Intelligence and Its Educational

Importance in Language Learning and

Classroom Performance
A Study of the Nature of Intelligence and Its Applications in the
Language Classroom
Introduction
Intelligence is one of the most widely discussed and most difficult-to-
define constructs in psychology and education. Every teacher, parent,
and learner uses the word freely in everyday conversation, yet when
psychologists have attempted to pin the concept down with scientific
precision, they have produced dozens of competing definitions and
theories, each highlighting a different facet of what it means to be
“intelligent.” This diversity of opinion is not a weakness of the field;
rather, it reflects the genuine complexity of human mental life, which
cannot be reduced to a single number or a single ability. Understanding
intelligence matters enormously for education because virtually every
decision made in a classroom, from how a lesson is planned to how a
learner is assessed, rests on some implicit assumption about what
intelligence is and how it can be nurtured.

This discussion begins by examining the major definitions and theories of

intelligence that have shaped psychological and educational thought over
the past century. It then turns specifically to the role that intelligence
plays in language learning, exploring how general cognitive ability
interacts with more specialised aptitudes to determine how quickly and
how well a person acquires a new language. Finally, it considers the
broader relationship between intelligence and classroom performance,
examining how an understanding of intelligence can inform teaching
practice, assessment, motivation, and the creation of inclusive learning
environments that serve learners of every cognitive profile.

Defining Intelligence
Despite more than a hundred years of research, there is still no single
definition of intelligence that commands universal agreement among
psychologists. Early researchers tended to define intelligence in terms of
the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend
complex ideas, learn quickly, and learn from experience. Alfred Binet,
one of the pioneers of intelligence testing, described intelligence as the
capacity to judge well, to comprehend well, and to reason well,
emphasising practical judgement over rote memory. David Wechsler, the
developer of the widely used Wechsler intelligence scales, offered a
broader definition, describing intelligence as the aggregate or global
capacity of an individual to act purposefully, to think rationally, and to
deal effectively with the environment. This definition is useful because it
moves beyond a narrow academic conception of intelligence and situates
it within the practical demands of everyday life.

More recent scholars have expanded the definition still further. Robert
Sternberg, for example, has argued that intelligence should be
understood as the mental activity directed toward purposive adaptation
to, selection of, and shaping of real-world environments relevant to one's
life. Howard Gardner, whose work is discussed in detail below, defined
intelligence as the biopsychological potential to process information in
certain ways in order to solve problems or fashion products that are
valued in at least one culture. What unites these varied definitions is a
shared emphasis on adaptability, problem-solving, and the capacity to
learn from and act effectively within one's environment, even though the
specific mechanisms and components proposed differ considerably from
theorist to theorist.

For educational purposes, it is helpful to think of intelligence not as a

single fixed quantity but as a broad set of cognitive capacities, including
reasoning, memory, attention, perception, language, and problem-
solving, that work together to allow a learner to acquire knowledge,
adapt to new situations, and perform effectively in academic and real-
world tasks. This working definition allows teachers to appreciate that
intelligence is multidimensional, that it can be expressed in many
different ways, and that it is shaped by both biological endowment and
environmental opportunity, including the quality of instruction a learner
receives.
Major Theories of Intelligence

The Psychometric Approach: General Intelligence and the g

Factor
The earliest scientific approach to intelligence, associated with Charles
Spearman, proposed that all cognitive tasks are correlated with one
another because they draw upon a single underlying general ability,
which Spearman labelled g, alongside specific abilities relevant to
particular tasks, which he labelled s. This two-factor theory laid the
foundation for the development of standardised intelligence tests and for
the intelligence quotient, or IQ, as a summary measure of a person's
general cognitive ability. Later psychometric theorists, such as Louis
Thurstone, challenged the idea of a single general factor and instead
proposed seven primary mental abilities, including verbal
comprehension, word fluency, number facility, spatial visualisation,
associative memory, perceptual speed, and reasoning. Although
Thurstone's model suggested that intelligence is composed of several
relatively independent abilities, subsequent statistical analysis showed
that these primary abilities are themselves correlated, lending renewed
support to the existence of a general factor operating alongside more
specific abilities.

