Topic: Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to

find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that because of internet technology, people do not need to travel to foreign countries
to understand how others live. From my perspective, the decision depends on what kind of
understanding a person is looking for.
On the one hand, for people who just want general information, the internet is a very good tool.
This is because the internet is an epitome of efficiency where you can watch videos and read
articles about different cultures. As a result, it is very convenient and cheap because you do not
have to buy an expensive plane ticket. For example, a student can learn about the history and
houses of people in another country just by using a search engine like Google. This is a situation
where technology helps us save a lot of time and money.
On the other hand, for those who want a deep experience, physical travel is still necessary. This
is important because seeing something on a computer screen is not the same as being there in
person. For instance, you can see many pictures of local food on the internet, but you cannot
taste the food or smell the atmosphere of a local market. Furthermore, interacting with local
people in real life plays a pivotal(mấu chốt/mang tính quyết định) role in understanding their true
culture and feelings. This results in a better memory and a more authentic understanding that a
website cannot provide.
In conclusion,the internet provides easy information, while physical travel provides a real
sensory experience. Accordingly, I believe that it largely depends on whether a person wants
basic facts or a deep cultural connection
Topic: Some people believe that those who prefer books can develop more imagination and
language skills than those who prefer to watch TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a contention that those who prefer books can develop more imagination and language
skills than those who prefer to watch television. I strongly concur with this proposition, the
reasons for which will be delved into in this essay.
The first one is that reading is an active process that significantly stimulates the reader's
imagination. This is because unlike television, where images are provided directly on a screen, a
reader must visualize the characters and settings described in the text. This is a situation where
the brain is forced to be creative, which plays a pivotal role in cognitive development. As a
result, consistent readers often have a more vivid imagination compared to those who passively
consume visual media.
It is also important to note that books are a superior tool for improving language skills and
vocabulary. This results from the fact that written language in books is generally more complex
and sophisticated than the conversational tone used on TV. To elaborate, authors use a wide
variety of formal grammar and diverse words that are rarely heard in daily speech. This situation
can be observed in academic success, where students who read frequently often have a more
advanced command of language than those who watch TV for many hours.
In conclusion, reading stimulates active visualization, and it provides exposure to sophisticated
language. Accordingly, I entirely agree with the view that book lovers develop better imagination
and linguistic abilities than TV viewers
Topic:Some educationalists say that every child should be taught how to play a musical
instrument. To what extent do you agree or disagree?".
It is argued that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument as a mandatory
part of their education. I strongly concur with this proposition, the reasons for which will be
delved into in this essay.
Proponents of a different view argue that music is a non-essential subject and forcing all children
to learn it may be a waste of school resources. However, I believe this line of thinking is a mere
oversimplification of the situation. This is because playing an instrument is not just about
entertainment; it is a crucial factor in brain development. For instance, various scientific studies
show that learning to read music and coordinate movements can significantly improve a child's
mathematical and memory skills.
Furthermore, it is important to note that music education teaches children valuable life skills
such as discipline and patience. This is a situation where a student must spend many hours of
practice to master a single piece of music. The result of this is that children learn that persistence
and hard work lead to success. This is important because these character traits(đặc điểm) are
essential for their future academic and professional careers. Additionally, music plays a pivotal
role in helping children express their emotions and manage stress effectively.
In conclusion, the argument that music is unnecessary is not sound because of its cognitive
benefits, and learning an instrument builds essential character traits. Accordingly, I entirely agree
with the view that music education should be a universal requirement for all children.
Topic: Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand
how others live. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that due to the advancement of internet technology, people no longer need to travel to
foreign countries to understand how others live. From my perspective, the decision depends on
whether one seeks a superficial overview or a profound, lived cultural experience.
On the one hand, for individuals who require quick and accessible information about a foreign
culture, the internet is an adequate tool. This is because the internet is an epitome of efficiency,
providing a vast wealth of documentaries, high-definition videos, and virtual tours. For instance,
a student researching the traditional lifestyles of nomadic tribes in Mongolia can find detailed
articles and visual content without the need for expensive travel. This is a situation where digital
technology effectively satisfies intellectual curiosity at a minimal cost. As a result, for
educational or basic informational purposes, physical travel may be considered unnecessary.
On the other hand, there is another situation where personal immersion is essential to truly
understand a culture. This is important because the internet cannot replicate sensory experiences
such as the authentic taste of local cuisine or the unique atmosphere of a crowded historical
market. For instance, interacting directly with local citizens in their own environment plays a
pivotal role in grasping the subtle nuances of their social etiquette and daily emotions. This
results in a much more authentic and emotional connection that no computer screen can provide.
Therefore, for those seeking a deep and genuine understanding of humanity, travel remains
irreplaceable.
In conclusion, the internet provides easy access to cultural information, while physical travel
offers an irreplaceable sensory immersion. Accordingly, I believe that it largely depends on the
depth of understanding an individual aims to achieve