to regular Assistant Professors work ng in
the 1st Respondent's University, i.e. Rs.21,600/- plus 132 per cent D.A.. in
terms of [Link]. No.38 dated 23.06.2016, and also taking into account the
principle of law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court in case of State of
Punjab & others [Link] Singh & Others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC 738,
pending disposal of the writ petition.
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
Pleased to vacate the interim order dated 26-12-2017 passed by this Honble
court in WPMP., 54850 of 2017 in writ petition no 44246/2017 in the interest of
justice
1. P V KRISHNAIAH
2. .
Between:
30
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased topleased to grant appropriate relief more in the nature of Writ of
Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the action
of the Respondents in not paying minimum time scale and other benefits to
the Petitioners attached to the post of Assistant Professor as per revised pay
scales applicable to regular Assistant Professors working under the 15t
Respondent's University, i.e. Rs_21,600/- plus 132 per cent D.A., in terms of
[Link] No.38 dated 27.06.2016, as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory and
unconstitutional violating Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India
31
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
apart from violating Article 41 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the
principle of law laid down by the Hon' ble Supreme Court in case of State of
Punjab & others V Jagjit Singh and others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC 738,
and issue consequential directions, directing the Respondents to forthwith pay
minimum time scale and other benefits to the Petitioners attached to the post
of regular Assistant Professor as per revised pay scales applicable to regular
Assistant Professors, working in the 1st Respondent's University in terms of
[Link] No.38 dated 23.06.2016 and also taking into account the and also
taking into account the principle of law laid down by the Honorable Supreme
Court in case of State of Punjab & others V. Jagith Singh & Others reported in
2016 INDLAW SC 738, with effect from the date of their initial appointment
with all other consequential benefits and pass
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
direct the Respondents to forthwith pay minimum time scale and other
benefits to the Petitioners attached to the post of regular Assistant Professor
as per revised pay scales applicable to regular Assistant Professors working
in the 1St Respondent's University, i.e. Rs.21,600/- plus 132 per cent D.A., in
terms of [Link]. No.38 dated 23.06.2016, and also taking into account the
principle of law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court in case of State of
Punjab & others V. Jagith Singh & Others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC 738,
pending disposal of the writ petition.
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to VACATE the interim order dated 26-12-2017 in WPMP No. 54853
of 2017- in [Link]. 44249 of 201721 passed by this Hon'ble High Court to
meet ends of justice and
1. P VASU SEKHAR
2. .
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased toto grant appropriate relief more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the action of the
Respondents in not paying minimum time scale and other benefits to the
Petitioner attached to the post of Assistant Professor as per revised pay
33
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
direct the Respondents to forthwith pay minimum time scale and other
benefits to the Petitioner attached to the post of regular Assistant Professor as
per revised pay scales applicable to regular Assistant Professors working in
the 1st Respondent's University, i.e. Rs.21,600/- plus 132 per cent D.A., in
terms of [Link]. No.38 dated 23.06.2016, and also taking into account the
principle of law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court in case of State of
Punjab & others V. Jagith Singh & Others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC 738,
pending disposal of the writ petition.
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
Pleased to vacate the interim order dated 26-12-2017 passed by this Honble
court in (WPMP.54855 of 2017) [Link]. 1 of 2017 in the writ petition No. 44251
of 2017 in the interest of justice and pass
1. P V KRISHNAIAH
1. P S P SURESH KUMAR
2. .