The psychometric tradition has had an enormous influence on education

because it gave rise to the standardised testing movement, including
tests of scholastic aptitude and achievement that remain widely used
today. Its central insight for teachers is that learners typically differ from
one another along a continuum of general cognitive ability, and that this
general ability tends to predict performance across a wide range of
academic subjects, including language learning. At the same time, the
psychometric approach has been criticised for reducing a rich and
multidimensional construct to a single score and for placing excessive
emphasis on the kinds of logical and verbal reasoning tasks that are easy
to measure on paper-and-pencil tests, while neglecting other valuable
forms of ability.
Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development
Jean Piaget approached intelligence from a developmental rather than a
psychometric perspective, viewing it not as a fixed quantity to be
measured but as a dynamic process of adaptation that unfolds through a
sequence of qualitatively distinct stages. According to Piaget,
intelligence is the process by which an organism adapts to its
environment through the complementary processes of assimilation, in
which new information is fitted into existing mental structures, and
accommodation, in which existing mental structures are modified to fit
new information. Piaget proposed four major stages of cognitive
development, namely the sensorimotor stage from birth to roughly two
years, the preoperational stage from about two to seven years, the
concrete operational stage from about seven to eleven years, and the
formal operational stage from adolescence onward, during which
abstract and hypothetical reasoning becomes possible.

Piaget's theory has profound implications for education because it

suggests that learners at different ages and developmental stages think
in qualitatively different ways, and that instruction must be matched to a
learner's current stage of cognitive development if it is to be effective. A
language teacher working with young children in the preoperational
stage, for instance, must rely heavily on concrete objects, images, and
direct experience rather than abstract grammatical explanation, whereas
a teacher working with older adolescents who have reached the formal
operational stage can introduce more abstract grammatical rules and
encourage learners to reason explicitly about language structure.

Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences

One of the most influential and pedagogically significant theories of
intelligence for language education is Howard Gardner's theory of
multiple intelligences, first proposed in 1983. Gardner rejected the
notion of a single, unitary intelligence measurable by a single test score
and instead proposed that human beings possess at least eight relatively
independent intelligences, each rooted in distinct neurological systems
and each valued differently across cultures. These include linguistic
intelligence, the capacity to use language effectively for expression and
communication; logical-mathematical intelligence, the capacity for logical
reasoning and numerical manipulation; spatial intelligence, the capacity
to perceive and manipulate visual and spatial information; musical
intelligence, sensitivity to rhythm, pitch, and melody; bodily-kinesthetic
intelligence, skill in using the body to solve problems or create products;
interpersonal intelligence, the capacity to understand and interact
effectively with others; intrapersonal intelligence, the capacity for self-
understanding and self-regulation; and naturalistic intelligence,
sensitivity to and understanding of the natural world.

Gardner's theory has been enthusiastically embraced by many educators

because it validates the idea that learners can be intelligent in different
ways and that classroom instruction should not privilege only linguistic
and logical-mathematical abilities, as traditional schooling and testing
have tended to do. For language teaching in particular, Gardner's
framework encourages instructors to design activities that engage
multiple intelligences simultaneously, for example by combining verbal
explanation with visual aids for spatially inclined learners, incorporating
songs and rhythm for musically inclined learners, using role play and
movement for bodily-kinesthetic learners, and encouraging pair and
group work for interpersonally inclined learners. Although the theory has
been criticised by some psychometricians for lacking strong empirical
support and for redefining talents and personality traits as separate
intelligences, its practical value in encouraging differentiated and
inclusive instruction is widely acknowledged.

Sternberg's Triarchic Theory of Intelligence

Robert Sternberg proposed a triarchic theory of intelligence that
identifies three interrelated aspects of intelligent behaviour: analytical
intelligence, the ability to analyse, evaluate, compare, and contrast
information, which is closely aligned with the kind of reasoning measured
by traditional IQ tests; creative intelligence, the ability to generate novel
ideas and to cope effectively with new and unfamiliar situations; and
practical intelligence, the ability to apply knowledge to everyday, real-
world contexts, often described as “street smarts.” Sternberg argued that
traditional schooling and testing overemphasise analytical intelligence at
the expense of creative and practical intelligence, and that a more
balanced education should cultivate all three aspects.

For language learners, Sternberg's theory highlights the importance of

moving beyond rote grammatical analysis toward creative language use,
such as composing original stories or dialogues, and practical language
use, such as successfully negotiating a real conversation in the target
language. A learner who scores highly on analytical grammar tests but
who cannot use the language spontaneously and appropriately in a real
conversational context has not achieved genuine communicative
competence, and Sternberg's framework provides teachers with a useful
lens for recognising and nurturing this broader range of abilities.

