0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views7 pages

6th Week Lecture Notes

The document provides a comprehensive guide to capital budgeting techniques used for evaluating long-term investment projects, including methods such as Payback Period, NPV, IRR, and MIRR. It highlights the advantages and limitations of each method, emphasizing that NPV is the most reliable for value maximization. The key takeaway is that NPV should be the primary decision criterion, with other methods serving as supplementary tools.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views7 pages

6th Week Lecture Notes

The document provides a comprehensive guide to capital budgeting techniques used for evaluating long-term investment projects, including methods such as Payback Period, NPV, IRR, and MIRR. It highlights the advantages and limitations of each method, emphasizing that NPV is the most reliable for value maximization. The key takeaway is that NPV should be the primary decision criterion, with other methods serving as supplementary tools.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Capital Budgeting Techniques

A comprehensive guide to evaluating long-term investment projects

1. Overview of Capital Budgeting Techniques


Definition: Capital budgeting is the process by which firms evaluate and
select long-term investment projects.
Key Techniques:
 Payback Period
 Discounted Payback Period
 Average Accounting Return (AAR)
 Net Present Value (NPV)
 Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
 Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR)
 Profitability Index (PI)

2. Payback Period
Definition: The time required for a project's cash inflows to recover the
initial investment.
Decision Rule: Accept if payback period ≤ a predetermined cutoff period.
Example:
Initial Investment: $10,000

Cash Inflows:

 Year 1: $3,000
 Year 2: $4,000
 Year 3: $5,000
Step-wise Calculation:
 Cumulative Cash Flow:
o Year 1: $3,000

o Year 2: $3,000 + $4,000 = $7,000


o Year 3: $7,000 + $5,000 = $12,000
 Payback occurs between Year 2 and Year 3.
 Exact Payback = 2 + ($10,000 - $7,000)/$5,000 = 2.6 years
Limitations:
Ignores time value of money and cash flows beyond payback period.

3. Discounted Payback Period


Definition: Similar to payback period, but uses discounted cash flows
(present values).
Example:
Initial Investment: $10,000

Discount Rate: 10%

Cash Inflows:

 Year 1: $3,000 → PV = $3,000 / 1.10 = $2,727.27


 Year 2: $4,000 → PV = $4,000 / 1.10² = $3,305.79
 Year 3: $5,000 → PV = $5,000 / 1.10³ = $3,756.57
Step-wise Calculation:
 Cumulative Discounted Cash Flow:
o Year 1: $2,727.27

o Year 2: $2,727.27 + $3,305.79 = $6,033.06


o Year 3: $6,033.06 + $3,756.57 = $9,789.63
 Payback not achieved by Year 3 since cumulative PV < $10,000.
Limitations:
Still ignores cash flows beyond payback period.

4. Average Accounting Return (AAR)


Definition: AAR = Average Net Income / Average Book Value of Investment
AAR = (Average Net Income) / (Average Book Value of Investment)

Example:
Initial Investment: $10,000

Useful Life: 3 years


Salvage Value: $1,000

Net Income:

 Year 1: $2,000
 Year 2: $3,000
 Year 3: $4,000
Step-wise Calculation:
 Average Net Income = ($2,000 + $3,000 + $4,000)/3 = $3,000
 Average Book Value = (Initial Value + Salvage Value)/2 = ($10,000
+ $1,000)/2 = $5,500
 AAR = $3,000 / $5,500 = 54.55%
Limitations:
Uses accounting income, not cash flows; ignores time value of money.