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased toTo issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the
35
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
IA NO: 1 OF 2017
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
may be pleased to Direct the Respondents to forthwith pay minimum time
scale and other benefits to the petitioner attached to the post of Regular
Assistant Professor as per revised Pay Scales applicable to regular Assistant
Professors working in the 1Respondent‟s University i.e. Rs. 21,600/- Plus 132
percent per àent D.A. in terms of [Link]. 38 dated 23-6-2016 and also
taking into account the principle of law laid down by the Hon ble Supreme
Court in case of State of Punjab others V. Jagith Singh others reported in
2016 INDLAW SC 738, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass
1. T BALAJI
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased toissue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of
WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in not paying
37
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
minimum time scale and other benefits to the petitioner attached to the Post of
Assistant Professor as per revised pay scales applicable to regular Assistant
Professors as pre-revised pay scales applicable to regular Assistant
Professors working under the 1st Respondent039s University ie. Rs. 21,600/-
plus 132 percent D.A. in terms of [Link].38 dated 27-6-2016, as arbitrary,
illegal, discriminatory and unconstitutional violating Articles 14, 16 and 21 of
the Constitution of India apart from violating Articles 41 of the Constitution of
India and contrary to the Principle of law laid down by the Honble Supreme
Court in case of State of Punjab and others V Jagjit Singh and others reported
in 2016 INDLAW SC 738 and issue consequential directions, directing the
Respondents to forthwith pay minimum time scale and other benefits to the
petitioner attached to the post of regular Assistant Professor as per revised
pay scales applicable to Regular Assistant Professors, working in the 1st
Respondent039s University in terms of GO [Link]. 38 dated 23-6-2016 and
also taking into account the Principle of law laid down by the Honble Supreme
Court in case of State of Punjab and others V Jagith Singh and others
reported in 2016 INDLAW SC 738, with effect from the date of his initial
appointment with all other consequential benefits and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2017
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
Direct the Respondents to forthwith pay minimum time scale and other
benefits to the petitioner attached to the post of Regular Assistant Professor
as per revised Pay Scales applicable to regular Assistant Professors working
in the 1st Respondent's University i.e. Rs. 21,600/- Plus 132 percent D.A. in
terms of [Link]. 38 dated 23-6-2016 and also taking into account the
principle of law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in case of State of
Punjab and others V. Jagith Singh and others reported in 2016 INDLAW SC
738, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass
1. T BALAJI
1. SUNDARI R PISUPATI
38
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
COMMON ORDER:
petitioners, but the issue involved in these petitions is one and the same.
authorities in not paying minimum time scale and other benefits to the
higher education and consequentially, it can also fix the salary with an
are entitled for dearness allowance @132%, however, the petitioners are
not being extended the said benefit. It is the case of the petitioners that
though the Hon‟ble Apex Court in State of Punjab & ors., Vs. Jagjit
Singh and ors.,1, held that all the temporary employees would be entitled
to draw wages at the minimum of the pay-scale grade, in the regular pay
respondent universities are not paying the minimum of the time scale and
considering the principle of law laid down by the Hon‟ble Apex Court in
State of Punjab & ors., Vs. Jagjit Singh and ors., passed an interim
pay to the petitioners if they are found to be discharging the same duties
1
(2017) 1 SCC 148
41
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
affidavits along with vacate stay petitions in all these writ petitions
time scale of pay applicable to a regular Assistant Professor and that the
way applicable to them. Hence requested to dismiss all the writ petitions
Hanumantha Rayudu and Mrs. A.V.S. Laxmi, learned counsel for the
petitioners; learned Government Pleader for Higher Education and all the
the notice of this Court that the Government of Andhra Pradesh, vide
ors., Vs. Jagjit Singh and ors., (referred supra) at paragraph No.55 held
as under:
and Others v. Sarvesh Kaushal and Ors.,2, held as under in its order
dated 04.05.2016:
“After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion
that the expression “minimum of the pay” mentioned in paragraph
22 is intended to mean not only the basic pay + grade pay, but also
the dearness allowance that comes along with the basic pay and
grade pay. This is in the context of the view expressed by this Court
denying regular appointments to the petitioners, while taking into
consideration the fact that the services of the Home Guards are
used during an emergency and for other purposes and at the time
of their duty they are empowered with the power of police
personnel.
2
Contempt Petition (Civil) Nos.699-700 of 2015
44
VS,J
[Link].1024 of 2018 & batch
10. It is made clear that once the petitioners are held entitled to the
Jagjit Singh & Ors., the Apex Court held that similarly situated
employees are entitled to the minimum of the pay scale applicable to the
Tej Singh and Others v. Sarvesh Kaushal and Others to include not
only the basic pay and grade pay, but also the dearness allowance and
11. Considering the fact that the petitioners were selected through
basis, the respondent universities are directed to grant all the petitioners
the post of Assistant Professor, with effect from the date of issuance of
The said process shall be completed within a period of three (3) months
12. Accordingly, with the above directions, these writ petitions are
_____________________
JUSTICE [Link]
20.07.2026
Gss