Emotional Intelligence
Daniel Goleman popularised the concept of emotional intelligence,
defined as the capacity to recognise, understand, and manage one's own
emotions as well as to recognise, understand, and influence the emotions
of others. Emotional intelligence is generally understood to comprise
self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skill.
Although emotional intelligence is not a component of traditional
cognitive intelligence, research has shown that it plays a significant role
in academic achievement and classroom behaviour, because learners
who can regulate their emotions, manage anxiety, and maintain
motivation in the face of difficulty tend to persist longer and perform
better academically than learners of similar cognitive ability who lack
these emotional competencies.

Emotional intelligence is especially relevant to language learning

because acquiring a new language is an inherently anxiety-provoking and
emotionally demanding process, requiring learners to take social risks,
tolerate ambiguity, and cope with the frustration of being unable to
express themselves fully. Learners with higher emotional intelligence
tend to manage language-learning anxiety more effectively, to remain
motivated through periods of slow progress, and to build the social
relationships with peers and teachers that facilitate authentic language
practice.

Measuring Intelligence
The measurement of intelligence has a long and controversial history in
psychology and education. Alfred Binet, working with Theodore Simon in
France in the early twentieth century, developed the first practical
intelligence test to identify children who required additional educational
support. This test introduced the concept of mental age, the level of
intellectual development typical of a given chronological age. William
Stern later proposed the intelligence quotient, calculated by dividing
mental age by chronological age and multiplying by one hundred, a
formula subsequently refined by Lewis Terman in the Stanford-Binet
Intelligence Scale. David Wechsler later developed a family of tests,
including scales for adults and children, that compute IQ scores by
comparing an individual's performance to that of a large, representative
normative sample, using a statistical procedure known as deviation IQ
rather than the simple mental-age formula.

Modern intelligence tests typically assess several distinct cognitive

domains, including verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working
memory, and processing speed, and combine these into a composite
score. While such tests remain widely used in educational and clinical
settings for purposes such as identifying giftedness or learning
disabilities, they have been criticised on several grounds. Critics argue
that standardised tests can be culturally biased, favouring learners from
backgrounds that match the cultural assumptions embedded in test
items; that they measure only a narrow slice of the many capacities that
contribute to real-world success; and that they can encourage a fixed,
deterministic view of ability that undervalues the role of effort,
opportunity, and instruction in developing intelligence. For these
reasons, many contemporary educators favour a broader, more dynamic
approach to assessing learner ability, one that considers classroom
performance, portfolios, and demonstrated skill across multiple
intelligences rather than relying on a single test score.

Intelligence and Language Learning

The Role of Linguistic Intelligence and Language Aptitude

Language learning draws heavily, though not exclusively, on what
Gardner termed linguistic intelligence, the sensitivity to the sounds,
structures, meanings, and functions of words and language. Learners
who possess strong linguistic intelligence typically display facility with
vocabulary acquisition, sensitivity to grammatical patterns, and skill in
both oral and written expression. However, research in applied
linguistics has shown that general intelligence alone does not fully
account for success in second language acquisition. Instead, researchers
such as John Carroll identified a more specific construct known as
language aptitude, which includes abilities such as phonetic coding
ability, the capacity to perceive and remember distinct speech sounds;
grammatical sensitivity, the capacity to recognise the grammatical
function of words in a sentence; rote learning ability, the capacity to
memorise associations between sounds and meanings; and inductive
language learning ability, the capacity to infer linguistic rules from
language samples. These aptitudes overlap with but are distinct from
general intelligence, meaning that a learner of average general
intelligence may nonetheless possess unusually strong language
aptitude, and vice versa.

This distinction matters greatly for teachers, because it means that

success in language learning cannot be predicted solely from a learner's
performance in other academic subjects such as mathematics or science.
A learner who struggles with logical-mathematical tasks may nonetheless
excel at language learning if they possess strong phonetic coding ability
and grammatical sensitivity, while a learner who performs well in
analytically demanding subjects may struggle with the more social,
communicative, and memory-intensive demands of acquiring a new
language. Recognising this diversity encourages teachers to avoid
making premature judgements about a learner's language-learning
potential based on their performance in unrelated subjects.