5. Net Present Value (NPV)


Definition: NPV = Present Value of Cash Inflows - Initial Investment
Decision Rule: Accept if NPV > 0
NPV = ∑ [Ct / (1+r)t] - C0

Example:
Initial Investment (C₀): $10,000

Cash Inflows:

 Year 1: $3,000
 Year 2: $4,000
 Year 3: $5,000
Discount Rate (r): 10%

Step-wise Calculation:
 PV of Year 1 = $3,000 / 1.10 = $2,727.27
 PV of Year 2 = $4,000 / 1.10² = $3,305.79
 PV of Year 3 = $5,000 / 1.10³ = $3,756.57
 Total PV = $2,727.27 + $3,305.79 + $3,756.57 = $9,789.63
 NPV = $9,789.63 - $10,000 = -$210.37
 Decision: Reject (NPV < 0)

6. Internal Rate of Return (IRR)


Definition: IRR is the discount rate that makes NPV = 0.
Decision Rule: Accept if IRR > cost of capital
0 = ∑ [Ct / (1+IRR)t] - C0

Example:
Initial Investment: $10,000

Cash Inflows:

 Year 1: $3,000
 Year 2: $4,000
 Year 3: $5,000
Step-wise Calculation (Trial and Error):
 Try r = 10%: NPV = -$210.37
 Try r = 8%:
o PV Year 1 = $3,000 / 1.08 = $2,777.78
o PV Year 2 = $4,000 / 1.08² = $3,429.36
o PV Year 3 = $5,000 / 1.08³ = $3,969.16
o Total PV = $10,176.30
o NPV = $176.30
 IRR is between 8% and 10%.
 Using interpolation:
o IRR ≈ 8% + (176.30 / (176.30 + 210.37)) × (10% - 8%) ≈
8.91%
Choosing Between Two IRRs: For non-conventional cash flows, use the
one closest to the firm's cost of capital.

7. Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR)


Definition: MIRR assumes reinvestment at the firm's cost of capital.
MIRR = (FVpositive cash flows / PVnegative cash flows)1/n - 1
Example:
Same cash flows as above, cost of capital = 10%

Step-wise Calculation:
 Reinvest cash inflows at 10%:
o Year 1: $3,000 × (1.10)² = $3,630
o Year 2: $4,000 × (1.10)¹ = $4,400
o Year 3: $5,000 × (1.10)⁰ = $5,000
 Total FV = $13,030
 MIRR = ($13,030 / $10,000)1/3 - 1 ≈ 9.23%

8. Comparing NPV and IRR

NPV IRR

Absolute measure of value Relative measure of return

Consistent with value May conflict with NPV for mutually


maximization exclusive projects

Uses cost of capital as


Calculates break-even discount rate
discount rate

Conflict Example:
Two projects: Project A (NPV=$500, IRR=15%) and Project B (NPV=$600,
IRR=12%). If mutually exclusive, choose Project B (higher NPV).

9. Profitability Index (PI)


Definition: PI = Present Value of Future Cash Flows / Initial Investment
Decision Rule: Accept if PI > 1
PI = (Present Value of Future Cash Flows) / (Initial Investment)

Example:
From NPV example:
 Total PV = $9,789.63
 Initial Investment = $10,000
 PI = $9,789.63 / $10,000 = 0.979
 Decision: Reject (PI < 1)

Summary
 Payback and Discounted Payback are simple but ignore cash flows
beyond payback.
 AAR uses accounting data, not cash flows.
 NPV is the most reliable and consistent with value maximization.
 IRR is popular but may conflict with NPV for mutually exclusive
projects.
 MIRR addresses reinvestment assumption and multiple IRR issues.
 PI is useful for ranking projects when capital is limited.

Summary Table

Metho Decisio Advantage Disadvantag


Definition
d n Rule s es

Time to
Simple, Ignores TVM,
Paybac recover Payback
liquidity cash flows
k initial < Cutoff
bias after payback
investment

Considers
PV of
TVM, all Requires
inflows
NPV NPV > 0 cash flows, discount rate
minus PV
maximizes estimation
of outflows
value

Discount
IRR > Considers Multiple IRRs,
rate that
IRR Cost of TVM, reinvestment
makes NPV
Capital intuitive assumption
=0
Metho Decisio Advantage Disadvantag
Definition
d n Rule s es

PV of
future cash
Useful for
flows Scale
PI PI > 1 capital
divided by problems
rationing
initial
investment

Key Takeaway:
NPV is the theoretically soundest method and should be the primary decision
criterion, with other methods providing supplementary information.

You might also like