Multiple Intelligences and Language Acquisition

Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences offers a particularly rich
framework for understanding the diverse ways in which learners
approach language acquisition. A learner with strong musical
intelligence may find it easier to acquire correct pronunciation, rhythm,
and intonation patterns, since these draw on the same auditory-rhythmic
sensitivities involved in music perception. A learner with strong bodily-
kinesthetic intelligence may benefit enormously from total physical
response activities, in which new vocabulary and structures are linked to
physical actions and gestures. A learner with strong interpersonal
intelligence may thrive in communicative, pair-work, and group-
discussion activities that allow them to practise the language socially,
while a learner with strong intrapersonal intelligence may prefer
independent study, journaling in the target language, or reflective
learning strategies. A learner with strong spatial intelligence may benefit
from visual organisers, mind maps, and picture-based vocabulary
instruction, while a learner with strong logical-mathematical intelligence
may respond well to the explicit, rule-based presentation of grammar.

This framework suggests that an effective language classroom should not

rely on a single instructional method but should instead offer a varied
menu of activities that allow learners with different intellectual strengths
to engage with the material in ways that suit their individual profiles.
Such variety not only supports learners with different dominant
intelligences but also helps every learner develop a more well-rounded
set of language skills by exposing them to modes of learning that may lie
outside their natural preference.

Individual Differences and Learning Strategies

Intelligence also interacts with the learning strategies that language
learners adopt. More cognitively able learners tend to use a wider and
more flexible repertoire of metacognitive strategies, including planning
their approach to a learning task, monitoring their comprehension as
they read or listen, and evaluating their own performance after
completing a task. They are also generally better able to make effective
use of context clues to infer the meaning of unfamiliar words, to notice
and internalise grammatical patterns from exposure to authentic
language input, and to transfer knowledge and strategies learned in one
context to new and unfamiliar language tasks. However, intelligence is
not the sole determinant of strategy use; motivation, prior language-
learning experience, and explicit strategy instruction from teachers all
play significant roles in shaping how effectively a learner deploys these
strategies, meaning that even learners of modest general ability can
become highly effective language learners when they are taught how to
learn strategically.

Intelligence and Classroom Performance

The General Relationship Between Intelligence and

Academic Achievement
Decades of educational research confirm that measures of general
intelligence correlate positively, though imperfectly, with academic
achievement across subjects, including language subjects. Learners with
higher general cognitive ability tend, on average, to acquire new
vocabulary more quickly, to grasp abstract grammatical rules more
readily, and to comprehend complex written and spoken texts with
greater ease. However, the correlation between intelligence and
achievement is far from perfect, typically explaining only a moderate
proportion of the variance in academic performance. This means that a
great many other factors, including motivation, quality of instruction,
study habits, socio-economic background, emotional wellbeing, and
classroom environment, exert substantial independent influence on how
well a learner actually performs in the classroom, regardless of their
underlying cognitive ability.

This finding carries an important message for teachers: intelligence

should never be treated as destiny. A learner of average or below-
average measured intelligence can, through effective instruction,
sustained effort, and a supportive learning environment, achieve strong
academic outcomes, while a learner of high measured intelligence can
underperform if they are poorly motivated, inadequately taught, or
emotionally disengaged from the learning process. This understanding
underlies the modern educational emphasis on growth mindset, the
belief, associated with the work of Carol Dweck, that intelligence and
ability are not fixed traits but can be developed through effort, effective
strategies, and persistence. Teachers who communicate a growth
mindset to their learners, praising effort and strategy rather than innate
ability, tend to foster greater resilience, motivation, and ultimately
achievement than teachers who implicitly treat intelligence as a fixed and
unchangeable quantity.

Implications for Teaching Practice

An accurate understanding of intelligence carries several direct
implications for how teachers should plan and deliver instruction. First,
because learners differ in their patterns of intellectual strength, effective
teaching requires differentiation, the practice of varying content,
process, and assessment to meet the needs of learners with different
profiles of ability. In a language classroom, differentiation might involve
providing more visual scaffolding for learners who need it, offering
extension activities for learners who grasp new material quickly, and
providing additional guided practice for learners who require more time
and repetition to consolidate new language forms.
Second, because intelligence includes not only analytical but also
creative and practical dimensions, effective language teaching should
move beyond rote memorisation and mechanical grammar drills toward
tasks that require learners to use language creatively and practically,
such as role plays, problem-solving tasks, project work, and authentic
communicative exchanges. Third, because emotional intelligence
significantly affects classroom performance, teachers should attend to
the emotional climate of the classroom, working to reduce language-
learning anxiety, build learner confidence, and foster a sense of
psychological safety in which learners feel comfortable taking the risks
that language production inevitably requires.

Fourth, an understanding of multiple intelligences encourages teachers

to diversify their instructional methods and assessment techniques rather
than relying exclusively on traditional written tests, which tend to favour
learners with strong linguistic and logical-mathematical intelligence
while disadvantaging learners whose strengths lie elsewhere. Alternative
and authentic assessment methods, including oral presentations,
portfolios, projects, and performance-based tasks, allow a broader range
of learners to demonstrate what they have learned and can achieve,
giving teachers a more complete and equitable picture of each learner's
true competence.

Motivation, Self-Concept, and Performance

Intelligence interacts closely with motivation and self-concept in shaping
classroom performance. Learners who believe themselves to be
intelligent and capable in a subject tend to approach learning tasks with
greater confidence, persistence, and willingness to take on challenges, a
pattern that tends to produce a self-fulfilling cycle of improved
performance and further confidence. Conversely, learners who have
internalised a belief that they are “not good at languages” or “not smart
enough” often withdraw effort, avoid challenging tasks, and interpret
setbacks as confirmation of fixed and limited ability, a pattern that can
severely depress performance regardless of the learner's actual
underlying capability. Teachers therefore play a critical role not only in
transmitting knowledge but in shaping the beliefs learners hold about
their own intelligence and potential, through the feedback they give, the
expectations they communicate, and the classroom culture they
establish.

Addressing Diverse Learners in the Classroom

A sound understanding of intelligence also equips teachers to recognise
and support learners at both ends of the ability spectrum. Gifted
learners, who display unusually high general intelligence or exceptional
talent in a specific domain such as language, benefit from enrichment
activities, accelerated pacing, and opportunities for independent and
creative exploration that prevent boredom and disengagement. Learners
who struggle academically, whether because of lower general cognitive
ability, specific learning difficulties, or gaps in prior knowledge, benefit
from additional structured support, explicit strategy instruction, more
frequent feedback, and a pace of instruction matched to their
developmental readiness. In both cases, an appreciation of the
multidimensional nature of intelligence helps teachers avoid the trap of
judging a learner's overall worth or potential based on a single measure
or a single subject, and instead encourages a more holistic, strengths-
based approach to supporting every learner in reaching their fullest
potential.

Nature, Nurture, and the Development of

Intelligence
A question that has long divided psychologists is the extent to which
intelligence is determined by heredity as opposed to environment. Twin
and adoption studies have consistently shown that genetic factors
account for a substantial proportion of the variation in measured
intelligence within a population, with heritability estimates generally
rising from childhood through adulthood as individuals increasingly
select and shape environments that match their genetic predispositions.
At the same time, an equally large and compelling body of evidence
demonstrates that environmental factors exert a powerful influence on
intellectual development. Nutrition, health care, exposure to language-
rich environments, quality of schooling, family socio-economic status, and
access to stimulating educational resources have all been shown to affect
measured intelligence significantly, sometimes by many points on a
standard IQ scale.

The most widely accepted contemporary view, therefore, treats

intelligence as the product of a continuous and dynamic interaction
between genetic potential and environmental opportunity, rather than as
a fixed quantity determined solely by biology. This interactionist view
carries an optimistic and practically important message for education:
while teachers cannot alter a learner's genetic endowment, they exercise
very substantial influence over the environmental half of the equation,
through the quality of instruction they provide, the richness of the
linguistic and intellectual environment they create in the classroom, and
the opportunities for practice, feedback, and growth that they offer. The
well documented phenomenon in which average measured intelligence
scores have risen steadily across successive generations in many
countries, a trend known as the Flynn effect, is generally attributed to
improvements in education, nutrition, health, and general environmental
complexity, and stands as further evidence that intelligence, or at least
its outward measurable expression, is far more malleable than early
hereditarian theorists assumed.

Practical Classroom Strategies for Supporting

Diverse Intelligences
Translating the theoretical understanding of intelligence discussed above
into everyday classroom practice requires teachers to adopt a deliberate
and varied set of strategies. The following practices, grounded in the
theories reviewed in this discussion, represent some of the most effective
ways in which an understanding of intelligence can be applied to improve
language learning and overall classroom performance.

• Vary instructional modalities within every lesson, combining

spoken explanation, visual materials, physical demonstration, and
written text so that learners with different intellectual strengths
each encounter the material in a form suited to them.

• Offer choice in how learners demonstrate understanding, allowing

some learners to complete a written composition, others to give an
oral presentation, and others to create a visual project, so that
assessment captures genuine competence rather than merely a
preference for one intelligence over another.

• Use cooperative and pair-work activities regularly, since these

benefit interpersonally inclined learners while also providing the
naturalistic, communicative practice that is essential for genuine
language acquisition.

• Build in regular opportunities for reflective, independent work,

such as learning journals or self-assessment tasks, to support
intrapersonally inclined learners and to strengthen every learner's
metacognitive awareness of their own learning process.

• Incorporate music, rhythm, and chants when teaching

pronunciation, vocabulary, or grammatical patterns, taking
advantage of the strong link between musical intelligence and
phonological sensitivity.

• Use movement, gesture, and total physical response techniques,

particularly with younger learners, to engage bodily-kinesthetic
intelligence and to reinforce new vocabulary and structures
through embodied, memorable experience.

• Explicitly teach and model learning strategies, including planning,

monitoring, and self-evaluation, so that learners of every ability
level develop the metacognitive skills that more naturally
intelligent learners tend to acquire on their own.
 • Foster a growth-oriented classroom culture by praising effort,
strategy, and persistence rather than innate ability, and by framing
mistakes as a natural and valuable part of the language-learning
process rather than as evidence of low intelligence.

• Attend explicitly to the emotional climate of the classroom,

reducing anxiety around speaking and error-making, since
emotional security is a precondition for the risk-taking that
authentic language production requires.

• Differentiate the pace and complexity of tasks, providing

appropriately challenging extension work for learners who
progress quickly and additional scaffolding and guided practice for
learners who need more time to consolidate new material.

When applied consistently, these strategies help ensure that classroom

instruction does not inadvertently privilege only one narrow band of
intellectual strength, typically linguistic and logical-mathematical ability,
while neglecting the many other ways in which learners can be
intelligent and can demonstrate genuine progress in language learning.

Conclusion
Intelligence is a complex, multidimensional construct that resists
reduction to any single definition or measure. From Spearman's general
factor to Gardner's multiple intelligences, from Piaget's stages of
cognitive development to Sternberg's triarchic theory and Goleman's
emotional intelligence, each theoretical perspective illuminates a
different facet of what it means for a learner to think, reason, adapt, and
succeed. In the domain of language learning, intelligence interacts with
more specific language aptitudes, learning strategies, motivation, and
emotional factors to determine how effectively a learner acquires and
uses a new language, meaning that success cannot be predicted from a
single cognitive score alone. In the broader classroom context,
intelligence correlates meaningfully but imperfectly with academic
achievement, leaving substantial room for effective teaching, sustained
motivation, and a supportive emotional climate to shape outcomes.

For educators, the central lesson to be drawn from the study of

intelligence is one of humility and flexibility: learners arrive in the
classroom with diverse and unique profiles of cognitive strength, and
effective teaching requires recognising, valuing, and building upon this
diversity rather than treating all learners as though they must fit a single
mould. By embracing differentiated instruction, nurturing creative and
practical as well as analytical abilities, attending to the emotional
dimensions of learning, and communicating a growth-oriented view of
intelligence, teachers can help every learner, regardless of their
particular pattern of strengths, achieve genuine success in language
learning and in academic life more broadly.

References
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The Development of Intelligence in
Children. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-Five Years of Research on Foreign Language

Aptitude. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual Differences and Universals in
Language Learning Aptitude. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New

York: Random House.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple

Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More

Than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.

Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York:

International Universities Press.
Spearman, C. (1904). General Intelligence, Objectively Determined and
Measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201–292.

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Human

Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary Mental Abilities. Chicago: University of

Chicago Press.

Wechsler, D. (1958). The Measurement and Appraisal of Adult

Intelligence (4th ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.